Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
President/Executive Department Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (191)
- University of Michigan Law School (24)
- Roger Williams University (21)
- University of Colorado Law School (18)
- Fordham Law School (11)
-
- New York Law School (11)
- William & Mary Law School (11)
- Washington University in St. Louis (10)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (9)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (8)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (7)
- Pepperdine University (6)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (6)
- American University Washington College of Law (5)
- Boston University School of Law (5)
- Georgetown University Law Center (5)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (4)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (4)
- Notre Dame Law School (4)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (4)
- University of Richmond (4)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (4)
- Cleveland State University (3)
- Liberty University (3)
- Brigham Young University Law School (2)
- Brooklyn Law School (2)
- Columbia Law School (2)
- Lewis & Clark Law School (2)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (2)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (2)
- Keyword
-
- Supreme Court (39)
- Constitution (23)
- Separation of powers (23)
- Congress (22)
- United States Supreme Court (21)
-
- Federalism (15)
- Law (14)
- Judicial review (13)
- President (13)
- Constitutional Law (12)
- Immigration (11)
- Courts (10)
- Supreme Court of the United States (9)
- Travel Ban (9)
- Administrative law (8)
- Constitutional law (8)
- Democracy (8)
- Executive Power (8)
- Executive power (8)
- Trump (8)
- Donald Trump (7)
- Executive branch (7)
- Regulation (7)
- SFFA (7)
- Administrative Law (6)
- Administrative Procedure Act (6)
- Affirmative Action (6)
- ESG (6)
- Judges (6)
- Politics (6)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (191)
- Faculty Scholarship (19)
- Publications (18)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (15)
- Michigan Law Review (12)
-
- Scholarship@WashULaw (10)
- Articles (8)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (7)
- Fordham Law Review (6)
- Pepperdine Law Review (6)
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - ) (6)
- NYLS Law Review (5)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (4)
- Northwestern University Law Review (4)
- Supreme Court Preview (4)
- University of Richmond Law Review (4)
- Cardozo Law Review (3)
- Catholic University Law Review (3)
- Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum (3)
- Other Publications (3)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (3)
- William & Mary Law Review (3)
- All Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Books (2)
- Indiana Law Journal (2)
- Journal Articles (2)
- Lewis & Clark Law Review (2)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (2)
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review (2)
- Public Land & Resources Law Review (2)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 421 - 422 of 422
Full-Text Articles in President/Executive Department
Indemnity Act Of 1863 A Study In The War-Time Immunity Of Governmental Officers, James G. Randall
Indemnity Act Of 1863 A Study In The War-Time Immunity Of Governmental Officers, James G. Randall
Michigan Law Review
One of the familiar measures of the Union administration during the Civil War was the suspension of the habeas corpus privilege and the consequent subjection of civilians to military authority. The essential irregularity of such a situation in American law is especially conspicuous when one considers its inevitable sequel-namely, the protection of military and civil officers from such prosecution as would normally follow invasion of private rights and actual injury of persons and property. Such protection was supplied by a bill of indemnity passed in 1863, and this law, with its amendment of i866, forms a significant chapter in the …
Some Checks And Balances In Government, Thomas M. Cooley
Some Checks And Balances In Government, Thomas M. Cooley
Articles
The purpose of the present paper is not to discuss the broad general subject of checks and balances in this, or any other, government. but to call attention to a few considerations only. These, in the main, affect the executive and the judiciary, rather than the legislature; and they will serve to show, perhaps, that neither of them can always, and under all circumstances, rely upon any very sure protection to its legitimate powers. It is one thing, unfortunately, to put intricate machinery in motion, and another, and quite a different, thing, to make it, under unforeseen occurrences, work out …