Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Civil Law (186)
- Civil Procedure (186)
- Constitutional Law (186)
- Evidence (186)
- First Amendment (186)
-
- Law and Economics (186)
- Legislation (186)
- Litigation (186)
- Other Law (186)
- President/Executive Department (186)
- Rule of Law (186)
- Supreme Court of the United States (186)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (185)
- Common Law (185)
- Communications Law (185)
- Conflict of Laws (185)
- Consumer Protection Law (185)
- Contracts (185)
- Criminal Law (185)
- Criminal Procedure (185)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (185)
- Food and Drug Law (185)
- Intellectual Property Law (185)
- Jurisprudence (185)
- Keyword
-
- Law (12)
- SFFA (7)
- Affirmative Action (6)
- ESG (6)
- Diversity (5)
-
- Securities and exchange commission (5)
- Addiction (4)
- Artificial intelligence (4)
- Constitution (4)
- Public health (4)
- Regulation (4)
- SEC (4)
- Supreme Court (4)
- Technology (4)
- Washington (4)
- Corporate (3)
- Corporate Governance (3)
- Data (3)
- Discrimination (3)
- First Amendment (3)
- Privacy (3)
- Reform (3)
- Sec (3)
- Securities (3)
- Shareholder (3)
- Antitrust (2)
- Appointments Clause (2)
- Censorship (2)
- Colonization (2)
- Constitutional Rights (2)
Articles 181 - 187 of 187
Full-Text Articles in Second Amendment
Enough Is As Good As A Feast, Noah C. Chauvin
Enough Is As Good As A Feast, Noah C. Chauvin
Seattle University Law Review
Ipse Dixit, the podcast on legal scholarship, provides a valuable service to the legal community and particularly to the legal academy. The podcast’s hosts skillfully interview guests about their legal and law-related scholarship, helping those guests communicate their ideas clearly and concisely. In this review essay, I argue that Ipse Dixit has made a major contribution to legal scholarship by demonstrating in its interview episodes that law review articles are neither the only nor the best way of communicating scholarly ideas. This contribution should be considered “scholarship,” because one of the primary goals of scholarship is to communicate new ideas.
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents
In Memory Of Professor James E. Bond, Janet Ainsworth
In Memory Of Professor James E. Bond, Janet Ainsworth
Seattle University Law Review
Janet Ainsworth, Professor of Law at Seattle University School of Law: In Memory of Professor James E. Bond.
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Dead Wrong: Why Washington’S Deadly Weapon Criminal Sentencing Enhancement Needs “Enhancement”, James Harlan Corning
Dead Wrong: Why Washington’S Deadly Weapon Criminal Sentencing Enhancement Needs “Enhancement”, James Harlan Corning
Seattle University Law Review
This Comment confronts the difficult question of how to reformulate the deadly weapon sentencing enhancement to better align it with the policy goals of deterring and punishing armed crime. Part II explores the constitutional and practical defects in each of the three formulations of the sentencing enhancement’s armed requirement by delving into the enhancement’s legislative history and the judicial struggle to interpret it. Part III analyzes the need for a more nuanced approach to the weapon enhancement by exploring key criticisms about the enhancement’s scope and application. Part IV argues that the Washington legislature must provide courts with more rigid …