Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Discipline
Institution
Keyword
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type
File Type

Articles 3871 - 3900 of 5612

Full-Text Articles in Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law

Appeal No. 0523: One Livingston Enterprises Ii< V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Division Of Oil And Gas, Oil And Gas Board Of Review May 1994

Appeal No. 0523: One Livingston Enterprises Ii< V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Division Of Oil And Gas, Oil And Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order No. 91-128


Appeal No. 0528: Beverly Jo Dobbin Williams, V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Division Of Oil And Gas, Oil And Gas Board Of Review May 1994

Appeal No. 0528: Beverly Jo Dobbin Williams, V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Division Of Oil And Gas, Oil And Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order No. 93-84


Appeal No. 0500: A & H, Inc., V. Richard Simmers, Acting Chief Division Of Oil And Gas Ohio Dept. Of Natural Resources, Oil And Gas Board Of Review May 1994

Appeal No. 0500: A & H, Inc., V. Richard Simmers, Acting Chief Division Of Oil And Gas Ohio Dept. Of Natural Resources, Oil And Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Review of Chief's Order No. 92-71


Appeal No. 0513: Eastland Energy Group, V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Division Of Oil And Gas, Oil And Gas Board Of Review May 1994

Appeal No. 0513: Eastland Energy Group, V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Division Of Oil And Gas, Oil And Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order No. 92-95


Appeal No. 0509: Mb Operating Co., Inc., V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Division Of Oil And Gas, Oil And Gas Board Of Review May 1994

Appeal No. 0509: Mb Operating Co., Inc., V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Division Of Oil And Gas, Oil And Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order No. 92-148


Appeal No. 0524: Red Hill Development, V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Division Of Oil And Gas, Oil And Gas Board Of Review May 1994

Appeal No. 0524: Red Hill Development, V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Division Of Oil And Gas, Oil And Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order No. 92-361


Appeal No. 0522: Canfield Oil And Gas Company, V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Division Of Oil And Gas, Oil And Gas Board Of Review May 1994

Appeal No. 0522: Canfield Oil And Gas Company, V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Division Of Oil And Gas, Oil And Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order No. 92-358


Appeal No. 0529: Francis Smith, V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Division Of Oil And Gas, Oil And Gas Board Of Review May 1994

Appeal No. 0529: Francis Smith, V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Division Of Oil And Gas, Oil And Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order No. 93-79


Appeal No. 0539: Black River Petroleum, Inc. V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Division Of Oil And Gas, Oil And Gas Board Of Review May 1994

Appeal No. 0539: Black River Petroleum, Inc. V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Division Of Oil And Gas, Oil And Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order No. 93-157


Appeal No. 0542: Black River Oil & Gas, V. Donald L. Mason Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Department Of Natural Rresources, Oil And Gas Board Of Review May 1994

Appeal No. 0542: Black River Oil & Gas, V. Donald L. Mason Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Department Of Natural Rresources, Oil And Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order No. 93-221


Appeal No. 0545: Century Surety Co., V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Division Of Oil And Gas, Oil And Gas Board Of Review May 1994

Appeal No. 0545: Century Surety Co., V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Division Of Oil And Gas, Oil And Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order No. 93-257


Appeal No. 0547: Energy Search, Inc., V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Divisoin Of Oil And Gas, Oil And Gas Board Of Review May 1994

Appeal No. 0547: Energy Search, Inc., V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Divisoin Of Oil And Gas, Oil And Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order No. 93-269


Appeal No. 0525: Glenn Ore, V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Division Of Oil And Gas, Oil And Gas Board Of Review May 1994

Appeal No. 0525: Glenn Ore, V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Division Of Oil And Gas, Oil And Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order No. 93-58


The New Gold Rush: Mine Tailings In Southeast Alaska And Perversion Of The Clean Water Act, Beth Leibowitz May 1994

The New Gold Rush: Mine Tailings In Southeast Alaska And Perversion Of The Clean Water Act, Beth Leibowitz

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

Part I of this Note provides a basic explanation of the mine tailings problem. Part II of this Note discusses the evolution of the agencies' tailings decision and the statutory and regulatory context in which it occurred. Part III outlines briefly the actual decision, which involved the theory that neither the EPA nor the Corps should apply the usual CWA permit requirements to the initial discharge of mine waste. Part IV evaluates the legal basis for that decision and concludes, based on the language of the CWA, the EPA's own prior policy, and judicial precedent, that the decision was without …


Resource Law Notes Newsletter, No. 31, Spring Issue, Apr. 1994, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center Apr 1994

Resource Law Notes Newsletter, No. 31, Spring Issue, Apr. 1994, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center

Resource Law Notes: The Newsletter of the Natural Resources Law Center (1984-2002)

No abstract provided.


Fire In The Hole To Longwall Shears: Old Law Applied To New Technology And Other Longwall Mining Issues, J. Thomas Lane Apr 1994

Fire In The Hole To Longwall Shears: Old Law Applied To New Technology And Other Longwall Mining Issues, J. Thomas Lane

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.


Meeting The Challenge At The Mines: The Americans With Disabilities Act, Susan E. Chetlin, Mark E. Baker Apr 1994

Meeting The Challenge At The Mines: The Americans With Disabilities Act, Susan E. Chetlin, Mark E. Baker

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.


Coalbed Methane: Recent Court Decisions Leave Ownership Up In The Air, But New Federal And State Legislation Should Facilitate Production, Jeff L. Lewin Apr 1994

Coalbed Methane: Recent Court Decisions Leave Ownership Up In The Air, But New Federal And State Legislation Should Facilitate Production, Jeff L. Lewin

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.


The North American Free Trade Agreement: What It Means For U.S. Coal Exports, Moya Phelleps Apr 1994

The North American Free Trade Agreement: What It Means For U.S. Coal Exports, Moya Phelleps

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.


Federal Black Lung Update, William S. Mattingly Apr 1994

Federal Black Lung Update, William S. Mattingly

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.


Mine Safety And Health: A Formula For Continued Success, J. Davitt Mcateer Apr 1994

Mine Safety And Health: A Formula For Continued Success, J. Davitt Mcateer

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.


Walkaround Rights For Miners' Representative Under Msha: A Compatible Statutory Scheme, Robert H. Stropp Jr. Apr 1994

Walkaround Rights For Miners' Representative Under Msha: A Compatible Statutory Scheme, Robert H. Stropp Jr.

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.


Engineering For Lawyers, Landmen, And Other Non-Engineers Or What Is That Guy Talking About?, Robert M. Mcgowen Feb 1994

Engineering For Lawyers, Landmen, And Other Non-Engineers Or What Is That Guy Talking About?, Robert M. Mcgowen

Annual of the Arkansas Natural Resources Law Institute

No abstract provided.


Rights And Liabilities For Personal Injuries On The Well Site, Douglas M. Carson Feb 1994

Rights And Liabilities For Personal Injuries On The Well Site, Douglas M. Carson

Annual of the Arkansas Natural Resources Law Institute

This paper considers three basic areas of law which may become involved when a person suffers a physical injury on an oil or gas well site. The first area considers the basic tort liabilities and defenses which may arise. But parties involved in the drilling and operating end of the oil and gas business frequently carry liability insurance to protect against tort claims. The second portion of this paper therefore considers issues which may arise relating to insurance coverage of claims. Finally, usually the direct employer of the injured person is immune from tort liability and the employee’s remedy is …


Appeal No. 0510: Transcontinental Oil And Gas, Inc., Et Al., V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas Ohio Department Of Natural, Resources, Oil And Gas Board Of Review Jan 1994

Appeal No. 0510: Transcontinental Oil And Gas, Inc., Et Al., V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas Ohio Department Of Natural, Resources, Oil And Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order No. 92-216


Resource Law Notes Newsletter, No. 30, Winter Issue, Jan. 1994, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center Jan 1994

Resource Law Notes Newsletter, No. 30, Winter Issue, Jan. 1994, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center

Resource Law Notes: The Newsletter of the Natural Resources Law Center (1984-2002)

No abstract provided.


Legislative Redistricting In 1991-1992: The Texas Bill Of Rights V. The Voting Rights Act., James C. Harrington, Judith Sanders-Castro Jan 1994

Legislative Redistricting In 1991-1992: The Texas Bill Of Rights V. The Voting Rights Act., James C. Harrington, Judith Sanders-Castro

St. Mary's Law Journal

Every decade, after the federal government has taken the census, Americans endure the process of redistricting Congress, state legislatures, county commissioner precincts, school boards, city councils, and a host of other elected bodies. Governed by the interplay of federal, state, and local law, the reapportionment process would seem to be a relatively easy task in theory. Yet, overriding forces unique to the political arena and the judiciary’s voice in redistricting questions undermine the implementation of such a simple system. Narrow interpretation of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 by the United State Supreme Court and lower federal courts further intensify …


Self-Publication: Defamation Within The Employment Context., Howard J. Siegel Jan 1994

Self-Publication: Defamation Within The Employment Context., Howard J. Siegel

St. Mary's Law Journal

This Article reviews the rules and reasoning various jurisdictions have maintained in defamation actions supported by self-publication. This type of defamation action is commonly known as self-defamation. Before the law will hold the originator of a defamatory statement liable for defamation, publication of the defamatory comments must occur. Generally, defamatory communications are those communications which tend to injure one’s reputation. Publication normally occurs when one communicates the defamatory matter to “one other than the person defamed.” Originally, courts considered defamation actions valid only when the defamed person alleged that the originator directly published the statement to a third person. Under …


Time Limitations For Objecting To Claims: The Interplay Between Sections 502(D) And 546(A) Of The Bankruptcy Code., Gregory G. Hesse Jan 1994

Time Limitations For Objecting To Claims: The Interplay Between Sections 502(D) And 546(A) Of The Bankruptcy Code., Gregory G. Hesse

St. Mary's Law Journal

It is common lore among bankruptcy trustees and lawyers that a bankruptcy trustee has an unlimited time period under the Bankruptcy Code (the Code) to file objections to claims. Neither Section 502(a) of the Code nor Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 3007 contains time limitations within which an objection to a claim must be filed. Yet, creative creditor attorneys have fashioned arguments that the two-year limitations period placed on avoidance actions by Section 546(a) of the Code applies to claim objection proceedings brought under Section 502(d). Because courts have held the limitations period of Section 546(a) applies to claim objection …


U.S. Taxation Of U.S. Persons Doing Business Or Investing In Mexico: An Overview., William H. Hornberger Jan 1994

U.S. Taxation Of U.S. Persons Doing Business Or Investing In Mexico: An Overview., William H. Hornberger

St. Mary's Law Journal

U.S. persons who plan to do business in Mexico or invest in new or existing Mexican business ventures are faced with a myriad of U.S. federal income tax issues. U.S. counsel advising U.S. persons regarding the ownership structure for a contemplated business or investment in Mexico should have a basic understanding of the U.S. system of international taxation. While a working knowledge of Mexico’s tax system is also helpful, Mexican counsel can provide information regarding the Mexican tax implications of doing business or investing in Mexico. A review of the U.S. system of international taxation should begin with a consideration …