Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (892)
- St. Mary's University (833)
- University of Colorado Law School (300)
- Seattle University School of Law (185)
- Universitas Indonesia (121)
-
- DePaul University (25)
- University of Michigan Law School (13)
- Southern Methodist University (8)
- Pace University (5)
- University of Montana (5)
- University of Richmond (4)
- West Virginia University (4)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
- UIC School of Law (3)
- BLR (2)
- The University of Akron (2)
- University of Georgia School of Law (2)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (2)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (2)
- Barry University School of Law (1)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (1)
- Pepperdine University (1)
- SIT Graduate Institute/SIT Study Abroad (1)
- The University of San Francisco (1)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (1)
- University of Dar es Salaam (1)
- University of Denver (1)
- Keyword
-
- Ohio (870)
- State law; State administrative decision; (556)
- St. Mary’s Law Journal (396)
- St. Mary’s University School of Law (386)
- State law; State administrative decision (311)
-
- Colorado (83)
- United States (80)
- Inc. (77)
- BLM (72)
- Texas (67)
- Hydraulic fracturing (55)
- Fracking (52)
- Wyoming (52)
- Fracing (47)
- Student comment (47)
- U.S. Bureau of Land Management (47)
- BMPs (43)
- Best management practices (43)
- Public lands (43)
- Oil and gas development (42)
- Congress (39)
- National Environmental Policy Act (39)
- FLPMA (37)
- Texas Supreme Court (36)
- EPA (33)
- Bureau of Land Management (32)
- Montana (32)
- NEPA (32)
- New Mexico (32)
- Utah (32)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions (892)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (832)
- Seattle University Law Review (185)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- New Sources of Water for Energy Development and Growth: Interbasin Transfers: A Short Course (Summer Conference, June 7-10) (29)
-
- The Future of Natural Resources Law and Policy (Summer Conference, June 6-8) (28)
- DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal (25)
- Water Resources Allocation: Laws and Emerging Issues: A Short Course (Summer Conference, June 8-11) (23)
- The Public Lands During the Remainder of the 20th Century: Planning, Law, and Policy in the Federal Land Agencies (Summer Conference, June 8-10) (22)
- Groundwater: Allocation, Development and Pollution (Summer Conference, June 6-9) (17)
- Public Lands Mineral Leasing: Issues and Directions (Summer Conference, June 10-11) (16)
- Getting a Handle on Hazardous Waste Control (Summer Conference, June 9-10) (14)
- Best Practices for Community and Environmental Protection (October 14) (13)
- The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Summer Conference, June 6-8) (13)
- The Promise and Peril of Oil Shale Development (February 5) (13)
- Best Management Practices (BMPs): What? How? And Why? (May 26) (11)
- Best Management Practices and Adaptive Management in Oil and Gas Development (May 12-13) (11)
- Opportunities and Obstacles to Reducing the Environmental Footprint of Natural Gas Development in Uintah Basin (October 14) (10)
- Shale Plays in the Intermountain West: Legal and Policy Issues (November 12) (10)
- Coalbed Methane Development in the Intermountain West (April 4-5) (8)
- Michigan Law Review (8)
- Natural Resource Development in Indian Country (Summer Conference, June 8-10) (7)
- Publications (7)
- SMU Annual Texas Survey (7)
- Workshop on Directional Drilling in the Rocky Mountain Region (November 13) (7)
- Federal Lands, Laws and Policies and the Development of Natural Resources: A Short Course (Summer Conference, July 28-August 1) (6)
- Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15) (6)
- Air Quality Impacts from Oil and Gas Development (January 27) (5)
- Drawing the Blueprint for a Sustainable Natural Gas Future (January 18) (5)
- Public Land & Resources Law Review (5)
- Publication Type
Articles 541 - 570 of 2427
Full-Text Articles in Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law
Appeal No. 0881: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0881: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 2014-39 (suspension of operations); 2014-236, 2014-238,2014-239, 2014-241 (denials of plug-back permits); 2014-253, 2014-256 thru 2014-262 & 2014-264 thru 2014-266 (plug orders)
Appeal No. 0880: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0880: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 2014-39 (suspension of operations); 2014-236, 2014-238,2014-239, 2014-241 (denials of plug-back permits); 2014-253, 2014-256 thru 2014-262 & 2014-264 thru 2014-266 (plug orders)
Appeal No. 0879: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0879: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 2014-39 (suspension of operations); 2014-236, 2014-238,2014-239, 2014-241 (denials of plug-back permits); 2014-253, 2014-256 thru 2014-262 & 2014-264 thru 2014-266 (plug orders)
Appeal No. 0885: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0885: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 2014-39 (suspension of operations); 2014-236, 2014-238,2014-239, 2014-241 (denials of plug-back permits); 2014-253, 2014-256 thru 2014-262 & 2014-264 thru 2014-266 (plug orders)
Appeal No. 0887: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0887: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 2014-39 (suspension of operations); 2014-236, 2014-238,2014-239, 2014-241 (denials of plug-back permits); 2014-253, 2014-256 thru 2014-262 & 2014-264 thru 2014-266 (plug orders)
Appeal No. 0883: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0883: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 2014-39 (suspension of operations); 2014-236, 2014-238,2014-239, 2014-241 (denials of plug-back permits); 2014-253, 2014-256 thru 2014-262 & 2014-264 thru 2014-266 (plug orders)
Appeal No. 0882: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0882: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 2014-39 (suspension of operations); 2014-236, 2014-238,2014-239, 2014-241 (denials of plug-back permits); 2014-253, 2014-256 thru 2014-262 & 2014-264 thru 2014-266 (plug orders)
Appeal No. 0875: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0875: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 2014-39 (suspension of operations); 2014-236, 2014-238,2014-239, 2014-241 (denials of plug-back permits); 2014-253, 2014-256 thru 2014-262 & 2014-264 thru 2014-266 (plug orders)
Appeal No. 0874: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0874: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 2014-39 (suspension of operations); 2014-236, 2014-238,2014-239, 2014-241 (denials of plug-back permits); 2014-253, 2014-256 thru 2014-262 & 2014-264 thru 2014-266 (plug orders)
Appeal No. 0878: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0878: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 2014-39 (suspension of operations); 2014-236, 2014-238,2014-239, 2014-241 (denials of plug-back permits); 2014-253, 2014-256 thru 2014-262 & 2014-264 thru 2014-266 (plug orders)
Appeal No. 0871: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0871: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 2014-39 (suspension of operations); 2014-236, 2014-238,2014-239, 2014-241 (denials of plug-back permits); 2014-253, 2014-256 thru 2014-262 & 2014-264 thru 2014-266 (plug orders)
Appeal No. 0876: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0876: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 2014-39 (suspension of operations); 2014-236, 2014-238,2014-239, 2014-241 (denials of plug-back permits); 2014-253, 2014-256 thru 2014-262 & 2014-264 thru 2014-266 (plug orders)
Appeal No. 0877: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0877: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 2014-39 (suspension of operations); 2014-236, 2014-238,2014-239, 2014-241 (denials of plug-back permits); 2014-253, 2014-256 thru 2014-262 & 2014-264 thru 2014-266 (plug orders)
Appeal No. 0863: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0863: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 2014-39 (suspension of operations); 2014-236, 2014-238,2014-239, 2014-241 (denials of plug-back permits); 2014-253, 2014-256 thru 2014-262 & 2014-264 thru 2014-266 (plug orders)
Appeal No. 0873: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0873: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 2014-39 (suspension of operations); 2014-236, 2014-238,2014-239, 2014-241 (denials of plug-back permits); 2014-253, 2014-256 thru 2014-262 & 2014-264 thru 2014-266 (plug orders)
Appeal No. 0905: Virginia Ohio Oil Company, Llc, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0905: Virginia Ohio Oil Company, Llc, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2015-43; William Hartley #1 Well
Appeal No. 0892: R.E. Disposal, Llc, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0892: R.E. Disposal, Llc, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2014-421
Regulation Of Fracking Is Not A Taking Of Private Property, Kevin Lynch
Regulation Of Fracking Is Not A Taking Of Private Property, Kevin Lynch
Sturm College of Law: Faculty Scholarship
As the use of fracking has spread during the recent oil and gas boom, inevitable conflicts have arisen between industry and its neighbors, particularly as fracking has moved into densely populated urban and suburban areas. Concerned over the impacts of fracking – such as risks to health and safely, diminished property values, air and water pollution, as well as noise, traffic, and other annoyances – many people have demanded a government response.
Government regulation of fracking has struggled to catch up, although in recent years many state and local governments have taken steps to reduce the impacts of fracking in …
Bridge Over Troubled Waters: Resolving The Ri Grande (Rio Bravo) Water Dispute., Ruben R. Barrera, Dan A. Naranjo
Bridge Over Troubled Waters: Resolving The Ri Grande (Rio Bravo) Water Dispute., Ruben R. Barrera, Dan A. Naranjo
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
The Dilemma Of Interpreting Rules Of Civil Procedure: A Proposal For Elastic Formalism., L. Wayne Scott
The Dilemma Of Interpreting Rules Of Civil Procedure: A Proposal For Elastic Formalism., L. Wayne Scott
St. Mary's Law Journal
When lawyers are well prepared, know the law, present the law, and have it ignored by judges who interpret the law in their own way, it can be frustrating. When courts publish opinions embodying this attitude, students, too, become frustrated or conclude that the law is whatever judges decide it should be. This Article does not focus on unethical judges who decide cases with wrong motives but, rather, it focuses on ethical judges who are faced with “hard” cases and have the dilemma of deciding the case, either by the rule or by the judge’s concept of fairness. In both …
Suppressing The Truth: States' Purposeful Violation Of The Right Of No Cruel Or Unreal Punishment In Lethal Injection Executions., Nadine G. Rodriguez
Suppressing The Truth: States' Purposeful Violation Of The Right Of No Cruel Or Unreal Punishment In Lethal Injection Executions., Nadine G. Rodriguez
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
A Law And Economics Analysis Of The Duty Of Utmost Good Faith (Uberrimae Fidei) In Marine Insurance Law For Protection And Indemnity Clubs., Elizabeth Germano
A Law And Economics Analysis Of The Duty Of Utmost Good Faith (Uberrimae Fidei) In Marine Insurance Law For Protection And Indemnity Clubs., Elizabeth Germano
St. Mary's Law Journal
Writing for the Supreme Court in The Lottawanna in 1875, Justice Joseph P. Bradley envisioned federal and state regulation of maritime affairs as “a system of law coextensive with, and operating uniformly in, the whole country.” He thought state involvement in maritime law defeated the consistency and uniformity the Constitution sought to achieve for interstate and international commerce. Over 100 years later, Justice Antonin Scalia, describing the current relationship between state and federal regulation in the admiralty arena, stated: “It would be idle to pretend that the line separating permissible from impermissible state regulation is readily discernible in our admiralty …
The Admissibility Of Aerial Photographs - Evidentiary Foundations., Kristopher R. Hufstetler
The Admissibility Of Aerial Photographs - Evidentiary Foundations., Kristopher R. Hufstetler
St. Mary's Law Journal
Services such as Google Maps and MapQuest significantly impact how consumers use the Internet. For as much as they contribute to Internet use, issues arise concerning the use of satellite images and aerial photographs in the context of litigation. Historical concerns about satellite and aerial imagery typically involved expectations of privacy and the application of the Fourth Amendment. Courts and citizens alike express concern with when and where privacy ends with respect to aerial views. Concerns as to the admissibility of aerial photographs have also been prominent. Specifically, interest in admissibility of these photographs focuses on sufficiency, relevance, and accuracy. …
When Fantasy Becomes Reality: Attempts To Regulate The Highly Unregulated Daily Fantasy Sports Industry., Garrett Greene
When Fantasy Becomes Reality: Attempts To Regulate The Highly Unregulated Daily Fantasy Sports Industry., Garrett Greene
St. Mary's Law Journal
Legislation is beginning to creep into the once safeguard-devoid sphere of the daily fantasy sports industry. Daily fantasy sports are a subset of traditional season-long fantasy sports and are immensely lucrative, yet there are hardly any standard regulations. Ironically, the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA) of 2006, which was used to outlaw online poker gambling, paved the way for daily fantasy sports, because it federally exempted fantasy sports from being classified as illegal sports gambling. The UIGEA further protects daily fantasy sports from the Professional and Amateur Sports Prohibition Act (PASPA) of 1992 which prohibits states from sponsoring sports …
The Ethics Of Inter Partes Review Before The Uspto., Dorian Ojemen
The Ethics Of Inter Partes Review Before The Uspto., Dorian Ojemen
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Texas's Excessive Demand Doctrine Impacts Recoveries In Litigation., Stephanie M. Green
Texas's Excessive Demand Doctrine Impacts Recoveries In Litigation., Stephanie M. Green
St. Mary's Law Journal
A party demanding money they are not entitled to becomes subject to the excessive demand doctrine. Because the excessive demand doctrine is an affirmative defense, a defending party must allege its claim of excessive demand in its pleadings. A party must “plead it, prove it, and obtain findings of fact on its essential elements.” To obtain findings on the issue, both the pleadings and the evidence are required to put a question or instruction before the jury. Ensuring that the evidence is enough depends upon the trial court—whose judgment will only be overturned upon a showing of an abuse of …
Ford V. State: Texas Forces A Resolution In The Cell Site Location Information Debate., Brandon J. Grable
Ford V. State: Texas Forces A Resolution In The Cell Site Location Information Debate., Brandon J. Grable
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Use It Or Lose It: Grappling With Classification Of Post-Petition Sale Proceeds Under Chapter Seven Bankruptcy For Consumer Debtors In The Lone Star State., Danielle Nicole Rushing
Use It Or Lose It: Grappling With Classification Of Post-Petition Sale Proceeds Under Chapter Seven Bankruptcy For Consumer Debtors In The Lone Star State., Danielle Nicole Rushing
St. Mary's Law Journal
Texas affords consumer debtors some of the most generous state bankruptcy exemptions in the United States. This includes the homestead exemption, which permits consumer debtors to exempt a homestead of unlimited value from forced sale, subject to certain enumerated exceptions. Bankruptcy courts throughout the state are grappling with how to characterize proceeds from the sale of an exempted homestead once a consumer debtor files a Chapter Seven bankruptcy petition. Specifically, courts consider whether a debtor may personally retain funds from the sale of a homestead or whether a Chapter Seven Trustee should receive the sale proceeds on behalf of the …
Managing Unconventional Oil And Gas Development As If Communities Mattered, Mark Squillace
Managing Unconventional Oil And Gas Development As If Communities Mattered, Mark Squillace
Publications
The advent of horizontal oil and gas drilling into relatively impermeable shale rock, and the companion technological breakthrough of high-pressure, multi-stage fracking that frees hydrocarbons along the substantial length of these horizontal wells, has fundamentally altered the oil and gas industry. The Energy Information Administration has gone so far as to predict that North America could become a net energy exporter as early as 2019, largely as a result of the explosive growth of this “unconventional” oil and gas development. Despite its promise, managing unconventional oil and gas development has proved challenging, and many of the communities that find themselves …
Appeal No. 0900: City Of Wooster, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0900: City Of Wooster, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2015-68 (Enviro Clean Facility)