Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Legal Profession (5)
- Tax Law (5)
- Law and Society (4)
- Business Organizations Law (3)
- Human Rights Law (3)
-
- Legal Education (3)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (2)
- Criminal Law (2)
- Education Law (2)
- Environmental Law (2)
- Family Law (2)
- Immigration Law (2)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (2)
- Social Welfare Law (2)
- Bankruptcy Law (1)
- Civil Law (1)
- Commercial Law (1)
- Disability Law (1)
- Elder Law (1)
- Energy and Utilities Law (1)
- Housing Law (1)
- Juvenile Law (1)
- Labor and Employment Law (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Natural Resources Law (1)
- Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law (1)
- Organizations Law (1)
- Religion Law (1)
- Institution
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 13 of 13
Full-Text Articles in Nonprofit Organizations Law
2023 Champions For Justice 1-27-2023, Roger Williams University School Of Law
2023 Champions For Justice 1-27-2023, Roger Williams University School Of Law
School of Law Conferences, Lectures & Events
No abstract provided.
Non-Profit Organizations Should Prioritize Governance In Board Selection Decisions—Those That Prioritize Money May Pay Too Much, Heidi Grunwald, Daniel Isaacs
Non-Profit Organizations Should Prioritize Governance In Board Selection Decisions—Those That Prioritize Money May Pay Too Much, Heidi Grunwald, Daniel Isaacs
Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law
Non-profit corporations must comply with federal tax laws, and their governing bodies must satisfy corporation law-based duties, but they are not subject to the regulatory requirements of publicly traded corporations. This discrepancy should be troubling, because the stakeholders of non-profit organizations are far more vulnerable than the typical investor. Accordingly, non-profit boards have a particularly strong need for good governance. However, our research shows that non-profit board members believe that board selection procedures prioritize giving over the ability to attract and retain members with attributes commonly associated with good governance. To address this problem, we argue that laws should require …
Extra Law Prices: Why Mrpc 5.4 Continues To Needlessly Burden Access To Civil Justice For Low- To Moderate-Income Clients, R. Matthew Black
Extra Law Prices: Why Mrpc 5.4 Continues To Needlessly Burden Access To Civil Justice For Low- To Moderate-Income Clients, R. Matthew Black
Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice
Whether alternative business structures might improve access to justice for low- to moderate-income clients remains a contentious matter.8 Because alternative business structures are generally unavailable, lawyers rely on 501(c)(3) non-profit status and sliding-scale fee structures to reach an underserved market of low-to moderate-income clientele. Nevertheless, use of a sliding- scale fee structure is rare—perhaps because it fails to maximize law firm profits. A sliding-scale fee structure also does not assist clients who need legal services, but do not qualify for LSC-funded programs and are unable to pay even a portion of subsidized legal fees.
This Note addresses why using a …
The Pro Bono Collaborative Project Spotlight: Rwu Law Alums Providing Pro Bono Through The Pbc (September 20, 2018), Roger Williams University School Of Law
The Pro Bono Collaborative Project Spotlight: Rwu Law Alums Providing Pro Bono Through The Pbc (September 20, 2018), Roger Williams University School Of Law
Pro Bono Collaborative Staff Publications
No abstract provided.
Montana Environmental Information Center V. U.S. Office Of Surface Mining, Lowell J. Chandler
Montana Environmental Information Center V. U.S. Office Of Surface Mining, Lowell J. Chandler
Public Land & Resources Law Review
In MEIC v. U.S. Office of Surface Mining, the cost of coal mining’s climate impacts and the agency’s NEPA review obligations are at issue. The United States District Court for the District of Montana found that the Office of Surface Mining and Enforcement failed to adequately consider the need for an EIS and to take a hard look at the indirect, cumulative, and foreseeable impacts of a proposed coal mine expansion in central Montana. In its NEPA analysis, the court concluded that if the benefits of a carbon-intensive project are quantified, then the costs to the climate should be …
The Cambridge Handbook Of Social Enterprise Law, Lloyd Histoshi Mayer
The Cambridge Handbook Of Social Enterprise Law, Lloyd Histoshi Mayer
Books
Book Chapters
Lloyd Hitoshi Mayer, Creating a Tax Space for Social Enterprise, in The Cambridge Handbook of Social Enterprise Law 157 (Benjamin Means & Joseph W. Yockey eds., 2018)
While still relatively few in number compared to traditional nonprofit and for-profit organizations, the rise of social enterprises represents a possible disruption of not only existing models of doing business but also areas of law that in many respects have seen little fundamental change for decades. One such area is domestic tax law, where social enterprises currently find themselves subject to the rules of for-profit activities and entities. Here, both scholars …
Charitable Subsidies And Nonprofit Governance: Comparing The Charitable Deduction With The Exemption For Endowment Income, David M. Schizer
Charitable Subsidies And Nonprofit Governance: Comparing The Charitable Deduction With The Exemption For Endowment Income, David M. Schizer
Faculty Scholarship
Charitable subsidies are supposed to encourage positive externalities from charity. In principle, the government can pursue this goal by evaluating specific charitable initiatives and deciding how much each should receive. Although the government sometimes makes this sort of fine-grained judgment, this Article focuses on two income tax rules that leave the government essentially no discretion about which charities to fund: the deduction for donations to charity ("the deduction") and the exemption of a charity's investment income ("the exemption"). With each subsidy, federal dollars flow automatically as long as charities satisfy very general criteria.
As a result, these subsidies are especially …
Video: Representing Charities: Profit V. Non Profit, Adam Goldberg
Video: Representing Charities: Profit V. Non Profit, Adam Goldberg
NSU Law Seminar Series
his particular seminar is designed to educate attorneys what to request prior to becoming a Board Member including but not limited to:
- Is there a Board Orientation?
- What is the Board's Liability?
- How to read IRS Form 990 and Financial Statements
- Legal Issues facing Charitable Organizations
- Best Practices
Learning Outcomes include:
- Difference between Tax Exempt and Not-For-Profit & Calendar v. Fiscal Year
- Serving as a Board Member
- Representing Charitable Organizations/Tax Exempt Organizations as Legal Counsel
- Ethical Considerations for Exempt Organizations Practitioners
The Pro Bono Collaborative: Celebrating 10 Years Of Pro Bono Partnerships, Roger Williams University School Of Law
The Pro Bono Collaborative: Celebrating 10 Years Of Pro Bono Partnerships, Roger Williams University School Of Law
Pro Bono Collaborative Staff Publications
No abstract provided.
The 21st Century Fight Over Who Sets The Terms Of The Charity Property Tax Exemption, Evelyn Brody
The 21st Century Fight Over Who Sets The Terms Of The Charity Property Tax Exemption, Evelyn Brody
All Faculty Scholarship
Turning from the substantive issue of defining charity, this article considers the “who” question by examining the roles of the courts, legislatures, municipalities, and charities in determining exemption and payments in lieu of taxes. The three covered topics – constitutional power, statutory interpretation, and the “intermediate sanctions” of user fees and PILOTs – braid together to form the procedural framework for the financial relationship between nonprofit property owners and the taxing jurisdictions that host them. Change the parameters of one, and you change the others. Staying off the rolls or minimizing the tax bite often results from compromise – whether …
Video: Charities For Fun & Profit: Serving & Representing Them, Adam Scott Goldberg
Video: Charities For Fun & Profit: Serving & Representing Them, Adam Scott Goldberg
NSU Law Seminar Series
Registration & Continental Breakfast:
7:30 to 7:55 am
Atrium & Lecture Room
Welcome & Introduction:
7:55 to 8:00 am
Elena Rose Minicucci, J.D., Director of Alumni Relations, NSU Shepard Broad Law Center
- Welcome
- Introduce Adam Scott Goldberg, J.D., LL.M. of Krause & Goldberg, PA Weston, Florida.
Seminar Presentation
8:00 am to 9:30 am
Adam Scott Goldberg, J.D., LL.M.
I. Introduction
1. What is the difference between Tax Exempt and Not-For-Profit?
2. Why is the difference between a Calendar Year and a Fiscal Year?
A. Many Charitable Organizations use July 1st to June 30th
B. Tax returns are due 4.5 months …
Bankrupting The Faith, Pamela Foohey
Bankrupting The Faith, Pamela Foohey
Scholarly Works
This Article presents the results of a comprehensive empirical study of religious organizations that filed bankruptcy under Chapter 11 from the beginning of 2006 to the end of 2011. It examines the institutions’ characteristics, reasons for filing, and case outcomes to investigate whether Chapter 11 is an effective solution to their financial problems. In investigating the religious organizations’ cases, the Article also assesses the role of bankruptcy courts in adjudicating Chapter 11 cases and places the cases within theories about the larger purposes of Chapter 11.
The study finds that the vast majority of debtors are small organizations that operate …
Foundations And The Patman Committee Report, John E. Riecker
Foundations And The Patman Committee Report, John E. Riecker
Michigan Law Review
It is the purpose of this article to evaluate the major points of the first, and main, installment of Congressman Patman's Report in the light of existing Internal Revenue Code provisions, Treasury regulations, and the more significant federal court decisions and Internal Revenue Service rulings. While the Report itself is more inclusive, space limitations dictate that this article be confined to section 501(c)(3) organizations-chiefly foundations, tax-exempt funds, and charitable trusts. Although the writer will strive to be objective, it is difficult to avoid some of the political gloss in which the Report is cast and impossible to discuss the ramifications …