Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (6)
- Legal Education (5)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (5)
- Human Rights Law (4)
- Litigation (4)
-
- Contracts (3)
- Law and Society (3)
- Tax Law (3)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (2)
- Criminal Law (2)
- Family Law (2)
- Fourth Amendment (2)
- International Law (2)
- Law and Economics (2)
- Legal Profession (2)
- Legal Remedies (2)
- Legislation (2)
- Agriculture Law (1)
- Banking and Finance Law (1)
- Bankruptcy Law (1)
- Bioethics and Medical Ethics (1)
- Business Organizations Law (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Consumer Protection Law (1)
- Courts (1)
- Criminal Procedure (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Food and Drug Law (1)
- Institution
-
- Brooklyn Law School (17)
- Florida International University College of Law (15)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (13)
- University of Richmond (13)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (7)
-
- American University Washington College of Law (6)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Mississippi Christian University School of Law (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (1)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (1)
- Seattle University School of Law (1)
- UIdaho Law (1)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (1)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (1)
- William & Mary Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- Levine (4)
- Samuel Levine (4)
- Contract (3)
- Jewish law (3)
- SALT (3)
-
- Society of American Law Teachers (3)
- Faculty (2)
- Refugee (2)
- Sex discrimination (2)
- Taxes (2)
- 1983 (1)
- Abortion (1)
- Abuse treatment (1)
- Academic Calendars (1)
- Academic Regulations (1)
- Adam (1)
- Administration (1)
- Administration of Criminal Justice (1)
- Admission (1)
- Advance health care directives (1)
- Agreement (1)
- American Legal Practice (1)
- Anti-discrimination model (1)
- Application Information (1)
- Assymetric information (1)
- Asylum-seekers (1)
- Batson v. Kentucky (1)
- Behavior-identity compression (1)
- Berman (1)
- Biotechnology (1)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (17)
- Scholarly Works (16)
- FIU Law Review (13)
- Museletter (6)
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law (5)
-
- SALT Equalizer (3)
- Faculty Publications (2)
- Journal Articles (2)
- Richmond Journal of Law & Technology (2)
- Richmond Law Magazine (2)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Articles (1)
- Journal of Food Law & Policy (1)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (1)
- Law School Catalogues (1)
- Other Faculty Publications (1)
- Richmond Journal of Law and the Public Interest (1)
- Richmond Public Interest Law Review (1)
- Seattle University Law Review (1)
- The Modern American (1)
- The Weldon Times (1)
- Touro Law Review (1)
- William & Mary Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 61 - 81 of 81
Full-Text Articles in Other Law
The Beleaguered Gatekeeper: Protection Challenges Posed By Unhcr Refugee Status Determination, Michael Kagan
The Beleaguered Gatekeeper: Protection Challenges Posed By Unhcr Refugee Status Determination, Michael Kagan
Scholarly Works
The number of individual Refugee Status Determination (RSD) applications received by United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) offices worldwide nearly doubled from 1997 to 2001, while UNHCR’s RSD operations have been criticized for failing to implement basic standards of procedural fairness. Yet, although there is some literature critiquing how UNHCR determines refugee status, there is little literature examining whether UNHCR should do so, and if it should, when, where, and under what conditions.
UNHCR performance of RSD poses protection challenges because it is founded on a basic contradiction. On the one hand, government action is essential for effective refugee …
Civil Disobedience In The Jury Room: Give Juries The Right To Go With Their Power, Robert J. Gallaghe
Civil Disobedience In The Jury Room: Give Juries The Right To Go With Their Power, Robert J. Gallaghe
Richmond Public Interest Law Review
This Comment will argue that jury nullification is not only a power enjoyed by juries throughout America, but a duty conferred on jurors, and a part of the criminal justice system that should be embraced, not hidden from sight. Part I will highlight the historical origins and justifications of jury nullification. It will also discuss jury nullification in its contemporary context. Part II will address some of the criticisms of jury nullification and provide responses to those criticisms. Finally, Part III will propose a framework for integrating jury nullification into the regular criminal justice process.
On Nourishing The Curriculum With A Transnational-Law Lagniappe (From The Association Of American Law Schools' Workshop On Integrating Transnational Legal Perspectives Into The First-Year Curriculum, Annual Meeting, Torts Panel, January 2006), Anita Bernstein
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Celebrating Life And Taxes, Francine J. Lipman
Nonprofit Takeovers: Regulating The Market For Mission, Dana Brakman Reiser
Nonprofit Takeovers: Regulating The Market For Mission, Dana Brakman Reiser
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Z-Test For Percentages: A Statistical Tool To Detect Pretextually Neutral Juror Challenges, Marvin L. Longabaugh
The Z-Test For Percentages: A Statistical Tool To Detect Pretextually Neutral Juror Challenges, Marvin L. Longabaugh
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
In June 1999, Sandy Murphy and Rick Tabish were arrested and charged with murder, robbery, burglary, and grand larceny related to the death of Las Vegas casino mogul Lonnie “Ted” Binion. The subsequent trial provided a captivated public with the elements of murder, greed, betrayal, torture, and extortion
Looking Beyond The Mercy/Justice Dichotomy: Reflections On The Complementary Roles Of Mercy And Justice In Jewish Law And Tradition, Samuel J. Levine
Looking Beyond The Mercy/Justice Dichotomy: Reflections On The Complementary Roles Of Mercy And Justice In Jewish Law And Tradition, Samuel J. Levine
Scholarly Works
In one of his earliest encyclicals, Dives in Misericordia, Pope John Paul II explored the concepts of mercy and kindness, with a focus on notions of divine love and compassion. Building upon these observations, and drawing extensively on the work of Rabbi Joseph Soloveitchik and other scholars of Jewish law and philosophy, Levine considers the complementary roles of justice and mercy in Jewish tradition. Toward that end, Levine places these concepts in a broader perspective, viewing mercy as representative of attributes such as kindness, compassion, love, and peacefulness, while understanding justice in terms of more exacting principles, such as strict …
University Of Richmond Bulletin: Catalog Of The T.C. Williams School Of Law For 2006-2008, University Of Richmond
University Of Richmond Bulletin: Catalog Of The T.C. Williams School Of Law For 2006-2008, University Of Richmond
Law School Catalogues
Method of Instruction
The educational program of the law school is designed to equip its graduates to render the highest quality of legal services, while instilling a sense of professional responsibility. Students are trained in the analysis and solution of legal problems by the application of logical reasoning. The course of study is not designed to teach legal rules, but rather to provide a foundation for the application and analysis of the law and the development of professional skills. The traditional case method of instruction is used in many courses. However, clinical education and courses devoted to various professional skills …
Civil Disobedience In The Jury Room: Give Juries The Right To Go With Their Power, Robert J. Gallaghe
Civil Disobedience In The Jury Room: Give Juries The Right To Go With Their Power, Robert J. Gallaghe
Richmond Journal of Law and the Public Interest
This Comment will argue that jury nullification is not only a power enjoyed by juries throughout America, but a duty conferred on jurors, and a part of the criminal justice system that should be embraced, not hidden from sight. Part I will highlight the historical origins and justifications of jury nullification. It will also discuss jury nullification in its contemporary context. Part II will address some of the criticisms of jury nullification and provide responses to those criticisms. Finally, Part III will propose a framework for integrating jury nullification into the regular criminal justice process.
A Tribute To Professor Daniel G. Gibbens, Andrew Coats
A Tribute To Professor Daniel G. Gibbens, Andrew Coats
Other Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Section 1983 Cases In The October 2004 Term, Martin A. Schwartz
Section 1983 Cases In The October 2004 Term, Martin A. Schwartz
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Introduction: The Plaintiff's Bar, Anita Bernstein, Marc Galanter, Tanina Rostain
Introduction: The Plaintiff's Bar, Anita Bernstein, Marc Galanter, Tanina Rostain
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Clinical Legal Education In Hong Kong: A Time To Move Forward, Stacy Caplow
Clinical Legal Education In Hong Kong: A Time To Move Forward, Stacy Caplow
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Federal Definition Of Tax Partnership, Bradley T. Borden
The Federal Definition Of Tax Partnership, Bradley T. Borden
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Markets For Markets: Origins And Subjects Of Information Markets, Miriam A. Cherry, Robert L. Rogers
Markets For Markets: Origins And Subjects Of Information Markets, Miriam A. Cherry, Robert L. Rogers
All Faculty Scholarship
This Article focuses on why information markets have covered certain subject areas, sometimes of minor importance, while neglecting other subject areas of greater significance. To put it another way, why do information markets exist to predict the outcome of the papal conclave and the Michael Jackson trial, but no information markets exist to predict government policy conclusions, Supreme Court decisions, or the rulings in Delaware corporate law cases? Arguably, from either a dollar value or a social utility perspective, these areas of law and business would be more important than the outcome of, say, the Jackson trial. Why, then, do …
Richmond Law Magazine: Winter 2006
Richmond Law Magazine: Winter 2006
Richmond Law Magazine
Features:
How Judges Judge
Balkans in the Balance
Varied Vocations
Proud History, Bright Future
The Man, The State And You: The Role Of The State In Regulating Gender Hierarchies, Meredith Render
The Man, The State And You: The Role Of The State In Regulating Gender Hierarchies, Meredith Render
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
No abstract provided.
Conversation With An Understanding Attorney, Mary Kennan Herbert
Conversation With An Understanding Attorney, Mary Kennan Herbert
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
No abstract provided.
Many Are Chilled, But Few Are Frozen: How Transformative Learning In Popular Culture, Christianity, And Science Will Lead To The Eventual Demise Of Legally Sanctioned Discrimination Against Sexual Minorities In The United States, Susan J. Becker
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
No abstract provided.
Rhetorical Holy War: Polygamy, Homosexuality, And The Paradox Of Community And Autonomy, Gregory C. Pinfree
Rhetorical Holy War: Polygamy, Homosexuality, And The Paradox Of Community And Autonomy, Gregory C. Pinfree
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
No abstract provided.
The "Public Use" Requirement In Eminent Domain Law: A Rationale Based On Secret Purchases And Private Influence, Daniel B. Kelly
The "Public Use" Requirement In Eminent Domain Law: A Rationale Based On Secret Purchases And Private Influence, Daniel B. Kelly
Journal Articles
This Article provides a rationale for understanding and interpreting the public use requirement within eminent domain law. The rationale is based on two factors. First, while the government often needs the power of eminent domain to avoid the problem of strategic holdout, private parties are generally able to purchase property through secret buying agents. The availability of these undisclosed agents makes the use of eminent domain for private parties unnecessary and indeed undesirable. The government, however, is ordinarily unable to make secret purchases because its plans are subject to democratic deliberation and thus publicly known in advance. Second, while the …