National Security Law Commons^™

Confessions Of A National Security Lawyer, Noah C. Chauvin

Faculty Articles

In part one of this paper, an unidentified national security lawyer tells all. In part two, I explain why the overclassification issues part one satirizes have important implications for the democratic accountability of intelligence agencies, using examples of classification abuses related to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

Tort Law As A Remedy For Terrorism, Boaz Segal

Touro Law Review

This article examines two basic questions. First, can tort law suits against operatives in various circles of the world of terrorism be added to the toolkit of deterrence? Second, assuming that the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, how can tort law be structured to effectively deter terror operatives? With respect to the first question, despite the intuitive assumption that the relevant branches of the law in such cases are criminal, international, and counter-terrorism law rather than the various branches of private law, this article argues that tort law is capable of serving as a significant deterrent …

The Administrative State's Second Face, Emily R. Chertoff, Jessica Bulman-Pozen

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works

We often assume that there is one administrative state, with one body of administrative law that governs it. In fact, the administrative state has two distinct faces: one turned toward regulation and benefits distribution, and one turned toward physical force and surveillance. The two faces are growing further apart under the Roberts Court, which has hemmed in the first face with decisions like Loper Bright while showing solicitude for national security and law enforcement agencies.

This Article delineates the two faces of the administrative state. It provides a descriptive account of the second face and the distinctive administrative law that …

The Military's Constitutional Role, Brenner M. Fissell

Faculty Publications

A basic principle of the American constitutional order is that civilian authority must be supreme over that of the military. The violation of this principle by the British was one of the grievances enumerated in the Declaration of Independence, and the Framers responded with a Constitution that made military rule impossible. But why is so-called “civilian control” of the military so important? This deep normative question has yet to be thoroughly answered by scholars, most of who assume it away as a given. This Article takes up that task, using contemporary political theory to defend the principle of civilian control. …

The Ethics Of Military Influence On Politics, Brenner M. Fissell

Faculty Publications

Military rule is common across the world, but this form of government is incompatible with the rule of law for various reasons. To prevent this, Western democracies such as the United States impose a strong norm of civilian supremacy over military officials. The most important role of this norm of “civilian control” in America today is to police the interventions of senior military officers’ influence in politics. While the standard position is that the military should be “apolitical,” this limitation does little work in helping senior officers understand permissible conduct, as nearly every issue confronting them will implicate matters of …