Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Courts (1473)
- Civil Procedure (1206)
- Constitutional Law (1058)
- State and Local Government Law (959)
- Legislation (926)
-
- Environmental Law (920)
- Law and Society (836)
- Natural Resources Law (811)
- Administrative Law (807)
- Torts (803)
- Water Law (735)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (700)
- International Law (695)
- Jurisdiction (683)
- Evidence (647)
- Jurisprudence (636)
- Intellectual Property Law (612)
- Land Use Law (608)
- Judges (586)
- Civil Law (577)
- Legal Profession (569)
- Energy and Utilities Law (564)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (540)
- Criminal Law (538)
- Agriculture Law (536)
- Legal Remedies (533)
- Health Law and Policy (531)
- Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law (531)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (816)
- Suffolk University (552)
- University of Colorado Law School (435)
- Seattle University School of Law (269)
- UIC School of Law (269)
-
- American University Washington College of Law (258)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (206)
- Cornell University Law School (202)
- Pepperdine University (200)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (192)
- Mercer University School of Law (169)
- Brooklyn Law School (168)
- Fordham Law School (120)
- University of Georgia School of Law (120)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (107)
- Roger Williams University (98)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (96)
- University of Washington School of Law (91)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (88)
- Georgetown University Law Center (87)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (83)
- Brigham Young University Law School (82)
- Notre Dame Law School (78)
- University of New Mexico (78)
- University of Richmond (77)
- BLR (72)
- Boston University School of Law (70)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (69)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (68)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (67)
- Keyword
-
- Litigation (643)
- Evidence (160)
- Class actions (121)
- Supreme Court (120)
- Trials (119)
-
- Courts (106)
- Discovery (105)
- Civil procedure (103)
- United States (102)
- Liability (99)
- Practice and Procedure (92)
- United States Supreme Court (87)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (86)
- Federal courts (85)
- Juries (83)
- California (82)
- Cleveland v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company (CEI) (82)
- Settlement (80)
- Arbitration (78)
- Damages (78)
- Jurisdiction (77)
- Colorado (76)
- Lawyers (73)
- Dispute resolution (68)
- Congress (67)
- Judges (65)
- Due process (63)
- Law reform (63)
- Law (62)
- Legislation (62)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy (552)
- Michigan Law Review (446)
- Faculty Scholarship (315)
- Seattle University Law Review (258)
- UIC Law Review (252)
-
- Articles (211)
- Faculty Publications (195)
- Sustainable Development Law & Policy (189)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (187)
- Publications (167)
- Mercer Law Review (165)
- Scholarly Works (147)
- City of Cleveland v. The Cleveland Illuminating Company, 1980 (105)
- Pepperdine Law Review (104)
- Indiana Law Journal (90)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (82)
- Touro Law Review (81)
- ExpressO (71)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (70)
- Fordham Law Review (69)
- Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal (68)
- Washington Law Review (67)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (66)
- Journal Articles (62)
- BYU Law Review (57)
- Scholarly Articles (57)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (53)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (50)
- NYLS Law Review (46)
- Akron Law Review (44)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 4381 - 4410 of 6932
Full-Text Articles in Litigation
Swancc: Full Of Sound And Fury, Signifying Nothing … Much?, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1017 (2004), Jeremy A. Colby
Swancc: Full Of Sound And Fury, Signifying Nothing … Much?, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1017 (2004), Jeremy A. Colby
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Retaliation Against Third Parties: A Potential Loophole In Title Vii's Discrimination Protection, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1313 (2004), Anita G. Schausten
Retaliation Against Third Parties: A Potential Loophole In Title Vii's Discrimination Protection, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1313 (2004), Anita G. Schausten
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
"Don't Let The Sun Go Down On Me:" An In-Depth Look At Opportunistic Business Method Patent Licensing And A Proposed Solution To Allow Small-Defendant Business Method Users To Sing A Happier Tune, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1359 (2004), Andrea Lynn Evensen
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Past Is Another Country: Against The Retroactive Applicability Of The Foreign Immunities Act To Pre-1952 Conduct, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1337 (2004), Andrzej R. Niekrasz
The Past Is Another Country: Against The Retroactive Applicability Of The Foreign Immunities Act To Pre-1952 Conduct, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1337 (2004), Andrzej R. Niekrasz
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Bankruptcy And Mortgage Lending: The Homeowner Dilemma, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 19 (2004), A. Mechele Dickerson
Bankruptcy And Mortgage Lending: The Homeowner Dilemma, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 19 (2004), A. Mechele Dickerson
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
203 N. Lasalle Five Years Later: Answers To The Open Questions, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 61 (2004), Paul B. Lewis
203 N. Lasalle Five Years Later: Answers To The Open Questions, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 61 (2004), Paul B. Lewis
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Treatment Of Real Property Liens In Bankruptcy Cases, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 171 (2004), Gerald F. Munitz
Treatment Of Real Property Liens In Bankruptcy Cases, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 171 (2004), Gerald F. Munitz
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Domestic Security Enhancement Act Of 2003: A Glimpse Into A Post-Patriot Act Approach To Combating Domestic Terrorism, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 327 (2004), Timothy Scahill
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Boundary Of Personal Jurisdiction: The "Effects Test" And The Protection Of Crazy Horse's Name, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 381 (2004), Scott Fruehwald
The Boundary Of Personal Jurisdiction: The "Effects Test" And The Protection Of Crazy Horse's Name, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 381 (2004), Scott Fruehwald
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Finding Religion For The First Amendment, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 469 (2004), Troy L. Booher
Finding Religion For The First Amendment, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 469 (2004), Troy L. Booher
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Global Antitrust Enforcement: The Sherman Act Does Not Apply Without Any Direct Domestic Effect, But Discovery Assistance May Be Available To Aid A Foreign Tribunal, According To The U.S. Supreme Court, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 495 (2004), Sue Ann Mota
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
State Sovereign Immunity And The Plaintiff State: Does The Eleventh Amendment Bar Removal Of Actions Filed In State Court?, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 513 (2004), Virginia F. Milstead
State Sovereign Immunity And The Plaintiff State: Does The Eleventh Amendment Bar Removal Of Actions Filed In State Court?, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 513 (2004), Virginia F. Milstead
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rethinking Campaign-Finance Reform: The Pressing Need For Deregulation And Disclosure, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 633 (2004), Cecil C. Kuhne Iii
Rethinking Campaign-Finance Reform: The Pressing Need For Deregulation And Disclosure, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 633 (2004), Cecil C. Kuhne Iii
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Remaining Silent: A Right With Consequences, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 649 (2004), Jeffrey D. Waltuck
Remaining Silent: A Right With Consequences, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 649 (2004), Jeffrey D. Waltuck
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
David Pays For Goliath's Mistakes: The Costly Effect Sarbanes-Oxley Has On Small Companies, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 671 (2004), Nathan Wilda
David Pays For Goliath's Mistakes: The Costly Effect Sarbanes-Oxley Has On Small Companies, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 671 (2004), Nathan Wilda
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Summary And Expert Witnesses: A Distinction With A Difference, Brandon L. Bigelow
Summary And Expert Witnesses: A Distinction With A Difference, Brandon L. Bigelow
Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy
No abstract provided.
Separations, Blow-Outs, And Fallout: A Treadise On The Regulatory Aftermath Of The Ford-Firestone Tire Recall, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1073 (2004), Kevin M. Mcdonald
Separations, Blow-Outs, And Fallout: A Treadise On The Regulatory Aftermath Of The Ford-Firestone Tire Recall, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1073 (2004), Kevin M. Mcdonald
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Precision In Statutory Drafting: The Qualitech Quagmire And The Sad History Of § 365(H) Of The Bankruptcy Code, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 97 (2004), Robert M. Zinman
Precision In Statutory Drafting: The Qualitech Quagmire And The Sad History Of § 365(H) Of The Bankruptcy Code, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 97 (2004), Robert M. Zinman
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Permitted But Not Intended: Boub V. Township Of Wayne, Municipal Tort Immunity In Illinois, And The Right To Local Travel, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 545 (2004), Bruce Epperson
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Hardball, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 523 (2004), Mark Tushnet
Constitutional Hardball, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 523 (2004), Mark Tushnet
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judges As Film Critics: New Approaches To Filmic Evidence, Jessica M. Silbey
Judges As Film Critics: New Approaches To Filmic Evidence, Jessica M. Silbey
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
This Article exposes internal contradictions in case law concerning the use and admissibility of film as evidence. Based on a review of more than ninety state and federal cases dating from 1923 to the present, the Article explains how the source of these contradictions is the frequent miscategorization of film as "demonstrative evidence, "evidence that purports to illustrate other evidence, rather than to be directly probative of some fact at issue. The Article further demonstrates how these contradictions are based on two venerable jurisprudential anxieties. One is the concern about the growing trend toward replacing the traditional testimony of live …
Disparate Impact Theory In Employment Discrimination: What’S Griggs Still Good For? What Not?, Elaine W. Shoben
Disparate Impact Theory In Employment Discrimination: What’S Griggs Still Good For? What Not?, Elaine W. Shoben
Scholarly Works
Is disparate impact a dead theory of employment discrimination? Definitely not. The theory itself has a more stable legal status than it did when the Supreme Court embraced it in its 1971 opinion Griggs v. Duke Power Co. But is it thriving in litigation? It appears to be neither thriving nor dead. It has become a relatively less vital tool, compared with theories of intentional discrimination. Despite the heroic effort of Congress to keep the theory from destruction by the Supreme Court through its express codification in 1991, disparate impact litigation is not making a major impact in this …
Not So Peaceful Coexistence: Inherent Tensions In Addressing Tort Law Reform, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Not So Peaceful Coexistence: Inherent Tensions In Addressing Tort Law Reform, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Scholarly Works
As Professor Michael Green's comments trenchantly remind us, all of this has a familiar ring: insurers and tort defendants claim unfairly escalating liability, plaintiffs' lawyers and consumer groups counterattack, and (for the most part), insurers and defendants obtain some of the relief they seek. The tort reform victories are not so overwhelming as to completely unravel the historical rights of victims or the power of courts generally, but some constriction of rights inevitably occurs. During periods of quiescence, plaintiffs and consumers take back some lost territory through common law victories expanding claimant rights, or through specific legislation. Statutes that permitted …
The Politics Of Inmate Litigation, Margo Schlanger
The Politics Of Inmate Litigation, Margo Schlanger
Other Publications
I feel compelled to respond to a recent student-written Note that critiques my Article, Inmate Litigation, published last year in the Review. The Note aims to expose my work as an (“at least . . . unconscious”) exercise in left-leaning political argumentation in the guise of technocratic, quantitative data-crunching. The accusation of covert politics is puzzling. My piece employed careful quantitative and qualitative empirical techniques to evaluate a statute, the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), that restricts the legal rights of some of the most disempowered and vulnerable people in this country. The politics of that inquiry are clear, and …
Arbitration Advocacy: From Clause To Hearing, 28 Am. J. Trial Advoc. 101 (2004), Celeste M. Hammond, Jeffrey J. Mayer
Arbitration Advocacy: From Clause To Hearing, 28 Am. J. Trial Advoc. 101 (2004), Celeste M. Hammond, Jeffrey J. Mayer
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
This Article provides an overview of the key differences between arbitration and litigation, a look at the past and present state of the law governing arbitration, techniques for drafting arbitration clauses, and effective advocacy at arbitration hearings
Arbitral Law-Making, Thomas E. Carbonneau
Arbitral Law-Making, Thomas E. Carbonneau
Michigan Journal of International Law
Diversity--of a cultural, economic, religious, and political kind—exists not only among nation-states and in the sources and interpretation of international law, but also among the group of commentators who study the interactions of transborder actors and institutions. For example, sociologists interested in the global community seek to identify emerging entities and activities and to elaborate conceptual models that explain the new differentiations within the traditional pattern. Some of them have a mounting interest in the fashioning of transborder commercial justice by international arbitrators and private arbitral institutions. Who are these new players? How did they acquire their mandate? Further, how …
Case Note: Contracts—Into The Void: Minnesota Limits Application Of The Prima Paint Doctrine—Onvoy, Inc. V. Shal, Llc, Mikel D. Johnson
Case Note: Contracts—Into The Void: Minnesota Limits Application Of The Prima Paint Doctrine—Onvoy, Inc. V. Shal, Llc, Mikel D. Johnson
William Mitchell Law Review
This note first gives a brief overview of arbitration use in the United States. It then discusses the Onvoy decision and provides an analysis of the Minnesota Supreme Court’s ruling. Finally, the note concludes that the court’s holding properly weighs Minnesota’s strong presumption in favor of arbitration against the need to allow access to the courts.
Creditors' Rights Risk: A Title Insurer's Perspective, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 223 (2004), Paul L. Hammann, John C. Murray
Creditors' Rights Risk: A Title Insurer's Perspective, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 223 (2004), Paul L. Hammann, John C. Murray
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Sizing Up A Multi-Party Tortfeasor Suit In Arkansas: A Tale Of Two Laws—How Fault Is, And Should Be, Distributed, Joseph R. Falasco
Sizing Up A Multi-Party Tortfeasor Suit In Arkansas: A Tale Of Two Laws—How Fault Is, And Should Be, Distributed, Joseph R. Falasco
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Joseph Henry Lumpkin Inn Of Court Team Members 2004-2005, Kellie Casey Monk
Joseph Henry Lumpkin Inn Of Court Team Members 2004-2005, Kellie Casey Monk
Materials from All Student Organizations
No abstract provided.