Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Law (12)
- SFFA (7)
- Affirmative Action (6)
- ESG (6)
- Diversity (5)
-
- Securities and exchange commission (5)
- Addiction (4)
- Artificial intelligence (4)
- First Amendment (4)
- Public health (4)
- Regulation (4)
- SEC (4)
- Technology (4)
- Constitution (3)
- Corporate (3)
- Corporate Governance (3)
- Data (3)
- Discrimination (3)
- Ethics (3)
- Legal ethics (3)
- Privacy (3)
- Reform (3)
- Sec (3)
- Second Amendment (3)
- Securities (3)
- Shareholder (3)
- Supreme Court (3)
- Washington (3)
- Antitrust (2)
- Censorship (2)
- Publication Year
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 211 - 213 of 213
Full-Text Articles in Second Amendment
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rwu Law: The Magazine Of Roger Williams University School Of Law (Issue No. 8) (2015), Roger Williams University School Of Law
Rwu Law: The Magazine Of Roger Williams University School Of Law (Issue No. 8) (2015), Roger Williams University School Of Law
RWU Law
No abstract provided.
Docs Versus Glocks: N.R.A. Takes Aim At Florida Physicians’ Freedom Of Speech: Leaving Patients’ Health, Safety, And Welfare At Risk, Michelle Foody
Docs Versus Glocks: N.R.A. Takes Aim At Florida Physicians’ Freedom Of Speech: Leaving Patients’ Health, Safety, And Welfare At Risk, Michelle Foody
Cardozo Law Review de•novo
Part I of this Note provides background on the Act at issue, its legislative history, the current status of the Supreme Court’s free speech jurisprudence, and it also introduces the constitutional interests at stake. Part II considers the constitutionality of the Act under the existing First Amendment standard and addresses the State’s assertions under the Second Amendment. Part III proposes that the Court’s standard ought to be recalibrated, taking into account the would-be listeners’ cognizable interest in the information. Part III goes on to legitimate the proposal by reconciling this new examination standard with existing free speech jurisprudence and justifications, …