Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (210)
- University of Georgia School of Law (18)
- Brooklyn Law School (15)
- University of Michigan Law School (14)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (9)
-
- University of Maine School of Law (6)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (3)
- Purdue University (3)
- St. Mary's University (3)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (3)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (2)
- City University of New York (CUNY) (2)
- Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University (2)
- Florida State University College of Law (2)
- Georgetown University Law Center (2)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (2)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
- UIC School of Law (2)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Barry University School of Law (1)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Liberty University (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Pepperdine University (1)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (1)
- St. John's University School of Law (1)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (1)
- U.S. Naval War College (1)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Law (13)
- United Nations (13)
- Terrorism (11)
- National security (8)
- Treaties (8)
-
- SFFA (7)
- Affirmative Action (6)
- ESG (6)
- World War II (6)
- Artificial intelligence (5)
- Diversity (5)
- NATO (5)
- Nuclear weapons (5)
- Public health (5)
- Sanctions (5)
- Securities and exchange commission (5)
- Security (5)
- Security Council (5)
- Addiction (4)
- Constitution (4)
- Extraterritoriality (4)
- International law (4)
- Organization of American States (4)
- Regulation (4)
- SEC (4)
- Supreme Court (4)
- Technology (4)
- UN (4)
- United Nations Security Council (4)
- Warsaw Pact (4)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (183)
- Seattle Journal for Social Justice (25)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (18)
- Brooklyn Journal of International Law (13)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (13)
-
- Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs (2012 - Present) (7)
- Ocean and Coastal Law Journal (6)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (3)
- Canada-United States Law Journal (2)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (2)
- Florida State University Journal of Transnational Law & Policy (2)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (2)
- Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review (2)
- Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business (2)
- Scholarly Articles (2)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (2)
- Articles (1)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (1)
- Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law (1)
- Capstones (1)
- Child and Family Law Journal (1)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (1)
- FORCES Initiative: Strategy, Security, and Social Systems (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Indiana Journal of Constitutional Design (1)
- Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies (1)
- International Law Studies (1)
- Journal of Aviation/Aerospace Education & Research (1)
- Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law (1)
- Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 301 - 317 of 317
Full-Text Articles in National Security Law
Denuclearization Of The Korean Peninsula: Recent Agreements And Lessons From The Past, Jared M. Lee
Denuclearization Of The Korean Peninsula: Recent Agreements And Lessons From The Past, Jared M. Lee
Florida State University Journal of Transnational Law & Policy
No abstract provided.
Averting Catastrophe: Why The Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty Is Losing Its Deterrence Capacity And How To Restore It, Orde F. Kittrie
Averting Catastrophe: Why The Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty Is Losing Its Deterrence Capacity And How To Restore It, Orde F. Kittrie
Michigan Journal of International Law
This Article analyzes from a legal perspective the responses of the international community, and especially the Security Council, to the examples of nuclear proliferation outlined in this Article and the impact of those responses on the vitality of the nuclear nonproliferation regime. In doing so, the Article identifies and focuses on two key, interrelated themes. The first theme is the effect on these responses of the NPT's remarkably weak mechanisms for detecting violations of NPT obligations. The second theme is the frequent strong reluctance of the international community, including the Security Council, to impose serious sanctions for proliferation activity when …
What's International Law Got To Do With It? Transnational Law And The Intelligence Mission, James E. Baker
What's International Law Got To Do With It? Transnational Law And The Intelligence Mission, James E. Baker
Michigan Journal of International Law
This Article describes a continuum of contemporary threats to U.S. national security, with a focus on nonstate terrorism. Part III addresses the role of intelligence and national security law, and in particular law addressed to process, in combating these threats. Good process advances the liberty and safety interests embodied in the concept of national security. Good process improves the quality of decision. It also enhances accountability, which in turn improves decision. Where good process is defined in law to include executive directive, it is better insulated from the immediate imperatives of secrecy and speed.
What’S International Law Got To Do With It? Transnational Law And The Intelligence Mission, James E. Baker
What’S International Law Got To Do With It? Transnational Law And The Intelligence Mission, James E. Baker
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The United States faces an immediate and continuous threat of terrorist attack using weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear weapons. The intelligence function and national security law, including international law--or more accurately transnational law--are central to addressing this threat. Indeed, international law is more relevant today in addressing this threat than it was before September 11. Part II of this article describes a continuum of contemporary threats to U.S. national security, with a focus on nonstate terrorism. Part III addresses the role of intelligence and national security law, and in particular law addressed to process, in combating these threats. Part …
Transnational Shipments Of Nuclear Materials By Sea: Do Current Safeguards Provide Coastal States A Right To Deny Innocent Passage?, David B. Dixon
Transnational Shipments Of Nuclear Materials By Sea: Do Current Safeguards Provide Coastal States A Right To Deny Innocent Passage?, David B. Dixon
Florida State University Journal of Transnational Law & Policy
No abstract provided.
Taking The Stand: The Lessons Of The Three Men Who Took The Japanese American Internment To Court, Lorraine K. Bannai
Taking The Stand: The Lessons Of The Three Men Who Took The Japanese American Internment To Court, Lorraine K. Bannai
Seattle Journal for Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Optrex And The Attorney-Client Privilege: Implications And Potential Significance, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1 (2005), Sandra Liss Friedman, Helena D. Sullivan
Optrex And The Attorney-Client Privilege: Implications And Potential Significance, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1 (2005), Sandra Liss Friedman, Helena D. Sullivan
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Panel One: Unfunding Terror--Perspectives On Unfundingterror: Commentary, Michael P. Malloy
Panel One: Unfunding Terror--Perspectives On Unfundingterror: Commentary, Michael P. Malloy
McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles
No abstract provided.
The United Nations Security Council's Quest For Effectiveness, Emilio J. Cárdenas
The United Nations Security Council's Quest For Effectiveness, Emilio J. Cárdenas
Michigan Journal of International Law
The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, on New York's World Trade Center Towers and Washington's Pentagon, instantly refocused the United Nations' attention on the issue of international terrorism. The Security Council (Council) responded immediately: first, on September 12, 2001, with an unequivocal condemnation of the attacks, contained in Resolution 1368 (2001), and second, on September 28, 2001, with the enactment of Resolution 1373 (2001), which, under Chapter VII of the Charter, mandated that all Member States take specific actions to combat international terrorism. Terrorism was rightly understood to be "a threat to international peace and security."
When Can Nations Go To War? Politics And Change In The Un Securtiy System, Charlotte Ku
When Can Nations Go To War? Politics And Change In The Un Securtiy System, Charlotte Ku
Michigan Journal of International Law
In an appreciation of Harold Jacobson written for the American Journal of International Law, the author concluded that following the events of September 11, 2001, we would need the kind of gentle wisdom Harold Jacobson brought to his tasks more than ever. The author also recalled Harold Jacobson's own observation in Networks of Interdependence that his assessment of the global political system was an optimistic, but not a naive one. These qualities of quiet determination to get to the bottom of an issue and of optimism stemmed from a fundamental belief that individuals, armed with information and the opportunity …
The Right To Self-Defense Once The Security Council Takes Action, Malvina Halberstam
The Right To Self-Defense Once The Security Council Takes Action, Malvina Halberstam
Michigan Journal of International Law
This article discusses the views of these commentators in the light of the language, history, and policies underlying Article 51. It concludes that the Charter was not intended to and should not be interpreted to deny a state the right of self-defense, even if the Security Council has taken measures to deal with the problem; if states are to cede their right to self-defense once the Security Council has taken measures, that should be made explicit.
Legal Restraints On Security Council Military Enforcement Action, Judith G. Gardam
Legal Restraints On Security Council Military Enforcement Action, Judith G. Gardam
Michigan Journal of International Law
This article considers an issue that, given its importance for the protection of combatants and civilians in armed conflict, has not attracted the attention it warrants: namely, the extent to which legal restraints derived from the ius in bello and the ius ad bellum apply to the Security Council when it is taking military enforcement action under Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter. Although a position not free from controversy, the recent practice of the Security Council in "authorizing" States to use force to restore international peace and security is treated as military enforcement action under Chapter VII of …
The "Privatization" Of Security Council Enforcement Action: A Threat To Multilateralism, John Quigley
The "Privatization" Of Security Council Enforcement Action: A Threat To Multilateralism, John Quigley
Michigan Journal of International Law
In-the post-Cold War period, the United Nations Security Council has emerged from a side show of international politics to center stage. It has acted to repel aggression, to promote humanitarian efforts, and to enforce democracy. This flowering of activity holds the potential for achieving concerted international action to remedy situations involving great human misery.
United States V. Palestine Liberation Organization: Continued Confusion In Congressional Intent And The Hierarchy Of Norms, Andrew R. Horne
United States V. Palestine Liberation Organization: Continued Confusion In Congressional Intent And The Hierarchy Of Norms, Andrew R. Horne
Michigan Journal of International Law
This Note concludes that while the court's rationale is disingenuous and misleading, the final decision was an appropriate reaffirmation of the importance which American jurisprudence places on international obligations. In Part One, this Note discusses whether the dispute resolution provisions of the Headquarters Agreement precluded the district court's jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter of this case. Part Two examines the constitutional hierarchy of the ATA and the Headquarters Agreement to determine which should govern this dispute. If the court had concluded that it lacked jurisdiction, the case would have been dismissed from the U.S. court system, leaving the …
The United States, The United Nations, And Micronesia: Questions Of Procedure, Substance, And Faith, Harry G. Prince
The United States, The United Nations, And Micronesia: Questions Of Procedure, Substance, And Faith, Harry G. Prince
Michigan Journal of International Law
This study first considers the procedural requirements for proper termination and concludes that Security Council approval is required. Second, this writing identifies the major issues that should be considered if the proposed termination of the Trusteeship Agreement for Micronesia is subjected to Security Council review. Two basic concerns should be the propriety of the division of the Trust Territory into four separate entities and the legitimacy of the agreements between the new governments and the United States for continuing relations as either commonwealth or freely associated states. The history of and practice under the trusteeship system indicate that the particular …
U.N. General Assembly Meetings Held Outside New York, Yehuda Z. Blum
U.N. General Assembly Meetings Held Outside New York, Yehuda Z. Blum
Michigan Journal of International Law
The decision taken by the United Nations General Assembly on December 2, 1988 "to consider the question of Palestine… in plenary, at the United Nations Office at Geneva during the period from December 13-15, 1988" has raised some questions regarding the procedural requirements that have to be fulfilled for General Assembly meetings to be held away from U.N. Headquarters in New York. For a better understanding of the issues involved, it would seem appropriate to summarize briefly the background and developments that led to the General Assembly's decision.
Espionage In Transnational Law, Leslie S. Edmondson
Espionage In Transnational Law, Leslie S. Edmondson
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
Traditionally, spies have been defined as "secret agents of a State sent abroad for the purpose of obtaining clandestinely information in regard to military or political secrets." Older authorities have stated emphatically that the gravamen of espionage is the employment of disguise or false pretense. Such deception has been the justification for visiting the severest of penalties upon the captured spy. Curiously, however, the employment of spies has not been considered reprehensible conduct. The refusal to officially acknowledge the commissioning of a spy operated to relieve the government of any responsibility either to the offended state or to the secret …