Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- ERISA (3)
- 401(k) (1)
- 403(b) (1)
- Access (1)
- Board of Veterans' Appeals (1)
-
- Combined plan (1)
- Contribution (1)
- Defined benefits (1)
- Defined contribution plans (1)
- Domestic Relations (1)
- Employee Retirement Income Security Act (1)
- Employee benefits (1)
- Employee retirement income security act (1)
- Employer-sponsored benefits (1)
- Family Law (1)
- Family aggregation (1)
- General savings accounts (1)
- Homeownership (1)
- IRAs (1)
- Income (1)
- Investments (1)
- Low-income (1)
- Minimum distributions (1)
- Multi-factor test (1)
- Nondiscrimination (1)
- PBGC (1)
- Pension (1)
- Pension plans (1)
- Pensions (1)
- Preemption (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Retirement Security Law
Why Low-Income Workers Need To Save For Retirement And How They Can Do It, Philip C. Aka, Chidera Oku, Elizabeth Arnott-Hill, Aref A. Hervani
Why Low-Income Workers Need To Save For Retirement And How They Can Do It, Philip C. Aka, Chidera Oku, Elizabeth Arnott-Hill, Aref A. Hervani
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Primer On The History And Proper Drafting Of Qualified Domestic-Relations Orders, Terrence Cain
A Primer On The History And Proper Drafting Of Qualified Domestic-Relations Orders, Terrence Cain
Law Faculty Scholarship
The divorce rate in the United States is slightly more than one-half the marriage rate. Divorce is a fact of life in this country, and will likely be so for the foreseeable future. On August 23, 1984, the divorce lawyer’s job got more complicated when Congress created the Qualified Domestic Relations Order ("QDRO") as part of some significant amendments to ERISA. QDROs are necessary because before those 1984 ERISA amendments, a lot of divorced persons discovered that they could be deprived of their marital or community property interest in their former spouses' retirement plans. For most divorcing couples, the two …
Pension And Employee Benefit Law—Employee Retirement Income Security Act—An Owner-Employee Can Qualify As A "Participant" In An Erisa Pension Plan Sponsored By His Corporation, As Long As The Plan Covers One Or More Non-Owner Employees. Yates V. Hendon, 541 U.S. 1 (2004), Quentin May
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Anastasoff V. United States And Appeals In Veterans' Cases, Charles G. Mills
Anastasoff V. United States And Appeals In Veterans' Cases, Charles G. Mills
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
Many cases regarding veterans' benefits are heard in the Federal Circuit. The Federal Circuit has a practice of issuing one sentence orders in some cases. This practice benefits veterans by allowing decisions adverse to veterans to be made without creating precedential value. Removing the practice of unpublished opinions in the Federal Circuit would extinguish this benefit.
Preemption Between The Poles: Erisa's Effect On State Common Law Actions Other Than Benefit Claims, Troy A. Price
Preemption Between The Poles: Erisa's Effect On State Common Law Actions Other Than Benefit Claims, Troy A. Price
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
1996 Pension Simplification, David M. Graf
1996 Pension Simplification, David M. Graf
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.