Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Discipline
Institution
Keyword
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type
File Type

Articles 3631 - 3660 of 5612

Full-Text Articles in Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law

Appeal No. 0587: Guardian Management, Inc. V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review May 1997

Appeal No. 0587: Guardian Management, Inc. V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 96-146


Appeal No. 0605: Blaze Oil & Gas, Inc. V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review May 1997

Appeal No. 0605: Blaze Oil & Gas, Inc. V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 96-280


Appeal No. 0604: John & Gladys Spillman V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission May 1997

Appeal No. 0604: John & Gladys Spillman V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Review of Chief's Order 96-267


Appeal No. 0608: Creighton Machine Co. V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review May 1997

Appeal No. 0608: Creighton Machine Co. V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 97-12


Appeal No. 0606: Paul M. Letwen V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review May 1997

Appeal No. 0606: Paul M. Letwen V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 96-277


Resource Law Notes Newsletter, No. 40, Spring Issue, Apr. 1997, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center Apr 1997

Resource Law Notes Newsletter, No. 40, Spring Issue, Apr. 1997, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center

Resource Law Notes: The Newsletter of the Natural Resources Law Center (1984-2002)

No abstract provided.


Mergers In Western Coal Markets: Conforming Antitrust Analysis To The New Reality, Mark A. Glick, David G. Mangum, Raymond J. Etcheverry Apr 1997

Mergers In Western Coal Markets: Conforming Antitrust Analysis To The New Reality, Mark A. Glick, David G. Mangum, Raymond J. Etcheverry

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.


Oil And Gas Regulatory Considerations For Coal, Oil And Gas Operators In West Virginia: Selected Issues, William H. Hill Iii Apr 1997

Oil And Gas Regulatory Considerations For Coal, Oil And Gas Operators In West Virginia: Selected Issues, William H. Hill Iii

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.


Worth Its Weight In Gold: Legal Analysis Of The Current Appraisal Of Coal Property In West Virginia, Ryan J. Morgan Apr 1997

Worth Its Weight In Gold: Legal Analysis Of The Current Appraisal Of Coal Property In West Virginia, Ryan J. Morgan

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.


Confusion In Regulating Coal Mine Water Pollution: Regulatory Overlap In Smcra And The Cwa, Brian Peterson Apr 1997

Confusion In Regulating Coal Mine Water Pollution: Regulatory Overlap In Smcra And The Cwa, Brian Peterson

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.


Appeal No. 0581: Roger Blodgett V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Mar 1997

Appeal No. 0581: Roger Blodgett V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 96-28


Appeal No. 0579: Raymond Branham V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Mar 1997

Appeal No. 0579: Raymond Branham V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 95-49


Appeal No. 0594: Halwell Company, Inc. V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Mar 1997

Appeal No. 0594: Halwell Company, Inc. V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 96-206


Appeal No. 0551: John G. Oliver V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Feb 1997

Appeal No. 0551: John G. Oliver V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 93-336


Appeal No. 0588: Lor-San Oil Company V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Feb 1997

Appeal No. 0588: Lor-San Oil Company V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 96-152


Appeal No. 0598: Halwell Company (Bt Energy Corporation) V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Feb 1997

Appeal No. 0598: Halwell Company (Bt Energy Corporation) V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Review of Chief's Order 96-209


Appeal No. 0599: Charlebois Energy Production V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Feb 1997

Appeal No. 0599: Charlebois Energy Production V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Review of Chief's Order 96-245


Appeal No. 0597: Halwell Company V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Feb 1997

Appeal No. 0597: Halwell Company V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Review of Chief's Order 96-208


Appeal No. 0596: Hanley Hardin V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Feb 1997

Appeal No. 0596: Hanley Hardin V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Review of Chief's Order 96-215


Appeal No. 0595: Halwell Company V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Feb 1997

Appeal No. 0595: Halwell Company V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 96-199


Appeal No. 0593: Bt Energy Corporation (Halwell Co.) V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Feb 1997

Appeal No. 0593: Bt Energy Corporation (Halwell Co.) V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 96-197 and 96-209


Appeal No. 0600: Olney Friends School, Inc., V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Feb 1997

Appeal No. 0600: Olney Friends School, Inc., V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 96-254


Recent Developments In Natural Resources Law-Circa 1996, Thomas A. Daily Feb 1997

Recent Developments In Natural Resources Law-Circa 1996, Thomas A. Daily

Annual of the Arkansas Natural Resources Law Institute

No abstract provided.


Resource Law Notes Newsletter, No. 39, Winter Issue, Feb. 1997, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center Jan 1997

Resource Law Notes Newsletter, No. 39, Winter Issue, Feb. 1997, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center

Resource Law Notes: The Newsletter of the Natural Resources Law Center (1984-2002)

No abstract provided.


The Interaction Of The Division Order And The Lease Royalty Clause., Laura H. Burney Jan 1997

The Interaction Of The Division Order And The Lease Royalty Clause., Laura H. Burney

St. Mary's Law Journal

Because lease royalty clauses, which establish the obligation of the lessee to pay royalties to the lessor, generally fail to include the details necessary to calculate a lessor’s royalty, lessee or third party purchasers historically have implemented a division order. An additional document in the payment process, the division order protects against a lessee or third party purchaser’s liability for conversion or failure to account properly. Recent court of appeals and Supreme Court of Texas opinions provide an analysis of the interaction of the lease royalty clause and the division order under Texas statutory and case law. The awkward wording …


The Prospects For Challenging U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy In Light Of The World Court's Advisory Opinion On The Legality Of The Threat Or Use Of Such Weapons Comment., Stephen Gordon Jan 1997

The Prospects For Challenging U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy In Light Of The World Court's Advisory Opinion On The Legality Of The Threat Or Use Of Such Weapons Comment., Stephen Gordon

St. Mary's Law Journal

In an opinion, the World Court concluded “the threat or use of nuclear weapons would generally be contrary to the rules of international law,” the only exception being “in an extreme circumstance of self-defense, where survival of a State is at stake.” The Court’s opinion could read as prohibiting the most common ways the United States incorporated nuclear weapons into its defense strategy. First, it may prevent the United States from using such weapons again legally. Second, if the opinion does not render using nuclear weapons illegal in all circumstances, it might prohibit the United States from ever being the …


Immigration Reform: Seeking The Right Reasons., Lamar Smith, Edward R. Grant Jan 1997

Immigration Reform: Seeking The Right Reasons., Lamar Smith, Edward R. Grant

St. Mary's Law Journal

The legacy of immigration to the United States permeates the debate over current immigration policy. Because our self-definition as a nation is at stake in this debate, the issue of immigration arouses our deepest sentiments regarding the communities in which we live. We do not need to search far back in our history to find examples of imprudent law-making. Both the 1924 and 1925 immigration laws were motivated in large part by purposes which eventually undermined the principles on which they rested. These acts serve as prime examples of how employing erroneous reasons to enact even well-intentioned laws can be …


Writing In The Margins: Brennan, Marshall, And The Inherent Weaknesses Of Liberal Judicial Decision-Making Essay., Donna F. Coltharp Jan 1997

Writing In The Margins: Brennan, Marshall, And The Inherent Weaknesses Of Liberal Judicial Decision-Making Essay., Donna F. Coltharp

St. Mary's Law Journal

From 1967, when Thurgood Marshall took his seat as Supreme Court Justice, until 1990, when William Brennan, Jr. vacated his seat, the two Justices formed one of the most consistent liberal voting blocs in the history of the Court. Both Justices were judicial activists who labored in the tradition of Legal Realism. Although both Brennan and Marshall recognized the interpretation and application of the law as purposeful exercises, they differed in their approach to the task. Marshall, for instance, appealed to social consensus stating that his views were supported by society. Furthermore, Marshall strongly believed that the Constitution is a …


Abandoned Frozen Embryos And Texas Law Of Abandoned Personal Property: Should There Be A Connection Comment., Lynne M. Thomas Jan 1997

Abandoned Frozen Embryos And Texas Law Of Abandoned Personal Property: Should There Be A Connection Comment., Lynne M. Thomas

St. Mary's Law Journal

In vitro fertilization (“IVF”) has become almost commonplace in society. The widespread utilization of IVF and cryopreservation raises new questions with respect to ownership and disposition of embryos. This legal confusion may be addressed by either crafting specific regulations for that particular technology as its implications become apparent, or by applying current law. IVF first began in Great Britain, and the British Parliament passed a law mandating destruction of abandoned frozen embryos five years after cryopreservation. Destruction of the embryos potentially caused the loss of reproduction capability for those persons whose embryos were destroyed. While the number of abandoned frozen …


Hiv And Aids Test Results And The Duty To Warn Third Parties: A Proposal For Uniform Guidelines For Texas Professionals Comment., Tammy R. Wavle Jan 1997

Hiv And Aids Test Results And The Duty To Warn Third Parties: A Proposal For Uniform Guidelines For Texas Professionals Comment., Tammy R. Wavle

St. Mary's Law Journal

Professionals in Texas are increasingly faced with the issues of if and when they must disclose infection of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), and if they may be held liable for failing to disclose a known infection. These professionals must deal with conflicting guidance from the courts and legislature. The source of confusion is the conflict between the common-law duty to warn identifiable third parties of the dangers posed to them and the Texas statute governing confidentiality of test results for Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS). The Communicable Disease Prevention and Control Act (CDPCA) mandates disclosure of positive test results …