Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Second Amendment (2)
- 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (1)
- 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2) (1)
- 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) (1)
- Alien Enemies Act (AEA) (1)
-
- And the Law; Second Amendment; Self-Defense; Criminal Defenses; Racial Profiling; Supreme Court of the United States (1)
- Andrew v. White (1)
- Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA) (1)
- Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA) (1)
- Barnes v. Felix (1)
- Bruen (1)
- Bump stocks (1)
- Castle Rock v. Gonzales (1)
- Chiaverini v. City of Napoleon (1)
- City of Grants Pass Oregon v. Johnson (1)
- Confrontation Clause (1)
- Context-based fact-sensitive analyses (1)
- Criminal Law and Procedure; Fourth Amendment; Constitutional Law (1)
- Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause (1)
- Domestic violence (1)
- Double Jeopardy Clause (1)
- Ethnicity (1)
- False statements under 18 U.S.C. § 101 (1)
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) (1)
- First Step Act (1)
- Fischer v. United States (1)
- Garland v. Cargill (1)
- Generally; Law Enforcement; Race (1)
- Ghost guns (1)
- Glossip v. Oklahoma (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Second Amendment
Rahimi And The Future Of (The Rest Of) The Protection Order Prohibition, Bonnie Carlson
Rahimi And The Future Of (The Rest Of) The Protection Order Prohibition, Bonnie Carlson
Articles
In the summer of 2024, the Supreme Court considered United States v. Rahimi. Scholars and lawyers watched with bated breath to see how the court would interpret and apply the foundation-shifting Second Amendment test it established in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen two years earlier. Ultimately, the Court upheld the federal law which temporarily bans some protection order respondents from possessing firearms. But the Court provided little in the way of additional guidance that lower courts desperately needed as evidenced by the disparate outcomes on gun cases nationwide following Bruen. Rather, the Court opted for a …
Consensus And Conflict Over Context: Select Criminal Law And Procedure Cases From The Supreme Court's 2024-25 Term, Eve Brensike Primus, Elena Schultz
Consensus And Conflict Over Context: Select Criminal Law And Procedure Cases From The Supreme Court's 2024-25 Term, Eve Brensike Primus, Elena Schultz
Articles
In its 2024-2025 Term, the Supreme Court emphasized the utility—and necessity—of context-based, fact-sensitive analyses throughout its criminal law and procedure cases. Though the Justices sparred over how to derive meaning from factual, structural, legal, and historical contexts, they tended to agree that courts should not be artificially restricted from considering the breadth of the record before them.
A Fractured Supreme Court: Select Criminal Law And Procedure Cases From The Supreme Court’S 2023-24 Term, Eve Brensike Primus, Jordan Schuler
A Fractured Supreme Court: Select Criminal Law And Procedure Cases From The Supreme Court’S 2023-24 Term, Eve Brensike Primus, Jordan Schuler
Articles
In its 2023-2024 Term, the Supreme Court outlined the contours of when a former President of the United States would be immune from criminal prosecution; issued important decisions interpreting the scope of the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause, the Double Jeopardy Clause, the Confrontation Clause, and the Second Amendment right to bear arms; decided a number of important statutory interpretation cases; and continued to avoid Fourth Amendment issues, only addressing them in the context of a malicious prosecution charge. Perhaps more striking than the Court’s decisions in these cases, though, was the Justices’ lack of consensus. Of the 16 criminal …
(Re)Framing Race In Civil Rights Lawyering, Anthony V. Alfieri, Angela Onwuachi-Willig
(Re)Framing Race In Civil Rights Lawyering, Anthony V. Alfieri, Angela Onwuachi-Willig
Articles
This Review examines the significance of Henry Louis Gates, Jr.'s new book, Stony the Road: Reconstruction, White Supremacy, and the Rise of Jim Crow, for the study of racism in our nation's legal system and for the regulation of race in the legal profession, especially in the everyday labor of civil-rights and poverty lawyers, prosecutors, and public defenders. Surprisingly, few have explored the relevance of the racial narratives distilled by Gates in Stony the Roa - the images, stereotypes, and tropes that Whites constructed of Blacks to deepen and ensure the life and legacy of white supremacy-to the practice …
Disarming State Action; Discharging State Responsibility, Zanita E. Fenton
Disarming State Action; Discharging State Responsibility, Zanita E. Fenton
Articles
No abstract provided.