Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (892)
- St. Mary's University (833)
- University of Colorado Law School (300)
- Seattle University School of Law (185)
- Universitas Indonesia (121)
-
- DePaul University (25)
- University of Michigan Law School (13)
- Southern Methodist University (8)
- Pace University (5)
- University of Montana (5)
- University of Richmond (4)
- West Virginia University (4)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
- UIC School of Law (3)
- BLR (2)
- The University of Akron (2)
- University of Georgia School of Law (2)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (2)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (2)
- Barry University School of Law (1)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (1)
- Pepperdine University (1)
- SIT Graduate Institute/SIT Study Abroad (1)
- The University of San Francisco (1)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (1)
- University of Dar es Salaam (1)
- University of Denver (1)
- Keyword
-
- Ohio (870)
- State law; State administrative decision; (556)
- St. Mary’s Law Journal (396)
- St. Mary’s University School of Law (386)
- State law; State administrative decision (311)
-
- Colorado (83)
- United States (80)
- Inc. (77)
- BLM (72)
- Texas (67)
- Hydraulic fracturing (55)
- Fracking (52)
- Wyoming (52)
- Fracing (47)
- Student comment (47)
- U.S. Bureau of Land Management (47)
- BMPs (43)
- Best management practices (43)
- Public lands (43)
- Oil and gas development (42)
- Congress (39)
- National Environmental Policy Act (39)
- FLPMA (37)
- Texas Supreme Court (36)
- EPA (33)
- Bureau of Land Management (32)
- Montana (32)
- NEPA (32)
- New Mexico (32)
- Utah (32)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions (892)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (832)
- Seattle University Law Review (185)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- New Sources of Water for Energy Development and Growth: Interbasin Transfers: A Short Course (Summer Conference, June 7-10) (29)
-
- The Future of Natural Resources Law and Policy (Summer Conference, June 6-8) (28)
- DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal (25)
- Water Resources Allocation: Laws and Emerging Issues: A Short Course (Summer Conference, June 8-11) (23)
- The Public Lands During the Remainder of the 20th Century: Planning, Law, and Policy in the Federal Land Agencies (Summer Conference, June 8-10) (22)
- Groundwater: Allocation, Development and Pollution (Summer Conference, June 6-9) (17)
- Public Lands Mineral Leasing: Issues and Directions (Summer Conference, June 10-11) (16)
- Getting a Handle on Hazardous Waste Control (Summer Conference, June 9-10) (14)
- Best Practices for Community and Environmental Protection (October 14) (13)
- The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Summer Conference, June 6-8) (13)
- The Promise and Peril of Oil Shale Development (February 5) (13)
- Best Management Practices (BMPs): What? How? And Why? (May 26) (11)
- Best Management Practices and Adaptive Management in Oil and Gas Development (May 12-13) (11)
- Opportunities and Obstacles to Reducing the Environmental Footprint of Natural Gas Development in Uintah Basin (October 14) (10)
- Shale Plays in the Intermountain West: Legal and Policy Issues (November 12) (10)
- Coalbed Methane Development in the Intermountain West (April 4-5) (8)
- Michigan Law Review (8)
- Natural Resource Development in Indian Country (Summer Conference, June 8-10) (7)
- Publications (7)
- SMU Annual Texas Survey (7)
- Workshop on Directional Drilling in the Rocky Mountain Region (November 13) (7)
- Federal Lands, Laws and Policies and the Development of Natural Resources: A Short Course (Summer Conference, July 28-August 1) (6)
- Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15) (6)
- Air Quality Impacts from Oil and Gas Development (January 27) (5)
- Drawing the Blueprint for a Sustainable Natural Gas Future (January 18) (5)
- Public Land & Resources Law Review (5)
- Publication Type
Articles 481 - 510 of 2427
Full-Text Articles in Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law
Oil, Gas, And Mineral Law, Richard F. Brown
Oil, Gas, And Mineral Law, Richard F. Brown
SMU Annual Texas Survey
No abstract provided.
United States V. Osage Wind, Llc, Summer Carmack
United States V. Osage Wind, Llc, Summer Carmack
Public Land & Resources Law Review
The Osage Nation, as owner of the beneficial interest in its mineral estate, issues federally-approved leases to persons and entities who wish to conduct mineral development on its lands. After an energy-development company, Osage Wind, leased privately-owned surface lands within Tribal reservation boundaries and began to excavate minerals for purposes of constructing a wind farm, the United States brought suit on the Tribe’s behalf. In the ensuing litigation, the Osage Nation insisted that Osage Wind should have obtained a mineral lease from the Tribe before beginning its work. In its decision, the Tenth Circuit applied one of the Indian law …
Appeal No. 0941: Duck Creek Energy, Inc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0941: Duck Creek Energy, Inc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2016-452 (Temporary Authorization; Mogadore Facility)
Appeal No. 0943: Mario V. D/Amico V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0943: Mario V. D/Amico V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2017-94
Appeal No. 0932: Steven Passerell V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management & Michael D. Hobbs, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0932: Steven Passerell V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management & Michael D. Hobbs, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2016-304 (H&R Smith Unit #1 Well)
Appeal No. 0926: Goerge Jr. & Karen L. Dudich V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources & Ascent Resources - Utica, Llc, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0926: Goerge Jr. & Karen L. Dudich V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources & Ascent Resources - Utica, Llc, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2016-118; Troyer W LND DR Unit (Ascent Resources - Utica)
Appeal No. 0935: B&N, Inc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0935: B&N, Inc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2016-346; (Weddle Wiley #1 Well)
Appeal No. 0912: John & Arlene Wehr V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management & Gulfport Energy Corporation, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0912: John & Arlene Wehr V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management & Gulfport Energy Corporation, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2014-471 (Gulfport Energy Corporation; Brown #9 Unit)
Appeal No. 0928: Clewell Family Farm, Llc V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0928: Clewell Family Farm, Llc V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2014-46 & 2016-16 (Unitzation Order & Revocation Order; Huffman Trust South Unit; Chsepeake Exploration, LLC)
Appeal No. 0862: Clewell Family Farm, Llc V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0862: Clewell Family Farm, Llc V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2014-46 & 2016-16 (Unitzation Order & Revocation Order; Huffman Trust South Unit; Chsepeake Exploration, LLC)
Hawkes Co. V. United States Army Corps Of Engineers, Sarah M. Danno
Hawkes Co. V. United States Army Corps Of Engineers, Sarah M. Danno
Public Land & Resources Law Review
A peat mining company will not be required to obtain a permit under the Clean Water Act to discharge dredged and fill material into wetlands. The United States District Court for the District of Minnesota held that the United States Army Corps of Engineers fell short in its attempts to establish jurisdiction over the wetlands by twice failing to show a significant nexus existed between the wetlands and navigable waters. Further, the district court enjoined the Corps from asserting jurisdiction a third time because it would force the mining company through a “never ending loop” of administrative law.
Appeal No. 0927: M-Il.L.C. Dba M_I Swaco, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0927: M-Il.L.C. Dba M_I Swaco, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2016-158 (modifying Chief's Order 2016-121); M-I SWACO Facility
Appeal No. 0931: M-Il.L.C. Dba M_I Swaco, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0931: M-Il.L.C. Dba M_I Swaco, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Termination Letter; Strasburg Facility
Transition Support Mechanisms For Communities Facing Full Or Partial Coal Power Plant Retirement In New York, Lisa Anne Hamilton, Radina Valova, Karl R. Rábago
Transition Support Mechanisms For Communities Facing Full Or Partial Coal Power Plant Retirement In New York, Lisa Anne Hamilton, Radina Valova, Karl R. Rábago
Environmental Law Program Publications @ Haub Law
New York State is undergoing a rapid and unprecedented energy transformation, particularly in the electricity sector. As new resources and technologies emerge to meet the demands of 21st century life, regulators must balance the need for cost effective and equitable participation in wholesale power markets while maintaining reliability on the grid. Furthermore, it is critical that all New Yorkers participate fully in the promise of a revitalized and equitable energy future. Such a transformation requires that the needs of all communities are factored into the polices and regulations that move New York toward the bold goals set forth under its …
Where Oil Is King, Kristen Van De Biezenbos
Where Oil Is King, Kristen Van De Biezenbos
Fordham Law Review
Donald Trump has won the 2016 presidential election, and, based on his campaign rhetoric, it seems reasonable to anticipate that the next four years will see a rollback of federal rules and regulations originally intended to combat climate change and environmental pollution in favor of increased production of fossil fuels, including coal. This raises the question of where we can look for protection of environmental goals, if not to federal law or agencies. Unconventional solutions to energy and environmental issues may be the only way to move forward on environmental challenges in the near term. This Article suggests one such …
Appeal No. 0936: Coddingville Reality Ltd, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0936: Coddingville Reality Ltd, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2016-368 (Liability Insurance)
Appeal No. 0929: Duck Creek Energy, Inc., V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0929: Duck Creek Energy, Inc., V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2016-162; (Cessation of Operations; Mogadore Facility)
Appeal No. 0940: Riverside Petroleum & Production, Inc., V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0940: Riverside Petroleum & Production, Inc., V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2016-420
Appeal No. 0909: Dow Cameron Oil & Gas, Llc V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0909: Dow Cameron Oil & Gas, Llc V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2015-413; Dow Cameron Facility
Appeal No. 0908: Dover-Atwood Corporation V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0908: Dover-Atwood Corporation V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2015-416; Shirley et al Unit #3 Well
The Post-Production Costs Issue In Texas And Louisiana: Implications For The Fate Of Implied Covenants And Pro-Lessor Clauses In The Shale Era Oil And Gas Lease., Laura H. Burney
St. Mary's Law Journal
This Article discusses the implications of Heritage Resources, Hyder, and several Louisiana cases on the “post-production costs” issue in gas royalty clauses, as well as the fate of implied covenants in the shale era. To better understand that issue, this Article first provides a background on the interaction of express lease clauses and the doctrine of implied covenants. This discussion reveals that implied covenants are relegated to a minor role in light of extensive express clauses in Shale Era leases because courts frequently view express or “plain” terms as barring implied covenants. The problem, however, as commentators have noted—particularly regarding …
The Executive Right To Lease After Kcm Financial Llc V. Bradshaw And A Louisiana Solution To A Texas Problem., Christopher S. Kulander
The Executive Right To Lease After Kcm Financial Llc V. Bradshaw And A Louisiana Solution To A Texas Problem., Christopher S. Kulander
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Zoning’S Centennial: A Complete Account Of The Evolution Of Zoning Into A Robust System Of Land Use Law—1916-2016 (Part Iv), John R. Nolon
Zoning’S Centennial: A Complete Account Of The Evolution Of Zoning Into A Robust System Of Land Use Law—1916-2016 (Part Iv), John R. Nolon
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
Fracking is happening and local governments are subjected to many of its associated risks. They either need to act, or know—clearly and convincingly—why they should not. The federal government has stopped far short of comprehensive regulation of fracking; the states’ regulations range from fair to poor, sometimes preempting local regulation but most often sharing regulatory authority over land use impacts.
A New Remedy For Junk Science: Article 11.073 And Texas's Response To The Changing Landscape In The Forensic Sciences., Trevor Rosson
A New Remedy For Junk Science: Article 11.073 And Texas's Response To The Changing Landscape In The Forensic Sciences., Trevor Rosson
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
No Appropriation Without Compensation: How Per Se Takings Of Personal Property Check The Power To Regulate Commerce., William Sumner Macdaniel
No Appropriation Without Compensation: How Per Se Takings Of Personal Property Check The Power To Regulate Commerce., William Sumner Macdaniel
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Pipe(Line) Dreams Post-Denbury Green., Nicholas Laurent, Christopher Oddo
Pipe(Line) Dreams Post-Denbury Green., Nicholas Laurent, Christopher Oddo
St. Mary's Law Journal
In Denbury Green Pipeline-Texas, LLC v. Texas Rice Land Partners, the Beaumont Court of Appeals articulated the test that should be applied when considering whether the condemnation of private property, which would result favorably for pipeline companies, should be allowed. In Denbury, the Beaumont Court of Appeals balanced the protection of private property rights against the need for true common carrier pipeline companies to condemn private property. The court held that in order to condemn private property, a substantial public interest must exist to justify such condemnation. The Texas Supreme Court, however, reversed the decision of the Beaumont Court of …
Tx Rice V. Denbury., Thomas Alan Zabel
The English Rule - It Ain't English, And Ought Not Be American., Timothy M. Mulligan
The English Rule - It Ain't English, And Ought Not Be American., Timothy M. Mulligan
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
The Demise Of Anti-Panhandling Laws In America., Natie Pilgram Neidig
The Demise Of Anti-Panhandling Laws In America., Natie Pilgram Neidig
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
The Exclusionary Rule And The Dueling Legacies Of Utah V. Streiff: Which Will Be Suppressed., Marcos Herrera
The Exclusionary Rule And The Dueling Legacies Of Utah V. Streiff: Which Will Be Suppressed., Marcos Herrera
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.