National Security Law Commons^™

Sovereignty In The Age Of Cyber, Gary Corn

Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals

International law is a foundational pillar of the modern international order, and its applicability to both state and nonstate cyber activities is, by now, beyond question. However, owing to the unique and rapidly evolving nature of cyberspace, its ubiquitous interconnectivity, its lack of segregation between the private and public sectors, and its incompatibility with traditional concepts of geography, there are difficult and unresolved questions about exactly how international law applies to this domain. Chief among these is the question of the exact role that the principle of sovereignty plays in regulating states' cyber activities.

The New Fisa Court Amicus Should Be Able To Ignore Its Congressionally Imposed Duty, Ben Cook

American University Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Mental Health Of Our National Security: Protecting The Minds That Protect The Homeland, Alan Wehbé

American University National Security Law Brief

No abstract provided.

Strengthen Section 702: A Critical Intelligence Tool Vital To The Protection Of Our Country, Deborah Samuel Sills

American University National Security Law Brief

No abstract provided.

Jasta Straw Man? How The Justice Against Sponsors Of Terrorism Act Undermines Our Security And Its Stated Purpose, Katherine Holcombe

American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law

No abstract provided.

Cybersecurity, Identity Theft, And Standing Law: A Framework For Data Breaches Using Substantial Risk In A Post-Clapper World, James C. Chou

American University National Security Law Brief

No abstract provided.

Terrorists On Appeal: An Exploratory Analysis Of Terrorism Appeals Since 1988, Wesley Mccann

Criminal Law Practitioner

No abstract provided.

Applying The Law Of Neutrality While Transitioning The Seas Of Cyberspace, Danielle Higson

American University National Security Law Brief

No abstract provided.

Should The Best Offenses Ever Be A Good Defense: The Public Authority To Use Force In Millitary Operations: Recalibrating The Use Of Force Rules In The Standing Rules Of Engagement, Gary Corn

Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals

The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff's Standing Rules of Engagement/StandingRules for the Use of Force (SROE/SRUF)for U.S. Forces provides strategic guidance to the armed forces on the authority to use force during all military operations. The standing self-defense rules in the SROE for national, unit, and individual self-defense form the core of these use-of-force authorities. The SROE self-defense rules are incorrectly built on a unitary jus ad bellum framework, legally inapplicable below the level of national self-defense. Coupled with the pressures of sustained counter-insurgency operations, this misalignment of individual and unit self-defense authorities has led to a conflation …

Applying The Ucmj To Contractors In Contingency Operations, Adam R. Pearlman

American University National Security Law Brief

No abstract provided.

Ex Parte Quirin: The Nazi Saboteur Case And The Tribunal Precedent, Andrew Buttaro

American University National Security Law Brief

No abstract provided.

The Intersection Of "Internet Terrorism" And "Individual Privacy" In The Context Of The First Amendment, Amanda Leonard

American University National Security Law Brief

No abstract provided.

The Implications Of Creating An Iphone Backdoor, Gregory Coutros

American University National Security Law Brief

No abstract provided.

Known Unknowns: State Cyber Operations, Cyber Warfare, And The Jus Ad Bellum, Peter Z. Stockburger

American University International Law Review

No abstract provided.

Until We Achieve Universal Peace: Implications Of The International Law Commission’S Draft Articles On The “Effects Of Armed Conflict On Treaties”, Lauren Dudley

American University National Security Law Brief

No abstract provided.

"Black" Hawala: Confronting Isil On The Financial Front, Kelsey Mowatt-Larssen

American University National Security Law Brief

No abstract provided.

The Law Of Armed Conflict, Unconventional Warfare, And Cyber Attacks, Thomas P. Jordan

American University National Security Law Brief

No abstract provided.

Beyond The Paris Attacks: Unveiling The War Within French Counterterror Policy, Khaled A. Beydoun

American University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Data Retention Requirements And Outsourced Analysis: Should Private Entities Become Government Surrogates In The Collection Of Intelligence?, Michael J. Woods

American University Business Law Review

No abstract provided.

High Technology, Consumer Privacy, And U.S. National Security, Laura K. Donohue

American University Business Law Review

No abstract provided.

United States Assistant Attorney General For National Security John P. Carlin Delivers Remarks At The American University Business Law Review 2014 Symposium, John P. Carlin

American University Business Law Review

No abstract provided.

Pre-Crime Restraints: The Explosion Of Targeted, Non-Custodial Prevention, Jennifer Daskal

Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals

This Article exposes the ways in which noncustodial pre-crime restraints have proliferated over the past decade, focusing in particular on three notable examples — terrorism-related financial sanctions, the No Fly List, and the array of residential, employment, and related restrictions imposed on sex offenders. Because such restraints do not involve physical incapacitation, they are rarely deemed to infringe core liberty interests. Because they are preventive, not punitive, criminal law procedural protections do not apply. They have exploded largely unchecked — subject to little more than bare rationality review and negligible procedural protections — and without any coherent theory as to …

After The Aumf, Jennifer Daskal

Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals

Over a dozen years later, the AUMF — which has never been amended — remains the principal source of the U.S. government’s domestic legal authority to use military force against al Qaeda and its associates, both on the battlefields of Afghanistan and far beyond. But even as the statutory framework has remained unchanged, the facts on the ground have evolved dramatically, leading some to call for a new AUMF. In short, calls for a new framework statute to replace the AUMF are unnecessary, provocative, and counterproductive; they perpetuate war at a time when we should be seeking to end it. …

Shearson V. United States Department Of Homeland Security: The Sixth Circuit Exempts National Security From The Privacy Act, Douglas A. Behrens

Legislation and Policy Brief

“ARMED AND DANGEROUS.” Imagine those words flashing on a Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) agent’s computer screen as you attempt to reenter your country of birth from a relaxing vacation. Reacting to the computerized warning, the CBP agents detain and question you for several hours before you are released from custody—without an explanation—and allowed to continue on your trip home as if nothing had happened.

This hypothetical scenario became very real for Julia Shearson and her four-year old daughter in January 2006, and marked the beginning of her quest for answers. Why was she flagged as “ARMED AND DANGEROUS?” What …

Book Reviews: Time Out Of Joint, Kenneth Anderson

Book Reviews

(reviewing War Time: An Idea, Its History, Its Consequences by Mary L. Dudziak) American University, WCL Research Paper No. 2013-10 Abstract: The meaning of time in war is the topic of legal historian Mary L. Dudziak's 2012 book. This extended review essay (30 pp) considers both on its own terms of cultural criticism, and then from the standpoint of rationalist and realist critics. The book's overall cultural claim is that time in war is its own category and has effects and meaning in war independent of the considerations of security, liberty, and necessity in war that are often thought to …

Hamdan V. United States: A Death Knell For Military Commissions?, Jennifer Daskal

Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals

In October 2012, a panel of the D.C. Circuit dealt a blow to the United States’ post- September 11, 2001 decade-long experiment with military commissions as a forum for trying Guantanamo Bay detainees. Specifically, the court concluded that prior to the 2006 statutory reforms, military commission jurisdiction was limited to violations of internationally-recognized war crimes; that providing material support to terrorism was not an internationally-recognized war crime; and that the military commission conviction of Salim Hamdan for material support charges based on pre-2006 conduct was therefore invalid. Three months later, a panel of the D.C. Circuit reached the same conclusion …

Maritime Piracy: A Sustainable Global Solution, Paul Williams, Lowry Pressly

Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals

Maritime piracy is a complex transnational security concern characterized by emerging international finance operations and organization, an oversupply of labor, and a low cost of market entry. This article provides a realistic picture of the driving forces behind maritime piracy in areas such as Southeast Asia, the Gulf of Aden, and the Gulf of Guinea. By examining some of the assumptions and proposed solutions in counter-piracy literature and policy, this article exposes some piracy illusions and proposes a sustainable, global response that addresses the persistent threat of modern maritime piracy. Today's manifold piracy challenges call for a multifaceted approach. Accordingly, …

The Law Of Operational Targeting: Viewing The Loac Through An Operational Lens, Gary Corn

Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals

Air and missile warfare is and will almost certainly continue to be a ubiquitous aspect of contemporary armed conflicts. Yet, the law related to the regulation of this aspect of warfare has failed to develop at the same pace as the methods and means of employing such combat assets. The Manual on International Law Applicable to Air and Missile Warfare (AMW Manual)' is therefore without question an important development in the law of armed conflict. Although not hard law, it reflects the consensus of some of the most respected jus in bello scholars in the world on how existing law …

Ten Years After 9/11: The Changing Terrorist Threat, Kenneth Anderson, Michael Leiter, John Carlin, Ivan Fong, Daniel Marcus, Stephen Vladeck

Presentations

On September 8, 2011, the American University National Security Law Brief and the Law and Government Program at American University’s Washington College of Law hosted a candid discussion on the changes throughout the American legal system in the 10 years since the tragic September 11th attacks. The event featured a keynote address from Michael Leiter, Director of the National Counterterrorism Center from 2007-2011, followed by a panel discussion with John Carlin, Principal Deputy to the Assistant Attorney General of the Department of Justice’s National Security Division; Ivan Fong, General Counsel at the Department of Homeland Security; Stephen Vladeck, Professor of …

Efficiency In Bello And Ad Bellum: Making The Use Of Force Too Easy?, Kenneth Anderson

Contributions to Books

This article criticizes a widely asserted claim that drones make the resort to force and violence — war — “too easy.” Attractive on the surface to many, this article says that “too easy” is not a coherent notion as applied in war. The “too easy” argument comes in two forms, a moral argument and a maximization of social welfare argument. The maximization of social welfare version (on which the article focuses) frames “too easy” as a matter of creating an “inefficient” level of disincentive to use of force on account of insufficient risks to one’s own forces in so doing …