Public Law and Legal Theory Commons^™

Regulation Of Fiberoptic Integrated Broadband Networks: Common Carriage, Ownership And Rates, Michael Botein

University of Florida Journal of Law & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

When Judicial Authority And The First Amendment Collide: A Publisher's Dilemma, Sigman L. Splichal

University of Florida Journal of Law & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Law: Warrantless Search And Seizure Of Trash Placed Outside The Home For Collection Permitted, Allison Lane

University of Florida Journal of Law & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

The United States Sentencing Guidelines: Has Sentencing Overstepped Separation Of Powers?, Laura A. Eidson

University of Florida Journal of Law & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Law: The Impact Of The Freedom Of The Press On Contractual Obligations, Dale Parker

University of Florida Journal of Law & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Generalization In Interpretive Theory, Joseph Vining

Articles

There are arguments at large about the nature of legal interpretation, proceeding from an implicit proposition that interpretation is the same phenomenon or experience whatever its setting. An assumption that there is one phenomenon can be found in discussions among lawyers of interpretation and in discussions among nonlawyers of legal interpretation-and as often in the work of those who would deny there is any significance to theorizing about interpretation, as of those who think persuasion to a particular theory will have the utmost consequence for law and society. Proceeding from such a proposition, rather than toward it, raises the risk …

Stalking The Squeeze: Understanding Commodities Market Manipulation, Richard D. Friedman

Articles

This article addresses the perplexing and important problem of how to distinguish valid, large-scale trading activity from a squeeze. Part I analyzes and reformulates what I will call the price-impact test, according to which manipulation is conduct motivated by its impact on price. This test, I contend, states a necessary but not sufficient condition for characterizing conduct as a squeeze. Part II offers a substantially different test, which I call the modified-sanctions approach. Under this approach, the price-impact test is used as a preliminary safe-harbor standard. The modified-sanctions approach goes further, however, recognizing that the essence of a squeeze is …

Risk, Courts, And Agencies, Clayton P. Gillette, James E. Krier

Articles

Public risks are precisely the risks that have recently captured the attention of the legal community and the world at large, in no small part because they give rise to such novel problems for lawyers and such grave apprehensions among lay people. Public risks have moved the legal system to relax doctrines--regarding, for example, standards of causation and culpability, burdens of proof, sharing of liability--that were designed to deal with the private risks that once dominated the landscape. And public risks have moved lay people to intensify their demands for risk control measures. These developments suggest that public risks are …

Progressive And Conservative Constitutionalism, Robin West

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works

American constitutional law in general, and fourteenth amendment jurisprudence in particular, is in a state of profound transformation. The "liberal-legalist" and purportedly politically neutral understanding of constitutional guarantees that dominated constitutional law and theory during the fifties, sixties, and seventies, is waning, both in the courts and in the academy. What is beginning to replace liberal legalism in the academy, and what has clearly replaced it on the Supreme Court, is a very different conception - a new paradigm - of the role of constitutionalism, constitutional adjudication, and constitutional guarantees in a democratic state. Unlike the liberal-legal paradigm it is …

Foreword: Antitrust As Public Interest Law, Rudolph J.R. Peritz

Articles & Chapters

No abstract provided.

Common-Law Background Of Nineteenth-Century Tort Law, The , Robert J. Kaczorowski

Faculty Scholarship

A century ago Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., examined the history of negligence in search of a general theory of tort. He concluded that from the earliest times in England, the basis of tort liability was fault, or the failure to exercise due care. Liability for an injury to another arose whenever the defendant failed "to use such care as a prudent man would use under the circumstances.” A decade ago Morton J. Horwitz reexamined the history of negligence for the same purpose and concluded that negligence was not originally understood as carelessness or fault. Rather, negligence meant "neglect or failure …

Review Of Christopher F. Mooney, Public Virtue: Law And The Social Character Of Religion (1986), Leslie C. Griffin

Scholarly Works

No abstract provided.

Public Interest Organizations, J. Jacobson

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Antitrust's Protected Classes, Herbert Hovenkamp

Michigan Law Review

For purposes of argument, this essay assumes that efficiency ought to be the exclusive goal of antitrust enforcement. That premise is controversial. Nonetheless, several economic and legal theorists, primarily among the Chicago School of economics and antitrust scholarship, have developed an Optimal Deterrence Model based on this assumption. The Model is designed to achieve the optimum, or ideal, amount of antitrust enforcement. The Model's originators generally believe that there is too much antitrust enforcement, particularly enforcement initiated by private plaintiffs. I intend to show that, even if efficiency is the only antitrust policy goal, a broader array of lawsuits should …

Critical Legal Theory And The Politics Of Pragmatism, Peter D. Swan

Dalhousie Law Journal

In this century mainstream legal scholarship in the United States has been subjected to various "crises of confidence" over the nature of the adjudication process. One of the key features of more traditional legal scholarship has been a belief in legal texts such as the constitution, statutes and precedents which are said to possess discrete and objective meaning capable of being discovered by objective detached observers. This belief in the authority of the text has been most clearly expressed in American constitutional law scholarship which has been dominated until recently by the quest to reveal the public moral values that …

Public Interest Organizations, J. Jacobson

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Towards A History Of Essential Federalism: Another Look At Owen In America, Carol Weisbrod

Faculty Articles and Papers

No abstract provided.

Public Interest Organizations, J. Jacobson

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Autopoietic Law: The New Science Of Niklas Luhmann, Arthur J. Jacobson

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Autopoietic Law: A New Approach to Law and Society Edited by Günther Teubner

Precedent In Law, Erik G. Light

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Precedent in Law edited by Laurence Goldstein

Statutory Interpretation And The Balance Of Power In The Administrative State, Cynthia R. Farina

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

How Separation Of Powers Protects Individual Liberties, Cynthia R. Farina

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Hegel On Slavery, Independence, And Liberalism, Merold Westphal

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Work On A Labor Theory Of Meaning, Kenneth Casebeer

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

In The 1990'S The Government Must Be A Reasonable Person In Its Workplaces: The Discretionary Function Immunity Must Be Trimmed, Victor E. Schwartz, Liberty Mahshigian

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Public Interest Organizations, J. Jacobson

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

The International Law Of State Responsibility: Revolution Or Evolution?, Pierre-Marie Dupuy

Michigan Journal of International Law

After briefly summarizing the classical doctrine of state responsibility, Part One will discuss whether extending compensation to the harmful consequences of certain hazardous activities necessarily involves the recognition of a "liability for lawful conduct" without any link to traditional ideas of state responsibility. Part Two, starting again from responsibility for wrongful acts, will discuss whether raising a new category, the breach of an "essential obligation" or "international crimes," confers not only an obligation to make reparations, but a right, in both the victim state and the non-victim states, to sanction the responsible state.

Public Rights In The Navigable Streams Of New York, John A. Humbach

Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications

This paper provides a comprehensive survey of the New York judicial decisions bearing on the public's right to use the state's navigable streams and waterways. The cases have been organized into a logical framework, in outline form, in order to give future researchers ready access to the relevant judicial materials. Wherever possible, the main thrust of the cases has been presented in the court's own words. Brief narrative summaries of the case law are provided under the main outline headings. An attempt has been made to include a reference to every New York case relevant to public use of freshwater …

Original Intentions, Standard Meanings And The Legal Character Of The Constitution, Richard Kay

Faculty Articles and Papers

No abstract provided.

Nomos And Thanatos (Part A), The Killing Fields: Modern Law And Legal Theory, Richard F. Devlin Frsc

Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press

The essay is to be published in two parts. Part A, "The Killing Fields .. . ", is a criticai inquiry into the way in which the "disciplines" of law and legal theory rationalize violence. I begin my discussion with a Celtic triptych - a series of three narratives - that is designed to provide the reader with some background information in order that he or she may acquire a sense of the perspective and experiential context from which this essay emerges.

Next, I briefly outline the central role which violence has played in structuring our received tradition of jurisprudential …