Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Courts (1465)
- Civil Procedure (1205)
- Constitutional Law (1058)
- State and Local Government Law (959)
- Legislation (926)
-
- Environmental Law (920)
- Law and Society (836)
- Natural Resources Law (811)
- Administrative Law (803)
- Torts (802)
- Water Law (735)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (700)
- International Law (694)
- Jurisdiction (682)
- Evidence (647)
- Jurisprudence (626)
- Intellectual Property Law (612)
- Land Use Law (608)
- Judges (586)
- Civil Law (574)
- Legal Profession (569)
- Energy and Utilities Law (564)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (540)
- Criminal Law (538)
- Agriculture Law (536)
- Health Law and Policy (531)
- Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law (531)
- Legal Remedies (529)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (816)
- Suffolk University (552)
- University of Colorado Law School (435)
- Seattle University School of Law (269)
- UIC School of Law (269)
-
- American University Washington College of Law (258)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (206)
- Cornell University Law School (202)
- Pepperdine University (200)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (192)
- Mercer University School of Law (169)
- Brooklyn Law School (168)
- Fordham Law School (120)
- University of Georgia School of Law (120)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (107)
- Roger Williams University (98)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (96)
- University of Washington School of Law (91)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (88)
- Georgetown University Law Center (87)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (83)
- Brigham Young University Law School (82)
- Notre Dame Law School (78)
- University of New Mexico (78)
- University of Richmond (77)
- BLR (72)
- Boston University School of Law (70)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (69)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (68)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (67)
- Keyword
-
- Litigation (643)
- Evidence (160)
- Class actions (121)
- Supreme Court (120)
- Trials (119)
-
- Courts (106)
- Discovery (105)
- Civil procedure (103)
- United States (102)
- Liability (99)
- Practice and Procedure (92)
- United States Supreme Court (87)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (86)
- Federal courts (85)
- Juries (83)
- California (82)
- Cleveland v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company (CEI) (82)
- Settlement (80)
- Arbitration (78)
- Damages (78)
- Jurisdiction (77)
- Colorado (76)
- Lawyers (73)
- Dispute resolution (68)
- Congress (67)
- Judges (65)
- Due process (63)
- Law reform (63)
- Law (62)
- Legislation (62)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy (552)
- Michigan Law Review (446)
- Faculty Scholarship (315)
- Seattle University Law Review (258)
- UIC Law Review (252)
-
- Articles (211)
- Faculty Publications (195)
- Sustainable Development Law & Policy (189)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (187)
- Publications (167)
- Mercer Law Review (165)
- Scholarly Works (147)
- City of Cleveland v. The Cleveland Illuminating Company, 1980 (105)
- Pepperdine Law Review (104)
- Indiana Law Journal (90)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (82)
- Touro Law Review (81)
- ExpressO (71)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (70)
- Fordham Law Review (69)
- Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal (68)
- Washington Law Review (67)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (66)
- Journal Articles (62)
- BYU Law Review (57)
- Scholarly Articles (57)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (53)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (50)
- NYLS Law Review (46)
- Akron Law Review (44)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 6421 - 6450 of 6921
Full-Text Articles in Litigation
Order Of Presentation As A Factor In Jury Persuasion, Robert G. Lawson
Order Of Presentation As A Factor In Jury Persuasion, Robert G. Lawson
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
The “law of primacy in persuasion” has been formulated as follows: The side of a controversial issue having the advantage of first position in the order of presentation is more effective in changing opinion than the side presented last, all other factors being equal. Recent experimentation has revealed that “primacy” is not “an indubitable factor in persuasion,” but occurs only under certain conditions. In this article, an effort has been made to evaluate the experimentation conducted in this area of communications research, and to determine if the conditions of the courtroom are such that order of presentation could be expected …
Insurance Questions In Voir Dire, Kenneth S. Kabb
Insurance Questions In Voir Dire, Kenneth S. Kabb
Cleveland State Law Review
The scope of this article includes the voir dire examination in the federal courts, primarily in civil cases. The questions to be considered are: (1) how is the voir dire examination to be conducted; (2) what are the limitations imposed on the trial judge, counsel, and the parties with respect to the manner and conduct of the questioning; (3) what is the allowable scope of questions that may be asked prospective jurors; and (4) what will constitute reversible error, and who has the burden of proof.
The Law Of Presumptions: A Look At Confusion, Kentucky Style, Robert G. Lawson
The Law Of Presumptions: A Look At Confusion, Kentucky Style, Robert G. Lawson
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
Over the years the term “presumption” has been used by virtually all courts to “designate what are more accurately termed inferences or substantive rules of law.” It has also been used as a “loose synonym for presumption of fact, presumption of law, rebuttable presumption, and irrebuttable presumption.” To this list the Kentucky Court of Appeals had added mandatory presumption, presumptive evidence, and prima facie case. Perhaps of more significance than the indiscriminate use of terminology is the extent to which courts have used “presumptions” to describe judicial reasoning of various kinds and to perform chores more appropriate to unrelated procedural …
Jurisdiction--Libel--First Amendment's Role In Determining Place Of Trial In Libel Actions, Michigan Law Review
Jurisdiction--Libel--First Amendment's Role In Determining Place Of Trial In Libel Actions, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
The seeming unfairness of basing jurisdiction solely on such ordinarily inconsequential acts as mailing a newspaper into another state has troubled some courts. Traditionally, the validity of such a jurisdictional basis would be judged against the fourteenth amendment standard of "fair play." In several recent cases, however, courts have brought to bear constitutional standards of free speech as well as of fairness in dealing with the problem of jurisdiction over the out-of- state defendant in a libel action. The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, in deciding New York Times Co. v. Connor, ruled that "First Amendment considerations …
Pleading & Practice (1959-1967), Dudley Warner Woodbridge
Pleading & Practice (1959-1967), Dudley Warner Woodbridge
Virginia Bar Notes
No abstract provided.
Causation In Common Sense: A Reply To Messrs. Hart And Honore, Paul F. Rothstein
Causation In Common Sense: A Reply To Messrs. Hart And Honore, Paul F. Rothstein
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
No abstract provided.
Weather Modification: Law And Administration, James N. Corbridge Jr., Raphael J. Moses
Weather Modification: Law And Administration, James N. Corbridge Jr., Raphael J. Moses
Publications
No abstract provided.
Wood: A Handbook Of Dental Malpractice, Marcus L. Plant
Wood: A Handbook Of Dental Malpractice, Marcus L. Plant
Michigan Law Review
A Review of A Handbook of Dental Malpractice by L. Brent Wood
Severance -- A Means Of Minimizing The Role Of Burden And Expense In Determining The Outcome Of Litigation, Warren F. Schwartz
Severance -- A Means Of Minimizing The Role Of Burden And Expense In Determining The Outcome Of Litigation, Warren F. Schwartz
Vanderbilt Law Review
This article is divided into two main parts. First, it is assumed that the controlling question is how severance affects the likely outcome of litigation by altering the normal incidence of expense and burden. Then the article examines the question of whether there are overriding considerations (particularly the need for "tempering" by reference to the entire controversy) which require that severance be withheld even if dictated by considerations of economy.
The Boston Strangler, By Gerold Frank
The Boston Strangler, By Gerold Frank
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Antitrust-Limitation Of Actions-Clayton Act Statute Of Limitations Tolled On Treble Damage Suits Against Non-Government Defendant Co-Conspirators-- Michigan V. Morton Salt Co., Michigan Law Review
Antitrust-Limitation Of Actions-Clayton Act Statute Of Limitations Tolled On Treble Damage Suits Against Non-Government Defendant Co-Conspirators-- Michigan V. Morton Salt Co., Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiffs, several states and smaller governmental units, filed related antitrust treble damage claims against ten rock salt companies that had allegedly conspired to fix prices. These private actions were instituted subsequent to civil and criminal antitrust proceedings brought by the federal government in which four of the ten companies had been named as defendants and five designated as co-conspirators but not prosecuted. Section 5(b) of the Clayton Act provides that when such actions are brought by the government, "the running of the statute of limitations in respect of every private right of action arising under said laws and based in …
A Divided Country In Foreign Courts-Recent Litigation Involving Germany's Legal Status And The Zeiss Stiftung, Herbert L. Bernstein
A Divided Country In Foreign Courts-Recent Litigation Involving Germany's Legal Status And The Zeiss Stiftung, Herbert L. Bernstein
Michigan Law Review
The partition of countries in the wake of the second World War accounts for two Asian battlefields: Korea and Viet Nam. In Europe, where a dividing line was drawn through Germany, military hostilities have been avoided thus far. Instead, the controversies originating from that line are fought out at the conference table, through public and private media of communication, and in the courthouses.
The American Jury, By Harry Kalven, Jr. And Hans Zeisel
The American Jury, By Harry Kalven, Jr. And Hans Zeisel
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Trademarks-Successful Plaintiffs In Trademark Infringement Actions Under The Lanham Act May Not Recover Attorney's Fees-Maier Brewing Co. V. Fleischmann Distilling Corp., Michigan Law Review
Trademarks-Successful Plaintiffs In Trademark Infringement Actions Under The Lanham Act May Not Recover Attorney's Fees-Maier Brewing Co. V. Fleischmann Distilling Corp., Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
In an action for trademark infringement under the Lanham Act and for unfair competition, the District Court enjoined the defendant company from further use of the trademark and awarded the plaintiff $60,000 in attorney's fees. On appeal, held, reversed in part. The issuance of the injunction was upheld but the court declared that attorney's fees are not recoverable in trademark infringement cases prosecuted under the Lanham Act since Congress had not expressly provided for such awards.
Jury Selection—Key-Man System Eliminated, Anon
Jury Selection—Key-Man System Eliminated, Anon
Washington Law Review
Defendant was indicted by a federal grand jury for perjury. The jury commissioner solicited names of prospective jurors from various "key-men," community leaders who had been instructed in the qualifications which the jury commissioner felt prospective jurors should have. On appeal the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit dismissed the indictment. Held: Key-man jury selection violates the standards for jury selection prescribed by the Civil Rights Act of 1957. Rabinowitz v. United States, 366 F.2d 34 (5th Cir. 1966).
Toward Uniform Guardianship Legislation, William F. Fratcher
Toward Uniform Guardianship Legislation, William F. Fratcher
Michigan Law Review
The Model Probate Code, part IV of which covers guardianship of the persons and property of infants and mental incompetents, was published in 1946 under the auspices of the University of Michigan Law School. It was prepared for the Probate Law Division of the Section of Real Property, Probate, and Trust Law of the American Bar Association by its Model Probate Code Committee in cooperation with the research staff of the Law School. No state has adopted the Model Probate Code in its entirety, but parts of it have been enacted in Arkansas, California, Colorado, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Missouri, …
Jury Trial Of Crimes, Lewis F. Powell, Jr.
Jury Trial Of Crimes, Lewis F. Powell, Jr.
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Book Review, Alfred W. Gans
Book Review, Alfred W. Gans
Cleveland State Law Review
Reviewing Philip J. Hermann, Better Settlements Through Leverage, Acqueduct Books, 1965
How To Try A Personal Injury Case, James Dooley
How To Try A Personal Injury Case, James Dooley
Cleveland State Law Review
Proper presentation of a case in court is dependent upon proper preparation. Proper presentation means an intimate knowledge of the facts, the parties, possible witnesses, and, o fcourse, the governing legal principles. Indeed, proper preparation means far more than knowledge. It embraces true compre-hension. Before an advocate can present his client's cause or meet his adversary on equal terms, he himself must completely understand the problem. Clear expression of an idea is impossible without a clear understanding of it.
James: Civil Procedure, Jon R. Waltz
James: Civil Procedure, Jon R. Waltz
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Civil Procedure by Fleming James, Jr.
Punitive Damages: Punishment Of An Insured Defendant?, Carroway V. Johnson, Kenneth Lasson
Punitive Damages: Punishment Of An Insured Defendant?, Carroway V. Johnson, Kenneth Lasson
All Faculty Scholarship
The plaintiff sued the defendant for injuries sustained in an automobile collision and was awarded a judgment in the amount of $5,000 actual damages and $1,500 punitive damages. The defendant's insurance company had refused to defend her in that action or to pay the judgment obtained, relying upon an employee exclusion clause in the policy. The plaintiff thereupon sued the defendant on the judgment, this time joining the insurer as a co-defendant, and won a verdict to recover against the insurer the aforesaid amount. The insurance company appealed, questioning its liability for punitive damages.
Discovery Of Prejudicial Pre-Trial Publicity On Voir Dire
Discovery Of Prejudicial Pre-Trial Publicity On Voir Dire
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Effect Of Diversity Jurisdiction On State Litigation
The Effect Of Diversity Jurisdiction On State Litigation
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Federal Courts--Application Of Federal Or State Law To Federal Agency Litigation, Larry Lynn Skeen
Federal Courts--Application Of Federal Or State Law To Federal Agency Litigation, Larry Lynn Skeen
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Revitalization Of The International Judicial Assistance Procedures Of The United States: Service Of Documents And Takings Of Testimony, Richard F. Gerber
Revitalization Of The International Judicial Assistance Procedures Of The United States: Service Of Documents And Takings Of Testimony, Richard F. Gerber
Michigan Law Review
This comment will examine two aspects of such judicial assistance-service. of documents and taking of testimony-and it will analyze each from the viewpoint of assistance obtained abroad in aid of American litigation as well as assistance rendered within the United States in aid of foreign litigation. It will attempt to survey some of the problems involved in securing performance of these acts, indicate the changes in current practice which are likely to result from the revisions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the proposed amendments to the Judicial Code, and, last, suggest some additional measures which might promote …
Civil Procedure- Venue-Effect Of Contract Provision Fixing Venue As To Future Litigation, Robert C. Bonges
Civil Procedure- Venue-Effect Of Contract Provision Fixing Venue As To Future Litigation, Robert C. Bonges
Michigan Law Review
Defendants, residents of Harris County, Texas, executed in Harris County a conditional sale contract to purchase a food freezer from plaintiff's assignor. One of the contract provisions was that any suit on the contract was to be tried in Travis County, Texas. Plaintiff subsequently brought an action on the contract in Travis County, and defendants, contrary to their agreement, requested the trial court to transfer the action to a court of proper jurisdiction in Harris County, which was the proper county for suit under the applicable venue statute. In response, plaintiff argued that, since the contract created an obligation performable …
Child Custody In A Federal System, Leonard G. Ratner
Child Custody In A Federal System, Leonard G. Ratner
Michigan Law Review
Among the most difficult of judicial functions is the determination of a child's custody after its parents have separated. The difficulties are acute enough when all the parties remain in the same place; when the parties are in different states, an additional perplexing problem arises as to which state should have authority to make the custody decision. This broad question can be resolved into three distinct though interrelated issues: (1) what state may initially determine custody; (2) what state may later modify that determination; (3) to what extent is such a determination binding on other states.
Book Review, William K. Gardner
Book Review, William K. Gardner
Cleveland State Law Review
Reviewing Melvin Block, ed., The Art of Summation, New York State Association of Trial Lawyers, 1963