Litigation Commons^™

The Suability Of The State, Charles S. Hyneman

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Corporations-Government Owned Corporation Claiming Attributes Of Sovereignty

Michigan Law Review

That the government or the sovereign can not be sued without its consent has been so often repeated that it has attained the prosaicness of a legal maxim. Even so the doctrine was never so whole heartedly acceded to in the United States as it was in England, and we find the cases setting up at least one notable exception in the United States as to the property of the sovereign.

The Illinois Appellate Courts-Are They Satisfactory?

Michigan Law Review

The instantaneous answer of "Yes" to this question was given by every Illinois attorney the writer asked while gathering material for this article, and undoubtedly that would be the answer of an overwhelming percentage of the Illinois Bar. In the Constitutional Convention of 1920 in Illinois, not one of the fifty odd lawyer members ever questioned their expediency in all the debates on the judiciary article. And much can, of course, be said in their favor. They relieve the supreme court of a great burden of work. They are closer at hand than the supreme court to most of the …

Fire Insurance-Is "Double" Payment Necessarily Overpayment?

Michigan Law Review

A recent Wisconsin case, Ramsdell v. Insurance Co., presents a novel and interesting situation. The lessor and lessee of business property each insured the property in separate companies, the lessor for $3,000 and the lessee for $7,500. The lease contained no provisions as to insurance, repairing, or rebuilding and there was no contract between any of the parties which could affect the situation that arose. A loss of $4,246 occurred in June. After lengthy negotiations had proved fruitless, the lessee rebuilt the premises and sued his insurer. At the same time the lessor sued on his policy. The lessee …

Injunctions-Statutory Injunctions In Legal Actions Under The Iowa Code

Michigan Law Review

The Iowa Code contains a unique and interesting provision which was copied from the English Common Law Procedure Act of 1854. It provides that :--"In all cases of breach of contract or other injury, where the party injured is entitled to maintain and has brought an action by ordinary proceedings, he may, in the same cause, pray and have a writ of injunction against the repetition or continuance of such breach of contract or other injury, or the commission of any breach of contract or injury of a like kind arising out of the same contract or relating to the …

Conviction Of Crime As Affecting The Credibility Of A Witness In The State Of Washington—Competency Of Persons Convicted Of Perjury To Testify In Civil And Criminal Proceedings, Elmer Goering

Washington Law Review

At common law persons convicted of heinous offenses were not competent as witnesses. In order to be totally disqualified the witness must have been convicted of a crime making him infamous. The infamous crimes consisted of treason, felony, and all forms of the crimen falsi. Just what crimen falsi includes is not entirely clear, but generally it comprehends all crimes which involve fraud or falsehood rendering the guilty party entirely untrustworthy, and injuriously affecting the administration of justice. The disqualification of a witness for infamy has been quite generally abolished by statute. In the state of Washington several statutes have …

Recent Cases, K. G. S.

Washington Law Review

No abstract provided.

How To Prove A Prima Facie Case, By Samuel Deutsch And Simon Balicer (1929), Ivan W. Goodner

Washington Law Review

No abstract provided.

Recent Cases, J. G. G.

Washington Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Art Of Argument, By Harold F. Graves And Carle B. Spotts (1927), M. A. M.

Washington Law Review

No abstract provided.

Recent Cases, A. E. H.

Washington Law Review

No abstract provided.

Recent Cases, J. G. G.

Washington Law Review

No abstract provided.

Damages-Apportionment Of Punitive Damages In An Action Against Agent And Corporation Jointly

Michigan Law Review

The recent South Carolina case of Johnson v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., presents, it is submitted, an undesirable extension of the rule announced in Goddard v. Grand Trunk R. Co. The latter decided that a corporation or principal is liable in punitive damages for a malicious act of its agent committed in the course of, or in connection with, his duties or employment. The prevailing opinion seems to be that the principal is liable (in exemplary damages) only when he has authorized, participated in, or ratified the act of the agent. or was negligent in the selection of …

International Law-Recognition Of Governments

Michigan Law Review

The decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently brought to a close an interesting piece of litigation which had been dragging its way through the courts for several years. The issue on the international law point was so sharply presented, the counsel so able, investigation so completely exhaustive, and the recovery so substantial that the case has been given full attention by the newspapers as well as by legal commentators.

What Price Success On Appeal?, Jacob Morgan

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Cases On Trial Practice, By James Patterson Mcbaine (1927), R. C. C.

Washington Law Review

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Law-Methods Of Testing The Constitutionality Of Rate Status Involving Heavy Penalties

Michigan Law Review

Where a state statute prescribes maximum intrastate railroad rates and also attaches heavy penalties for violations of the statute by a railroad or its agents, and where a railroad thinks the rates are confiscatory and hence unconstitutional, it is faced with an apparent dilemma. Must it either submit to the supposed confiscatory rates or else run the chance of incurring heavy penalties in case the statute is held constitutional? Or, is there another alternative-a painless way of testing the validity of the rates?

Book Review. Rationale Of Proximate Cause By Leon Green, Fowler V. Harper

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

Book Review. Zoning Cases In The United States By Edward M. Bassett And Frank B. Williams, Frank Edward Horack Jr.

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

Injunction In Labor Disputes--Anti-Trust Laws--"Secondary Boycott".

Michigan Law Review

Since the passing of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act in 1890 there has been an enormous increase in litigation concerning the trade union and its activities. When the Supreme Court in the Danbury Hatters' case8 held that labor organizations were included in the provisions of the Sherman Act, and that the so-called "secondary boycott"' was a violation of the terms of this act, labor felt that it had lost a very effective weapon and at once began to fear that the very existence of the labor union was in danger. Not having much hope of relief from the courts, the forces …

Carriers-Statute Of Limitations For Bringing Suit For Injury To Goods

Michigan Law Review

A recent case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States suggests the query-ls there a federal statute of limitations for bringing suit for injury to goods in an interstate shipment? The answer depends on the interpretation of the Cummins Amendment of March 4, 1915 and the Transportation Act of 1920. The relevant and germane provision of these acts as to the time limit for commencing suit for injury to goods on an interstate carriage is "That it shall be unlawful for any such common carrier to provide by rule, contract, or regulation a shorter period for giving notice …

A Rational Theory For Joinder Of Causes Of Action And Defences, And For The Use Of Counterclaims, William Wirt Blume

Michigan Law Review

In discussing, first, the joinder of actions it will be convenient to consider three groups or classes of cases:

Class I : Where one plaintiff (or joint plaintiffs) unites in a single proceeding two or more causes of action against one defendant (or joint defendants).

Class 2: "Where two or more plaintiffs, each having a cause of action against the same party (or parties), unite their causes of action in one proceeding.

Class 3: Where one plaintiff (or joint plaintiffs) having several causes of action, each against a different party, unites them in one proceeding.

In considering each group or …

Invading The Province Of The Jury, Glenn D. Peters

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Ex Parts Divorce As A Bar To A Subsequent Action For Alimony

Michigan Law Review

A decree of divorce purports only to affect the marital status of the parties and as such is an action en rem, while an order to pay alimony is a personal judgment. To be effective it must be rendered by a court having personal jurisdiction over the defendant. Since the decision of Pennoyer v. Neff, if the defendant, though an assent non-resident, has property within the jurisdiction the local law may authorize proceedings for seizing it for a personal claim against the owner, the action in effect being against the owner's interest in the property attached. This applies …

Insurance-Incontestability Clauses-What Will Amount To A Contest

Michigan Law Review

The incontestability clause is quite common at present in life insurance policies, and is the source of much litigation. The insurance policy has usually contained many statements or representations by the insured, and it was a common experience that after the insured had paid premiums on a life insurance policy, perhaps for years, and had died in the belief that his family was well provided for, the insurance company avoided payment on the ground that the insured had made a misrepresentation in the policy, or had committed a breach of warranty. As a result, a feeling grew up that all …

Recent Cases, C. P.

Washington Law Review

No abstract provided.

Joinder And Splitting Of Causes Of Action, Charles E. Clark

Michigan Law Review

The pleading rules concerning joinder and splitting of causes of action are complements of each other, though designed to achieve different objectives. The joinder rule is that separate causes cannot be "joined" or pleaded in the same suit unless they fall within one of the classes of permissible joinder specified in the codes. The purpose of the rule is to prevent too wide a field of litigation and too diverse issues in a single suit and thus to avoid a case of undue confusion and complexity. The rule against splitting is that a single cause shall not be "split" or …

Notes To Statutes Of Indiana 1925, Edited By Emerson E. Ballard, Paul L. Sayre

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Recent Cases, G. De G.

Washington Law Review

No abstract provided.

Hyatt On Trials, By W.H. Hyatt (1924), Ivan W. Goodner

Washington Law Review

No abstract provided.