Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Military, War, and Peace (44)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (31)
- Defense and Security Studies (30)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (30)
- Business (23)
-
- Portfolio and Security Analysis (23)
- Human Rights Law (16)
- International Law (14)
- Constitutional Law (12)
- President/Executive Department (8)
- Peace and Conflict Studies (7)
- Political Science (7)
- Terrorism Studies (7)
- American Politics (6)
- Criminal Law (6)
- International Relations (6)
- Internet Law (6)
- Law and Politics (5)
- Privacy Law (5)
- Courts (4)
- Criminal Procedure (4)
- Legislation (4)
- Jurisprudence (3)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (3)
- Legal Remedies (3)
- Administrative Law (2)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (2)
- Evidence (2)
- Institution
-
- University of South Florida (23)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (20)
- University of Denver (7)
- University of Richmond (7)
- Columbia Law School (6)
-
- Georgetown University Law Center (5)
- The Peter A. Allard School of Law (4)
- University of Michigan Law School (4)
- New York Law School (3)
- University of Colorado Law School (3)
- Brigham Young University Law School (2)
- Duke Law (2)
- Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University (2)
- UIC School of Law (2)
- University of Baltimore Law (2)
- University of Georgia School of Law (2)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Florida A&M University College of Law (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- St. John's University School of Law (1)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (1)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (1)
- University of San Diego (1)
- Valparaiso University (1)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- National security (24)
- Human rights (11)
- Torture (9)
- Counterterrorism (8)
- War on terror (8)
-
- Terrorism (7)
- Terrorism / counterterrorism (7)
- Detention of persons (5)
- Executive power (5)
- Habeas corpus (5)
- Right of privacy (5)
- Security (5)
- Afghanistan (4)
- Al-Qaida (4)
- Asymmetric warfare (4)
- Boumediene (4)
- CIA (4)
- Combatant (4)
- History (4)
- Homeland security (4)
- Boumediene v. Bush (3)
- Bush (3)
- Combatants & noncombatants (International law) (3)
- Detention (3)
- Due process (3)
- Global warming (3)
- International security (3)
- Interrogation (3)
- Irregular warfare (3)
- Islamic culture and politics (3)
- Publication
-
- Journal of Strategic Security (23)
- William Mitchell Law Review (17)
- Faculty Scholarship (12)
- Human Rights & Human Welfare (7)
- University of Richmond Law Review (6)
-
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (5)
- All Faculty Publications (4)
- NYLS Law Review (3)
- Publications (3)
- All Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Georgia Law Review (2)
- Applied Aviation Sciences - Daytona Beach (1)
- Articles (1)
- BYU Law Review (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Journal Articles (1)
- Journal Publications (1)
- Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Maryland Law Review Online (1)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (1)
- Michigan Law Review (1)
- Michigan Law Review First Impressions (1)
- San Diego International Law Journal (1)
- Scholarly Articles (1)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (1)
- Security Studies & International Affairs - Daytona Beach (1)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (1)
- UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law (1)
- UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship (1)
- University of Richmond Law Review Symposium (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 61 - 90 of 105
Full-Text Articles in National Security Law
University Research Under Siege: How The War On Terror Has Placed Academic Freedom Under Fire, 26 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 547 (2009), James Templin
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
The Comment analyzes the proposed revisions to United States export regulations contained in the Deemed Export Advisory Committee’s 2007 report. While the Advisory Committee’s work was much needed and its recommendations laudable, this comment discusses why its recommendations must be narrowly tailored in order to preserve the competitiveness of U.S. businesses and universities in the globalizing world and to advance national security. Part II explains the regulations that govern U.S. exports, including the deemed export regulatory regime and how those rules implement a range of national obligations and interests. This Part also discusses the events that threatened to significantly burden …
Putting Surveillance On The Political Agenda – A Short Defence Of Surveillance: Citizens And The State, Benjamin J. Goold, Charles D. Raab
Putting Surveillance On The Political Agenda – A Short Defence Of Surveillance: Citizens And The State, Benjamin J. Goold, Charles D. Raab
All Faculty Publications
In February 2009 the House of Lords Constitutional Committee in the United Kingdom published the report Surveillance: Citizens and the State. Some have hailed this as a landmark document. Volume 6(3) of Surveillance & Society published 4 invited responses to this report written by prominent scholars. In the attached paper the two Specialist Advisers to this Committee set the context for the report and provide a brief rejoinder to the four responses. NOTE: The authors write in their academic and personal capacities, and not as representatives of the Committee.
United States V. Benkahla: Illustrating The Need For Reform - The Fourth Circuit's Unprecedented Application Of The United States Sentencing Guideline Terrorism Enhancement To An Obstruction Of Justice Conviction, Steven A. Book
Maryland Law Review Online
No abstract provided.
In Search Of Justice: Increasing The Risk Of Business With State Sponsors Of Terror, Gabriel C. Lajeunesse
In Search Of Justice: Increasing The Risk Of Business With State Sponsors Of Terror, Gabriel C. Lajeunesse
Michigan Law Review First Impressions
If the aims of tort law are deterrence, compensation, and provision of equitable distribution of risks, U.S. anti-terrorism laws have been margin-ally effective at best. Though Congress has passed legislation providing causes of action to U.S. victims of terrorism, compensation of victims is often difficult and terrorists are rarely deterred. Attempts to provide such recourse include the Antiterrorism Act of 1991 ("ATA"), the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 ("AEDPA"), and the Flatow Amendment to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act ("FSIA"). These attempts, however, are not enough.
Title Vi Disparate Impact Claims Would Not Harm National Security - A Response To Paul Taylor, 46 Harv. J. On Legis. 503 (2009), Michael T. Kirkpatrick, Margaret B. Kwoka
Title Vi Disparate Impact Claims Would Not Harm National Security - A Response To Paul Taylor, 46 Harv. J. On Legis. 503 (2009), Michael T. Kirkpatrick, Margaret B. Kwoka
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
As Paul Taylor recognizes in the previous issue of this volume of the Harvard Journal on Legislation, Congress is considering amendments to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to explicitly allow private plaintiffs to use the disparate impact theory to prove discrimination by recipients of federal financial assistance. This Article responds to Taylor's assertion that allowing such disparate impact claims could harm national security programs. The authors explore the history of the disparate impact theory under both Title VI and Title VII, explain that use of the theory is consistent with Congress's original intent, and argue that …
International Terrorism: The Legitimization Of Safe Harbor States In International Law, Carol A. Bahan
International Terrorism: The Legitimization Of Safe Harbor States In International Law, Carol A. Bahan
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Deep Secrecy, David E. Pozen
Deep Secrecy, David E. Pozen
Faculty Scholarship
This Article offers a new way of thinking and talking about government secrecy. In the vast literature on the topic, little attention has been paid to the structure of government secrets, as distinct from their substance or function. Yet these secrets differ systematically depending on how many people know of their existence, what sorts of people know, how much they know, and how soon they know. When a small group of similarly situated officials conceals from outsiders the fact that it is concealing something, the result is a deep secret. When members of the general public understand they are being …
The Law Of Armed Conflict And Detention Operations In Afghanistan, Matthew C. Waxman
The Law Of Armed Conflict And Detention Operations In Afghanistan, Matthew C. Waxman
Faculty Scholarship
In reflecting on the arc of US and coalition detention operations in Afghanistan, three key issues related to the law of armed conflict stand out: one substantive, one procedural and one policy. The substantive matter – what are the minimum baseline treatment standards required as a matter of international law? – has clarified significantly during the course of operations there, largely as a result of the US Supreme Court's holding in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld. The procedural matter – what adjudicative processes does international law require for determining who may be detained? – eludes consensus and has become more controversial …
Police And National Security: American Local Law Enforcement And Counter-Terrorism After 9/11, Matthew C. Waxman
Police And National Security: American Local Law Enforcement And Counter-Terrorism After 9/11, Matthew C. Waxman
Faculty Scholarship
This article examines three national security law challenges resulting from greater involvement of state and local police agencies in protecting national security, especially in combating terrorism: organizational challenges, accountability challenges, and institutional tensions with traditional local police functions. Each threatens the balance of security and civil liberties.
International Standards For Detaining Terrorism Suspects: Moving Beyond The Armed Conflict-Criminal Divide, Monica Hakimi
International Standards For Detaining Terrorism Suspects: Moving Beyond The Armed Conflict-Criminal Divide, Monica Hakimi
Articles
Although sometimes described as war, the fight against transnational jihadi groups (referred to for shorthand as the "fight against terrorism") largely takes place away from any recognizable battlefield. Terrorism suspects are captured in houses, on street corners, and at border crossings around the globe. Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the high-level Qaeda operative who planned the September 11 attacks, was captured by the Pakistani government in a residence in Pakistan. Abu Omar, a radical Muslim imam, was apparently abducted by U.S. and Italian agents off the streets of Milan. And Abu Baker Bashir, the spiritual leader of the Qaeda-affiliated group responsible for …
Due Process And Targeted Killing Of Terrorists, Richard Murphy, Afsheen John Radsan
Due Process And Targeted Killing Of Terrorists, Richard Murphy, Afsheen John Radsan
Faculty Scholarship
"Targeted killing" is extra-judicial, premeditated killing by a state of a specifically identified person not in its custody. States have used this tool, secretly or not, throughout history. In recent years, targeted killing has generated new controversy as two states in particular-Israel and the United States-have struggled against opponents embedded in civilian populations. As a matter of express policy, Israel engages in targeted killing of persons it deems members of terrorist organizations involved in attacks on Israel. The United States, less expressly, has adopted a similar policy against al Qaeda-particularly in the border areas of Afghanistan and Pakistan, where the …
Change Versus Continuity At Obama’S Cia, Afsheen John Radsan
Change Versus Continuity At Obama’S Cia, Afsheen John Radsan
Faculty Scholarship
Sweeping change is necessary at the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). During President Barack Obama‘s transition into office, change should go deeper than usual between administrations. To restore the trust of the American people and to regain the confidence of the international community, the CIA needs to do better. I will outline three areas for legislative change relating to my former employer, the CIA. The first proposal is to have a national security court for the trials of terrorists. The second is to permit the CIA to continue to have an exception to pursue aggressive interrogations with a lot of oversight …
An Overt Turn On Covert Action, Afsheen John Radsan
An Overt Turn On Covert Action, Afsheen John Radsan
Faculty Scholarship
Long past the soul-searching of Watergate, very few people question the need for covert action as a part of American foreign policy. The world is so dangerous after 9/11 that it would be irresponsible to suggest that our intelligence agencies should be disbanded or that our government should acknowledge everything it does on the dark side. Today the question is not whether we should engage in covert action at all, but how often and under what circumstances.
Not everything stays secret. Our Nation has been conducting covert action with greater transparency and more congressional participation than during the Cold War. …
Responses To Ten Questions, William C. Banks
Responses To Ten Questions, William C. Banks
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To Ten Questions, Marion "Spike" Bowman
Responses To Ten Questions, Marion "Spike" Bowman
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To Ten Questions, Victor Hansen
Responses To Ten Questions, Victor Hansen
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To Ten Questions, Scott Horton
Responses To Ten Questions, Scott Horton
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To Ten Questions, Michael J. Kelly
Responses To Ten Questions, Michael J. Kelly
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To Ten Questions, Gregory E. Maggs
Responses To Ten Questions, Gregory E. Maggs
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Why The Hubbub About Habeas?: A Post-Mortem On A Failed Policy, Joseph Margulies
Why The Hubbub About Habeas?: A Post-Mortem On A Failed Policy, Joseph Margulies
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Taking The "Combat" Out Of The "Enemy Combatant" Category: Yet Another Expansion Of The President's Authority To Indefinitely Detain "Enemy Combatants" Within The United States—Al-Marri V. Pucciarelli, 534 F.3d 213 (4th Cir. 2008), Scott M. Kranz
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Funding Bin Laden's Avatar: A Proposal For The Regulation Of Virtual Hawalas, Stephen I. Landman
Funding Bin Laden's Avatar: A Proposal For The Regulation Of Virtual Hawalas, Stephen I. Landman
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Security Vs. The Law: A False Choice, Walter F. Mondale
Security Vs. The Law: A False Choice, Walter F. Mondale
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Use Of Force Against States That Might Have Weapons Of Mass Destruction, Matthew C. Waxman
The Use Of Force Against States That Might Have Weapons Of Mass Destruction, Matthew C. Waxman
Faculty Scholarship
The Iraq war rekindled debate – debate now further inflamed in discussions of Iran and North Korea-about the legal use of force to disarm an adversary state believed to pose a threat of catastrophic attack, including with weapons of mass destruction (WMD). Coinciding with this debate is the stark fact that intelligence about allegedly hostile states' WMD capabilities is and will remain limited.
This Article aims to develop more fully how an objective reasonableness approach to WMD capability assessments would work, and more generally how the law governing use of force should guide capability assessments. It begins in Part I …
Secret Evidence And The Due Process Of Terrorist Detentions, Daphne Barak-Erez, Matthew C. Waxman
Secret Evidence And The Due Process Of Terrorist Detentions, Daphne Barak-Erez, Matthew C. Waxman
Faculty Scholarship
Courts across many common law democracies have been wrestling with a shared predicament: proving cases against suspected terrorists in detention hearings requires governments to protect sensitive classified information about intelligence sources and methods, but withholding evidence from suspects threatens fairness and contradicts a basic tenet of adversarial process. This Article examines several models for resolving this problem, including the "special advocate" model employed by Britain and Canada, and the 'Judicial management" model employed in Israel. This analysis shows how the very different approaches adopted even among democracies sharing common legal foundations reflect varying understandings of 'fundamental fairness" or "due process," …
Unaccountable? The United Nations, Emergency Powers, And The Rule Of Law, Simon Chesterman
Unaccountable? The United Nations, Emergency Powers, And The Rule Of Law, Simon Chesterman
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
For a body committed to the rule of law in theory, the applicability of the rule of law to the United Nations in practice remains oddly unclear. This Article will not consider the personal responsibility of UN officials, who generally enjoy personal or functional immunity from legal process in the territories where they work. Rather the focus of this Article is on the quasi-constitutional question of the liability of the organization itself. As the United Nations has assumed more state-like functions-in particular through the coercive activities of its Security Council--the question of what limits exist on the powers thus exercised …
Terrorist Detention: Directions For Reform, Benjamin Priester
Terrorist Detention: Directions For Reform, Benjamin Priester
Journal Publications
Counterterrorism efforts by the U.S. government since 2001 have produced numerous legal controversies. One of the most controversial subjects has been the detention of individuals allegedly involved with terrorist organizations or activities. Unlike traditional criminal detainees, such persons are not held pursuant to indictment on charges pending trial or to a verdict of conviction. Unlike traditional military detainees, they are not battlefield captives from combat in a war zone against the military forces of another nation. Rather, terrorist detainees are held based on the individual's alleged connections to terrorist organizations and activities, without more. Terrorist detention, so defined, is an …
An Improved Analytical Framework For The Official Acknowledgment Doctrine: A Broader Interpretation Of “Through An Official And Documented Disclosure”, Jessica Fisher
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Bah V. Mukasey, Sandrine Dehaeze
Le Développement De L’Évaluation De La Menace De La Criminalité Organisée Et L’Architecure De Sécurité Intérieure (Development Of The Organised Crime Threat Assessment (Octa) And Internal Security Architecture), Benjamin J. Goold
All Faculty Publications
Cette note propose une vue d’ensemble de l’approche européenne des questions de sécurité, de lutte contre le terrorisme et contre la criminalité organisée. Elle aborde plus particulièrement le rôle de la Stratégie européenne de sécurité (SES) dans l’élaboration des politiques et des dispositions institutionnelles, ainsi que l’influence de l’OCTA (Évaluation de la menace de la criminalité organisée). cette note recommande qu’un certain nombre de mesures soient prises pour recentrer et rationaliser les structures existantes attachées aux questions de sécurité et de lutte contre le terrorisme et le crime organisé. Le nombre d’agences directement ou indirectement impliquées dans le recueil d’informations, …