Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (184)
- Fordham Law School (10)
- Duke Law (9)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (8)
- Notre Dame Law School (7)
-
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (4)
- American University Washington College of Law (2)
- Cleveland State University (2)
- Roger Williams University (2)
- UIC School of Law (2)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (2)
- University of Michigan Law School (2)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (2)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (1)
- Emory University School of Law (1)
- Florida International University College of Law (1)
- Marquette University Law School (1)
- Mississippi Christian University School of Law (1)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (1)
- Pepperdine University (1)
- The University of San Francisco (1)
- University of Denver (1)
- University of Kentucky (1)
- University of Maine School of Law (1)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas (1)
- University of South Carolina (1)
- William & Mary Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- Second Amendment (17)
- Law (13)
- Constitution (10)
- Constitutional law (10)
- Firearms (10)
-
- Firearms--Law and legislation (9)
- Arms (7)
- History (7)
- SFFA (7)
- Affirmative Action (6)
- District of Columbia v. Heller (6)
- ESG (6)
- First Amendment (6)
- Gun control (6)
- Supreme Court (6)
- Constitution. 2nd Amendment (5)
- Diversity (5)
- Public health (5)
- Regulation (5)
- Securities and exchange commission (5)
- Addiction (4)
- Artificial intelligence (4)
- Bruen (4)
- Discrimination (4)
- Gun Control; Heller; SCOTUS; Second Amendment (4)
- Guns (4)
- Legal history (4)
- Originalism (4)
- SEC (4)
- Second amendment (4)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (184)
- Faculty Scholarship (12)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (8)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (7)
- Notre Dame Law Review (6)
-
- Cardozo Law Review (3)
- Buffalo Law Review (2)
- Cleveland State Law Review (2)
- Michigan Law Review (2)
- UIC Law Review (2)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Brookings Scholar Lecture Series (1)
- Brooklyn Law Review (1)
- Cardozo Law Review de•novo (1)
- Criminal Law Practitioner (1)
- FIU Law Review (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- Faculty Works (1)
- Fordham Law Review (1)
- Journal of Legislation (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (1)
- MC Law Review (1)
- Maine Law Review (1)
- Marquette Law Review (1)
- NULR Online (1)
- Pepperdine Law Review (1)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (1)
- Senior Theses (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 211 - 240 of 252
Full-Text Articles in Second Amendment
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents
In Memory Of Professor James E. Bond, Janet Ainsworth
In Memory Of Professor James E. Bond, Janet Ainsworth
Seattle University Law Review
Janet Ainsworth, Professor of Law at Seattle University School of Law: In Memory of Professor James E. Bond.
Glorious Revolution To American Revolution: The English Origin Of The Right To Keep And Bear Arms, Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain
Glorious Revolution To American Revolution: The English Origin Of The Right To Keep And Bear Arms, Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain
Notre Dame Law Review
It is definitively not my intention to wade into such debates about the wisdom of the Second Amendment or to deal with pending or recent court interpretations. Rather, I want to explore how it came to be and what role British history had in its genesis. For Americans like myself, such history helps us to understand the meaning of our own Constitution. For the Britons, it is a powerful example of how your own constitutional principles shaped the legal landscape of far-flung countries once within the British Empire. And for those simply interested in law as a discipline, irrespective of …
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Faces Of The Second Amendment Outside The Home, Take Three: Critiquing The Circuit Courts Use Of History-In-Law, Patrick J. Charles
The Faces Of The Second Amendment Outside The Home, Take Three: Critiquing The Circuit Courts Use Of History-In-Law, Patrick J. Charles
Cleveland State Law Review
This article seeks to critique the circuit courts’ varying history-in-law approaches, as well as to provide advice on the proper role that history-in-law plays when examining the scope of the Second Amendment outside the home. This article sets forth to accomplish this task in three parts. Part I argues why history-in-law is appropriate when adjudicating Second Amendment decisions outside the home. Part II examines the benefits and burdens of utilizing history-in-law as a method of constitutional interpretation, while breaking down the alternative approaches employed by circuit courts when adjudicating Second Amendment decisions outside the home. Lastly, Part III offers practical …
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Revisionist History? Responding To Gun Violence Under Historical Limitations, Michael Ulrich
Revisionist History? Responding To Gun Violence Under Historical Limitations, Michael Ulrich
Faculty Scholarship
In the D.C. Circuit case Heller v. District of Columbia (Heller II), Judge Kavanaugh wrote that “Heller and McDonald leave little doubt that courts are to assess gun bans and regulations based on text, history, and tradition, not by a balancing test such as strict or intermediate scrutiny.” Now Justice Kavanaugh, will he find support on the highest court for what was then a dissenting view? Chief Justice Roberts, during oral arguments for Heller I, asked “Isn’t it enough to…look at the various regulations that were available at the time…and determine how these—how this restriction and the scope of this …
Considerations Of History And Purpose In Constitutional Borrowing, Robert Tsai
Considerations Of History And Purpose In Constitutional Borrowing, Robert Tsai
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
This essay is part of a symposium issue dedicated to "Constitutional Rights: Intersections, Synergies, and Conflicts" at William and Mary School of Law. I make four points. First, perfect harmony among rights might not always be normatively desirable. In fact, in some instances, such as when First Amendment and Second Amendment rights clash, we might wish to have expressive rights consistently trump gun rights. Second, we can't resolve clashes between rights in the abstract but instead must consult history in a broadly relevant rather than a narrowly "originalist" fashion. When we do so, we learn that armed expression and white …
Owning Heller, Darrell A. H. Miller
Owning Heller, Darrell A. H. Miller
Faculty Scholarship
Recent historical research using big-data techniques casts doubt on whether District of Columbia v. Heller was rightly decided according to originalist methods. These new discoveries put originalists in a bind. Do they embrace “faint hearted” originalism: the idea that as between the need for stability in prior decision making, settled expectations, and the coherence of the law, some adulterated decisions must remain enforced for the greater good? Or do they follow Justice Thomas’s reasoning in Gamble v. United States, remain stout-hearted, and reject any prior decision that cannot be supported by the common linguistic usage of the founding era – …
Constitutional Conflict And Sensitive Places, Darrell A. H. Miller
Constitutional Conflict And Sensitive Places, Darrell A. H. Miller
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Creating Precedents Through Words And Deeds, Harold Krent
Creating Precedents Through Words And Deeds, Harold Krent
All Faculty Scholarship
Book review: Untrodden ground: how presidents interpret the Constitution. By Harold H. Bruff. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015. 557 pages. Reviewed by Harold J. Krent
Fear And Firearms, Darrell A. H. Miller
Newsroom: Time: Bogus On Second Amendment 09/28/2016, Arica L. Coleman, Roger Williams University School Of Law
Newsroom: Time: Bogus On Second Amendment 09/28/2016, Arica L. Coleman, Roger Williams University School Of Law
Life of the Law School (1993- )
No abstract provided.
The Great Gun Control War Of The Twentieth Century—And Its Lessons For Gun Laws Today, David B. Kopel
The Great Gun Control War Of The Twentieth Century—And Its Lessons For Gun Laws Today, David B. Kopel
Fordham Urban Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Heller, Mcdonald, And Murder: Testing The More Guns = More Murder Thesis, Don B. Kates, Carlisle Moody
Heller, Mcdonald, And Murder: Testing The More Guns = More Murder Thesis, Don B. Kates, Carlisle Moody
Fordham Urban Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Why Can't We Be Like France? How The Right To Bear Arms Got Left Out Of The Declaration Of Rights And How Gun Registration Was Decreed Just In Time For The Nazi Occupation, Stephen P. Halbrook
Why Can't We Be Like France? How The Right To Bear Arms Got Left Out Of The Declaration Of Rights And How Gun Registration Was Decreed Just In Time For The Nazi Occupation, Stephen P. Halbrook
Fordham Urban Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Gun Control And The Second Amendment: Developments And Controversies In The Wake Of District Of Columbia V. Heller And Mcdonald V. Chicago, Harris Fischman
Gun Control And The Second Amendment: Developments And Controversies In The Wake Of District Of Columbia V. Heller And Mcdonald V. Chicago, Harris Fischman
Fordham Urban Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The (New) New Judicial Federalism: State Constitutions And The Protection Of The Individual Right To Bear Arms, Michael B. De Leeuw
The (New) New Judicial Federalism: State Constitutions And The Protection Of The Individual Right To Bear Arms, Michael B. De Leeuw
Fordham Urban Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Right To Carry Firearms Outside Of The Home: Separating Historical Myths From Historical Realities, Saul Cornell
The Right To Carry Firearms Outside Of The Home: Separating Historical Myths From Historical Realities, Saul Cornell
Fordham Urban Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Second Amendment In Historiographical Crisis: Why The Supreme Court Must Reevaluate The Embarrassing “Standard Model” Moving Forward, Patrick J. Charles
The Second Amendment In Historiographical Crisis: Why The Supreme Court Must Reevaluate The Embarrassing “Standard Model” Moving Forward, Patrick J. Charles
Fordham Urban Law Journal
No abstract provided.
On The Effects And History Of Stand-Your-Ground Laws, E. Dimitri Hasandras
On The Effects And History Of Stand-Your-Ground Laws, E. Dimitri Hasandras
Criminal Law Practitioner
No abstract provided.
Second Amendment Traditionalism And Desuetude, Darrell A. H. Miller
Second Amendment Traditionalism And Desuetude, Darrell A. H. Miller
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Essays In Response To Michael Waldman's The Second Amendment: A Biography: Introduction, Adam Riff
Essays In Response To Michael Waldman's The Second Amendment: A Biography: Introduction, Adam Riff
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Living Constitution And The Second Amendment: Poor History, False Originalism, And A Very Confused Court, Paul Finkelman
The Living Constitution And The Second Amendment: Poor History, False Originalism, And A Very Confused Court, Paul Finkelman
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Can The Quill Be Mightier Than The Uzi?: History "Lite," "Law Office," And Worse Meets The Second Amendment, Martin S. Flaherty
Can The Quill Be Mightier Than The Uzi?: History "Lite," "Law Office," And Worse Meets The Second Amendment, Martin S. Flaherty
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Continuing Battle Over The Second Amendment, Allen K. Rostron
The Continuing Battle Over The Second Amendment, Allen K. Rostron
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
Overcoming Legislative Gridlock In The U.S. Congress: How Procedural Rules Affect Legislative Obstructionism, Molly Jackman
Overcoming Legislative Gridlock In The U.S. Congress: How Procedural Rules Affect Legislative Obstructionism, Molly Jackman
Brookings Scholar Lecture Series
More than 90 percent of bills introduced in the U.S. House never make it to a floor vote, and far fewer are enacted into law. Since legislative gridlock is much more common than legislative action, in order to understand policy outcomes, it is critical to know why bills are obstructed. Gridlock occurs when a legislator (or group of legislators) wants to block a bill, and has the procedural right to do so. Using new data on the procedural rules in the U.S. states, this presentation will identify the chambers in which legislators can block bills from the legislative agenda. Then, …
Docs Versus Glocks: N.R.A. Takes Aim At Florida Physicians’ Freedom Of Speech: Leaving Patients’ Health, Safety, And Welfare At Risk, Michelle Foody
Docs Versus Glocks: N.R.A. Takes Aim At Florida Physicians’ Freedom Of Speech: Leaving Patients’ Health, Safety, And Welfare At Risk, Michelle Foody
Cardozo Law Review de•novo
Part I of this Note provides background on the Act at issue, its legislative history, the current status of the Supreme Court’s free speech jurisprudence, and it also introduces the constitutional interests at stake. Part II considers the constitutionality of the Act under the existing First Amendment standard and addresses the State’s assertions under the Second Amendment. Part III proposes that the Court’s standard ought to be recalibrated, taking into account the would-be listeners’ cognizable interest in the information. Part III goes on to legitimate the proposal by reconciling this new examination standard with existing free speech jurisprudence and justifications, …
Text, History, And Tradition: What The Seventh Amendment Can Teach Us About The Second, Darrell A. H. Miller
Text, History, And Tradition: What The Seventh Amendment Can Teach Us About The Second, Darrell A. H. Miller
Faculty Scholarship
In District of Columbia v. Heller and McDonald v. City of Chicago, the Supreme Court made seemingly irreconcilable demands on lower courts: evaluate Second Amendment claims through history, avoid balancing, and retain as much regulation as possible. To date, lower courts have been unable to devise a test that satisfies all three of these conditions. Worse, the emerging default candidate, intermediate scrutiny, is a test that many jurists and scholars consider exceedingly manipulable.
This Article argues that courts could look to the Supreme Court’s Seventh Amendment jurisprudence, and in particular the Seventh Amendment’s “historical test,” to help them devise a …