National Security Law Commons^™

Flying Under The Radar Or An Unnecessary Intelligence Watchdog: A Review Of The President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board, Christine E. Hinrichs

William Mitchell Law Review

No abstract provided.

Responses To Ten Questions, John Yoo

William Mitchell Law Review

No abstract provided.

Gaming The System: "Are You Saying If We Plead Guilty We Will Not Be Able To Be Sentenced To Death?", Adine S. Momoh

William Mitchell Law Review

No abstract provided.

Responses To Ten Questions, Stephen Dycus

William Mitchell Law Review

No abstract provided.

National Security Lawyering And The Persistent Neglect Of Institutional Culture, Peter Margulies

William Mitchell Law Review

No abstract provided.

Serial War Crimes In Response To Terrorism Can Pose Threats To National Security, Jordan J. Paust

William Mitchell Law Review

No abstract provided.

Due Process And Targeted Killing Of Terrorists, Richard Murphy, Afsheen John Radsan

Faculty Scholarship

"Targeted killing" is extra-judicial, premeditated killing by a state of a specifically identified person not in its custody. States have used this tool, secretly or not, throughout history. In recent years, targeted killing has generated new controversy as two states in particular-Israel and the United States-have struggled against opponents embedded in civilian populations. As a matter of express policy, Israel engages in targeted killing of persons it deems members of terrorist organizations involved in attacks on Israel. The United States, less expressly, has adopted a similar policy against al Qaeda-particularly in the border areas of Afghanistan and Pakistan, where the …

Change Versus Continuity At Obama’S Cia, Afsheen John Radsan

Faculty Scholarship

Sweeping change is necessary at the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). During President Barack Obama‘s transition into office, change should go deeper than usual between administrations. To restore the trust of the American people and to regain the confidence of the international community, the CIA needs to do better. I will outline three areas for legislative change relating to my former employer, the CIA. The first proposal is to have a national security court for the trials of terrorists. The second is to permit the CIA to continue to have an exception to pursue aggressive interrogations with a lot of oversight …

An Overt Turn On Covert Action, Afsheen John Radsan

Faculty Scholarship

Long past the soul-searching of Watergate, very few people question the need for covert action as a part of American foreign policy. The world is so dangerous after 9/11 that it would be irresponsible to suggest that our intelligence agencies should be disbanded or that our government should acknowledge everything it does on the dark side. Today the question is not whether we should engage in covert action at all, but how often and under what circumstances.

Not everything stays secret. Our Nation has been conducting covert action with greater transparency and more congressional participation than during the Cold War. …

Responses To Ten Questions, William C. Banks

William Mitchell Law Review

No abstract provided.

Responses To Ten Questions, Marion "Spike" Bowman

William Mitchell Law Review

No abstract provided.

Responses To Ten Questions, Victor Hansen

William Mitchell Law Review

No abstract provided.

Responses To Ten Questions, Scott Horton

William Mitchell Law Review

No abstract provided.

Responses To Ten Questions, Michael J. Kelly

William Mitchell Law Review

No abstract provided.

Responses To Ten Questions, Gregory E. Maggs

William Mitchell Law Review

No abstract provided.

Why The Hubbub About Habeas?: A Post-Mortem On A Failed Policy, Joseph Margulies

William Mitchell Law Review

No abstract provided.

Taking The "Combat" Out Of The "Enemy Combatant" Category: Yet Another Expansion Of The President's Authority To Indefinitely Detain "Enemy Combatants" Within The United States—Al-Marri V. Pucciarelli, 534 F.3d 213 (4th Cir. 2008), Scott M. Kranz

William Mitchell Law Review

No abstract provided.

Funding Bin Laden's Avatar: A Proposal For The Regulation Of Virtual Hawalas, Stephen I. Landman

William Mitchell Law Review

No abstract provided.

Security Vs. The Law: A False Choice, Walter F. Mondale

William Mitchell Law Review

No abstract provided.

A New, Balanced System Of Detention: An Analysis Of Neal Katyal And Jack Goldsmith's Proposal For "A Terrorists' Court", Leah Ceee O. Boomsma

William Mitchell Law Review

No abstract provided.

A Legion Of Worries: National Security Reporting In The Age Of The War On Terror, Katherine L. Johnson

William Mitchell Law Review

No abstract provided.

Due Process Rights: Rendition Of A Citizen Terrorist, Sarah A. Weiss

William Mitchell Law Review

No abstract provided.

Targeting Terrorists: The Counterrevolution, Paul Rosenzweig

William Mitchell Law Review

No abstract provided.

Ten Questions On National Security, Norman Abrams, Geoffrey S. Corn, Amos Guiora, Glenn Sulmasy

William Mitchell Law Review

No abstract provided.

Who's The Boss—The "Public Interest Vs. Agency Interest" Balancing Act Of Intelligence Agency General Counsels, Ryan M. Clark

William Mitchell Law Review

No abstract provided.

Trying Terrorists, Brian S. Carter-Stiglitz

William Mitchell Law Review

No abstract provided.

Can Government Indefinitely Detain Individuals Accused Of Being Enemy Combatants?, Deva Solomon

William Mitchell Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Hamdan V. Rumsfeld Decision, Thomas F. Berndt, Josiah Ramsey Fricton, Alethea M. Huyser

William Mitchell Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Balance Of Power: The Supreme Court's Decision On Military Commissions And The Competing Interests In The War On Terror, Josiah Ramsey Fricton

William Mitchell Law Review

No abstract provided.

Ten Questions: Responses Of Robert F. Turner, Robert F. Turner

William Mitchell Law Review

No abstract provided.