Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

National Security Law Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

University of Richmond

Discipline
Keyword
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 31 - 34 of 34

Full-Text Articles in National Security Law

Proposal For A New Executive Order On Assassination, Jeffrey F. Addicott Mar 2003

Proposal For A New Executive Order On Assassination, Jeffrey F. Addicott

University of Richmond Law Review

No abstract provided.


It's Not Really "Assassination": Legal And Moral Implications Of Intentionally Targeting Terrorists And Aggressor-State Regime Elites, Robert F. Turner Mar 2003

It's Not Really "Assassination": Legal And Moral Implications Of Intentionally Targeting Terrorists And Aggressor-State Regime Elites, Robert F. Turner

University of Richmond Law Review

No abstract provided.


Targeted Killing And Assassination: The U.S. Legal Framework, William C. Banks, Peter Raven-Hansen Mar 2003

Targeted Killing And Assassination: The U.S. Legal Framework, William C. Banks, Peter Raven-Hansen

University of Richmond Law Review

No abstract provided.


Terrorism And Assassination: Political Assassination As An Instrument Of National Policy - An Inquiry Into Operations, Expediency, Morality, And The Law, Jeff Addicott, June Aprille, William C. Banks, Azizah Al-Hibri, Julie Laskaris, Peter Raven-Hansen, Gary Solis, Porcher Taylor, Robert Turner Apr 2002

Terrorism And Assassination: Political Assassination As An Instrument Of National Policy - An Inquiry Into Operations, Expediency, Morality, And The Law, Jeff Addicott, June Aprille, William C. Banks, Azizah Al-Hibri, Julie Laskaris, Peter Raven-Hansen, Gary Solis, Porcher Taylor, Robert Turner

University of Richmond Law Review Symposium

The 2002 Symposium opened on Thursday, April 11, with a role-playing exercise and town meeting: Assassination of a Terrorist Enemy. In this session, a group of nationally prominent political leaders, policy makers, scholars, and members of the intelligence, military, religious and civil liberties communities engaged in a role-playing exercise exploring a fictional scenario posing the question of whether the United States should undertake an operation to assassinate the leader of a terrorist organization deemed responsible for acts of violence against the United States. The issue was explored through historical, moral, religious, operational, political, diplomatic, and legal perspectives. The final segment …