Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Military, War, and Peace (30)
- International Law (19)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (15)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (15)
- Defense and Security Studies (13)
-
- Constitutional Law (12)
- Human Rights Law (11)
- Business (9)
- Law and Politics (8)
- Portfolio and Security Analysis (8)
- President/Executive Department (7)
- International Relations (6)
- Political Science (6)
- American Politics (5)
- Economic Policy (5)
- Legislation (5)
- Criminal Law (4)
- Environmental Law (4)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (3)
- First Amendment (3)
- Immigration Law (3)
- Internet Law (3)
- Law and Society (3)
- Privacy Law (3)
- Rule of Law (3)
- Science and Technology Law (3)
- Transnational Law (3)
- Administrative Law (2)
- Institution
-
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (8)
- University of Michigan Law School (8)
- University of South Florida (8)
- University of Denver (6)
- Georgetown University Law Center (5)
-
- Roger Williams University (4)
- Florida A&M University College of Law (3)
- UIC School of Law (3)
- University of Colorado Law School (3)
- University of Richmond (3)
- Cornell University Law School (2)
- Duke Law (2)
- Georgia State University College of Law (2)
- Notre Dame Law School (2)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (2)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (2)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (1)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (1)
- St. John's University School of Law (1)
- University of Baltimore Law (1)
- University of Miami Law School (1)
- University of South Carolina (1)
- University of Washington School of Law (1)
- West Virginia University (1)
- William & Mary Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- National security (18)
- Terrorism (10)
- Economy (6)
- Human rights (6)
- Torture (6)
-
- Intelligence studies/education (5)
- Terrorists (5)
- United States foreign policy (5)
- Intelligence analysis (4)
- Security studies (4)
- Habeas corpus (3)
- Interrogation (3)
- Security (3)
- War on Terror (3)
- 9-11 (2)
- Armed conflicts (2)
- Bush Administration (2)
- Combatants & noncombatants (International law) (2)
- DHS (2)
- Department of Homeland Security (2)
- Detention (2)
- Due process (2)
- Due process of law (2)
- Guantanamo Bay (2)
- History (2)
- Illegal (2)
- Immigration (2)
- Methodology (2)
- National Security (2)
- Preventive paradigm (2)
- Publication
-
- Journal of Strategic Security (8)
- William Mitchell Law Review (8)
- Human Rights & Human Welfare (6)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (5)
- Faculty Scholarship (3)
-
- Publications (3)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (3)
- University of Richmond Law Review (3)
- Articles (2)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Faculty Publications (2)
- Faculty Publications By Year (2)
- Florida A & M University Law Review (2)
- Journal Articles (2)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (2)
- Michigan Law Review (2)
- Scholarly Articles (2)
- Sea Grant Law Fellow Publications (2)
- UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship (2)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Buffalo Public Interest Law Journal (1)
- Dalhousie Law Journal (1)
- Journal Publications (1)
- NULR Online (1)
- Other Scholarship (1)
- UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law (1)
- Washington International Law Journal (1)
- West Virginia Law Review (1)
- William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 61 - 73 of 73
Full-Text Articles in National Security Law
Book Review, Susan Nevelow Mart
Book Review, Jordan J. Paust, Beyond The Law: The Bush Administration’S Unlawful Responses In The ‘War’ On Terror (2007), Mark A. Drumbl
Book Review, Jordan J. Paust, Beyond The Law: The Bush Administration’S Unlawful Responses In The ‘War’ On Terror (2007), Mark A. Drumbl
Scholarly Articles
The situation at Guantánamo is one of several past and ongoing examples of what Jordan Paust calls ‘dirty war tactics' deployed by the United States in response to the 9/11 attacks. In Beyond the Law: The Bush Administration's Unlawful Responses in the ‘War’ on Terror, Professor Paust describes these ‘dirty war tactics' and claims that, in undertaking them, the Bush Administration balefully has corroded the rule of law itself.
A Tale Of Two Networks: Terrorism, Transnational Law, And Network Theory, Christopher J. Borgen
A Tale Of Two Networks: Terrorism, Transnational Law, And Network Theory, Christopher J. Borgen
Faculty Publications
Talk of networks and "network theory" has become almost ubiquitous in the field of counterterrorism. Terrorist organizations are networks. Terrorists have been empowered by the Internet, ethnic diasporas, and cell phones—networks all. Many of the putative targets of terrorists—electrical grids, oil pipelines, and transportation systems, to name a few—are themselves networks. And, perhaps less often mentioned, terrorists are increasingly hampered by national and international laws that foster cooperation and coordination among states—a network of laws.
From "smart mobs" to "net wars," from narco-trafficking to the Internet, network theory has provided insights into decentralized social organizations and their coordinated action. Both …
The Accounting: Habeas Corpus And Enemy Combatants, Emily Calhoun
The Accounting: Habeas Corpus And Enemy Combatants, Emily Calhoun
Publications
The judiciary should impose a heavy burden of justification on the executive when a habeas petitioner challenges the accuracy of facts on which an enemy combatant designation rests. A heavy burden of justification will ensure that the essential institutional purposes of the writ--and legitimate, separated-powers government--are preserved, even during times of national exigency. The institutional purposes of the writ argue for robust judicial review rather than deference to the executive. Moreover, the procedural flexibility traditionally associated with the writ gives the judiciary the tools to ensure that a heavy burden of justification can be imposed.
The Chains Of The Constitution And Legal Process In The Library: A Post-Usa Patriot Reauthorization Act Assessment, Susan Nevelow Mart
The Chains Of The Constitution And Legal Process In The Library: A Post-Usa Patriot Reauthorization Act Assessment, Susan Nevelow Mart
Publications
Since the Patriot Act was passed in 2001, controversy has raged over nearly every provision. The controversy has been particularly intense over provisions that affect the patrons of libraries. This article follows those Patriot Act provisions that affect libraries, and reviews how they have been interpreted, how the Patriot Reauthorization Acts have changed them, and what government audits and court affidavits reveal about the use and misuse of the Patriot Act. The efforts of librarians and others opposed to the Patriot Act have had an effect, both legislatively and judicially, in changing and challenging the Patriot Act. Because libraries are …
The Memory Gap In Surveillance Law, Patricia L. Bellia
The Memory Gap In Surveillance Law, Patricia L. Bellia
Journal Articles
U.S. information privacy laws contain a memory gap: they regulate the collection and disclosure of certain kinds of information, but they say little about its retention. This memory gap has ever-increasing significance for the structure of government surveillance law. Under current doctrine, the Fourth Amendment generally requires government agents to meet high standards before directly and prospectively gathering a target's communications. The law takes a dramatically different approach to indirect, surveillance-like activities, such as the compelled production of communications from a third party, even when those activities yield the same information as, or more information than, direct surveillance activities. Because …
Court Grants Stay Of Injunction In Navy Sonar Case, Alicia Schaffner
Court Grants Stay Of Injunction In Navy Sonar Case, Alicia Schaffner
Sea Grant Law Fellow Publications
No abstract provided.
The Reformed Cfius Regulatory Framework: Mediating Between Continued Openness To Foreign Investment And National Security, George S. Georgiev
The Reformed Cfius Regulatory Framework: Mediating Between Continued Openness To Foreign Investment And National Security, George S. Georgiev
Articles
No abstract provided.
A Running Start: Getting “Law Ready” During A Presidential Transition, James E. Baker
A Running Start: Getting “Law Ready” During A Presidential Transition, James E. Baker
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
We are headed for our first wartime Presidential transition in forty years. The good news is that this has prompted uncommon attention to the process of transition. The bad news is that transitions are difficult in the best of circumstances; forewarned does not always equal prepared. The United States handles transitions well on a strategic level. Strategic continuity is found in the Constitution. Transition is also part of the rhythm of government. The intelligence community, for example, has a sound tradition of briefing candidates and Presidents-elect. However, there is tactical vulnerability. An outgoing administration may hesitate to initiate all but …
The Twenty Year Test: Principles For An Enduring Counterterrorism Legal Architecture, James E. Baker
The Twenty Year Test: Principles For An Enduring Counterterrorism Legal Architecture, James E. Baker
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The United States faces three enduring terrorism-related threats. First, there is the realistic prospect of additional attacks in the United States including attacks using weapons of mass destruction (“WMD”). Second, in responding to this threat, we may undermine the freedoms that enrich our lives, the tolerance that marks our society, and the democratic values that define our government. Third, if we are too focused on terrorism, we risk losing sight of this century’s other certain threats as well as the capacity to respond to them, including the state proliferation of nuclear weapons, nation-state rivalry, pandemic disease, oil dependency, and environmental …
Panel: Restrictions On Freedom Of Association Through Material Support Prohibitions And Visa Denials, David Cole
Panel: Restrictions On Freedom Of Association Through Material Support Prohibitions And Visa Denials, David Cole
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
In the 1950s, we were afraid of communism. We were afraid, in particular, of the Soviet Union, the world's second greatest superpower, which was armed with masses of nuclear warheads aimed at all our largest cities. As a result, we fought the Cold War, engaged in espionage, proxy wars, and an arms race. We also took aggressive preventive measures at home. The principal preventive measure of that period was guilt by association. We made it a crime to be a member of the Communist Party, and we created a whole administrative scheme to implement and enforce this notion of guilt …
Less Safe, Less Free: A Progress Report On The War On Terror: Address To The Terrorism & Justice Conference At The University Of Central Missouri, David Cole
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The Bush Administration since 9-11 has adopted a strategy, which in some sense depends upon the ability to predict with incredible accuracy at what will happen in the future. It was given its name by the U.S. Attorney General during the first Bush Administration, Missouri’s John Ashcroft, who argued that what we need in the wake of 9-11 is a “preventive paradigm.” The argument is understandable: when facing foes who are willing to commit suicide in order to inflict mass casualties on innocent civilians, it is not enough to bring them to justice after the fact. The perpetrators are dead--and …
Judicial Power And Moral Ideology In Wartime: Shaping The Legal Process In World War I Britain , Rachel Vorspan
Judicial Power And Moral Ideology In Wartime: Shaping The Legal Process In World War I Britain , Rachel Vorspan
Faculty Scholarship
Offering a cautionary lesson of contemporary significance, the Article suggests that judicial power is not in and of itself the solution to executive infringements on due process rights in wartime. It examines the response of the British judiciary to serious threats to its institutional power during the First World War. To facilitate prosecution of the war, the government narrowed the jurisdiction of the traditional courts by eliminating jury trial, subjecting civilians to court-martial, and establishing new administrative tribunals to displace the traditional courts. Rather than remaining passive and deferential to the executive, as scholars have generally assumed, the judges moved …