Natural Resources Law Commons^™

Appeal No. 0682: Eastland Energy Group V. Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Review of Chief's Order 2000-14

Appeal No. 0676: Robert Barr, Dba Big Sky Petro. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 99-129. 99-130, 2000-16 & 2000-17

Appeal No. 0677: B.T. Energy Corp. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 99-142

Appeal No. 0678: Perto Drilling Corp., Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 99-156

Appeal No. 0681: Joseph T. Flaherty, Dba Pioneer Production V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 99-82

Appeal No. 0683: Robert Barr, Dba Big Sky Petro. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 99-129. 99-130, 2000-16 & 2000-17

Appeal No. 0654: Paul A. Grim V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 98-48

The Wto Panel Decision On Australia's Salmon Import Guidelines: Evidence That The Sps Agreement Can Effectively Protect Human Health Interests, Matthew D. Taylor

Washington International Law Journal

On July 19, 1999, Australia lifted its ban on salmon imports and announced new salmon import guidelines. The new guidelines were promulgated in response to a World Trade Organization ("WTO") Appellate Body determination that the import ban violated the Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures ("SPS Agreement"). Canada challenged Australia's new import guidelines, alleging that the new guidelines also violate the SPS Agreement. The WTO dispute settlement panel held that, with the exception of only one provision, Australia's new salmon import guidelines are based on appropriate scientific risk analyses and are now in line with comparable import …

Reply Brief Of Appellant Muckleshoot Indian Trive Responding To Joint Brief Of Appellees Puyallup, Swinomish And Suquamish Tribes And Brief Of Appellee Tulalip Tribes - United States V. Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, Docket No. 99-35960 (235 F.3d 429 (9th Cir. 2000))

United States v. Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, Docket No. 99-35960 (235 F.3d 429 (9th Cir. 2000))

No abstract provided.

Resource Law Notes Newsletter, No. 49, Spring Issue, Mar. 2000, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center

Resource Law Notes: The Newsletter of the Natural Resources Law Center (1984-2002)

No abstract provided.

The Lining Of The All-American Canal: The Forgotten Voices, Alfonso Cortez-Lara, Maria Rosa Garcia-Acevedo

Natural Resources Journal

No abstract provided.

The La Paz Symposium On Transboundary Groundwater Management On The U.S.-Mexico Border, Stephen P. Mumme

Natural Resources Journal

No abstract provided.

Brief Of Intervenor - Plaintiffs/Petitioners - Appellees Puyallup Indian Tribe, Suquamish Indian Tribe And Swinomish Indian Tribal Community - United States V. Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, Docket No. 99-35960 (235 F.3d 429 (9th Cir. 2000))

United States v. Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, Docket No. 99-35960 (235 F.3d 429 (9th Cir. 2000))

No abstract provided.

Brief Of Intervenor- Plaintiff/Appellee The Tulalip Tribes Of Washington - United States V. Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, Docket No. 99-35960 (235 F.3d 429 (9th Cir. 2000))

United States v. Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, Docket No. 99-35960 (235 F.3d 429 (9th Cir. 2000))

No abstract provided.

Brief Of Appellant Muckleshoot Indian Tribe - United States V. Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, Docket No. 99-35960 (235 F.3d 429 (9th Cir. 2000))

United States v. Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, Docket No. 99-35960 (235 F.3d 429 (9th Cir. 2000))

No abstract provided.

Final Environmental Impact Statement - Iron Point Exploraton License - Iron Point Coal Lease Tract - Elk Creek Coal Lease Tract, Volume 2, United States Department Of Agriculture -- Forest Service, United States Department Of The Interior -- Bureau Of Land Management

Environmental Assessments (CO)

This appendix documents BLM and Forest Service activities to involve and consult with other government agencies and the public in the preparation of the Final EIS for the potential leasing of the Iron Point and Elk Creek Coal lease tracts, as well as the issuance of a coal exploration license for an area within and surrounding the Iron Point Coal lease Tract.

Final Envrionmental Impact Statement: Iron Point Exploration License -- Iron Point Coal Lease Tract -- Elk Creek Coal Lease Tract, Volume 1, United States Department Of Agriculture -- Forest Service, United States Departement Of The Interior -- Bureau Of Land Management

Environmental Assessments (CO)

The Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) describes the physical, biological, social, and economic resources that would be potentially affected by leasing of the Iron Point and Elk Creek Coal Lease tracts as well as issuing an exploration license for an area within and surrounding the Iron Point Coal Lease Tract. The federal decisions to be made involve the approval or disapproval of coal leasing (the Iron Point and Elk Creek tracts) and of an exploration license. Some of the key issues for these proposed actions include: the potential effects of transporting over 19 million tons of coal per year from …

Adverse Possession Of The Severed Mineral Estate In Arkansas, Phillip E. Norvell

Annual of the Arkansas Natural Resources Law Institute

No abstract provided.

Everything You Ever Needed To Know About Lakes, Streams, Rivers, Riparian Rights, Accretions & Avulsions, Robert Honea

Annual of the Arkansas Natural Resources Law Institute

No abstract provided.

Selected Issues In Oil And Gas Title Examination, Thomas K. Dougherty

Annual of the Arkansas Natural Resources Law Institute

No abstract provided.

Valuing Oil & Gas Properties, Robert M. Mcgowen

Annual of the Arkansas Natural Resources Law Institute

No abstract provided.

Recent Developments In Natural Resource Law - Circa 1999, Thomas A. Daily

Annual of the Arkansas Natural Resources Law Institute

No abstract provided.

Engineering Aspects Of The Implied Covenant To Protect Against Drainage, Henry C. Coutret Jr.

Annual of the Arkansas Natural Resources Law Institute

No abstract provided.

Messages From Frank's Landing: A Story Of Salmon, Treaties, And The Indian Way, Charles F. Wilkinson

Books, Reports, and Studies

This digital resource contains only an abstract, cover image and table of contents information from the published book.

Print copy of book is available in the University of Colorado’s Wise Law Library: http://lawpac.colorado.edu/record=b243280~S0

Contents: Muck Creek -- Nisqually River -- George Hugo Boldt -- Fort Lewis -- Wa He Lut -- Afterword

Laws Influencing Community-Based Conservation In Colorado And The American West: A Primer, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center

Books, Reports, and Studies

vi, 51 p.

Resource Law Notes Newsletter, No. 48, Winter Issue, Jan. 2000, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center

Resource Law Notes: The Newsletter of the Natural Resources Law Center (1984-2002)

No abstract provided.

Taxation In The Republic Of Armenia: An Overview And Discussion From The Perspectives Of Law, Economics And Ethics, Robert W. Mcgee

ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law

Like many economies in transition, the Republic of Armenia is in the process of adopting market-oriented policies and laws.

The Cartagena Protocol And Biological Diversity; Biosafe Or Bio-Sorry, Jonathan H. Adler

Faculty Publications

In January 2000, delegates from over 100 nations completed negotiations on an international treaty for the regulation of biotechnology, the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. The stated purpose of this protocol is to enhance the protection of biological diversity. Despite its good intentions, there is a mismatch between the protocol's substantive provisions and present threats to biological diversity. The protocol endorses "precautionary" regulation of transboundary shipments of genetically engineered organisms, including crops, so as to reduce the environmental risks that such organisms may pose. The greatest threat to biological diversity is habitat loss, largely driven by the conversion of land for …

Royalty Valuation: Should Overriding Royalty Interests And Nonparticipating Royalty Interests, Whether Payable In Value Or In Kind, Be Subject To The Same Valuation Standard As Lease Royalty, Owen L. Anderson

Faculty Articles

No abstract provided.

The Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District's Protected Water Rights: Legal, Beneficial, Or Against The Public Interest In New Mexico, Lisa D. Brown

Natural Resources Journal

No abstract provided.