Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Marketing Law Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law and Economics

Institution
Keyword
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 331 - 334 of 334

Full-Text Articles in Marketing Law

United States Food Law Update, Michael T. Roberts, Margie Alsbrook May 2005

United States Food Law Update, Michael T. Roberts, Margie Alsbrook

Journal of Food Law & Policy

The one constancy about food law in the United States is change, especially in a rapidly-developing food industry. Innovations in food technology, shifts in popular culture and tastes, concerns of safety and nutrition, pressures from international markets, all contribute to the changing landscape of food law. These changes are reflected in new federal statutes, regulations, administrative decisions, and judicial decisions.


European Union Food Law Update, Nicole Coutrelis May 2005

European Union Food Law Update, Nicole Coutrelis

Journal of Food Law & Policy

The purpose of this update is to present the main events that have taken place each six months in the food law sector in the European Union (E.U.). This presentation will cover June through December 2004, but is not exhaustive. This update will not include detailed discussions of regulations, such as authorizations of new additives for animal feed or registrations of new geographic names. Instead it will concentrate on fundamental topics and focus on food, which excludes from our scope questions regarding the management of agricultural products (Common Agricultural Policy, or CAP). However, some questions which legally pertain to the …


European Community Competition Law, Subsidiarity, And The National Courts, Eric F. Hinton May 1997

European Community Competition Law, Subsidiarity, And The National Courts, Eric F. Hinton

Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law

No abstract provided.


Boycotts And Restrictive Marketing Arrangements, Richard M. Buxbaum Feb 1966

Boycotts And Restrictive Marketing Arrangements, Richard M. Buxbaum

Michigan Law Review

It is currently a common if still relatively unheralded practice for a "fired" dealer to bring an antitrust action against his former manufacturer-supplier (and perhaps other dealers), alleging that his termination was the result of a boycott. Boycotts-collective efforts to obtain the exclusion of a party from a market-are illegal per se under section 1 of the Sherman Act. Thus, questions concerning the justification for the boycott or the significance of the offender's market position do not arise.