Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
President/Executive Department Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Judges (19)
- Law and Politics (18)
- Courts (13)
- Constitutional Law (12)
- Military, War, and Peace (8)
-
- National Security Law (8)
- Legal History (5)
- Legislation (5)
- Criminal Law (4)
- Supreme Court of the United States (4)
- Criminal Procedure (3)
- Administrative Law (2)
- Agency (2)
- Immigration Law (2)
- International Law (2)
- State and Local Government Law (2)
- American Politics (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Election Law (1)
- Environmental Law (1)
- Health Law and Policy (1)
- International Relations (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Law and Gender (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Political Science (1)
- Keyword
-
- President (10)
- Constitution (6)
- Executive (6)
- Nomination (6)
- Politics (5)
-
- Administration (4)
- Appointment (4)
- Bush (4)
- Confirmation (4)
- Congress (4)
- Obama (4)
- Senate (4)
- 9/11 (3)
- Combatant (3)
- Democrat (3)
- Domestic (3)
- Furman v. Georgia (3)
- Judges (3)
- Judgeships (3)
- Judicial selection (3)
- Judicial vacancies (3)
- Law (3)
- Power (3)
- Republican (3)
- Security (3)
- Selection (3)
- Terrorism (3)
- Terrorist (3)
- Al-queda (2)
- Assassination (2)
- Publication Year
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 60 of 64
Full-Text Articles in President/Executive Department
Challenging Supremacy: Virginia's Response To The Patient Protection And Affordable Care Act, Matthew R. Farley
Challenging Supremacy: Virginia's Response To The Patient Protection And Affordable Care Act, Matthew R. Farley
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Long War, The Federal Courts, And The Necessity/Legality Paradox, Stephen I. Vladeck
The Long War, The Federal Courts, And The Necessity/Legality Paradox, Stephen I. Vladeck
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Boumediene And Lawfare, Tung Yin
Boumediene And Lawfare, Tung Yin
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Future Of Detainees In The Global War On Terror: A U.S. Policy Perspective, Saxby Chamblis
The Future Of Detainees In The Global War On Terror: A U.S. Policy Perspective, Saxby Chamblis
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Combatants And The Combat Zone, Mary Ellen O'Connell
Combatants And The Combat Zone, Mary Ellen O'Connell
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Medellín V. Texas: The Treaties That Bind, Mary D. Hallerman
Medellín V. Texas: The Treaties That Bind, Mary D. Hallerman
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Dear President Bush: Leaving A Legacy On The Federal Bench, Carl Tobias
Dear President Bush: Leaving A Legacy On The Federal Bench, Carl Tobias
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Fighting Terrorism And Preserving Civil Liberties, James B. Comey
Fighting Terrorism And Preserving Civil Liberties, James B. Comey
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Appellate Court Appointments In The Second Bush Administration, Carl Tobias
Appellate Court Appointments In The Second Bush Administration, Carl Tobias
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Federal Judicial Selection: The First Decade, Maeva Marcus
Federal Judicial Selection: The First Decade, Maeva Marcus
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Why Nuclear Disarmament May Be Easier To Achieve Than An End To Partisan Conflict Over Judicial Appointments, David S. Law, Sanford Levinson
Why Nuclear Disarmament May Be Easier To Achieve Than An End To Partisan Conflict Over Judicial Appointments, David S. Law, Sanford Levinson
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Assassination, The War On Terrorism, And The Constitution, Rodney A. Smolla
Assassination, The War On Terrorism, And The Constitution, Rodney A. Smolla
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Proposal For A New Executive Order On Assassination, Jeffrey F. Addicott
Proposal For A New Executive Order On Assassination, Jeffrey F. Addicott
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Presidential Election Case: Remembering Safe Harbor Day, Gary C. Leedes
The Presidential Election Case: Remembering Safe Harbor Day, Gary C. Leedes
University of Richmond Law Review
The 2000 presidential election transported the nation down a long and winding road without a map and headed in an uncertain direction. While it might be an exaggeration to say that the system of constitutional law was self-destructing, it is undoubtedly true that the events surrounding the election were spinning out of control, and that irreparable harm to the electoral process and thereby the nation was imminent.
Foreign Policy: Can The President Act Alone?Gaps And Conflicts In The Constitutional Grants Of Power, Dana C. Makielski
Foreign Policy: Can The President Act Alone?Gaps And Conflicts In The Constitutional Grants Of Power, Dana C. Makielski
Richmond Journal of Law and the Public Interest
The Framers did not intend the Constitution to be an all-inclusive "bill of lading," for we cannot forget John Marshall's famous admonition "that it is a constitution we are expounding."' Nonetheless, there are many large gaps and conflicts in the allocation of power among the three branches, most in the area of foreign relations, that have caused serious problems for our nation's leaders and constitutional scholars over the past two centuries. How have our presidents reacted? Certainly the President can and has acted on his own in negotiating, enacting, and implementing foreign policy, despite the lack of any express executive …
Executive/Congressional Liason In A Post Cold War Era, Anthony J. Eksterowicz, Glenn P. Hastedt
Executive/Congressional Liason In A Post Cold War Era, Anthony J. Eksterowicz, Glenn P. Hastedt
Richmond Journal of Law and the Public Interest
While it is true that presidents can and will attempt to practice domination of the Congress when making public policy, the nature of the new environment makes it less likely that they will regularly succeed. Because of the complexity of issues, there is a need to revisit the mechanics of executive/legislative liaisons in this new era. This essay represents such an attempt. First, we examine the changes that impact presidential policy-making in the post-Cold War era. Second, we review the ongoing debate in presidential literature concerning executive dominance over the Congress. Third, we briefly examine the modern history of presidential/congressional …
Jones V. Clinton:Reconsidering Presidential Immunity, Amy Marshall
Jones V. Clinton:Reconsidering Presidential Immunity, Amy Marshall
Richmond Journal of Law and the Public Interest
Part I sets out the basic concepts of immunity, both absolute and qualified, and proceeds to provide the relevant historical precedent regarding legislative, judicial, and executive immunity. The discussion regarding executive immunity covers Supreme Court precedent from 1895 to the watershed case of Nixon v. Fitzgerald in 1982. Part I focuses on Nixon v. Fitzgerald because both the district court and the court of appeals rely most heavily on this case in their respective opinions in Jones v. Clinton. Part II discusses the district court and the court of appeals opinions in Jones v. Clinton. Part III presents the argument …
Foreign Policy: Can The President Act Alone?Gaps And Conflicts In The Constitutional Grants Of Power, Dana C. Makielski
Foreign Policy: Can The President Act Alone?Gaps And Conflicts In The Constitutional Grants Of Power, Dana C. Makielski
Richmond Public Interest Law Review
The Framers did not intend the Constitution to be an all-inclusive "bill of lading," for we cannot forget John Marshall's famous admonition "that it is a constitution we are expounding."' Nonetheless, there are many large gaps and conflicts in the allocation of power among the three branches, most in the area of foreign relations, that have caused serious problems for our nation's leaders and constitutional scholars over the past two centuries. How have our presidents reacted? Certainly the President can and has acted on his own in negotiating, enacting, and implementing foreign policy, despite the lack of any express executive …
The U.S. Presidency: Fostering Global Free Trade Through Minilateral Free Trade Agreeements With Germany And Japan, J.R. Smith
Richmond Public Interest Law Review
The U.S. Presidency: Fostering Global Free Trade Through Minilateral Free Trade Agreements with Germany and Japan argues that global free trade will be better served by agreements of substance among fewer countries than by agreements of form among many countries. Specifically, the article addresses problems with the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and argues that the goal of global free trade is more easily achieved through bilateral agreements between the United States and Germany, and the United States and Japan. The article concludes that such bilateral agreements, and the ultimate goal of global free trade, can be realized …
Jones V. Clinton:Reconsidering Presidential Immunity, Amy Marshall
Jones V. Clinton:Reconsidering Presidential Immunity, Amy Marshall
Richmond Public Interest Law Review
Part I sets out the basic concepts of immunity, both absolute and qualified, and proceeds to provide the relevant historical precedent regarding legislative, judicial, and executive immunity. The discussion regarding executive immunity covers Supreme Court precedent from 1895 to the watershed case of Nixon v. Fitzgerald in 1982. Part I focuses on Nixon v. Fitzgerald because both the district court and the court of appeals rely most heavily on this case in their respective opinions in Jones v. Clinton. Part II discusses the district court and the court of appeals opinions in Jones v. Clinton. Part III presents the argument …
From The Covenant To The Contract:Rhetoric And Meaning In The American Presidency, Dean C. Hammer
From The Covenant To The Contract:Rhetoric And Meaning In The American Presidency, Dean C. Hammer
Richmond Journal of Law and the Public Interest
My concern here is not with explaining why the "New Covenant" failed to capture the political imagination of the electorate; rather, my interest lies in how the covenant as a political symbol was analyzed by both the media and scholarship. My suggestion is that this treatment is itself symbolic of a far deeper dilemma that faces not only President Clinton but also future presidents. The problem is this: at the same time that the public turns increasingly to the President to provide a "vision" of a common purpose and direction to government and society, the articulation of that vision rests …
Executive/Congressional Liason In A Post Cold War Era, Anthony J. Eksterowicz, Glenn P. Hastedt
Executive/Congressional Liason In A Post Cold War Era, Anthony J. Eksterowicz, Glenn P. Hastedt
Richmond Public Interest Law Review
While it is true that presidents can and will attempt to practice domination of the Congress when making public policy, the nature of the new environment makes it less likely that they will regularly succeed. Because of the complexity of issues, there is a need to revisit the mechanics of executive/legislative liaisons in this new era. This essay represents such an attempt. First, we examine the changes that impact presidential policy-making in the post-Cold War era. Second, we review the ongoing debate in presidential literature concerning executive dominance over the Congress. Third, we briefly examine the modern history of presidential/congressional …
From The Covenant To The Contract:Rhetoric And Meaning In The American Presidency, Dean C. Hammer
From The Covenant To The Contract:Rhetoric And Meaning In The American Presidency, Dean C. Hammer
Richmond Public Interest Law Review
My concern here is not with explaining why the "New Covenant" failed to capture the political imagination of the electorate; rather, my interest lies in how the covenant as a political symbol was analyzed by both the media and scholarship. My suggestion is that this treatment is itself symbolic of a far deeper dilemma that faces not only President Clinton but also future presidents. The problem is this: at the same time that the public turns increasingly to the President to provide a "vision" of a common purpose and direction to government and society, the articulation of that vision rests …
Jones V. Clinton And Presidential Immunity, Braxton Hill
Jones V. Clinton And Presidential Immunity, Braxton Hill
Richmond Public Interest Law Review
On May 6, 1994, Paula Corbin Jones set in motion events that could alter the legal status of the office of the President of the United States. Ms. Jones filed a lawsuit against William Jefferson Clinton, the sitting President, because of sexual improprieties he allegedly committed while serving as Governor of Arkansas. As of January 1996, the case had already worked its way up the judicial ladder from the trial court to the first appellate level. Jones v. Clinton is poised to come before the United States Supreme Court, which could address unexplored areas of presidential jurisprudence--the body of legal …
Jones V. Clinton And Presidential Immunity, Braxton Hill
Jones V. Clinton And Presidential Immunity, Braxton Hill
Richmond Journal of Law and the Public Interest
On May 6, 1994, Paula Corbin Jones set in motion events that could alter the legal status of the office of the President of the United States. Ms. Jones filed a lawsuit against William Jefferson Clinton, the sitting President, because of sexual improprieties he allegedly committed while serving as Governor of Arkansas. As of January 1996, the case had already worked its way up the judicial ladder from the trial court to the first appellate level. Jones v. Clinton is poised to come before the United States Supreme Court, which could address unexplored areas of presidential jurisprudence--the body of legal …
The U.S. Presidency: Fostering Global Free Trade Through Minilateral Free Trade Agreeements With Germany And Japan, J.R. Smith
Richmond Journal of Law and the Public Interest
The U.S. Presidency: Fostering Global Free Trade Through Minilateral Free Trade Agreements with Germany and Japan argues that global free trade will be better served by agreements of substance among fewer countries than by agreements of form among many countries. Specifically, the article addresses problems with the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and argues that the goal of global free trade is more easily achieved through bilateral agreements between the United States and Germany, and the United States and Japan. The article concludes that such bilateral agreements, and the ultimate goal of global free trade, can be realized …
Executive Clemency In Post-Furman Capital Cases, Michael L. Radelet, Barbara A. Zsembik
Executive Clemency In Post-Furman Capital Cases, Michael L. Radelet, Barbara A. Zsembik
University of Richmond Law Review
In the 1972 case of Furman v. Georgia, the United States Supreme Court invalidated virtually all existing death penalty statutes in the United States. Consequently, those jurisdictions that wanted to continue to execute were forced to revise their capital sentencing procedures. Since Furman,nearly all aspects of American death penalty law have been rewritten. Left unchanged by both the courts and the legislatures, however, are the ways in which states decide which death-sentenced inmates will have their sentences commuted through the powers of executive clemency.
Federal Executive Clemency Power: The President's Prerogative To Escape Accountability, James N. Jorgensen
Federal Executive Clemency Power: The President's Prerogative To Escape Accountability, James N. Jorgensen
University of Richmond Law Review
The United States Constitution vests the President with "power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, except in cases of impeachment." Although Virginia delegate Edmund Randolph raised concerns about the executive branch possibly abusing the pardon power to conceal criminal conduct at the Constitutional Convention, Randolph's colleagues relied upon the presumption that a president would not break the law and defeated his motion to limit presidential pardon power to cases of treason. Recently, the scandalous Iran-Contra affair has demonstrated that, contrary to the Framers' expectations, presidents may circumvent or directly violate federal laws.
A Retributive Theory Of The Pardoning Power?, Hugo Adam Bedau
A Retributive Theory Of The Pardoning Power?, Hugo Adam Bedau
University of Richmond Law Review
During the past two decades; the retributive theory of punishment has made remarkable strides in recapturing the affections of penologists. The story has been told elsewhere and need not be reviewed here. For philosophers, if not for others interested in the theory and practice of punishment, a retributive approach holds a double attraction.
The Role Of Executive Clemency In Modern Death Penalty Cases, Bruce Ledewitz, Scott Staples
The Role Of Executive Clemency In Modern Death Penalty Cases, Bruce Ledewitz, Scott Staples
University of Richmond Law Review
When a governor commutes a sentence of death, typically to one of life imprisonment either with an extended mandatory term or without possibility of parole, how is this action to be understood? As former Governor Pat Brown's book about his commutation decisions illustrates, in a period of widespread support for the death penalty, each commutation contains an appeal for popular support and understanding as to why the decision was made. Where the case for commutation cannot be made to the public's satisfaction, a governor is not likely to act.