Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (186)
- University of Michigan Law School (18)
- UIC School of Law (15)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (10)
- Pepperdine University (6)
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (6)
- BLR (4)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (4)
- University of Missouri School of Law (4)
- Cornell University Law School (3)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (3)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Barry University School of Law (1)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Brigham Young University Law School (1)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (1)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- Georgetown University Law Center (1)
- Liberty University (1)
- New York Law School (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- Roger Williams University (1)
- St. Mary's University (1)
- University of Colorado Law School (1)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (1)
- University of New Mexico (1)
- Keyword
-
- Law (13)
- Courts (11)
- Assisted suicide (9)
- Euthanasia (9)
- Medical treatment (8)
-
- United States Supreme Court (8)
- Constitution (7)
- Due process (7)
- Medical malpractice (7)
- SFFA (7)
- Affirmative Action (6)
- ESG (6)
- Physician-assisted suicide (6)
- Right to die (6)
- Constitutional law (5)
- Discrimination (5)
- Diversity (5)
- General Law (5)
- Health Law and Policy (5)
- Jurisprudence (5)
- Legislation (5)
- Medical Jurisprudence (5)
- Politics (5)
- Privacy (5)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (5)
- Regulation (5)
- Securities Law (5)
- Securities and exchange commission (5)
- Supreme Court (5)
- Addiction (4)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (185)
- UIC Law Review (13)
- Articles (9)
- Michigan Law Review (6)
- Touro Law Review (6)
-
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (4)
- Cardozo Law Review (4)
- ExpressO (4)
- Faculty Publications (4)
- Book Chapters (3)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (3)
- Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Pepperdine Law Review (3)
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - ) (3)
- Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (2)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (2)
- Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal (2)
- UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship (2)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Articles & Chapters (1)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- BYU Law Review (1)
- Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal (1)
- Child and Family Law Journal (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- Faculty Working Papers (1)
- Faculty Works (1)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (1)
- Helm's School of Government Conference - 2021-2024 (1)
- Indiana Law Journal (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 271 - 283 of 283
Full-Text Articles in Medical Jurisprudence
A Moral Dilemma: The Role Of Judicial Intervention In Withholding Or Withdrawing Nutrition And Hydration, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 537 (1990), Anthony M. Peccarelli
A Moral Dilemma: The Role Of Judicial Intervention In Withholding Or Withdrawing Nutrition And Hydration, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 537 (1990), Anthony M. Peccarelli
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Dralle V. Ruder: Did The Decision Close The Book On Recovery For Society And Companionship In Illinois Or Just Turn The Page, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 721 (1989), Frank I. Powers
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Does Competency Matter After Charters?, Michael L. Perlin, Michael L. Perlin
Does Competency Matter After Charters?, Michael L. Perlin, Michael L. Perlin
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.
Brief For Petitioner, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 955 (1988), L. Lee Byrd, Yvonne T. Griffin, G. Rodney Young
Brief For Petitioner, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 955 (1988), L. Lee Byrd, Yvonne T. Griffin, G. Rodney Young
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Agreements Changing The Forum For Resolving Malpractice Claims, James A. Henderson Jr.
Agreements Changing The Forum For Resolving Malpractice Claims, James A. Henderson Jr.
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Can Mental Health Professionals Predict Judicial Decisionmaking? Constitutional And Tort Liability Aspects Of The Right Of The Institutionalized Mentally Disabled To Refuse Treatment: On The Cutting Edge, Michael L. Perlin
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Role Of Judges In Life/Death Decisions For The Neurologically Impaired, H. Richard Beresford
The Role Of Judges In Life/Death Decisions For The Neurologically Impaired, H. Richard Beresford
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
The Massachusetts Supreme Court has recently ruled that decisions about withholding care from hopelessly ill, legally incapacitated patients must be made by judges. It clearly rejected the view that families and attending physicians should be empowered to make such decisions. In this respect, the ruling contrasts with that of the Quinlan case and highlights the issue of whether judges or physicians and families are better able to make medically and morally sound decisions respecting this class of patients.
Evidence--Medical Treatises To Be Admitted As Direct Evidence In Wisconsin--Lewandowski V. Preferred Risk Mutual Ins. Co., Michigan Law Review
Evidence--Medical Treatises To Be Admitted As Direct Evidence In Wisconsin--Lewandowski V. Preferred Risk Mutual Ins. Co., Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Defendant's attorney in a personal injury action sought on cross-examination to impeach plaintiff's physician regarding his determination of the degree of plaintiff's disability by referring to the medical standards set forth in the American Medical Association's Guide to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment--The Extremities and Back. Pointing to the physician's testimony that he had not relied on the Guide in making his evaluation, the trial court sustained plaintiff's objection that such cross-examination was not permissible. On appeal, the Wisconsin Supreme Court held that the trial court was correct in sustaining the objection in accordance with the established rule that it …
Courts-Scope Of Authority-Sterilization Of Mental Defectives, William R. Warnock
Courts-Scope Of Authority-Sterilization Of Mental Defectives, William R. Warnock
Michigan Law Review
Respondent, age nineteen, appeared before the probate court of Muskingum County, Ohio, upon an affidavit filed by her mother alleging the child to be feeble-minded and in need of medical treatment. Results of psychological tests were presented at the hearing, revealing that respondent had an intelligence quotient of thirty-six and was therefore a feeble-minded person within the statutory definition. Respondent had had one illegitimate child, for whom she was unable to provide even rudimentary care or financial support, and was physically capable of bearing more children. Taking judicial notice that the state mental hospitals were then overcrowded and unable to …
Abstracts Of Recent Cases, T. E. P.
Medical Facts That Can And Cannot Be Proved By X-Ray: Historical Review And Present Possibilities, Samuel W. Donaldson
Medical Facts That Can And Cannot Be Proved By X-Ray: Historical Review And Present Possibilities, Samuel W. Donaldson
Michigan Law Review
As the science of the practice of medicine has progressed, new discoveries have brought out newer methods of diagnosis and treatment. With the discovery of x-rays by Professor Wilhelm Roentgen in 1895, an entirely new field was opened. The growth of this new field of medical radiology has been unusually rapid and of great importance. Radiology embraces the use of x-rays, radium, and other radioactive substances. Roentgenology is a division of radiology in that it is limited to the use of the Roentgen rays or x-rays, and medical roentgenology may be termed as the use of x-rays for the diagnosis …
Constitutional Law - Psychopathic Proceeding - Due Process And Jury Trial, Michigan Law Review
Constitutional Law - Psychopathic Proceeding - Due Process And Jury Trial, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Proceedings were brought against appellant under a Minnesota statute providing for commitment of psychopathic persons who showed habitual sexual misconduct. Appellant appealed to the state supreme court for a writ of prohibition, claiming denial of due process. Appellant's contentions were overruled and he appealed to the United States Supreme Court. Held, the statute did not deny due process. Minnesota ex rel. Pearson v. Probate Court, (U.S. 1940) 60 S. Ct. 523.
The Compensation Of Medical Witnesses, Harry B. Hutchins
The Compensation Of Medical Witnesses, Harry B. Hutchins
Michigan Law Review
The power to compel testimony is inherent in every court, for without it justice could constantly be thwarted. Generally all persons may be compelled to give evidence that is relevant to the matter in controversy. If, therefore, a person who has been duly summoned as a witness at a particular trial absents himself therefrom, without just cause, or attending, refuses to give evidence or to answer questions when directed so to do by the court, he is liable to punishment for contempt. But there are limitations upon the general rule, some based upon principles of legal policy and some upon …