Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
President/Executive Department Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (49)
- Administrative Law (38)
- Law and Politics (29)
- Legislation (26)
- Immigration Law (24)
-
- Judges (24)
- Courts (23)
- Law and Society (20)
- Legal History (19)
- Supreme Court of the United States (19)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (18)
- National Security Law (15)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (15)
- International Law (14)
- Law and Race (14)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (13)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (13)
- State and Local Government Law (13)
- Environmental Law (12)
- Human Rights Law (12)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (11)
- Criminal Law (11)
- Military, War, and Peace (11)
- Political Science (11)
- Civil Procedure (10)
- First Amendment (10)
- Jurisdiction (10)
- Jurisprudence (10)
- Institution
-
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (12)
- Seattle University School of Law (10)
- William & Mary Law School (8)
- Columbia Law School (7)
- New York Law School (6)
-
- University of Colorado Law School (6)
- University of Michigan Law School (6)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (6)
- Brooklyn Law School (5)
- Purdue University (5)
- Montclair State University (4)
- Pepperdine University (4)
- Roger Williams University (4)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (4)
- Brigham Young University Law School (3)
- University of Miami Law School (3)
- University of the District of Columbia School of Law (3)
- American University Washington College of Law (2)
- Georgetown University Law Center (2)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
- Notre Dame Law School (2)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (2)
- Southern Methodist University (2)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (2)
- University of Maine School of Law (2)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Claremont Colleges (1)
- Colby College (1)
- Duke Law (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- Executive power (12)
- President (11)
- Constitution (7)
- Trump (7)
- Trump administration (7)
-
- Article II (6)
- Congress (6)
- Constitutional law (6)
- Democracy (6)
- Executive theory (6)
- Congressional oversight (5)
- Donald Trump (5)
- Immigration (5)
- Administrative Law (4)
- Administrative Procedure Act (4)
- COVID-19 (4)
- Coronavirus (4)
- DACA (4)
- Law (4)
- President Trump (4)
- Separation of powers (4)
- Supreme Court (4)
- Administrative law (3)
- Administrative state (3)
- Constitutional Law (3)
- Deregulation (3)
- Due process (3)
- Executive branch (3)
- Federal Courts (3)
- Federal courts (3)
- Publication
-
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (12)
- Faculty Scholarship (12)
- Seattle University Law Review (9)
- Publications (6)
- Articles (4)
-
- Department of Justice Studies Faculty Scholarship and Creative Works (4)
- Pepperdine Law Review (4)
- Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law (3)
- Journal of Law and Policy (3)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Libraries Faculty and Staff Presentations (3)
- NYLS Law Review (3)
- University of Miami Business Law Review (3)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (3)
- William & Mary Law Review (3)
- American University Law Review (2)
- Articles & Chapters (2)
- Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review (2)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (2)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (2)
- Journal Articles (2)
- Libraries Faculty and Staff Scholarship and Research (2)
- Maine Law Review (2)
- Notre Dame Law Review (2)
- Other Publications (2)
- Roger Williams University Law Review (2)
- Scholarly Articles (2)
- University of the District of Columbia Law Review (2)
- Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice (2)
- Book Chapters (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 91 - 120 of 129
Full-Text Articles in President/Executive Department
Preserving The Nationwide National Government Injunction To Stop Illegal Executive Branch Activity, Doug Rendleman
Preserving The Nationwide National Government Injunction To Stop Illegal Executive Branch Activity, Doug Rendleman
Scholarly Articles
The Trump Administration’s extravagant claims of executive power have focused the federal courts’ attention on separation of powers, judicial review, and equitable jurisdiction to grant broad injunctions that forbid the administration’s violations of the Constitution and federal statutes. Critics question the federal courts’ power to grant broad injunctions that are effective everywhere. These critics maintain, among other things, that the federal courts lack jurisdiction and that broad injunctions improperly affect nonparties and militate against “percolation” of issues in a variety of courts.
This Article examines the critics’ arguments and finds them unconvincing. Accepting the critics’ arguments would rebalance the separation …
Cve And Constitutionality In The Twin Cities: How Countering Violent Extremism Threatens The Equal Protection Rights Of American Muslims In Minneapolis-St. Paul, Sarah Chaney Reichenbach
Cve And Constitutionality In The Twin Cities: How Countering Violent Extremism Threatens The Equal Protection Rights Of American Muslims In Minneapolis-St. Paul, Sarah Chaney Reichenbach
American University Law Review
In 2011, President Barack Obama announced a national strategy for countering violent extremism (CVE) to attempt to prevent the “radicalization” of potential violent extremists. The Obama Administration intended the strategy to employ a community-based approach, bringing together the government, law enforcement, and local communities for CVE efforts. Despite claiming to target extremism in all forms, government-funded CVE programs in the United States have almost exclusively focused on Islamic extremism. One pilot program focused on the Twin Cities in Minnesota—Minneapolis and St. Paul—home to the largest Somali community in the United States, most of whom are Muslim. The Trump Administration has …
In Memory Of Professor James E. Bond, Janet Ainsworth
In Memory Of Professor James E. Bond, Janet Ainsworth
Seattle University Law Review
Janet Ainsworth, Professor of Law at Seattle University School of Law: In Memory of Professor James E. Bond.
"Inciting A Riot": Silent Sentinels, Group Protests, And Prisoners' Petition And Associational Rights, Nicole B. Godfrey
"Inciting A Riot": Silent Sentinels, Group Protests, And Prisoners' Petition And Associational Rights, Nicole B. Godfrey
Seattle University Law Review
This Article argues for increased legal protections for prisoners who choose to engage in group protest to shed light on the conditions of their incarceration. A companion piece to a similar article that focused on prisoner free speech rights, this Article uses the acts of protest utilized by the Silent Sentinels to examine why prisoners’ rights to petition and association should be strengthened. By strengthening these rights, the Article argues that we will advance the values enshrined by the First Amendment’s Petition Clause while simultaneously advancing the rights of the incarcerated millions with little to no political power.
The Article …
Black Women And Girls And The Twenty-Sixth Amendment: Constitutional Connections, Activist Intersections, And The First Wave Youth Suffrage Movement, Mae C. Quinn
Seattle University Law Review
On this 100th anniversary of the Nineteenth Amendment—and on the cusp of the fiftieth anniversary of the Twenty-sixth Amendment—this article seeks to expand the voting rights canon. It complicates our understanding of voting rights history in the United States, adding layers to the history of federal constitutional enfranchisement and encouraging a more intersectional telling of our suffrage story in the days ahead.
Thus, this work not only seeks to acknowledge the Twenty-sixth Amendment as important constitutional content, as was the goal of the article I wrote with my law student colleagues for a conference held at the University of Akron …
The Failed Transparency Regime For Executive Agreements: An Empirical And Normative Analysis, Oona A. Hathaway, Curtis A. Bradley, Jack L. Goldsmith
The Failed Transparency Regime For Executive Agreements: An Empirical And Normative Analysis, Oona A. Hathaway, Curtis A. Bradley, Jack L. Goldsmith
Faculty Scholarship
The Constitution specifies only one process for making international agreements. Article II states that the President “shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur.” The treaty process has long been on a path to obsolescence, however, with fewer and fewer treaties being made in each presidential administration. Nevertheless, the United States has not stopped making international agreements. Even as Article II treaties have come to a near halt, the United States has concluded hundreds of binding international agreements each year. These agreements, known as …
Executive Power And The Aca, Nicholas Bagley
Executive Power And The Aca, Nicholas Bagley
Book Chapters
As with any law of its complexity and ambition, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) vests in the sitting president broad implementation discretion. The law is not a blank check: in many ways both large and small, the ACA shapes and constrains the exercise of executive power. But Congress has neither the institutional resources nor the attention span to micromanage the rollout of a massive health program. It has no choice but to delegate.
Naturally, both President Obama and President Trump have drawn on their authority to tailor the ACA to their policy preferences. Neither president, however, has been able to …
Has President Trump Committed A War Crime By Pardoning War Criminals?, 35 Am. U. Int'l L. Rev. 757 (2020), Stuart Ford
Has President Trump Committed A War Crime By Pardoning War Criminals?, 35 Am. U. Int'l L. Rev. 757 (2020), Stuart Ford
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Investments And Security: Balancing International Commerce And National Security With Expanded Authority For The Committee On Foreign Investment In The United States, Christopher Jusuf
Investments And Security: Balancing International Commerce And National Security With Expanded Authority For The Committee On Foreign Investment In The United States, Christopher Jusuf
Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology
What happens when the interests of international trade conflict with those of national security? This article analyzes this question within the context of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), an obscure but increasingly powerful executive panel that exercises the president's broad authority to unilaterally interfere with and stop international mergers and acquisitions. With the passage of the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act (FIRRMA), CFIUS is more powerful now than it has ever been, and should be a key consideration for any company seeking to do business with foreign investors. This is especially true as America …
The Art Of Sore Losing: The Effect Of Outsider Candidates On The Democratic Nomination System, Cassidy Holzer
The Art Of Sore Losing: The Effect Of Outsider Candidates On The Democratic Nomination System, Cassidy Holzer
Honors Theses
Abstract: The 2016 election posed a series of interesting questions about outsider candidates: Who are they? Why do they run? How do they affect the party? What party mechanisms either foster or hinder outsiders? To answer these questions, I look at every election after 1968-- the year the McGovern-Fraser reforms flipped the Democratic nomination system on its head. I classify every competitive candidate in every post-1968 election as an outsider, an establishment-like, or an establishment candidate, evaluating their political experience and reliance on small-donors. I find that Iowa and New Hampshire serve a pivotal point for all candidates, encouraging a …
Judge, Jury, And Executioner: Why Private Parties Have Standing To Challenge An Executive Order That Prohibits Icts Transactions With Foreign Adversaries, Ari K. Bental
American University Law Review
On May 15, 2019, President Donald Trump, invoking his constitutional executive and statutory emergency powers, signed Executive Order 13,873, which prohibits U.S. persons from conducting information and communications technology and services (ICTS) transactions with foreign adversaries. Though the executive branch has refrained from publicly identifying countries or entities as foreign adversaries under the Executive Order, observers agree that the Executive Order’s main targets are China and telecommunications companies, namely Huawei, that threaten American national security and competitiveness in the race to provide the lion’s share of critical infrastructure to support the world’s growing 5G network.
Executive Order 13,873 raises several …
The Major Questions Doctrine: How The Supreme Court’S Efforts To Rein In The Effects Of Chevron Have Failed To Meet Expectations, Andrew Howayeck
The Major Questions Doctrine: How The Supreme Court’S Efforts To Rein In The Effects Of Chevron Have Failed To Meet Expectations, Andrew Howayeck
Roger Williams University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Against Executive-Controlled Administrative Law Judges, Stephanie N. Higginson
Against Executive-Controlled Administrative Law Judges, Stephanie N. Higginson
Harvey M. Applebaum ’59 Award
No abstract provided.
Law, Race, And The Epistemology Of Ignorance, George A. Martinez
Law, Race, And The Epistemology Of Ignorance, George A. Martinez
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
Philosophers and other theorists have developed the field of epistemology which is the study of human knowledge. Critical race theorists have begun to explore how epistemological theory and insights may illuminate the study of race, including the analysis of race and the law. Such use of epistemology is appropriate because theoretical work on knowledge can be used to advance one of the key goals of critical race theory which is to understand how a regime of white supremacy and its subordination of people of color have been created and maintained in America. In this regard, philosophers and other theorists have …
Restoring Stare Decisis In The Wake Of Janus V. Afscme, Council 31, James Tilghman
Restoring Stare Decisis In The Wake Of Janus V. Afscme, Council 31, James Tilghman
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Does Doe V. Mattis Open The Door To Citizen-Detainee Transfer?, Amy Greer Ph.D.
Does Doe V. Mattis Open The Door To Citizen-Detainee Transfer?, Amy Greer Ph.D.
Roger Williams University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Procedural Law, The Supreme Court, And The Erosion Of Private Rights Enforcement, Suzette M. Malveaux
Procedural Law, The Supreme Court, And The Erosion Of Private Rights Enforcement, Suzette M. Malveaux
Publications
No abstract provided.
Foreword, National Injunctions: What Does The Future Hold?, Suzette Malveaux
Foreword, National Injunctions: What Does The Future Hold?, Suzette Malveaux
Publications
This Foreword is to the 27th Annual Ira C. Rothgerber Jr. Conference, National Injunctions: What Does the Future Hold?, which was hosted by The Byron R. White Center for the Study of American Constitutional Law at the University of Colorado Law School, on Apr. 5, 2019.
The Constitutionality Of The Self-Pardon And Its Compatibility With Lockean Prerogative, Michael Kelley
The Constitutionality Of The Self-Pardon And Its Compatibility With Lockean Prerogative, Michael Kelley
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Hargis V. Bevin, Gabriella Castellano
Presidential Whim, Matthew J. Steilen
Presidential Whim, Matthew J. Steilen
Journal Articles
This article describes a new body of legal literature on the presidency. In contrast to older bodies of writing, which emphasize presidential independence, this body of writing emphasizes the dependence of the executive power, and a set of moral values associated with the office: faith, faithfulness, responsibility, honesty, due care, and professionalism, among others. The article considers prospects for enforcing this vision of the presidency in light of the particular problems posed by the Trump presidency. Many writers have complained of President Trump's leadership style, which is abrupt, reflexive, dissembling, and unilateral. I refer to this as the problem of …
Presidential Crimes Matter, Julian A. Cook
Presidential Crimes Matter, Julian A. Cook
Scholarly Works
The resignations of United States Attorneys Geoffrey Berman and Jessie Liu from their respective positions in the Southern District of New York and the District of Columbia, and Attorney General William Barr’s and President Donald Trump’s persistent undermining of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s Russian interference and obstruction of justice investigations and prosecutions are clarion calls to reform the process by which the executive branch criminally investigates itself. But there is another critical circumstance—the Special Counsel regulations—that has been largely overlooked and has been grossly underappreciated in the public discussion about undue executive branch influence. These regulations are foundational, their impact …
Healthy And Unhealthy Responses To American Democratic Institutional Failure, Thomas D'Anieri
Healthy And Unhealthy Responses To American Democratic Institutional Failure, Thomas D'Anieri
CMC Senior Theses
I have set out on the hunch that politics in America “feels different,” that we are frustrated both with our institutions as well as with one another. First, I will seek to empirically verify this claim beyond mere “feelings.” If it can be shown that these kinds of discontent genuinely exist to the extent that I believe they do, I will then explain why people feel this way and why things are different this time from the economic, political, and social points of view. Next, I will examine two potential responses, what I will call the populist and the institutional …
Consent Of The Governed: A Constitutional Norm That The Court Should Substantially Enforce, David Schoenbrod
Consent Of The Governed: A Constitutional Norm That The Court Should Substantially Enforce, David Schoenbrod
Articles & Chapters
Available at https://www.harvard-jlpp.com/
Honoring Sally Jewell, Charles Wilkinson
Administrative Law's Extraordinary Cases, Jonathan Skinner-Thompson
Administrative Law's Extraordinary Cases, Jonathan Skinner-Thompson
Publications
The Supreme Court's major questions doctrine is grounded in the Chevron framework. Reconstituting it as a "major rules" exception to Chevron or as a non-delegation principle are misguided and create greater uncertainty.
How Much Procedure Is Needed For Agencies To Change “Novel” Regulatory Policies?, Ming Hsu Chen
How Much Procedure Is Needed For Agencies To Change “Novel” Regulatory Policies?, Ming Hsu Chen
Publications
The use of guidance documents in administrative law has long been controversial and considered to be one of the most challenging aspects of administrative law. When an agency uses a guidance document to change or make policy, it need not provide notice to the public or allow comment on the new rule; this makes changes easier and faster and less subject to judicial review. Under the Obama Administration, guidance documents were used to implement policy shifts in many areas of administrative law, including civil rights issues such as transgender inclusion and campus sexual harassment and immigration law issues such as …
Making Litigating Citizenship More Fair, Ming H. Chen
Making Litigating Citizenship More Fair, Ming H. Chen
Publications
No abstract provided.
New Environmental Crimes Project Data Shows That Pollution Prosecutions Plummeted During The First Two Years Of The Trump Administration, David M. Uhlmann
New Environmental Crimes Project Data Shows That Pollution Prosecutions Plummeted During The First Two Years Of The Trump Administration, David M. Uhlmann
Other Publications
The latest data from the Environmental Crimes Project at the University of Michigan Law School shows a dramatic drop in pollution prosecutions during the first two years under President Donald J. Trump. The data, which now includes 14 years of cases from 2005–2018, shows a 70 percent decrease in Clean Water Act prosecutions under President Trump, as well as a more than 50 percent decrease in Clean Air Act prosecutions. The data again shows that most defendants charged with pollution crime commit misconduct involving one or more of the aggravating factors identified in my previous scholarship, so prosecutors continue to …
Presidential Control Over Disputed Elections, Lisa Marshall Manheim
Presidential Control Over Disputed Elections, Lisa Marshall Manheim
Articles
An election that is “disputed” lacks two qualities after Election Day: a clear winner and a concession. These elections instead depend on legal processes — recounts, court proceedings, and more — for resolution. As a result, when a sitting President, running for reelection, becomes immersed in a disputed presidential election, he potentially enjoys an advantage over his opponent. He can attempt to exploit the powers of the presidency to push these legal proceedings in his favor. As a practical matter, this advantage can be formidable. A sitting president can resort to his extraordinary bully pulpit, for example, to influence public …