Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Health Law and Policy (32)
- Torts (7)
- Constitutional Law (6)
- Law and Society (6)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (5)
-
- Criminal Law (4)
- Food and Drug Law (4)
- Science and Technology Law (4)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (3)
- Courts (3)
- Criminal Procedure (3)
- Elder Law (3)
- Human Rights Law (3)
- Jurisprudence (3)
- Law and Gender (3)
- Law and Psychology (3)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (3)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (2)
- International Law (2)
- Legal Education (2)
- Privacy Law (2)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (2)
- Social Welfare Law (2)
- Agriculture Law (1)
- Bioethics and Medical Ethics (1)
- Business Organizations Law (1)
- Civil Law (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Institution
-
- BLR (9)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (6)
- University of Michigan Law School (4)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (3)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (2)
-
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (2)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (2)
- UIC School of Law (2)
- University of San Diego (2)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (2)
- Association of American Law Schools (1)
- Brigham Young University Law School (1)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (1)
- Georgetown University Law Center (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (1)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (1)
- University of Baltimore Law (1)
- University of Missouri School of Law (1)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (1)
- University of Washington School of Law (1)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (1)
- Western New England University (1)
- Keyword
-
- Health Law and Policy (11)
- Medical Jurisprudence (11)
- Constitutional Law (6)
- Medical malpractice (6)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (5)
-
- General Law (4)
- Law and Society (4)
- Litigation (4)
- Elder Law (3)
- Human Rights Law (3)
- Oklahoma (3)
- Science and Technology (3)
- Abortion (2)
- Affordable Access to Health Care Act (2)
- Bioethics (2)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (2)
- Duty of care (2)
- HIPAA (2)
- International Law (2)
- Jurisprudence (2)
- Kamisar (Yale) (2)
- Medical decision-making (2)
- Physicians (2)
- Privacy (2)
- Psychology and Psychiatry (2)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (2)
- Social Welfare (2)
- Women (2)
- Washington D.C. (1)
- "Terri's Law" (1)
- Publication
-
- ExpressO (6)
- All Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Articles (3)
- Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Michigan Law Review (3)
-
- Oklahoma Law Review (3)
- Rutgers Law School (Newark) Faculty Papers (3)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (2)
- Indiana Law Journal (2)
- Public Interest Law Reporter (2)
- University of San Diego Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series (2)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (2)
- BYU Law Review (1)
- Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (1)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (1)
- Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law (1)
- Cardozo Law Review (1)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (1)
- Journal of Legal Education (1)
- Scholarly Articles (1)
- Scholarly Works (1)
- UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship (1)
- UIC Law Review (1)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (1)
- Washington International Law Journal (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 49 of 49
Full-Text Articles in Medical Jurisprudence
A Quantitative Methodology For Determining The Need For Exposure-Prompted Medical Monitoring, Christopher P. Guzelian, Bruce E. Hillner, Philip S. Guzelian
A Quantitative Methodology For Determining The Need For Exposure-Prompted Medical Monitoring, Christopher P. Guzelian, Bruce E. Hillner, Philip S. Guzelian
Indiana Law Journal
Some toxic exposures to drugs or other environmental chemicals may create an increased risk of future disease for which periodic preventive medical screening might be desirable. However, many of these risks, even if unacceptable as a matter of public health policy, might still not be significant enough for medical monitoring (periodic diagnostic screening for latent illnesses or medical conditions) to be an appropriate medical intervention. This somewhat unintuitive, but statistically certain, conclusion can be demonstrated in relatively simple mathematical terms. Accordingly, we introduce Bayes's Rule and decision analysis, a quantitative methodology commonly employed by medical practitioners. A review of current …
How A Drug Becomes ‘Ethnic’: Law, Commerce, And The Production Of Racial Categories In Medicine, Jonathan Kahn
How A Drug Becomes ‘Ethnic’: Law, Commerce, And The Production Of Racial Categories In Medicine, Jonathan Kahn
Faculty Scholarship
A drug called BiDil is poised to become the first drug ever approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat heart failure in African Americans - and only African Americans. This article explores the story of BiDil and considers some of its broader implications for the use of racial categories in law, medicine, and science. It argues that BiDil is an ethnic drug today as much, if not more because of the interventions of law and commerce as because of any biomedical considerations. The article is, first, a retrospective analysis of how law, commerce, science, and medicine interacted …
Use And Disclosure Of Protected Health Information For Research Under The Hippa Privacy Rule, The: Unrealized Patient Autonomy And Burdensome Government Regulation, Stacey A. Tovino
Scholarly Works
This article offers a legal and ethical analysis of the requirements of federal privacy regulations (herein after the “Privacy Rules”) relating to the use and disclosure of individually identifiable health information for research activities. Section II of this article provides a legal summary of the Privacy Rules’ complex research provisions. Sections III and IV of this article analyze the Privacy Rules’ research provisions from a legal and ethical perspective. Specifically, Section III addresses whether the Privacy Rules promote autonomy by analyzing certain of the legal rights attributed to individuals who are the subjects of health information including: (1) the general …
Evidence-Based Medicine In The Law Beyond Clinical Practice Guidelines: What Effect Will Ebm Have On The Standard Of Care?, Carter L. Williams
Evidence-Based Medicine In The Law Beyond Clinical Practice Guidelines: What Effect Will Ebm Have On The Standard Of Care?, Carter L. Williams
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
In Defense Of The Professional Standard Of Care: A Response To Carter Williams On "Evidence-Based Medicine", Ann Maclean Massie
In Defense Of The Professional Standard Of Care: A Response To Carter Williams On "Evidence-Based Medicine", Ann Maclean Massie
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
American Midwifery Litigation And State Legislative Preferences For Physician-Controlled Childbirth, Stacey A. Tovino
American Midwifery Litigation And State Legislative Preferences For Physician-Controlled Childbirth, Stacey A. Tovino
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
The transition from lay midwife-assisted home births to physician-controlled hospital deliveries in the U.S. was driven by a complex interplay of professional competition, economic interests, and societal biases, which were reinforced by judicial deference to state legislative preferences favoring medical dominance over childbirth practices.
The Ada And Tennessee's Sovereign Immunity Crawl Into The Supreme Court, Mary E. O'Malley
The Ada And Tennessee's Sovereign Immunity Crawl Into The Supreme Court, Mary E. O'Malley
Public Interest Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Organ Transplants Are Becoming A Possibility For Hiv Patients, Michelle Lammers
Organ Transplants Are Becoming A Possibility For Hiv Patients, Michelle Lammers
Public Interest Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
A Review Of Oklahoma's 2003 And 2004 Tort Reform, Beth Reynolds
A Review Of Oklahoma's 2003 And 2004 Tort Reform, Beth Reynolds
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Civil Procedure: Medical Malpractice Gets Eerie: The Erie Implications Of A Heightened Pleading Burden In Oklahoma, Dace A. Caldwell
Civil Procedure: Medical Malpractice Gets Eerie: The Erie Implications Of A Heightened Pleading Burden In Oklahoma, Dace A. Caldwell
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Preface To The Justice In Mediation Symposium, Lela Love
Preface To The Justice In Mediation Symposium, Lela Love
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
On March 12, 2004, the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law held a symposium on Justice in Mediation. The papers below represent the first group of articles emanating from that event. More articles will follow in the next issue of the Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution.
Steering And Rowing In Health Care: The Devolution Option?, Colleen Flood, Joanna Erdman, Duncan Sinclair
Steering And Rowing In Health Care: The Devolution Option?, Colleen Flood, Joanna Erdman, Duncan Sinclair
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
Publicly funded health care systems are often the subject of heated policy debates. All too often (particularly in Canada), these debates focus on the prohibitive costs, the resultant taxation levels, and the questionable efficiency and outcomes associated with a publicly funded system. Moreover, the institutionalization of the system and the entrenchment of its many stakeholders make effecting change particularly difficult. In this article, the authors begin with an assessment of the drawbacks of the Canadian health care system in the federal-provincial context and its resulting gaps in governance (steering), in management (rowing), and in overall accountability (apart from that offered …
The Boundaries Of Medicare: Tensions In The Dual Role Of Ontario's Physician Services Review Committee, Colleen Flood, Joanna Erdman
The Boundaries Of Medicare: Tensions In The Dual Role Of Ontario's Physician Services Review Committee, Colleen Flood, Joanna Erdman
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
In this research, we describe and analyse the Physician Services Committee (PSC) in Ontario, focusing on its role in determining what physician services are publicly funded and what services are de-listed (i.e. no longer eligible for public funding). We explain how the PSC's role in determining the boundaries of Medicare is in tension with its role as a medium for labour relations between the government and the medical profession. We suggest that while the values of privacy, secrecy and a lack of transparency may enhance the PSC's fulfillment of its labour relations mandate, they impede the Committee's successful fulfillment of …
Damages: Using A Case Study To Teach Law, Lawyering, And Dispute Resolution, Chris Guthrie
Damages: Using A Case Study To Teach Law, Lawyering, And Dispute Resolution, Chris Guthrie
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
Seven law school faculty members and one practicing attorney recently developed and taught a wholly new kind of law course based on an already published case study, Damages: One Family's Legal Struggles in the World of Medicine, by Barry Werth, an investigative reporter who spent several years researching to write the book. Damages, an in-depth account of a medical malpractice case, presents the perspectives of the injured family, the defendant physician, the lawyers, and the three mediators. In this Symposium Introduction, the authors provide a summary of Werth's book, explain why they decided to create a course based on his …
On Kamisar, Killing, And The Future Of Physician-Assisted Death, Norman L. Cantor
On Kamisar, Killing, And The Future Of Physician-Assisted Death, Norman L. Cantor
Michigan Law Review
Tens - perhaps hundreds - of thousands of trees could have been spared over the last forty-five years had opponents of physician-assisted death only been content to let Yale Kamisar be their exclusive spokesperson. Their movement would have lost no significant substance or persuasive force, for Kamisar's 1958 article - Some Non-Religious Views Against Proposed 'Mercy-Killing' Legislation - presaged the shape and content of the subsequent forty-five year debate over legalizing physician-assisted death ("PAD" ). Kamisar's article preceded by years the development of a whole jurisprudence relating to the withholding/withdrawing of life-sustaining medical treatment ("LSMT") and the administration of pain-relief …
Benumbed, Carl E. Schneider
Benumbed, Carl E. Schneider
Articles
I originally intended to write a column on tort liability and research ethics, and I still plan to do so. But this column is a cri de coeur as I finish another semester teaching law and bioethics. This year, I asked with growing frequency, urgency, and exasperation, "Must law's reverence for autonomy squeeze out the impulse to kindness? Where is the beneficence in bioethics?" These questions assail me every term. Why? Consider Steele v. Hamilton County Community Mental Health Board. Mr. Steele was involuntarily "hospitalized after his family reported that he was 'seeing things and trying to fight imaginary …
Time To Enter A "Do Not Resuscitate" Order On The National Resident Matching Program's Chart, Gregory Dolin
Time To Enter A "Do Not Resuscitate" Order On The National Resident Matching Program's Chart, Gregory Dolin
All Faculty Scholarship
This article focuses on the NRMP system and argues that the process is neither efficient nor pro-competitive. This article argues that Congress erred in bestowing an antitrust exemption on the NRMP and the participating institutions.
This article suggests that although the system may have been necessary to check the problem of early recruiting that was pervasive in the 1950s (similar to the one that plagued the federal judiciary until just two years ago), the system has outlived its usefulness. Part II will explain the Match's history and function and will discuss how the system makes participation in the Match inevitable …
Politicizing The End Of Life: Lessons From The Schiavo Controversy, Barbara A. Noah
Politicizing The End Of Life: Lessons From The Schiavo Controversy, Barbara A. Noah
Faculty Scholarship
The case of Theresa Marie Schiavo raises challenging legal and ethical issues, although the events of the case are not entirely novel. It is a well-settled principle under Florida law that individuals have a right to refuse life-sustaining medical treatment. After years of litigation, numerous courts have confirmed that removal of life support is legally appropriate under the facts of this case. Nevertheless, six days after Theresa's feeding tube was removed, the Florida legislature
opted to intervene in the final judicial decision by granting the Governor the authority to overrule the court's decision and to order the tube reinserted. These …
Deliberate Extinction: Whether To Destroy The Last Smallpox Virus, David A. Koplow
Deliberate Extinction: Whether To Destroy The Last Smallpox Virus, David A. Koplow
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The target problem to be examined is smallpox. Specifically, what should we (the United States and the entire world) now do with the last known residual samples of the virus that causes this uniquely horrific disease? The illness itself has virtually disappeared from the catalogue of human afflictions: due to a stunningly imaginative, concerted, and resolute campaign of the World Health Organization (WHO) through the 1970s, no one has contracted this deadly impairment for twenty-five years. Yet the causative element, an insidious scourge known as the variola virus, still remains, housed for now in high-security freezers at the U.S. Centers …