National Security Law Commons^™

The Trump Administration’S Theory Of Constitutional War Powers: “The President Could Decide”, Rebecca Ingber

Online Publications

President Donald Trump has launched another unlawful war, this time in the service of regime change in Iran. The administration has been threatening the use of force for weeks, but provided very little public justification, description of what the president hoped to accomplish, or explanation for how the use of force would effectuate such goals. It has also to date presented no legal justification whatsoever. Much of what we know at this moment about how the administration views, and how it lawyers, questions of war powers can be derived from the one legal memorandum the administration has released on the …

Confronting The War On International Law In The United States, Rebecca Ingber

Online Publications

Harold Hongju Koh’s The National Security Constitution in the 21st Century is a code red threat assessment of the state of public law in America today. True to Koh’s nature, he does not leave us without hope; rather he devotes a sizeable portion of the book to calls for reform, from the legal frameworks governing war powers and intelligence to the division of labor in the national security legal bureaucracy plodding away within the deepest (secure) chambers of the executive branch itself.

Production And Global Dissemination Of Chinese Legal Ideology: Implications For The Study Of Illiberalism, Samuli Seppänen

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

This Article discusses the production and global dissemination of Chinese legal ideology and considers its implications for the study of illiberalism. The leaders and ideologues of the Chinese Communist Party profess an interest in increasing the impact of its social sciences and governance ideology in foreign countries. On its face, this project amounts to an ambitious, even radical, ideological challenge against liberal legal thought. Nevertheless, these attempts can also be seen to highlight various challenges that illiberal regimes face in ideological production and advocacy. First, the domestic priorities of illiberal ideological speech may not support ideological advocacy efforts in foreign …

Learning From Guantanamo: Avoiding Legal Black Holes In Outer Space, Mia Bonardi

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

"Legal black holes" are spaces beyond the reach of enforceable law and thus inflict people within their pull with "rightlessness." The term "legal black hole" arose originally around the Guantinamo Bay detention center, but it has since been used in other contexts, such as migrant drownings. There is a new frontier for legal black holes in the space beyond Earth. This topic is timely and pertinent to modern application because if places or spaces exist where fundamental laws cannot be applied or enforced, then such legal black holes undermine the rule of law.

This Article argues that outer space is, …

How To Undermine A Nation-State In 120 Days: Mediation And Negotiation In A Hybrid Warfare World, Christopher A. Corpora

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

The original and admittedly provocative title for this essay was "How to Take Down a State in 120 days" and the original November 2022, 20-minute presentation at Cardozo Law School was so titled. The intention behind the provocations was to demonstrate the speed of growing investment in and multi-disciplinary nature of the current hybrid war threat. We have not yet witnessed many state takedowns through this form of warfare; but we have seen states significantly undermined and captured in timelines almost as aggressive as the title suggests. We have seen authoritarian states and criminal organizations significantly weaken more vulnerable states, …

A Theory Of Interests In The Context Of Hybrid Warfare: It's Complex, Cynthia Alkon, Sanda Kaufman

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

In the 2020 British TV series The Undeclared War, the Russians launch a series of attacks against the United Kingdom that destabilize key sectors in the UK and (spoiler alert) almost end in a full-scale conventional war. In this fictionalized account, the UK only considers fighting back against cyber warfare with cyber warfare. There is no negotiation. Despite knowing who is responsible for these attacks (the Russian government), negotiation is never even considered.

Introduction: Negotiation Strategies For War By Other Means, Chris Honeyman, Andrea Kupfer Schneider

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

We are delighted to introduce the topic of hybrid warfare into the dispute resolution field, with the first symposium for a law audience focused on how hybrid warfare might be more effectively understood, and defended against, through negotiation theories. In the last three-plus years we, along with three colleagues, have enlisted a number of additional colleagues from a variety of fields in a very unusual project-how to engage with a type of conflict often called grey zone conflict (by some people) or hybrid warfare (by others). Our conflict management experts have come from a wide array of disciplines, as well …

Negotiation Theories Engage Hybrid Warfare, Nancy A. Welsh, Sharon Press, Andrea Kupfer Schneider

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

When Calvin Chrustie and Chris Honeyman first approached the authors of this Article regarding the potential application of negotiation scholars' expertise to the problem of hybrid warfare, our first reaction was confusion. First, what exactly was hybrid warfare? Second, since "war" was in its name, what did our field have to say that could even potentially be useful? This Article, in some sense, is designed to begin to respond to those questions and, hopefully, to encourage other scholars in our field to weigh in with their contributions and criticisms. This Article represents only a start.

Where Is Negotiation In Hybrid Warfare?, Art Hinshaw, Adrian Borbely, Calvin Chrustie

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

The question of what negotiation has to do with hybrid warfare was the starting point for Project Seshat, a project gathering a global group of academics and practitioners from many walks of life. Their shared interest is in exploring what the fields that fit generally within the concepts of "security" and "dispute resolution" have to offer each other in the context of hybrid warfare grey zone conflict, and how these two "sets" of fields interconnect. In trying to better understand what hybrid warfare is, how it works, and how best to respond to it, negotiation and dispute resolution academics have …

A Sheep In Wolf's Clothing: Assessing The Dangerous, Hidden, And Increasing Defects Of The Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act, David S. Jonas, Erielle Davidson

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The article critically examines the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act (INARA) of 2015, arguing that while it was intended to enhance congressional oversight of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) and other agreements with Iran, INARA falls short of its goals. The analysis reveals that INARA is poorly drafted, lacks teeth, and fails to provide meaningful transparency or checks on executive power, ultimately undermining Congress's role in national security matters.

Lawyering The Presidency, Deborah Pearlstein

Articles

Among its many profound effects on American life, the Trump presidency has triggered a surge of interest in the project of law reform to better check the exercise of presidential power. Yet these reform efforts arise against a wholly unsettled debate about the function and effectiveness of existing checks, perhaps none more so than the role of executive branch legal counsel. With courts often deferential, and Congress hamstrung by partisan polarization, scholars have drawn on the experiences of executive branch lawyers to assess whether counsel functions as part of an “internal separation of powers” form of constraint. Yet while these …

Tightwire Of National Interests And Publicity In The Evolved Process Of Democratization And Constitutional Transformation: Lessons From Taiwan, Hsin-Hsuan Lin

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

Achieving an optimal balance between government secrecy and democratic accountability has led to long-standing questions in the discussion of contemporary constitutionalism. To address the complex contemporary phenomenon of government secrecy within a democratic society, a more in-depth understanding of its tension with democratic accountability and transparency is essential. This article provides a descriptive overview of Taiwan's legal system, its legal implications in relation to government secrecy, and its normative implications. The article begins with a historical background of Taiwan's legal system, focusing on legal reform as it relates to government secrecy. The article investigates the complex interactions between the administrative, …

A Bull In A China Shop: How Cfius Made Tiktok A National Security Problem, Adina Feder

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The note critiques the expansion of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States' (CFIUS) mandate under the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act of 2018 (FIRRMA), particularly its inclusion of "sensitive personal data" as a factor in national security reviews. This expansion has led to overly broad and vague definitions, resulting in unnecessary restrictions on foreign direct investment (FDI) without adequately addressing legitimate national security concerns. The note argues that data privacy issues should be addressed through separate federal privacy legislation rather than CFIUS, which is ill-suited to handle such matters. It calls for clearer definitions and a …

State Energy Cartels, James W. Coleman

Cardozo Law Review

Fracking has made America the center of global oil production and the engine of the world’s economy. But haste makes waste. America’s new oil wells are releasing natural gas as well, which is prized as a clean and reliable fuel around the world but must be simply burned off or “flared” if there are no pipelines to bring it to the customers that need it. The pace of the oil boom and the challenges of building new pipelines have forced oil companies to flare staggering quantities of natural gas. Texas and North Dakota are now flaring—that is, wasting—more gas than …

The Article Iii Publication Power And The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, John Langford

Cardozo Law Review

The Framers vested “the judicial Power of the United States” in independent courts so that they may protect individual liberty and serve as a check on the legislative and executive branches. The judicial power, however, is narrow and not self-executing. As Chief Justice Marshall put it, it is merely the power “to say what the law is.” Federal courts cannot raise armies or pay money to enforce their decrees. Having neither force nor will, courts must instead rely on cultivating public support to secure the authoritative legitimacy necessary to effectuate their judgments.

But what happens when the executive branch asserts …

Article I: Reforming The War Powers Resolution For The 21st Century, Rebecca Ingber

Testimony

Professor Rebecca Ingber testified at a U.S. House Committee on Rules hearing on March 23, 2021, titled "Article I: Reforming the War Powers Resolution for the 21st Century."

The Gsa’S Delay In Recognizing The Biden Transition Team And The National Security Implications, Katherine A. Shaw, Ryan Goodman

Online Publications

Pressure is mounting on a usually low-profile government official to activate the full range of resources ordinarily provided to an incoming administration’s presidential transition team. Under the Presidential Transition Act of 1963, a statute that has been revised a number of times since passage, it is not until the Administrator of the General Services Administration (GSA) “ascertain[s]” the “apparent successful candidate” of a presidential election that the president-elect and his transition team gain access to the office space, funds, briefings, and other government resources necessary to effect a smooth and effective transfer of power.

The “National Security” Of Nations: President Trump’S Pretextual Tariff Rationale And How To Overcome It, Jacob Ely

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The note argues that President Trump's use of Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act to impose tariffs on steel, aluminum, and automobiles under the pretext of national security constitutes an abuse of executive power. It contends that this action undermines the constitutional authority of Congress to regulate trade and tariffs, raising significant concerns about the separation of powers and the potential for future presidential overreach. The note advocates for legislative reforms to reclaim congressional oversight and ensure that national security justifications for tariffs are genuine and narrowly defined.

The Narrative Of Costs, The Cost Of Narrative, Alexander A. Reinert

Cardozo Law Review

In this Article, I will highlight some of my concerns, but they boil down to this: in terms of diagnosis, I am simply not convinced that Judge Marrero has compellingly demonstrated that in the run of cases, our procedural rules are being abused in ways that undermine justice and increase cost and inefficiencies. In part, this is a data-driven critique-there is little empirical support for the proposition that our procedural system is too costly in most cases. But my critique is also an attitudinal one. Judge Marrero makes much of the extent to which litigants fail-claims that are dismissed, motions …

Fall 2016 Cross-Border Data Privacy Issues, Daniel Goldberger, Nick Akerman, Joanna Levin, David Ray

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

The symposium examines the challenges and complexities of cross-border data transfers, particularly between the EU and the US, highlighting the stringent data protection regulations in the EU, such as the GDPR, and the lack of a comprehensive federal data protection law in the US. It discusses the impact of these legal frameworks on global businesses and the evolving privacy rights in both regions. The analysis underscores the need for robust compliance mechanisms and international cooperation to address the growing concerns surrounding data privacy and security.

Shifting From 'Consent' To Advice: Reimagining The Role Of The Senate In Foreign Affairs, Benjamin Dynkin

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This Note will begin by discussing the JCPOA, its history and enactment, as well as some of the hostile responses to its procedural posture. The procedural posture in this case is that of a Congressional-Executive Agreement, and this Note will examine what that means, as well as other methods that our Nation has for implementing foreign policy, and the issues that those options present. It will then examine Article II, section 2 of the United States Constitution and the JCPOA, and the weaknesses in the procedure of its enactment, as well as identifying where progress can be made in the …

Innovation Worth Sharing: Seeking Balance Between Innovation Policy And National Security, Alexandra H. Katich

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

The note examines the tension between promoting innovation and safeguarding national security, focusing on the Invention Secrecy Act of 1951. It argues that while the Act is designed to protect sensitive inventions, extending its secrecy powers to economically significant patents would be counterproductive, unconstitutional, and harmful to U.S. competitiveness. The analysis highlights the challenges of balancing economic security, intellectual property rights, and the constitutional mandate to promote scientific progress.

Panel Ii: Balancing National Security And Transparency In Government Data Collection, Nate Cardozo, Mariko Hirose, Jonathan Manes, Ira Rubinstein, Christopher Wolf

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Courts And National Security: The Ordeal Of The State Secrets Privilege, David Rudenstine

Articles

The state secrets privilege, originally established in United States v. Reynolds, has evolved into a powerful tool for the Executive to shield actions from judicial scrutiny, undermining the rule of law and constitutional checks and balances. This expansion, driven by judicial deference and circuit court interpretations, now prioritizes national security over accountability, threatening core legal principles. The article argues for reform to balance national security concerns with judicial oversight and individual rights.

Revisiting "Special Needs" Theory Via Airport Searches, Alexander A. Reinert

Articles

Controversy has raged since the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) introduced Advanced Imaging Technology, capable of producing detailed images of travelers' bodies, and "enhanced" pat frisks as part of everyday airport travel. In the face of challenges in the courts and in public discourse, the TSA has justified the heightened security measures as a necessary means to prevent terrorist attacks. The purpose of this Essay is to situate the Fourth Amendment implications of the new regime within a broader historical context. Most germane, after the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) introduced sweeping new screening of air travelers in the 1960s and 1970s …

Bring In The Nerds: Secrecy, National Security, And The Creation Of International Intellectual Property Law, David S. Levine

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The negotiations of the international Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement and Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement have been conducted largely in secret, elevating intellectual property piracy to the level of national security concerns for purposes of accessing information through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). However, the level of actual secrecy has been tiered, with corporate interests enjoying far more access to negotiation information than the general public. At the same time, similar intellectual property issues were negotiated in the relative transparency of Congress' debate over the Stop Online Piracy Act and PROTECT IP Act, allowing for much greater public involvement. With national …

National Security And The Shadows Of Judicial "Common Sense", Alexander A. Reinert

Articles

The article critiques Peter Margulies's analysis of cognitive biases in judicial decision-making within national-security cases, particularly his proposed evidentiary presumption to address these biases. While acknowledging Margulies's contribution to the discussion, the article argues that his characterization of cases and proposed solution may oversimplify the complexities of judicial deference and interventionism. It suggests that the central issue in these cases is not excessive deference or interventionism but rather the government's resistance to transparency and the disclosure of sensitive information. The article advocates for a more nuanced approach, emphasizing managed discovery processes to balance national-security concerns with constitutional rights.

Keynote Address: Secret Evidence In The Age Of National Security, Adam Liptak

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

The article explores the tension between national security and the First Amendment, arguing that while the First Amendment remains a robust protection against government censorship, recent trends threaten press freedom, particularly in protecting confidential sources and accessing information. The author, drawing on personal experience as a media lawyer and reporter, emphasizes the importance of procedural safeguards and judicial oversight to prevent government overreach and ensure transparency.

The Slow Erosion Of The Adversary System: Article Iii Courts, Fisa, Cipa And Ethical Dilemmas, Ellen C. Yaroshefsky

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

The article examines the increasing reliance on secret evidence in U.S. legal proceedings, particularly in post-9/11 national security and terrorism cases, facilitated by the Classified Information Procedures Act (CIPA) and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). This trend undermines the adversarial system by denying defendants access to relevant information, raising ethical concerns for defense attorneys, and potentially eroding constitutional rights. The author advocates for reforms to balance national security with civil liberties, emphasizing the need for judicial vigilance and legislative changes to address these issues.

Panel Report: Investigative Journalism And National Security, Zachary D. Streit

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

The panel discussion explores the tension between government secrecy and media transparency, focusing on the challenges investigative journalists face in reporting on national security issues. The participants argue that while some secrecy is necessary for national security, excessive classification hampers transparency and accountability. They discuss legal battles, over-classification, and the need for a balance between protecting sensitive information and the public's right to know.