Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (222)
- Universitas Indonesia (121)
- UIC School of Law (39)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (32)
- University of Michigan Law School (22)
-
- University of Colorado Law School (19)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (18)
- William & Mary Law School (15)
- Brooklyn Law School (14)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (14)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (13)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (13)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (12)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (11)
- University of Washington School of Law (11)
- Florida State University College of Law (10)
- Pepperdine University (10)
- West Virginia University (10)
- Brigham Young University Law School (9)
- New York Law School (9)
- Washington University in St. Louis (9)
- Duke Law (7)
- Fordham Law School (7)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (7)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (6)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (6)
- Roger Williams University (6)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (6)
- The University of Akron (6)
- American University Washington College of Law (5)
- Keyword
-
- Privacy (138)
- Fourth Amendment (45)
- Fourth amendment (39)
- First Amendment (37)
- Surveillance (32)
-
- Technology (23)
- Abortion (21)
- Law (21)
- Search (20)
- Constitutional law (18)
- Constitution (16)
- Right to privacy (16)
- Right of privacy (14)
- Internet (13)
- Supreme Court (13)
- Privacy law (12)
- Constitutional Law (11)
- Police (11)
- Social media (11)
- Copyright (10)
- Discrimination (10)
- Roe v. Wade (10)
- Third party doctrine (10)
- Data (9)
- First amendment (9)
- Free speech (9)
- Seizure (9)
- Artificial intelligence (8)
- Due process (8)
- Expectation of privacy (8)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (191)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- UIC Law Review (39)
- Seattle Journal for Social Justice (25)
- Faculty Articles (24)
-
- Publications (19)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (18)
- Michigan Law Review (14)
- Faculty Scholarship (12)
- Touro Law Review (12)
- Buffalo Law Review (11)
- Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology (10)
- West Virginia Law Review (10)
- Scholarship@WashULaw (9)
- Washington Law Review (9)
- BYU Law Review (8)
- Faculty Publications (8)
- NYLS Law Review (8)
- Articles (7)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (7)
- Akron Law Review (6)
- Florida State University Law Review (6)
- Fordham Law Review (6)
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review (6)
- Pepperdine Law Review (6)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (5)
- Northwestern University Law Review (5)
- Oklahoma Law Review (5)
- Other Faculty Publications (5)
- Seattle Journal of Technology, Environmental, & Innovation Law (5)
- Publication Type
Articles 721 - 750 of 819
Full-Text Articles in Privacy Law
Feeling Violated: Seventh Circuit Puts The Squeeze On Fourth Amendment Rights Of Bus Travelers, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 245 (1997), Andrew J. Purcell
Feeling Violated: Seventh Circuit Puts The Squeeze On Fourth Amendment Rights Of Bus Travelers, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 245 (1997), Andrew J. Purcell
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
To Test Or Not To Test: Article I, Section 7 And Random Drug-Testing Of Washington's Public School Student-Athletes, Kristi L. Helgeson
To Test Or Not To Test: Article I, Section 7 And Random Drug-Testing Of Washington's Public School Student-Athletes, Kristi L. Helgeson
Washington Law Review
In Vernonia School District 47J v. Acton, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution does not protect the privacy interests of the nation's public school student-athletes from mandatory, random urinalysis drug-testing. This Comment argues that article I, section 7 of the Washington State Constitution provides Washington's student-athletes greater protection than the Fourth Amendment and, consequently, proscribes mandatory, random urinalysis drug-testing. It concludes by providing parameters for student-athlete drug-testing programs that will pass state constitutional muster.
The State As Landlord: The Constitutionality Of The Termination Of Public Housing Leases On Account Of A Tenant's Illegal Activities, Mark Anthony Drumbl
The State As Landlord: The Constitutionality Of The Termination Of Public Housing Leases On Account Of A Tenant's Illegal Activities, Mark Anthony Drumbl
Scholarly Articles
Paragraph 107(l)(b) of the Ontario Landlord and Tenant Act enables landlords to evict tenants on short notice for engaging in illegal activity or for permitting such activity to be conducted in or on any part of the rental premises. Under this provision, the landlord can serve a notice of termination on the tenant, who may then exercise his/her right to dispute the landlord's allegation at a scheduled court hearing.
This paper suggests that paragraph 107(l)(b) is inconsistent with the underlying purposes of the Landlord and Tenant Act, and might run afoul of sections 7 and 15 of the Canadian Charter …
Lochner For Women: The Ideology Of Separate Spheres In Muller V. Oregon, Anne Dailey
Lochner For Women: The Ideology Of Separate Spheres In Muller V. Oregon, Anne Dailey
Faculty Articles and Papers
No abstract provided.
Revealing The Constitutional Infirmities Of The "Crime Victims Protection Act," Florida's New Privacy Statute For Sexual Assault Victims, Brett Jarad Berlin
Revealing The Constitutional Infirmities Of The "Crime Victims Protection Act," Florida's New Privacy Statute For Sexual Assault Victims, Brett Jarad Berlin
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
State V. Young And The New Test For Privacy In Washington, Michael M. Suga
State V. Young And The New Test For Privacy In Washington, Michael M. Suga
Washington Law Review
In State v. Young, the Washington Supreme Court determined that the warrantless use of an infrared thermal detection device on the home of a suspected marijuana grower was a violation of Article I, Section 7 of the Washington State Constitution. This Note argues that the court's test for determining privacy rights under Article I, Section 7 is flawed in form and fails to achieve those goals set forth by the court. It suggests an alternative test for Article I, Section 7 privacy rights as well as a remedial prerequisite standard of proof in cases involving minimally intrusive surveillance techniques.
The Countermajoritarian Paradox, Neal Davis
The Countermajoritarian Paradox, Neal Davis
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Liberty and Sexuality: The Right to Privacy and the Making of Roe v. Wade. by David J. Garrow
Privacy's Problem And The Law Of Criminal Procedure, William J. Stuntz
Privacy's Problem And The Law Of Criminal Procedure, William J. Stuntz
Michigan Law Review
Part I of this article addresses the connection between privacy-based limits on police authority and substantive limits on government power as a general matter. Part II briefly addresses the effects of that connection on Fourth and Fifth Amendment law, both past and present. Part ID suggests that privacy protection has a deeper problem: it tends to obscure more serious harms that attend police misconduct, harms that flow not from information disclosure but from the police use of force. The upshot is that criminal procedure would be better off with less attention to privacy, at least as privacy is defined in …
Response: The Problems With Privacy's Problem, Louis Michael Seidman
Response: The Problems With Privacy's Problem, Louis Michael Seidman
Michigan Law Review
A Response to William J. Stuntz's "Privacy's Problem and the Law of Criminal Procedure"
Reply, William J. Stuntz
Reply, William J. Stuntz
Michigan Law Review
A Reply to Louis Michael Seidman's Response
Clinic Blockades: What Is The Problem? What Is The Harm? What Is The Solution?, Nona Laplante
Clinic Blockades: What Is The Problem? What Is The Harm? What Is The Solution?, Nona Laplante
Circles: Buffalo Women's Journal of Law and Social Policy
No abstract provided.
The Metaphor Is The Key: Cryptography, The Clipper Chip, And The Constitution, A. Michael Froomkin
The Metaphor Is The Key: Cryptography, The Clipper Chip, And The Constitution, A. Michael Froomkin
Articles
No abstract provided.
Life's Sacred Value—Common Ground Or Battleground, Alexander Morgan Capron
Life's Sacred Value—Common Ground Or Battleground, Alexander Morgan Capron
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Life's Dominion: An Argument About Abortion, Euthanasia, and Individual Freedom by Ronald Dworkin
Pc Peep Show: Computers, Privacy, And Child Pornography, 27 J. Marshall L. Rev. 989 (1994), John C. Scheller
Pc Peep Show: Computers, Privacy, And Child Pornography, 27 J. Marshall L. Rev. 989 (1994), John C. Scheller
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Consent Exception To The Warrant Requirement, H. Patrick Furman
The Consent Exception To The Warrant Requirement, H. Patrick Furman
Publications
No abstract provided.
Florida's Constitutional Shield: An Express Right To Be Let Alone By Government And The Private Sector, Scott Denson
Florida's Constitutional Shield: An Express Right To Be Let Alone By Government And The Private Sector, Scott Denson
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
State Interest Analysis And The Channeling Function, Carl E. Scheider
State Interest Analysis And The Channeling Function, Carl E. Scheider
Book Chapters
In this article, I wish to criticize the narrowness of the Supreme Court's conception of the interests states may advance to justify statutes challenged on constitutional privacy grounds. I also wish to identify and describe one of the several state interests that not infrequently undergirds such legislation but that the Court has failed to understand.
Rust V. Sullivan: The Supreme Court Upholds The Title X Abortion-Counseling Gag Rule, Scott E. Johnson
Rust V. Sullivan: The Supreme Court Upholds The Title X Abortion-Counseling Gag Rule, Scott E. Johnson
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Introduction: Observations On Teaching Griswold, Hugh Macgill
Introduction: Observations On Teaching Griswold, Hugh Macgill
Faculty Articles and Papers
No abstract provided.
Patentability Of Genetically Engineered Life-Forms: Legal Issues And Solutions, 25 J. Marshall L. Rev. 119 (1991), Matthew B. Tropper
Patentability Of Genetically Engineered Life-Forms: Legal Issues And Solutions, 25 J. Marshall L. Rev. 119 (1991), Matthew B. Tropper
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Some Queries About Privacy And Constitutional Rights, Michael Grossberg
Some Queries About Privacy And Constitutional Rights, Michael Grossberg
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
The State Constitutional Right To Privacy Conflicts With Tax Reporting Requiremnets: The Florida Model, Daniel R. Gorgon
The State Constitutional Right To Privacy Conflicts With Tax Reporting Requiremnets: The Florida Model, Daniel R. Gorgon
Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law
No abstract provided.
The Constitutionality Of An Off-Dutysmoking Ban For Public Employees:Should The State Butt Out?, Elizabeth B. Thompson
The Constitutionality Of An Off-Dutysmoking Ban For Public Employees:Should The State Butt Out?, Elizabeth B. Thompson
Vanderbilt Law Review
During the past several years, restrictions imposed by states, cities,and municipalities on smoking in public areas have survived court challenges and become almost commonplace.' Likewise, both public and private employers have limited smoking in the workplace. A further restriction that seems to be emerging, however, is a refusal by both the state and a growing number of private employers to hire or to continue to employ smokers. These restrictions limit the employee's freedom to smoke not only in the workplace, but also after working hours and within the privacy of the worker's home.
This Note will address the constitutionality of …
Florida Star V. B.J.F.: The Rape Of The Right To Privacy, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 731 (1990), Barbara Lynn Pedersen
Florida Star V. B.J.F.: The Rape Of The Right To Privacy, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 731 (1990), Barbara Lynn Pedersen
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
New York V. Sullivan: Shhh .... Don't Say The A Word - Another Outcome-Oriented Abortion Decision, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 753 (1990), Christopher C. Kendall
New York V. Sullivan: Shhh .... Don't Say The A Word - Another Outcome-Oriented Abortion Decision, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 753 (1990), Christopher C. Kendall
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Court, The Academy, And The Constitution: A Comment On Bowers V. Hardwick And Its Critics, Earl M. Maltz
The Court, The Academy, And The Constitution: A Comment On Bowers V. Hardwick And Its Critics, Earl M. Maltz
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Diminishing Expectations Of Privacy In The Rehnquist Court, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 825 (1989), Laurence A. Benner
Diminishing Expectations Of Privacy In The Rehnquist Court, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 825 (1989), Laurence A. Benner
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Forgetting The Constitution, Robert F. Nagel
Privacy, Pornography, And The Supreme Court, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 755 (1988), Richard F. Hixson
Privacy, Pornography, And The Supreme Court, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 755 (1988), Richard F. Hixson
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Arizona V. Hicks: Probable Cause Requirement Under The Plain View Doctrine, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 903 (1988), Robert J. Kuker
Arizona V. Hicks: Probable Cause Requirement Under The Plain View Doctrine, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 903 (1988), Robert J. Kuker
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.