Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

National Security Law Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

2009

Discipline
Institution
Keyword
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 61 - 90 of 105

Full-Text Articles in National Security Law

University Research Under Siege: How The War On Terror Has Placed Academic Freedom Under Fire, 26 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 547 (2009), James Templin Jan 2009

University Research Under Siege: How The War On Terror Has Placed Academic Freedom Under Fire, 26 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 547 (2009), James Templin

UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law

The Comment analyzes the proposed revisions to United States export regulations contained in the Deemed Export Advisory Committee’s 2007 report. While the Advisory Committee’s work was much needed and its recommendations laudable, this comment discusses why its recommendations must be narrowly tailored in order to preserve the competitiveness of U.S. businesses and universities in the globalizing world and to advance national security. Part II explains the regulations that govern U.S. exports, including the deemed export regulatory regime and how those rules implement a range of national obligations and interests. This Part also discusses the events that threatened to significantly burden …


Putting Surveillance On The Political Agenda – A Short Defence Of Surveillance: Citizens And The State, Benjamin J. Goold, Charles D. Raab Jan 2009

Putting Surveillance On The Political Agenda – A Short Defence Of Surveillance: Citizens And The State, Benjamin J. Goold, Charles D. Raab

All Faculty Publications

In February 2009 the House of Lords Constitutional Committee in the United Kingdom published the report Surveillance: Citizens and the State. Some have hailed this as a landmark document. Volume 6(3) of Surveillance & Society published 4 invited responses to this report written by prominent scholars. In the attached paper the two Specialist Advisers to this Committee set the context for the report and provide a brief rejoinder to the four responses. NOTE: The authors write in their academic and personal capacities, and not as representatives of the Committee.


United States V. Benkahla: Illustrating The Need For Reform - The Fourth Circuit's Unprecedented Application Of The United States Sentencing Guideline Terrorism Enhancement To An Obstruction Of Justice Conviction, Steven A. Book Jan 2009

United States V. Benkahla: Illustrating The Need For Reform - The Fourth Circuit's Unprecedented Application Of The United States Sentencing Guideline Terrorism Enhancement To An Obstruction Of Justice Conviction, Steven A. Book

Maryland Law Review Online

No abstract provided.


In Search Of Justice: Increasing The Risk Of Business With State Sponsors Of Terror, Gabriel C. Lajeunesse Jan 2009

In Search Of Justice: Increasing The Risk Of Business With State Sponsors Of Terror, Gabriel C. Lajeunesse

Michigan Law Review First Impressions

If the aims of tort law are deterrence, compensation, and provision of equitable distribution of risks, U.S. anti-terrorism laws have been margin-ally effective at best. Though Congress has passed legislation providing causes of action to U.S. victims of terrorism, compensation of victims is often difficult and terrorists are rarely deterred. Attempts to provide such recourse include the Antiterrorism Act of 1991 ("ATA"), the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 ("AEDPA"), and the Flatow Amendment to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act ("FSIA"). These attempts, however, are not enough.


Title Vi Disparate Impact Claims Would Not Harm National Security - A Response To Paul Taylor, 46 Harv. J. On Legis. 503 (2009), Michael T. Kirkpatrick, Margaret B. Kwoka Jan 2009

Title Vi Disparate Impact Claims Would Not Harm National Security - A Response To Paul Taylor, 46 Harv. J. On Legis. 503 (2009), Michael T. Kirkpatrick, Margaret B. Kwoka

UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship

As Paul Taylor recognizes in the previous issue of this volume of the Harvard Journal on Legislation, Congress is considering amendments to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to explicitly allow private plaintiffs to use the disparate impact theory to prove discrimination by recipients of federal financial assistance. This Article responds to Taylor's assertion that allowing such disparate impact claims could harm national security programs. The authors explore the history of the disparate impact theory under both Title VI and Title VII, explain that use of the theory is consistent with Congress's original intent, and argue that …


International Terrorism: The Legitimization Of Safe Harbor States In International Law, Carol A. Bahan Jan 2009

International Terrorism: The Legitimization Of Safe Harbor States In International Law, Carol A. Bahan

NYLS Law Review

No abstract provided.


Deep Secrecy, David E. Pozen Jan 2009

Deep Secrecy, David E. Pozen

Faculty Scholarship

This Article offers a new way of thinking and talking about government secrecy. In the vast literature on the topic, little attention has been paid to the structure of government secrets, as distinct from their substance or function. Yet these secrets differ systematically depending on how many people know of their existence, what sorts of people know, how much they know, and how soon they know. When a small group of similarly situated officials conceals from outsiders the fact that it is concealing something, the result is a deep secret. When members of the general public understand they are being …


The Law Of Armed Conflict And Detention Operations In Afghanistan, Matthew C. Waxman Jan 2009

The Law Of Armed Conflict And Detention Operations In Afghanistan, Matthew C. Waxman

Faculty Scholarship

In reflecting on the arc of US and coalition detention operations in Afghanistan, three key issues related to the law of armed conflict stand out: one substantive, one procedural and one policy. The substantive matter – what are the minimum baseline treatment standards required as a matter of international law? – has clarified significantly during the course of operations there, largely as a result of the US Supreme Court's holding in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld. The procedural matter – what adjudicative processes does international law require for determining who may be detained? – eludes consensus and has become more controversial …


Police And National Security: American Local Law Enforcement And Counter-Terrorism After 9/11, Matthew C. Waxman Jan 2009

Police And National Security: American Local Law Enforcement And Counter-Terrorism After 9/11, Matthew C. Waxman

Faculty Scholarship

This article examines three national security law challenges resulting from greater involvement of state and local police agencies in protecting national security, especially in combating terrorism: organizational challenges, accountability challenges, and institutional tensions with traditional local police functions. Each threatens the balance of security and civil liberties.


International Standards For Detaining Terrorism Suspects: Moving Beyond The Armed Conflict-Criminal Divide, Monica Hakimi Jan 2009

International Standards For Detaining Terrorism Suspects: Moving Beyond The Armed Conflict-Criminal Divide, Monica Hakimi

Articles

Although sometimes described as war, the fight against transnational jihadi groups (referred to for shorthand as the "fight against terrorism") largely takes place away from any recognizable battlefield. Terrorism suspects are captured in houses, on street corners, and at border crossings around the globe. Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the high-level Qaeda operative who planned the September 11 attacks, was captured by the Pakistani government in a residence in Pakistan. Abu Omar, a radical Muslim imam, was apparently abducted by U.S. and Italian agents off the streets of Milan. And Abu Baker Bashir, the spiritual leader of the Qaeda-affiliated group responsible for …


Due Process And Targeted Killing Of Terrorists, Richard Murphy, Afsheen John Radsan Jan 2009

Due Process And Targeted Killing Of Terrorists, Richard Murphy, Afsheen John Radsan

Faculty Scholarship

"Targeted killing" is extra-judicial, premeditated killing by a state of a specifically identified person not in its custody. States have used this tool, secretly or not, throughout history. In recent years, targeted killing has generated new controversy as two states in particular-Israel and the United States-have struggled against opponents embedded in civilian populations. As a matter of express policy, Israel engages in targeted killing of persons it deems members of terrorist organizations involved in attacks on Israel. The United States, less expressly, has adopted a similar policy against al Qaeda-particularly in the border areas of Afghanistan and Pakistan, where the …


Change Versus Continuity At Obama’S Cia, Afsheen John Radsan Jan 2009

Change Versus Continuity At Obama’S Cia, Afsheen John Radsan

Faculty Scholarship

Sweeping change is necessary at the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). During President Barack Obama‘s transition into office, change should go deeper than usual between administrations. To restore the trust of the American people and to regain the confidence of the international community, the CIA needs to do better. I will outline three areas for legislative change relating to my former employer, the CIA. The first proposal is to have a national security court for the trials of terrorists. The second is to permit the CIA to continue to have an exception to pursue aggressive interrogations with a lot of oversight …


An Overt Turn On Covert Action, Afsheen John Radsan Jan 2009

An Overt Turn On Covert Action, Afsheen John Radsan

Faculty Scholarship

Long past the soul-searching of Watergate, very few people question the need for covert action as a part of American foreign policy. The world is so dangerous after 9/11 that it would be irresponsible to suggest that our intelligence agencies should be disbanded or that our government should acknowledge everything it does on the dark side. Today the question is not whether we should engage in covert action at all, but how often and under what circumstances.

Not everything stays secret. Our Nation has been conducting covert action with greater transparency and more congressional participation than during the Cold War. …


Responses To Ten Questions, William C. Banks Jan 2009

Responses To Ten Questions, William C. Banks

William Mitchell Law Review

No abstract provided.


Responses To Ten Questions, Marion "Spike" Bowman Jan 2009

Responses To Ten Questions, Marion "Spike" Bowman

William Mitchell Law Review

No abstract provided.


Responses To Ten Questions, Victor Hansen Jan 2009

Responses To Ten Questions, Victor Hansen

William Mitchell Law Review

No abstract provided.


Responses To Ten Questions, Scott Horton Jan 2009

Responses To Ten Questions, Scott Horton

William Mitchell Law Review

No abstract provided.


Responses To Ten Questions, Michael J. Kelly Jan 2009

Responses To Ten Questions, Michael J. Kelly

William Mitchell Law Review

No abstract provided.


Responses To Ten Questions, Gregory E. Maggs Jan 2009

Responses To Ten Questions, Gregory E. Maggs

William Mitchell Law Review

No abstract provided.


Why The Hubbub About Habeas?: A Post-Mortem On A Failed Policy, Joseph Margulies Jan 2009

Why The Hubbub About Habeas?: A Post-Mortem On A Failed Policy, Joseph Margulies

William Mitchell Law Review

No abstract provided.


Taking The "Combat" Out Of The "Enemy Combatant" Category: Yet Another Expansion Of The President's Authority To Indefinitely Detain "Enemy Combatants" Within The United States—Al-Marri V. Pucciarelli, 534 F.3d 213 (4th Cir. 2008), Scott M. Kranz Jan 2009

Taking The "Combat" Out Of The "Enemy Combatant" Category: Yet Another Expansion Of The President's Authority To Indefinitely Detain "Enemy Combatants" Within The United States—Al-Marri V. Pucciarelli, 534 F.3d 213 (4th Cir. 2008), Scott M. Kranz

William Mitchell Law Review

No abstract provided.


Funding Bin Laden's Avatar: A Proposal For The Regulation Of Virtual Hawalas, Stephen I. Landman Jan 2009

Funding Bin Laden's Avatar: A Proposal For The Regulation Of Virtual Hawalas, Stephen I. Landman

William Mitchell Law Review

No abstract provided.


Security Vs. The Law: A False Choice, Walter F. Mondale Jan 2009

Security Vs. The Law: A False Choice, Walter F. Mondale

William Mitchell Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Use Of Force Against States That Might Have Weapons Of Mass Destruction, Matthew C. Waxman Jan 2009

The Use Of Force Against States That Might Have Weapons Of Mass Destruction, Matthew C. Waxman

Faculty Scholarship

The Iraq war rekindled debate – debate now further inflamed in discussions of Iran and North Korea-about the legal use of force to disarm an adversary state believed to pose a threat of catastrophic attack, including with weapons of mass destruction (WMD). Coinciding with this debate is the stark fact that intelligence about allegedly hostile states' WMD capabilities is and will remain limited.

This Article aims to develop more fully how an objective reasonableness approach to WMD capability assessments would work, and more generally how the law governing use of force should guide capability assessments. It begins in Part I …


Secret Evidence And The Due Process Of Terrorist Detentions, Daphne Barak-Erez, Matthew C. Waxman Jan 2009

Secret Evidence And The Due Process Of Terrorist Detentions, Daphne Barak-Erez, Matthew C. Waxman

Faculty Scholarship

Courts across many common law democracies have been wrestling with a shared predicament: proving cases against suspected terrorists in detention hearings requires governments to protect sensitive classified information about intelligence sources and methods, but withholding evidence from suspects threatens fairness and contradicts a basic tenet of adversarial process. This Article examines several models for resolving this problem, including the "special advocate" model employed by Britain and Canada, and the 'Judicial management" model employed in Israel. This analysis shows how the very different approaches adopted even among democracies sharing common legal foundations reflect varying understandings of 'fundamental fairness" or "due process," …


Unaccountable? The United Nations, Emergency Powers, And The Rule Of Law, Simon Chesterman Jan 2009

Unaccountable? The United Nations, Emergency Powers, And The Rule Of Law, Simon Chesterman

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

For a body committed to the rule of law in theory, the applicability of the rule of law to the United Nations in practice remains oddly unclear. This Article will not consider the personal responsibility of UN officials, who generally enjoy personal or functional immunity from legal process in the territories where they work. Rather the focus of this Article is on the quasi-constitutional question of the liability of the organization itself. As the United Nations has assumed more state-like functions-in particular through the coercive activities of its Security Council--the question of what limits exist on the powers thus exercised …


Terrorist Detention: Directions For Reform, Benjamin Priester Jan 2009

Terrorist Detention: Directions For Reform, Benjamin Priester

Journal Publications

Counterterrorism efforts by the U.S. government since 2001 have produced numerous legal controversies. One of the most controversial subjects has been the detention of individuals allegedly involved with terrorist organizations or activities. Unlike traditional criminal detainees, such persons are not held pursuant to indictment on charges pending trial or to a verdict of conviction. Unlike traditional military detainees, they are not battlefield captives from combat in a war zone against the military forces of another nation. Rather, terrorist detainees are held based on the individual's alleged connections to terrorist organizations and activities, without more. Terrorist detention, so defined, is an …


An Improved Analytical Framework For The Official Acknowledgment Doctrine: A Broader Interpretation Of “Through An Official And Documented Disclosure”, Jessica Fisher Jan 2009

An Improved Analytical Framework For The Official Acknowledgment Doctrine: A Broader Interpretation Of “Through An Official And Documented Disclosure”, Jessica Fisher

NYLS Law Review

No abstract provided.


Bah V. Mukasey, Sandrine Dehaeze Jan 2009

Bah V. Mukasey, Sandrine Dehaeze

NYLS Law Review

No abstract provided.


Le Développement De L’Évaluation De La Menace De La Criminalité Organisée Et L’Architecure De Sécurité Intérieure (Development Of The Organised Crime Threat Assessment (Octa) And Internal Security Architecture), Benjamin J. Goold Jan 2009

Le Développement De L’Évaluation De La Menace De La Criminalité Organisée Et L’Architecure De Sécurité Intérieure (Development Of The Organised Crime Threat Assessment (Octa) And Internal Security Architecture), Benjamin J. Goold

All Faculty Publications

Cette note propose une vue d’ensemble de l’approche européenne des questions de sécurité, de lutte contre le terrorisme et contre la criminalité organisée. Elle aborde plus particulièrement le rôle de la Stratégie européenne de sécurité (SES) dans l’élaboration des politiques et des dispositions institutionnelles, ainsi que l’influence de l’OCTA (Évaluation de la menace de la criminalité organisée). cette note recommande qu’un certain nombre de mesures soient prises pour recentrer et rationaliser les structures existantes attachées aux questions de sécurité et de lutte contre le terrorisme et le crime organisé. Le nombre d’agences directement ou indirectement impliquées dans le recueil d’informations, …