Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (11)
- Human Rights Law (10)
- Law and Society (10)
- Jurisprudence (9)
- Law and Philosophy (8)
-
- Law and Politics (8)
- Supreme Court of the United States (8)
- International Law (7)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (6)
- Courts (6)
- Law and Race (5)
- Legal History (5)
- Legal Remedies (5)
- Property Law and Real Estate (5)
- Torts (5)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (4)
- Criminal Law (4)
- Judges (4)
- Law and Economics (4)
- Law and Gender (4)
- Law and Psychology (4)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (4)
- Legislation (4)
- Rule of Law (4)
- Social Welfare Law (4)
- Administrative Law (3)
- Common Law (3)
- Communications Law (3)
- Institution
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Articles (7)
- Review of law sciences (4)
- Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies (3)
- Michigan Law Review (3)
- ExpressO (2)
-
- Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality (2)
- Seattle University Law Review (2)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (1)
- Book Chapters (1)
- Dalhousie Law Journal (1)
- Florida Atlantic University Undergraduate Law Journal (1)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (1)
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (1)
- Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy (1)
- Pepperdine Law Review (1)
- Scholarly Publications (1)
- Undergraduate Scholarly Works (1)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 36 of 36
Full-Text Articles in Public Law and Legal Theory
Making Something Out Of Nothing: The Law Of Takings And Phillips V. Washington Legal Foundation, Michael A. Heller, James E. Krier
Making Something Out Of Nothing: The Law Of Takings And Phillips V. Washington Legal Foundation, Michael A. Heller, James E. Krier
Articles
Phillips v. Washington Legal Foundation held that interest on principal amounts deposited into IOLTA accounts is the property of the various clients who handed over the money but expressed no view as to whether the Texas IOLTA program worked a taking, or, if it did, whether any compensation was due. The debates among the justices about the meaning of private property, argued in terms of contextual and conceptual severance, are unlikely to prove fruitful. We elaborate a better approach in terms of the underlying purposes of just compensation. We conclude that efficiency and justice are best served by uncoupling matters …
Deterrence And Distribution In The Law Of Takings, Michael A. Heller, James E. Krier
Deterrence And Distribution In The Law Of Takings, Michael A. Heller, James E. Krier
Articles
Supreme Court decisions over the last three-quarters of a century have turned the words of the Takings Clause into a secret code that only a momentary majority of the Court is able to understand. The Justices faithfully moor their opinions to the particular terms of the Fifth Amendment, but only by stretching the text beyond recognition. A better approach is to consider the purposes of the Takings Clause, efficiency and justice, and go anew from there. Such a method reveals that in some cases there are good reasons to require payment by the government when it regulates property, but not …
The Kantian Theory Of International Law, Fernando R. Tesón
The Kantian Theory Of International Law, Fernando R. Tesón
Scholarly Publications
This Article defends the view, first developed by Immanuel Kant, that international law and domestic justice are fundamentally connected.'
Gender Justice Without Foundations, Marion Smiley
Gender Justice Without Foundations, Marion Smiley
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Feminism/Postmodernism edited by Linda J. Nicholson and Justice and the Politics of Difference by Iris Marion Young
Justice And The Bureaucratization Of Appellate Courts, Joseph Vining
Justice And The Bureaucratization Of Appellate Courts, Joseph Vining
Articles
The author notes the growing bureaucratization of appellate justice in the United States and, in particular, the drafting of opinions by law clerks rather than by judges. Taking the Supreme Court of the United States as an example, and comparing its internal procedure with that of large administrative agencies, he questions whether the method of analysis familiarly used by lawyers to arrive at an authoritative statement of law is applicable to legal texts bureaucratically produced. He suggests that legal method and its presuppositions are ultimately associated with the authority of law, and concludes that there may be critical losses not …