Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law Commons^™

Appeal No. 0570: Muskingum Development Corp. V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 95-62

Appeal No. 0568: R & W Greathouse V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 95-75

Appeal No. 0563: Annie Thomas V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 95-1

Appeal No. 0580: K.S.T. Oil & Gas V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 96-2

Appeal No. 0558: Transcontinental Oil & Gas V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 94-86

Appeal No. 0458: Hall Energy, Inc. V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Dept. Of Natural Resources, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 91-140

Appeal No. 0550: Kelly H. Boals, V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Oil And Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order No. 93-303

Appeal No. 0555: Centry Surety Company (Re Omega Oil Company) V. Richard J. Simmers, Acting,Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Review of Chief's Order 94-62

Appeal No. 0552: Mission Gas Company V. Richard J. Simmers, Acting Chief Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Review of Chief's Order 94-09

Appeal No. 0526: D & L Energy, Inc. V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Oil And Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order No. 93-53

Appeal No. 0538: Petro Drilling Corp., V. Richard J. Simmers, Acting Chief Division Of Oil And Gas, Oil And Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order No. 93-210

Appeal No. 0541: Simco Exploration Corporation, V. Richard J. Simmers, Acting Chief Division Of Oil And Gas, Oil And Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order No. 93-204

Appeal No. 0543: Starvaggi Industries, Inc, V. Richard J. Simmers, Acting Chief Division Of Oil And Gas, Oil And Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order No. 93-252

Appeal No. 0533: Tom Wears, V. Richard J. Simmers, Acting Chief Division Of Oil And Gas, Oil And Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order No. 93-73

Appeal No. 0546: The Highland School, V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Oil And Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order No. 93-235

Appeal No. 0548: Indepdendence Trust, James Robert Ford, Trustee, V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Oil And Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order No. 93-283

Appeal No. 0536: South Palm Energy, Inc., V. Richard J. Simmers, Acting Chief Division Of Oil And Gas, Oil And Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order No. 93-179

Home Dance, The Hopi, And Black Mesa Coal: Conquest And Endurance In The American Southwest, Charles F. Wilkinson

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Problem Of Federal-Private Split Mineral Estates: Who Has Control?, David B. Shaver, Andrew C. Mergen, Scott W. Hardt, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center

The Problem of Federal-Private Split Mineral Estates: Who Has Control? (April 23)

19 pages.

Includes footnotes.

Collection of 3 papers presented at the Hot Topics in Natural Resources Law program held on April 23, 1996.

Contents: National Park Service regulation of private mineral estates / David B. Shaver -- Recent litigation regarding federal split estates : who has control? what are the limits? / Andrew C. Mergen -- The problem of federal-private split mineral estates / Scott W. Hardt

Many federally owned lands overlie privately owned oil and gas and mineral rights. Increasingly, the competition between agency multiple use directives and private interests in resource development has resulted in legal battles between …

Resource Law Notes Newsletter, No. 37, Spring Issue, Apr. 1996, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center

Resource Law Notes: The Newsletter of the Natural Resources Law Center (1984-2002)

No abstract provided.

Rivers As Legal Structures: The Examples Of The Jordan And The Nile, Joseph W. Dellapenna

Natural Resources Journal

No abstract provided.

Attorney Liability To Non-Clients When Issuing Oil And Gas Title Opinions, John Land Mcdavid

Annual of the Arkansas Natural Resources Law Institute

No abstract provided.

Enviornmental Auditing, Reporting & Confidentiality Issues, Walter G. Wright Jr.

Annual of the Arkansas Natural Resources Law Institute

No abstract provided.

Oil Field Pitfalls: Avoiding Environmental Liabilities Affecting Petroleum And Natural Gas Drilling And Production, Walter G. Wright Jr.

Annual of the Arkansas Natural Resources Law Institute

No abstract provided.

Resource Law Notes Newsletter, No. 36, Winter Issue, Jan. 1996, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center

Resource Law Notes: The Newsletter of the Natural Resources Law Center (1984-2002)

No abstract provided.

Texas Private Real Property Rights Preservation Act: A Political Solution To The Regulatory Takings Problem Comment., George E. Grimes Jr.

St. Mary's Law Journal

Increasing environmental regulation has resulted in an antiregulation backlash and the growth of a property rights movement. Unable to successfully use the courts to protect private property from diminution in value due to government regulations, property rights advocates have looked to the federal and state legislatures for assistance. This has led to some states and the United States Congress to introduce private property rights protection. This protection generally takes one of two forms. The first requires the government to assess the possible effect on property rights before enacting regulations. The second requires the government to compensate property owners for the …

The Maquiladora Industry And Environmental Degradation In The United States-Mexico Borderlands Symposium - The Environment And The United States-Mexico Border., Edward J. Williams

St. Mary's Law Journal

Periods of rapid industrial growth and environmental degradation in the United States-Mexico Borderlands have historically coincided with negative shifts in Mexico’s economy. The Mexican economic crisis of 1982 sparked burgeoning growth in the maquiladora industry, with plants in the Borderlands increasing at a rate of fifteen percent per year. Due to the Mexican economic crisis of the mid-1990s, renewed industrial expansion and environmental degradation is once again expected. The maquiladora program is frequently used to identify cooperative industrial efforts between the United States and Mexico. The term refers to an assembly process in which twin plants operate on opposite sides …

Private Enforcement Of Nafta Environmental Standards Through Transnational Mass Tort Litigation: The Role Of United States Courts In The Age Of Free Trade Symposium - The Environment And The United States-Mexico Border - Comment., Michael Sang H. Cho

St. Mary's Law Journal

Maquiladoras are manufacturing facilities along the United States-Mexico border operated by transnational corporations (TNCs). The arrival of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) meant TNCs are free to move capital and operations across the United States-Mexico border at will. Yet, the maquiladora workers are not free to travel or seek employment across the border. The NAFTA debate in the United States raised public awareness of environmental problems in the border region. Nevertheless, maquiladora workers have lived with environmental degradation long before the NAFTA environmental debate began. With the passage of NAFTA, increased trade and the burgeoning industries along the …

Oil And Gas: Roye Realty & Developing V. Watson--An Answer To The Take-Or-Pay Royalty Issue In Oklahoma Or Simply More Confusion?, James Muenker

Oklahoma Law Review

No abstract provided.

Florida Game And Fresh Water Fish Commission V. Flotilla, Inc., Holly R. Harvey

Natural Resources Journal

No abstract provided.