Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Natural Resources Law (133)
- Energy and Utilities Law (122)
- Environmental Law (107)
- Administrative Law (103)
- Constitutional Law (98)
-
- Land Use Law (97)
- Water Law (92)
- Agriculture Law (90)
- Cultural Heritage Law (86)
- Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law (82)
- Animal Law (81)
- International Law (79)
- International Trade Law (76)
- Science and Technology Law (76)
- Law of the Sea (75)
- Property Law and Real Estate (75)
- Law and Race (74)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (72)
- Civil Law (71)
- Construction Law (71)
- Food and Drug Law (70)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (70)
- Natural Law (67)
- State and Local Government Law (67)
- Disaster Law (66)
- European Law (66)
- Human Rights Law (66)
- Intellectual Property Law (66)
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (56)
- University of Montana (25)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (24)
- Fordham Law School (9)
- DePaul University (6)
-
- American University Washington College of Law (4)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (4)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (3)
- Brooklyn Law School (2)
- St. Mary's University (2)
- U.S. Naval War College (2)
- University of Maine School of Law (2)
- University of Michigan Law School (2)
- West Virginia University (2)
- City University of New York (CUNY) (1)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- National Law School of India University (1)
- SJ Quinney College of Law, University of Utah (1)
- Southern Methodist University (1)
- University of Denver (1)
- University of Minnesota Law School (1)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (1)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Law (10)
- SFFA (7)
- Affirmative Action (6)
- Diversity (5)
- Environmental law (5)
-
- Ohio (4)
- State law; State administrative decision (4)
- Supreme Court (4)
- ESG (3)
- Extractivism (3)
- Just transition (3)
- Natural resources (3)
- Corporate Governance (2)
- Corporate Law (2)
- Corporate law (2)
- Critical minerals (2)
- Dispossession (2)
- EPA (2)
- Education (2)
- Environmental justice (2)
- Equality (2)
- Federalism (2)
- Fourteenth Amendment (2)
- Free-entry mining (2)
- Indian Law (2)
- Indigenous resistance (2)
- Infrastructural (dis)entitlement (2)
- International law (2)
- Justice (2)
- Law of the Sea (2)
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (56)
- Public Land & Resources Law Review (25)
- Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal (22)
- Fordham Environmental Law Review (9)
- DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal (6)
-
- Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions (4)
- Sustainable Development Law & Policy (4)
- Faculty Articles (3)
- Articles & Book Chapters (2)
- Brooklyn Journal of International Law (2)
- International Law Studies (2)
- Ocean and Coastal Law Journal (2)
- All Papers (1)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (1)
- Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports (ETD) (1)
- Michigan Journal of Environmental & Administrative Law (1)
- Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology (1)
- National Law School Journal (1)
- Other Publications (1)
- Publications and Research (1)
- Rowling Books (1)
- SAIPAR Case Review (1)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (1)
- Sturm College of Law: Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Utah Law Review (1)
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - ) (1)
- West Virginia Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 151 - 153 of 153
Full-Text Articles in Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law
The Supreme Court And The Challenges For Fiscal Federalism: Mineral Area Development Authority V Steel Authority Of India, Sanyukta Chowdhury, Amit Chowdhury
The Supreme Court And The Challenges For Fiscal Federalism: Mineral Area Development Authority V Steel Authority Of India, Sanyukta Chowdhury, Amit Chowdhury
National Law School Journal
This case comment analyses the 2024 Supreme Court judgement in Mineral Area Development Authority v Steel Authority of India, in which the court upheld the states’ power to tax mineral rights and mineral-bearing land. The authors discuss the issues involved, the approach of the bench towards interpretation, and the implications for the parties to the case and other stakeholders. They argue that while fiscal federalism is crucial to India’s constitutional scheme, the bench had limited leeway in deciding the case on this basis due to the absence of legal, doctrinal, and factual clarity.
Banning Plastic, Rachael E. Salcido
Banning Plastic, Rachael E. Salcido
Utah Law Review
The disgusting nature of plastic pollution has finally captured the attention of policymakers and driven legal change. Local, state, and national bans on various plastic consumer items coupled with voluntary industry switching creates momentum toward a full-scale end to unnecessary plastic products. Bans have the capacity to create an important tipping point. This Article extolls the effectiveness of consumer bans and explores the challenges to achieving this highest level of environmental control. Plastic is essentially pure petroleum.1 Its persistence and destructiveness in the environment presents unique reasons to eliminate its use altogether. Plastics should only be used for essential products …
Students For Fair Admissions: Affirming Affirmative Action And Shapeshifting Towards Cognitive Diversity?, Steven A. Ramirez
Students For Fair Admissions: Affirming Affirmative Action And Shapeshifting Towards Cognitive Diversity?, Steven A. Ramirez
Seattle University Law Review
The Roberts Court holds a well-earned reputation for overturning Supreme Court precedent regardless of the long-standing nature of the case. The Roberts Court knows how to overrule precedent. In Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard (SFFA), the Court’s majority opinion never intimates that it overrules Grutter v. Bollinger, the Court’s leading opinion permitting race-based affirmative action in college admissions. Instead, the Roberts Court applied Grutter as authoritative to hold certain affirmative action programs entailing racial preferences violative of the Constitution. These programs did not provide an end point, nor did they require assessment, review, periodic expiration, or revision for greater …