Privacy Law Commons^™

The Intersection Between Finance And Intellectual Property: Trade Secrets, Hedge Funds, And Section 13(F) Of The Exchange Act, Erin E. Martin

NYLS Law Review

No abstract provided.

Identity Theft: Plugging The Massive Data Leaks With A Stricter Nationwide Breach-Notification Law, 40 J. Marshall L. Rev. 681 (2007), Amanda Draper

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Taking The Stand: The Lessons Of The Three Men Who Took The Japanese American Internment To Court, Lorraine K. Bannai

Seattle Journal for Social Justice

No abstract provided.

When Cows Have Wings: An Analysis Of The Oecd's Tax Haven Work As It Relates To Globalization, Sovereignty And Privacy, 35 J. Marshall L. Rev. 163 (2002), Kimberly Carlson

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

The New Consumer Financial Privacy Regulations: Balancing The Interests Of Consumers And Industry, Dolores S. Smith, James H. Mann

NYLS Journal of Human Rights

No abstract provided.

Commentary On Financial Privacy, Lynn M. Lopucki

UF Law Faculty Publications

My three criticisms are this: First, Peter frames the problem as privacy versus government surveillance, thus ignoring the best solution to the problem, which is to make more information public. Second, Peter exaggerates the human need for privacy by presenting the need as immutable and essentially coextensive with embarrassment. People do not need nearly the privacy they think they do. Third, if Peter’s broad view of privacy holds, then you can forget about the information age.

Logos, Links, And Lending: Towards Standardized Privacy And Use Policies For Banking Web Sites, Walter Effross

Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals

No abstract provided.

Piracy, Privacy, And Privitization: Fictional And Legal Approaches To The Electronic Future Of Cash, Walter Effross

Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals

No abstract provided.

Pennsylvania Constitutional Law - Search And Seizure - Right To Privacy - Individual Banking Records, Jane E. L. Miller

Duquesne Law Review

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that the Pennsylvania Constitution protects an individual bank depositor's records from unauthorized police subpoenas when no legal proceedings have been instituted against the individual.

Commonwealth v. DeJohn, 403 A.2d 1283 (Pa. 1979)

Rifkin, A Documentary History, 2 Computer L.J. 471 (1980), Jay Becker

UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law

No abstract provided.

The Right To Financial Privacy Act Of 1978: New Protection From Federal Intrusion, 12 J. Marshall J. Prac. & Proc. 487 (1979), George B. Trubow, Dennis L. Hudson

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Right To Financial Privacy Act Of 1978-The Congressional Response To United States V. Miller: A Procedural Right To Challenge Government Access To Financial Records, Nancy M. Kirschner

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

This article will review the factors leading to the Miller decision and the legislative response to that decision. Part I will examine the bank customer's expectation of privacy and the way Miller affects this expectation. Part II will discuss the congressional response to Miller and the competing interests which led to the Right to Financial Privacy Act. The Act itself will be discussed in detail in Part III. Part IV will evaluate the Act, and offer recommendations for reform. The article concludes that the Act, by adopting a purely procedural approach, fails to provide adequate protection to bank customers.

Banking-Disclosure Of Records-The Duty Of A Bank As To Customer Information, Robert B. Wessling S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

The purpose of this comment, therefore, is to describe the scope of the banker's duty as to customer information as best it can be discerned in light of the increasing exchange of credit information and increasing resort to such information by government agencies-particularly the Internal Revenue Service. In the process, it is hoped that attention will be drawn to the uncertainty which exists in this area, perhaps prompting action by the states or the banks themselves to clarify the scope of the duty and to encourage uniform treatment of customer information in a manner consistent with this duty.