Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (186)
- Universitas Indonesia (123)
- UIC School of Law (18)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (8)
- University of Michigan Law School (8)
-
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (7)
- Brooklyn Law School (6)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (4)
- Boston University School of Law (3)
- Roger Williams University (3)
- Fordham Law School (2)
- New York Law School (2)
- St. Mary's University (2)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (2)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (2)
- University of Richmond (2)
- University of the District of Columbia School of Law (2)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (2)
- Bridgewater College (1)
- Brigham Young University Law School (1)
- Florida International University College of Law (1)
- Georgetown University Law Center (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- National Law School of India University (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (1)
- Southern Methodist University (1)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (1)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (1)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Privacy (18)
- Law (14)
- Supreme Court (10)
- Copyright (7)
- SFFA (7)
-
- Affirmative Action (6)
- Constitution (6)
- Discrimination (6)
- ESG (6)
- First Amendment (6)
- Fourth Amendment (6)
- Investment (6)
- Securities and exchange commission (6)
- Courts (5)
- Diversity (5)
- Surveillance (5)
- Technology (5)
- United States Supreme Court (5)
- Addiction (4)
- Artificial intelligence (4)
- Corporation (4)
- Internet (4)
- Public health (4)
- Regulation (4)
- SEC (4)
- Sec (4)
- Securities (4)
- Agreement (3)
- Banking (3)
- Business Competition (3)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (185)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- UIC Law Review (14)
- Touro Law Review (7)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (6)
-
- Articles (4)
- Michigan Law Review (3)
- Northwestern University Law Review (3)
- Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law (2)
- Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology (2)
- Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Fordham Law Review (2)
- Journal of Law and Policy (2)
- NYLS Law Review (2)
- Shorter Faculty Works (2)
- UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law (2)
- University of Richmond Law Review (2)
- BYU Law Review (1)
- Brooklyn Journal of International Law (1)
- Buffalo Law Review (1)
- Canadian Journal of Law and Technology (1)
- Circles: Buffalo Women's Journal of Law and Social Policy (1)
- Court Briefs (1)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (1)
- FIU Law Review (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty White Papers (1)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 391 - 402 of 402
Full-Text Articles in Privacy Law
"Comparing Medical Provider Performance: A First Look At The New Era Of Medical Statistics", Neil B. Cohen, Aaron D. Twerski
"Comparing Medical Provider Performance: A First Look At The New Era Of Medical Statistics", Neil B. Cohen, Aaron D. Twerski
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
New York V. Sullivan: Shhh .... Don't Say The A Word - Another Outcome-Oriented Abortion Decision, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 753 (1990), Christopher C. Kendall
New York V. Sullivan: Shhh .... Don't Say The A Word - Another Outcome-Oriented Abortion Decision, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 753 (1990), Christopher C. Kendall
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Diminishing Expectations Of Privacy In The Rehnquist Court, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 825 (1989), Laurence A. Benner
Diminishing Expectations Of Privacy In The Rehnquist Court, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 825 (1989), Laurence A. Benner
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Arizona V. Hicks: Probable Cause Requirement Under The Plain View Doctrine, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 903 (1988), Robert J. Kuker
Arizona V. Hicks: Probable Cause Requirement Under The Plain View Doctrine, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 903 (1988), Robert J. Kuker
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Brief For Petitioner, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 955 (1988), L. Lee Byrd, Yvonne T. Griffin, G. Rodney Young
Brief For Petitioner, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 955 (1988), L. Lee Byrd, Yvonne T. Griffin, G. Rodney Young
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Brief For Respondent, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 983 (1988), Matthew W. Nakon, Laura J. Steffe, Steven R. Yoo
Brief For Respondent, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 983 (1988), Matthew W. Nakon, Laura J. Steffe, Steven R. Yoo
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Can Mental Health Professionals Predict Judicial Decisionmaking? Constitutional And Tort Liability Aspects Of The Right Of The Institutionalized Mentally Disabled To Refuse Treatment: On The Cutting Edge, Michael L. Perlin
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Book Review Of Passion: An Essay On Personality , Richard F. Devlin Frsc
Book Review Of Passion: An Essay On Personality , Richard F. Devlin Frsc
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
Passion is a cogently structured, compel Jingly argued and seductively enthralling masterpiece which, in years to come, will undoubtedly stand out as an inspirational source for many who seek social transformation. Unger's style, in this essay at least, is lucid and inviting. Substantively, Passion demonstrates not only the depth of his penetrating intellect but also his command of an array of' disciplines. Unger's polymathy is all the more impressive when we remember that ours is an era in which idiosyncratic specialization is the norm.
The Public Right Of Access To Juvenile Delinquency Hearings, Michigan Law Review
The Public Right Of Access To Juvenile Delinquency Hearings, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Despite the differences between the criminal and juvenile court systems, the Supreme Court has extended many criminal procedural safeguards to juvenile delinquency hearings. The Court does not, however, "automatically and preemptorily" apply every procedural safeguard to juvenile hearings; rather, it carefully examines the criminal trial standard in the context of delinquency hearings. Adopting a similar approach, this Note considers the implications of a constitutional right of access to juvenile delinquency hearings. Part I examines the right of access announced in Globe Newspaper and Richmond Newspapers v. Virginia. Part II looks at the juvenile justice system and argues that extension …
Rewriting Roe V. Wade, Donald H. Regan
Rewriting Roe V. Wade, Donald H. Regan
Articles
Roe v. Wade is one of the most controversial cases the Supreme Court has decided. The result in the case - the establishment of a constitutional right to abortion - was controversial enough. Beyond that, even people who approve of the result have been dissatisfied with the Court's opinion. Others before me have attempted to explain how a better opinion could have been written. It seems to me, however, that the most promising argument in support of the result of Roe has not yet been made. This essay contains my suggestions for "rewriting" Roe v. Wade
Domestic Intelligence Informants, The First Amendment And The Need For Prior Judicial Review, Martin L. Perschetz
Domestic Intelligence Informants, The First Amendment And The Need For Prior Judicial Review, Martin L. Perschetz
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law-Due Process-Use Of Television At Congressional Hearings, S. I. Shuman
Constitutional Law-Due Process-Use Of Television At Congressional Hearings, S. I. Shuman
Michigan Law Review
Defendant, not claiming constitutional protection against self-incrimination, refused to testify before a Senate committee on grounds that his "constitutional rights" would be violated if compelled to give testimony while being televised, photographed, etc. Cited for willfully and without justification refusing to testify on matters pertinent to the purpose of the inquiry, defendant was tried for contempt of Congress. Held, not guilty; defendant's refusal was justified. The court, after stating that there were no precedents, and that no constitutional issue was involved, seemed to rest its decision on the fact that the atmosphere of the forum did not lend itself …