Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
President/Executive Department Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (25)
- National Security Law (16)
- Administrative Law (15)
- Law and Politics (15)
- International Law (12)
-
- Military, War, and Peace (12)
- Courts (8)
- Human Rights Law (5)
- Immigration Law (5)
- Legislation (5)
- Supreme Court of the United States (5)
- Judges (4)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (4)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (3)
- International Humanitarian Law (3)
- Jurisdiction (3)
- Legal History (3)
- Privacy Law (3)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (3)
- Science and Technology Law (3)
- Defense and Security Studies (2)
- Environmental Law (2)
- First Amendment (2)
- International Trade Law (2)
- Law and Economics (2)
- Political Science (2)
- Rule of Law (2)
- State and Local Government Law (2)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (8)
- The University of Akron (6)
- Duke Law (4)
- University of Georgia School of Law (4)
- Barry University School of Law (3)
-
- Columbia Law School (3)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (3)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (3)
- Pepperdine University (3)
- Roger Williams University (3)
- University of Colorado Law School (3)
- University of Richmond (3)
- Fordham Law School (2)
- Notre Dame Law School (2)
- Seattle University School of Law (2)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Brigham Young University Law School (1)
- Emory University School of Law (1)
- Florida State University College of Law (1)
- Georgetown University Law Center (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- New York Law School (1)
- Purdue University (1)
- Southern Methodist University (1)
- University of Baltimore Law (1)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (1)
- University of Washington School of Law (1)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional law (7)
- Separation of powers (7)
- Congress (6)
- Constitution (5)
- Executive power (5)
-
- Federal agencies (5)
- President (5)
- International law (4)
- Law of war (4)
- Obama (4)
- Rulemaking (4)
- Supreme Court (4)
- Taliban (4)
- War (4)
- Al-Qaeda (3)
- Armed conflict (3)
- Article II (3)
- Cuba (3)
- Executive branch (3)
- Judicial review (3)
- Presidency (3)
- Privacy (3)
- Regulation (3)
- United States (3)
- United States Supreme Court (3)
- 9/11 (2)
- AUMF (2)
- Barack Obama (2)
- Citizens (2)
- Confirmation (2)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (11)
- Akron Law Review (6)
- Articles (6)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (4)
- Law Faculty Publications (3)
-
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review (3)
- Northwestern University Law Review (3)
- Pepperdine Law Review (3)
- Publications (3)
- Fordham Law Review (2)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Notre Dame Law Review (2)
- Seattle University Law Review (2)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Articles & Chapters (1)
- BYU Law Review (1)
- Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology (1)
- Catholic University Law Review (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- Florida State University Law Review (1)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (1)
- Harvey M. Applebaum ’59 Award (1)
- Indiana Law Journal (1)
- Libraries Faculty and Staff Scholarship and Research (1)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (1)
- Michigan Journal of Environmental & Administrative Law (1)
- Michigan Law Review (1)
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (1)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (1)
- Scholarly Works (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 61 - 70 of 70
Full-Text Articles in President/Executive Department
A Functional Theory Of Congressional Standing, Jonathan Remy Nash
A Functional Theory Of Congressional Standing, Jonathan Remy Nash
Michigan Law Review
The Supreme Court has offered scarce and inconsistent guidance on congressional standing—that is, when houses of Congress or members of Congress have Article III standing. The Court’s most recent foray into congressional standing has prompted lower courts to infuse analysis with separation-ofpowers concerns in order to erect a high standard for congressional standing. It has also invited the Department of Justice to argue that Congress lacks standing to enforce subpoenas against executive branch actors. Injury to congressional litigants should be defined by reference to Congress’s constitutional functions. Those functions include gathering relevant information, casting votes, and (even when no vote …
Taxation And Surveillance: An Agenda, Michael Hatfield
Taxation And Surveillance: An Agenda, Michael Hatfield
Articles
Among government agencies, the IRS likely has the surest legal claim to the most information about the most Americans: their hobbies, religious affiliations, reading activities, travel, and medical information are all potentially tax relevant. Privacy scholars have studied the arrival of Big Data, the internet-of-things, and the cooperation of private companies with the government in surveillance, but neither privacy nor tax scholars have considered how these technological advances should impact the U.S. tax system. As government agencies and private companies increasingly pursue what has been described as the “growing gush of data,” the use of these technologies in tax administration …
Agora: Reflections On Zivotofsky V. Kerry : Historical Gloss, The Recognition Power, And Judicial Review, Curtis A. Bradley
Agora: Reflections On Zivotofsky V. Kerry : Historical Gloss, The Recognition Power, And Judicial Review, Curtis A. Bradley
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Introduction To Agora: Reflections On Zivotofsky V. Kerry, Curtis A. Bradley, Carlos M. Vazquez
Introduction To Agora: Reflections On Zivotofsky V. Kerry, Curtis A. Bradley, Carlos M. Vazquez
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Quitting In Protest: A Theory Of Presidential Policy Making And Agency Response, Charles M. Cameron, John M. De Figueiredo, David E. Lewis
Quitting In Protest: A Theory Of Presidential Policy Making And Agency Response, Charles M. Cameron, John M. De Figueiredo, David E. Lewis
Faculty Scholarship
This paper examines the effects of centralized presidential policy-making, implemented through unilateral executive action, on the willingness of bureaucrats to exert effort and stay in the government. Extending models in organizational economics, we show that policy initiative by the president is a substitute for initiative by civil servants. Yet, total effort is enhanced when both work. Presidential centralization of policy often impels policy-oriented bureaucrats ("zealots") to quit rather than implement presidential policies they dislike. Those most likely to quit are a range of moderate bureaucrats. More extreme bureaucrats may be willing to wait out an opposition president in the hope …
The President And The Constitution, Peter L. Strauss
The President And The Constitution, Peter L. Strauss
Faculty Scholarship
That comprehensive and undefined presidential powers hold both practical advantages and grave dangers for the country will impress anyone who has served as legal adviser to a President in time of transition and public anxiety.... The purpose of the Constitution was not only to grant power, but to keep it from getting out of hand.... With all its defects, delays and inconveniences, men have discovered no technique for long preserving free government except that the Executive be under the law, and that the law be made by parliamentary deliberations.
The Administrative Conference And The Political Thumb, Peter L. Strauss
The Administrative Conference And The Political Thumb, Peter L. Strauss
Faculty Scholarship
In his valuable contribution to this special issue, Richard Pierce underscores the role the Administrative Conference of the United States (“ACUS”) has played over the years in encouraging on the ground fact-finding by its consultants, who have usually been academics consulted at the beginning of careers that ever after would be marked by this encounter with the realities of the administrative process. As the mentee of Walter Gellhorn, who directed the remarkable empirical studies of federal agency procedures that underlay the eventual Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) and who was a member of the ACUS Council from its initiation in 1964 …
The Uncertain Effects Of Senate Confirmation Delays In The Agencies, Nina A. Mendelson
The Uncertain Effects Of Senate Confirmation Delays In The Agencies, Nina A. Mendelson
Articles
As Professor Anne O’Connell has effectively documented, the delay in Senate confirmations has resulted in many vacant offices in the most senior levels of agencies, with potentially harmful consequences to agency implementation of statutory programs. This symposium contribution considers some of those consequences, as well as whether confirmation delays could conceivably have benefits for agencies. I note that confirmation delays are focused in the middle layer of political appointments—at the assistant secretary level, rather than at the cabinet head—so that formal functions and political oversight are unlikely to be halted altogether. Further, regulatory policy making and even agenda setting can …
Intelligence Legalism And The National Security Agency’S Civil Liberties Gap, Margo Schlanger
Intelligence Legalism And The National Security Agency’S Civil Liberties Gap, Margo Schlanger
Articles
Since June 2013, we have seen unprecedented security breaches and disclosures relating to American electronic surveillance. The nearly daily drip, and occasional gush, of once-secret policy and operational information makes it possible to analyze and understand National Security Agency activities, including the organizations and processes inside and outside the NSA that are supposed to safeguard American’s civil liberties as the agency goes about its intelligence gathering business. Some have suggested that what we have learned is that the NSA is running wild, lawlessly flouting legal constraints on its behavior. This assessment is unfair. In fact, the picture that emerges from …
Taking Public Access To The Law Seriously: The Problem Of Private Control Over The Availability Of Federal Standards, Nina A. Mendelson
Taking Public Access To The Law Seriously: The Problem Of Private Control Over The Availability Of Federal Standards, Nina A. Mendelson
Articles
In the 1930s, Harvard professor Erwin Griswold famously complained about the enormous numbers of New Deal regulations that were obscurely published on individual sheets or in “separate paper pamphlets.” Finding these binding federal rules was difficult, leading to “chaos” and an “intolerable” situation. Congress responded, requiring that agencies publish all rules in the Federal Register and in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). Currently, recent federal public laws, the entire U.S. Code, the Federal Register, and the CFR are all freely available online as well as in governmental depository libraries. But with respect to thousands of federal regulations, the clock …