Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
President/Executive Department Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (187)
- University of Michigan Law School (24)
- Purdue University (13)
- University of Georgia School of Law (13)
- Columbia Law School (10)
-
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (9)
- Pepperdine University (9)
- Roger Williams University (8)
- UIC School of Law (8)
- University of Richmond (8)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (8)
- Georgetown University Law Center (7)
- U.S. Naval War College (7)
- University of Maine School of Law (6)
- New York Law School (5)
- Pace University (5)
- University of Baltimore Law (5)
- William & Mary Law School (5)
- American University Washington College of Law (4)
- Duke Law (4)
- US Army War College (4)
- Brooklyn Law School (3)
- Fordham Law School (3)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (3)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (3)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (3)
- West Virginia University (3)
- Brigham Young University Law School (2)
- City University of New York (CUNY) (2)
- Florida State University College of Law (2)
- Keyword
-
- Terrorism (29)
- Military (21)
- Congress (18)
- Constitution (18)
- War (18)
-
- War powers (15)
- President (14)
- Executive power (13)
- Law (13)
- Congressional oversight (11)
- National security (11)
- Constitutional law (10)
- 9/11 (9)
- Military law (9)
- Presidents (9)
- September 11 (9)
- United States (9)
- Obama (8)
- Armed forces (7)
- Artificial intelligence (7)
- Authority (7)
- International law (7)
- Iraq (7)
- Russia (7)
- SFFA (7)
- Separation of powers (7)
- Terrorist (7)
- War on terror (7)
- AUMF (6)
- Affirmative Action (6)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (186)
- Faculty Scholarship (16)
- Michigan Law Review (15)
- Libraries Faculty and Staff Presentations (10)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (8)
-
- University of Richmond Law Review (8)
- Articles (7)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (7)
- Indiana Law Journal (7)
- International Law Studies (7)
- Pepperdine Law Review (7)
- UIC Law Review (7)
- Maine Law Review (6)
- Pace Law Review (5)
- All Faculty Scholarship (4)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (4)
- The US Army War College Quarterly: Parameters (4)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (3)
- Faculty Publications (3)
- Georgia Law Review (3)
- Libraries Faculty and Staff Scholarship and Research (3)
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review (3)
- Northwestern University Law Review (3)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (3)
- West Virginia Law Review (3)
- Articles & Chapters (2)
- Brooklyn Journal of International Law (2)
- Fordham Law Review (2)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (2)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 361 - 390 of 402
Full-Text Articles in President/Executive Department
Assassination, The War On Terrorism, And The Constitution, Rodney A. Smolla
Assassination, The War On Terrorism, And The Constitution, Rodney A. Smolla
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Proposal For A New Executive Order On Assassination, Jeffrey F. Addicott
Proposal For A New Executive Order On Assassination, Jeffrey F. Addicott
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law: The Province And Duty Of The Judicial Department: Why The Court Cannot Continue To Use Justiciability To Avoid Dealing With The Tension Between Congress And The President Regarding The War Powers, Cassandra L. Wilkinson
Constitutional Law: The Province And Duty Of The Judicial Department: Why The Court Cannot Continue To Use Justiciability To Avoid Dealing With The Tension Between Congress And The President Regarding The War Powers, Cassandra L. Wilkinson
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Ordered Liberty And The Homeland Security Mission, James E. Baker
Ordered Liberty And The Homeland Security Mission, James E. Baker
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
This paper will start with a brief discussion of the terrorism threat because the threat remains predicate for any serious discussion of where we draw our legal lines. I will then suggest a legal model for looking at questions of homeland security called ordered liberty. The model is simple. First, given the nature of the threat, the executive must have broad and flexible authority to detect and respond to terrorism-–to provide for our physical security. Second, the sine qua non for such authority is meaningful oversight. Oversight means the considered application of constitutional structure, executive process, legal substance, and relevant …
When Lawyers Advise Presidents In Wartime: Kosovo And The Law Of Armed Conflict, James E. Baker
When Lawyers Advise Presidents In Wartime: Kosovo And The Law Of Armed Conflict, James E. Baker
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The events of September 11 changed how we perceive national security as a society, a government, and as individuals. This is as true of national security specialists, who have been aware that America has been at war with terrorism sine at least the 1990s, as it is for those whose sense of geographic security was shattered in New York and Washington. There is talk of “new war” and “new rules,” and concern that we not apply twentieth-century lessons to a twenty-first-century war.
Over time, September 11 and its aftermath will test our interpretation and application of domestic law. It may …
At War With Civil Rights And Civil Liberties, Thomas E. Baker
At War With Civil Rights And Civil Liberties, Thomas E. Baker
Faculty Publications
This essay looks at the Supreme Court and acquiescence to measures by the Executive Branch that limit or suspend civil liberties during times of war or threats to national security.
What Is It Good For? War Power, Judicial Review, And Constitutional Deliberation, J. Richard Broughton
What Is It Good For? War Power, Judicial Review, And Constitutional Deliberation, J. Richard Broughton
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Clinton Administration And War Powers, Lori Fisler Damrosch
The Clinton Administration And War Powers, Lori Fisler Damrosch
Faculty Scholarship
The strongest of all governmental powers is the power to engage in war; and the strongest challenge for constitutionalism is to bring the war power of the state under meaningful control. The 1787 Constitution allocated some military powers to the Congress and others to the President as part of the scheme of constitutional checks and balances. To this day, however, the distribution of authority between the branches remains contested and uncertain.
The Clinton Administration has had substantial opportunity to contribute to the evolution of constitutional practice concerning war powers, by virtue of numerous occasions of combat deployments, cruise missile strikes, …
Word Games, War Games, Diane H. Mazur
Word Games, War Games, Diane H. Mazur
Michigan Law Review
In 1993, the country's interest in the issue of military service by gay citizens escalated to a level that can only be described as a national obsession, and "obsession" is by no means too strong a term. The subject of gay servicemembers was debated within all three branches of government, all ranks of the military, and all walks of civilian life.1 The issue of military service by gay citizens became a line in the sand, a cultural standoff on issues as sensitive and disparate as sexuality, patriotism, civil rights, and civic obligation. Janet Halley2 returns to that time of obsession …
Bending Toward Justice: The Posthumous Pardon Of Lieutenant Henry Ossian Flipper, Darryl W. Jackson, Jeffery H. Smith, Edward H. Sisson, Helene T. Krasnoff
Bending Toward Justice: The Posthumous Pardon Of Lieutenant Henry Ossian Flipper, Darryl W. Jackson, Jeffery H. Smith, Edward H. Sisson, Helene T. Krasnoff
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Catastrophic Terrorism- Thinking Fearfully, Acting Legally, Barry Kellman
Catastrophic Terrorism- Thinking Fearfully, Acting Legally, Barry Kellman
Michigan Journal of International Law
The time has come to move beyond howls of alarm to a public discussion of what policies should be adopted or reformed. That discussion should proceed even as crucial questions remain only partially answerable: How realistic is the possibility of catastrophic terrorism? How easy is it to make a catastrophic device that actually works? Why would any person or group want to kill hundreds, thousands, or tens of thousands of innocent victims?
The Northern Ireland Peace Agreement: Evolving The Principle Of Self-Determination, Paul Williams, Sabrineh Ardalan
The Northern Ireland Peace Agreement: Evolving The Principle Of Self-Determination, Paul Williams, Sabrineh Ardalan
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
Central to this article is the evolution of the nature of the principle of self-determination. The main focus will be on the examination of a recent instance of state practice — the Northern Ireland Peace Agreement. In particular, the way in which the Northern Ireland Peace Agreement has given effect to the primary elements of self-determination, including democratic self-government, the protection of human rights, and the protection of minority rights will be discussed.
Without Justification: Misplaced Reliance On United Nations Security Council Resolutions For Presidential War Making, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 583 (1998), Timothy D. A. O'Hara
Without Justification: Misplaced Reliance On United Nations Security Council Resolutions For Presidential War Making, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 583 (1998), Timothy D. A. O'Hara
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Constitution, The White House, And The Military Hiv Ban: A New Threshold For Presidential Non-Defense Of Statutes, Chrysanthe Gussis
The Constitution, The White House, And The Military Hiv Ban: A New Threshold For Presidential Non-Defense Of Statutes, Chrysanthe Gussis
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
The President's constitutional duty to 'take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed" implies that the President is entrusted with the responsibility to defend those laws against court challenges. On occasion, however, Presidents faced with legislation that they deem unconstitutional have declined to defend that legislation against legal challenges. On February 10, 1996, President Clinton declined to defend a provision included in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996 that required discharge from the military of all HIV-positive servicemembers because he believed that the provision violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. This Note explores whether …
Challenging The Constitutionality Of President Clinton's Compromise: A Practical Alternative To The Military's Don't Ask, Don't Tell Policy, 28 J. Marshall L. Rev. 179 (1994), Kenneth S. Mclaughlin Jr.
Challenging The Constitutionality Of President Clinton's Compromise: A Practical Alternative To The Military's Don't Ask, Don't Tell Policy, 28 J. Marshall L. Rev. 179 (1994), Kenneth S. Mclaughlin Jr.
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Review By The Executive In Foreign Affairs And War Powers: A Consequence Of Rational Choice In The Separation Of Powers, John O. Mcginnis
Constitutional Review By The Executive In Foreign Affairs And War Powers: A Consequence Of Rational Choice In The Separation Of Powers, John O. Mcginnis
Articles
No abstract provided.
The War Power After 200 Years: Congress And The President At A Constitutional Impasse: Hearings Before The Subcommittee On War Powers Of The Committee On Foreign Relations, United States Senate, One Hundredth Congress, First Session, Claiborne Pell, Larry Pressler, Paul Simon, Paul S. Sarbanes, Edwin B. Firmage, Michael J. Glennon, W. Taylor Reveley Iii, Robert F. Turner
The War Power After 200 Years: Congress And The President At A Constitutional Impasse: Hearings Before The Subcommittee On War Powers Of The Committee On Foreign Relations, United States Senate, One Hundredth Congress, First Session, Claiborne Pell, Larry Pressler, Paul Simon, Paul S. Sarbanes, Edwin B. Firmage, Michael J. Glennon, W. Taylor Reveley Iii, Robert F. Turner
Congressional Testimony
No abstract provided.
What The Constitution Means By Executive Power, Charles J. Cooper, Orrin Hatch, Eugene V. Rowstow, Michael E. Tigar
What The Constitution Means By Executive Power, Charles J. Cooper, Orrin Hatch, Eugene V. Rowstow, Michael E. Tigar
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Congress And The Executive: Who Calls The Shots For National Security? – Remarks By Lori Fisler Damrosch, Lori Fisler Damrosch
Congress And The Executive: Who Calls The Shots For National Security? – Remarks By Lori Fisler Damrosch, Lori Fisler Damrosch
Faculty Scholarship
Professor Firmage's reaffirmation of the Framers' conception of a President who would wait for congressional instructions appeals to traditional values of democratic control and congressional primacy that have deep roots in our national consciousness. But this model of presidential passivity has some of the same strengths and weaknesses as the advocacy of chastity to solve today's problems of teenage pregnancy and sexually transmitted disease. The basic values may be sound, but when one moves from the assertion of those values to the identification of policy prescriptions, then it becomes clear that contemporary problems are too complex to be solved by …
A Republic, If You Can Keep It, Daniel N. Hoffman
A Republic, If You Can Keep It, Daniel N. Hoffman
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Undeclared War: Twilight Zone of Constitutional Power by Edward Keynes and The War-Making Powers of the President: Constitutional and International Law Aspects by Ann Van Wynen Thomas and A.J. Thomas, Jr.
The Consultation Clause Of The 1973 War Powers Resolution, Laurence D. Pierce
The Consultation Clause Of The 1973 War Powers Resolution, Laurence D. Pierce
Antioch Law Journal
In 1973, Congress enacted the War Powers Resolution.' The purpose of the Resolution was "to fulfill the intent of the framers of the Constitution of the United States and insure that the collective judgment of both the Congress and the President will apply to the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances .... 2 Part I of this comment examines the legislative evolution of the consultation clause to ascertain the intent of those congressional members who drafted and ratified the War Powers Resolution. Part II …
The National Executive And The Use Of The Armed Forces Abroad, John Norton Moore
The National Executive And The Use Of The Armed Forces Abroad, John Norton Moore
International Law Studies
No abstract provided.
Presidential Control Of Nuclear Weapons In Limited War Situations, Hugh F. Lynch
Presidential Control Of Nuclear Weapons In Limited War Situations, Hugh F. Lynch
International Law Studies
No abstract provided.
The International Law Of The Armed Forces Abroad, Gordon B. Baldwin
The International Law Of The Armed Forces Abroad, Gordon B. Baldwin
International Law Studies
No abstract provided.
The Status Of Armed Forces Abroad, Robert C. Grabb
The Status Of Armed Forces Abroad, Robert C. Grabb
International Law Studies
No abstract provided.
A Rejoinder, David E. Engdahl
The Civil Disturbance Regulations: Threats Old And New, Dominic J. Campisi
The Civil Disturbance Regulations: Threats Old And New, Dominic J. Campisi
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Book Review Of Undeclared War And Civil Disobedience: The American System In Crisis, W. Taylor Reveley Iii
Book Review Of Undeclared War And Civil Disobedience: The American System In Crisis, W. Taylor Reveley Iii
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
War Powers Legislation: An Addendum, J. Terry Emerson
War Powers Legislation: An Addendum, J. Terry Emerson
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
War Powers Legislation, J. Terry Emerson
War Powers Legislation, J. Terry Emerson
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.