Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
President/Executive Department Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (186)
- University of Colorado Law School (74)
- Purdue University (8)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (6)
- U.S. Naval War College (6)
-
- Columbia Law School (3)
- University of Michigan Law School (3)
- Brooklyn Law School (2)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Bemidji State University (1)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Florida International University College of Law (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (1)
- Pepperdine University (1)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (1)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (1)
- University of Connecticut (1)
- University of Montana (1)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Climate change (28)
- Colorado (25)
- Water law (24)
- Water policy (24)
- Western water law (24)
-
- West (22)
- California (18)
- Congress (18)
- United States (18)
- BLM (16)
- Law (16)
- U.S. Bureau of Land Management (16)
- Utah (15)
- Oil shale development (14)
- Water quality (13)
- Arizona (12)
- New Mexico (12)
- Oil shale (12)
- USFS (12)
- Wyoming (12)
- Conservation (11)
- Drought (11)
- National Environmental Policy Act (11)
- Science (11)
- Secretary of the Interior (11)
- Technology (11)
- U.S. Forest Service (11)
- Colorado River (10)
- ESA (10)
- Global warming (10)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (186)
- The Future of Natural Resources Law and Policy (Summer Conference, June 6-8) (28)
- Western Water Law, Policy and Management: Ripples, Currents, and New Channels for Inquiry (Martz Summer Conference, June 3-5) (26)
- The Promise and Peril of Oil Shale Development (February 5) (13)
- Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology (6)
-
- International Law Studies (6)
- Libraries Faculty and Staff Scholarship and Research (5)
- Faculty Scholarship (4)
- Libraries Faculty and Staff Presentations (3)
- Publications (3)
- Brooklyn Journal of International Law (2)
- Conversation with Water Management Reps from Colorado and Australia: "Adapting to Climate Change: Lessons Learned from Australia" (February 14) (2)
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - ) (2)
- Water Negotiation Workshop (June 4-5) (2)
- American University Law Review (1)
- Articles (1)
- Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (1)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (1)
- FIU Law Review (1)
- Faculty Articles and Papers (1)
- Fordham Law Review (1)
- Michigan Law Review (1)
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (1)
- Pepperdine Law Review (1)
- Political Science Theses and Capstones (1)
- Public Land & Resources Law Review (1)
- Student Scholarship (1)
- The University of Cincinnati Intellectual Property and Computer Law Journal (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 301 - 302 of 302
Full-Text Articles in President/Executive Department
Appendix L: Twelve-State Treaty Guaranteeing Nonmilitarization Of Antarctica And Freedom Of Scientific Investigation, Carl M. Franklin
Appendix L: Twelve-State Treaty Guaranteeing Nonmilitarization Of Antarctica And Freedom Of Scientific Investigation, Carl M. Franklin
International Law Studies
No abstract provided.
Federal Employee Invention Rights - Time To Legislate, Marcus B. Finnegan, Richard W. Pogue
Federal Employee Invention Rights - Time To Legislate, Marcus B. Finnegan, Richard W. Pogue
Michigan Law Review
It is the purpose of this article to review judicial standards applicable to the determination of rights in inventions made by employees of the federal government, to note statutory provisions affecting the problem, to examine the content and effect of the present Executive program for determining such rights, to review and evaluate two fundamental and conflicting theories in this field, and to propose legislation establishing appropriate standards and procedures. This topic is believed to have general interest because, in addition to the urgencies suggested above, the problem touches some of the basic legal philosophy underlying the United States patent system.