Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law Commons^™

Tennessee, Westley A. Ketron

Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal

No abstract provided.

Pennsylvania, Nathaniel I. Holland

Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal

No abstract provided.

Oklahoma, Matt Schlensker, Sandra Fraley

Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal

No abstract provided.

Ohio, Tim Mckeen, Melissa Grimes

Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal

No abstract provided.

North Dakota, William J. Black

Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal

No abstract provided.

New York, Delainey Banks

Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal

No abstract provided.

New Mexico, Blake C. Jones

Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal

No abstract provided.

Nevada, Grace E. George

Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal

No abstract provided.

Nebraska, Sarah Trainer

Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal

No abstract provided.

Montana, Kathleen R. Begley

Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal

No abstract provided.

Missouri, Douglas J. Crouse

Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal

No abstract provided.

Michigan, M. Vafa Barissi, Delainey Banks

Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal

No abstract provided.

Maryland, Tia L. Churchfield

Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal

No abstract provided.

Louisiana, Jim Tartaglia

Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal

No abstract provided.

Kentucky, Kathleen R. Begley

Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal

No abstract provided.

Kansas, Steven Rhodes, Sarah Trainer

Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal

No abstract provided.

Illinois, Delainey Banks, Madison Pemberton

Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal

No abstract provided.

Colorado, David R. Little, Diana S. Prulhiere

Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal

No abstract provided.

Arkansas, Andreah Riedel

Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal

No abstract provided.

Alaska, Steven A. Rhodes, Zachary H. Barrett, Kizito Aidam

Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal

No abstract provided.

Editor's Introduction & Front Pages, Alexandra Jury

Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal

No abstract provided.

The Economic Rhetoric Of Carbon Pricing, Jeff Todd

Brooklyn Law Review

Economists overwhelmingly prefer the carbon pricing instruments of carbon taxes and cap-and-trade programs as the most cost-effective way to reduce greenhouse gases and combat climate change. By contrast, US lawmakers have largely eschewed carbon pricing, and legal scholars have mixed views about implementing it. In order for legal scholars to better understand economic studies on carbon pricing and incorporate those studies into their own climate change scholarship, this Article turns to the rhetoric of economics. Economists view problems like climate change through the metaphor of the market, so they embrace carbon pricing because it is a market-based approach that corrects …

Infrastructure, Equity And Climate Change: The Promise Of The Infrastructure Investment And Jobs Act (Iija), Dante R. Gurule

Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal

No abstract provided.

Fixing The Last Frontier: How Law And Policy Governing Commercial Fishing Have Failed Alaska’S Environment And Economy, Andrew Ilemsky

Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal

No abstract provided.

Overview Of Oil And Gas Activities In The Amazonian Territories, Leonardo Costa Da Fonseca, Marcio Pina Marques

Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal

No abstract provided.

Editor's Introduction & Front Pages, Alexandra Jury

Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal

No abstract provided.

The Climate-Arbitration Nexus: How Legitimate Expectations Shape Investor Claims In A Decarbonizing World, M. Uzeyir Karabiyik

American University International Law Review

The global push for climate change mitigation, particularly through renewable energy promotion and fossil fuel phase-out, has sparked a surge in investor-state arbitrations. At the heart of these arbitrations lies the concept of “legitimate expectations,” which is considered by arbitral tribunals as a cornerstone of the fair and equitable treatment (FET) standard. This Article conducts a comprehensive analysis of diverse approaches adopted by arbitral tribunals in interpreting legitimate expectations in the context of climate action. It then delves into specific interpretations of this concept within two categories: disputes related to states’ renewable energy promotion policies and those that stem from …

Through A Glass Darkly: How Securities Disclosures Give A Distorted View Of The Economy, Gerald F. Davis

Seattle University Law Review

Our understanding of the American economy often relies on stylized facts derived from mandatory disclosures by listed corporations. Data vendors like Standard & Poor’s vacuum up 10Ks and proxy statements into databases, and scholars distill these into tentative maps. This may have been adequate for a postwar economy centered on asset-heavy manufacturers, but it is increasingly out of step with an information-based economy. Companies listed on the stock market are fewer in number and less representative than they were, light in tangible assets and people, and heavy on IP. Basic facts such as what industry they are in are increasingly …

Beyond Agency Authority: Regulating Sulfur Hexafluoride Under An Enhanced Title Ii Framework Of The Clean Air Act, Matthew Gawley

Fordham Environmental Law Review

This paper explores the critical need for robust Congressional action to regulate sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), a greenhouse gas with a global warming potential more than 20,000 times greater than carbon dioxide. Recent Supreme Court decisions––in West Virginia v. EPA and Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo––to restrict EPA authority and end the Chevron doctrine have curtailed federal environmental agencies’ regulatory authority, shifting the responsibility for addressing major environmental challenges back to Congress. Despite being addressed under Title I of the Clean Air Act (CAA) through the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), current SF6 regulations prove grossly inadequate. The utilities industry––the largest …

Article Iii Standing For Cercla Private Cost Recovery Actions: How The Test's Strained Logic Belies Its Authority, Jonathan M. Palacios

Fordham Environmental Law Review

This Note examines how Article III standing doctrine applies to

private plaintiffs’ cost recovery actions under § 107(a)(4)(B) of the

Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and

Liability Act. A review of judicial decisions reveals inconsistencies

in the analysis of injury in fact and traceability, and suggests that

current Article III standing doctrine is misaligned with its purported

objectives. In response, this Note proposes a structured framework

for assessing injury in fact and a refined approach to analyzing

traceability that distinguishes between different forms of causal

uncertainty. These doctrinal adjustments should better align case

outcomes with Article III standing doctrine’s constitutional and …