Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Washington (3)
- #MeToo (1)
- Accountability (1)
- Army Commander (1)
- Article 15 (1)
-
- Bicycle Helmet Law (1)
- Blood on the Tracks (1)
- Business case (1)
- Cash bail (1)
- Child Sexual Abuse (1)
- Choice of Law (1)
- Civil Forfeiture (1)
- Community Property (1)
- Comply-or-Explain Disclosure Regulation (1)
- Constitutional Theory of the Firm (1)
- Contraband (1)
- Corporate Diversity (1)
- Corporate Governance (1)
- Corporate Human Rights (1)
- Corporate boards (1)
- Corporation (1)
- Courts (1)
- Criminal Rule 3.2 (1)
- DEI (1)
- Data (1)
- Deportation (1)
- Detained Youth (1)
- Diversity leaders (1)
- Dobbs (1)
- Eyewitness misidentification (1)
Articles 31 - 33 of 33
Full-Text Articles in Privacy Law
Army Commander’S Role—The Judge, Jury, & Prosecutor For The Article 15, Anthony Godwin
Army Commander’S Role—The Judge, Jury, & Prosecutor For The Article 15, Anthony Godwin
Seattle University Law Review
Service members in the armed forces are bound by a different set of rules when compared to other U.S. citizens. Some of the normal safeguards and protections that civilians enjoy are much more restrictive for military service members, and this is generally for a good reason. Such restrictions are partly due to the complex demands and needs of the United States military. Congress and the President have entrusted military commanders with special powers that enable them to handle minor violations of law without needing to go through a full judicial proceeding. Non-judicial punishments (NJP), also known as Article 15s, are …
Nestlé V. Doe: A Death Knell To Corporate Human Rights Accountability?, Phillip Ayers
Nestlé V. Doe: A Death Knell To Corporate Human Rights Accountability?, Phillip Ayers
Seattle University Law Review
The Supreme Court in Nestlé v. Doe held that foreign plaintiffs who claimed to be victims of overseas tortious conduct by corporate defendants had no jurisdiction to sue in federal courts using the Alien Tort Statute. This Comment looks at the history of the Alien Tort Statute, from its inspiration, long dormancy, and recent reinvigoration beginning in the 1980s. The Comment then explores the background of Nestlé and its issues with child slavery in its cocoa supply chain. From there, the Comment analyzes the Nestlé v. Doe decision, and posits an alternative outcome. Finally, this Comment looks for a new …
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents