Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

1989

Discipline
Institution
Keyword
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 31 - 60 of 102

Full-Text Articles in Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law

New Direction In Scared Lands Claims: Lying V. Northwest Indian Cemetary Protective Association, Nancy Akins Apr 1989

New Direction In Scared Lands Claims: Lying V. Northwest Indian Cemetary Protective Association, Nancy Akins

Natural Resources Journal

No abstract provided.


Pushing State Regulatory Commissions Behind The Bright Line: Ferc Jurisdiction Pervails In Mississippi Power & (And) Light Co. V. Mississippi Ex Rel. Moore, Elizabeth Newlin Taylor Apr 1989

Pushing State Regulatory Commissions Behind The Bright Line: Ferc Jurisdiction Pervails In Mississippi Power & (And) Light Co. V. Mississippi Ex Rel. Moore, Elizabeth Newlin Taylor

Natural Resources Journal

No abstract provided.


Reforming The Forest Service, Denise D. Fort Apr 1989

Reforming The Forest Service, Denise D. Fort

Natural Resources Journal

No abstract provided.


Appeal No. 0323: Dusty Drilling And Producing Corporation V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Mar 1989

Appeal No. 0323: Dusty Drilling And Producing Corporation V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 88-874


Appeal No. 0334: Jonsu Oil Corp. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Mar 1989

Appeal No. 0334: Jonsu Oil Corp. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 88-1268


Appeal No. 0338: D & L Energy, Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Mar 1989

Appeal No. 0338: D & L Energy, Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 88-2027


Utah's New Mechanics' Lien Statute: Clarification For The Oil And Gas Industry, Alan A. Enke Mar 1989

Utah's New Mechanics' Lien Statute: Clarification For The Oil And Gas Industry, Alan A. Enke

Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law

No abstract provided.


Reconciling State Oil And Gas Conservation Regulation With The Natural Gas Act: New Statutory Revelations, David E. Pierce Mar 1989

Reconciling State Oil And Gas Conservation Regulation With The Natural Gas Act: New Statutory Revelations, David E. Pierce

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.


Appeal No. 0258: Harry A. Holtem V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Feb 1989

Appeal No. 0258: Harry A. Holtem V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 87-05


Appeal No. 0330: Bob Lane Dba Bethel Oil & Gas V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Feb 1989

Appeal No. 0330: Bob Lane Dba Bethel Oil & Gas V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 88-1564


Appeal No. 0324: William E. Kidd V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Feb 1989

Appeal No. 0324: William E. Kidd V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 88-1227


Appeal No. 0292: Southern Ohio Petr. Co., Inc. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Feb 1989

Appeal No. 0292: Southern Ohio Petr. Co., Inc. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 87-438


Appeal No. 0295: Bkk Prospecting, Ltd. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Feb 1989

Appeal No. 0295: Bkk Prospecting, Ltd. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 87-443


Appeal No. 0296: Bkk Prospecting, Ltd. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Feb 1989

Appeal No. 0296: Bkk Prospecting, Ltd. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 87-444


Appeal No. 0308: Progressive Oil & Gas, Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Feb 1989

Appeal No. 0308: Progressive Oil & Gas, Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 88-651


Appeal No. 0226: Berresford Enterprises, Inc. V. Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Feb 1989

Appeal No. 0226: Berresford Enterprises, Inc. V. Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 86-551


Appeal No. 0284: Ellysons, Inc. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Jan 1989

Appeal No. 0284: Ellysons, Inc. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 87-381


Appeal No. 0322: Cannan Oil Company V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Jan 1989

Appeal No. 0322: Cannan Oil Company V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 88-936


Appeal No. 0332: Portage Resources, Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Jan 1989

Appeal No. 0332: Portage Resources, Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 88-1281


Resource Law Notes Newsletter, No. 16, Jan. 1989, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center Jan 1989

Resource Law Notes Newsletter, No. 16, Jan. 1989, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center

Resource Law Notes: The Newsletter of the Natural Resources Law Center (1984-2002)

No abstract provided.


Continental Insurance Companies V. Northeastern Pharmaceutical & (And) Chemical Company: Cleanup Costs Are Not Damages Under A Standard Liability Policy, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 703 (1989), Michael J. Holt Jan 1989

Continental Insurance Companies V. Northeastern Pharmaceutical & (And) Chemical Company: Cleanup Costs Are Not Damages Under A Standard Liability Policy, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 703 (1989), Michael J. Holt

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.


Texas Oil And Gas Leases Contain Separate And Distinct Implied Covenant To Further Explore After Lucrative Production., E. Joy Jackson Sparks Jan 1989

Texas Oil And Gas Leases Contain Separate And Distinct Implied Covenant To Further Explore After Lucrative Production., E. Joy Jackson Sparks

St. Mary's Law Journal

In Sun Exploration & Production Co. v. Jackson, the Texas Supreme Court held Texas oil and gas leases contain a separate and distinct implied covenant to further explore after lucrative production. A lease that grants an interest in oil and gas found beneath the ground surface holds several implied covenants. Once successful production begins on a leasehold, implied covenants arise to encourage cooperation between the lessor and the lessee. A covenant is a “promise” between two or more parties to perform or not to perform a specific act. A covenant may be expressly stated within a contract or implied by …


Jury Trials In The Bankruptcy Courts: Awaiting A Final Verdict., Ann Van Bever, V. Craig Cantrell Jan 1989

Jury Trials In The Bankruptcy Courts: Awaiting A Final Verdict., Ann Van Bever, V. Craig Cantrell

St. Mary's Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Miranda Warnings Sufficient To Inform Defendant Of Sixth Amendment Right To Counsel For Postindictment Interrogations., David M. Shearer Jan 1989

Miranda Warnings Sufficient To Inform Defendant Of Sixth Amendment Right To Counsel For Postindictment Interrogations., David M. Shearer

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.


How An Errorless Judgment Can Become Erroneous., Robert W. Calvert Jan 1989

How An Errorless Judgment Can Become Erroneous., Robert W. Calvert

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.


Hazardous Chemicals In The Workplace: The Employer's Obligation To Inform Employees And The Community., Nelson A. Clare Jan 1989

Hazardous Chemicals In The Workplace: The Employer's Obligation To Inform Employees And The Community., Nelson A. Clare

St. Mary's Law Journal

Significant changes have recently occurred in reporting requirements for employers who have hazardous chemicals in their workplaces. The amended Federal Hazard Communication Standard requires private employers, engaged in a business using hazardous chemicals, to communicate to employees the potential hazards. The Standard requires employers to use: 1) a Hazard Communication Program, 2) labels and other forms of warning, 3) material safety data sheets, and 4) information and training about hazardous chemicals. Local and state governments must compare and reconcile the various and complex provisions relating to the Standard to ensure compliance with all requirements of the respective laws. The Texas …


Private Retirement Benefits Earned During Marriage Characterized As Community Property And Do Not Automatically Remain Property Of Surviving Spouse., Darryl J. Silvera Jan 1989

Private Retirement Benefits Earned During Marriage Characterized As Community Property And Do Not Automatically Remain Property Of Surviving Spouse., Darryl J. Silvera

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.


Should Your Spouse Be Compensated For Putting You Through School - Texas Says No; Is That Just And Right., Darryl J. Silvera Jan 1989

Should Your Spouse Be Compensated For Putting You Through School - Texas Says No; Is That Just And Right., Darryl J. Silvera

St. Mary's Law Journal

No abstract provided.


A Proposal To Protect Injured Workers From Employers' Shield Of Immunity., Catherine A. Hale Jan 1989

A Proposal To Protect Injured Workers From Employers' Shield Of Immunity., Catherine A. Hale

St. Mary's Law Journal

The current workers’ compensation system shields negligent employers from liability and fails to encourage compliance with safety standards. A practical solution is to broaden the judicial definition of intentional conduct and reinstate a common-law negligence action in workers’ compensation statutes. The Texas Workers’ Compensation Act awards compensation to employees for accidental injuries sustained in the course of employment. The Act bars an employee who accepts these benefits from bringing a common-law suit for damages against the employer. The exclusive nature of the workers’ compensation remedy thus leaves employers immune from common-law negligence actions by employees who accept the plan. An …


Judicial Rulemakers Held To Have Produced Federal Sentencing Guidelines Within Permissible Twilight Area In Which Branches Of Government Merge., Janis Hillman Jan 1989

Judicial Rulemakers Held To Have Produced Federal Sentencing Guidelines Within Permissible Twilight Area In Which Branches Of Government Merge., Janis Hillman

St. Mary's Law Journal

No abstract provided.