Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Courts (1473)
- Civil Procedure (1206)
- Constitutional Law (1058)
- State and Local Government Law (959)
- Legislation (926)
-
- Environmental Law (920)
- Law and Society (836)
- Natural Resources Law (811)
- Administrative Law (807)
- Torts (803)
- Water Law (735)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (700)
- International Law (695)
- Jurisdiction (683)
- Evidence (647)
- Jurisprudence (636)
- Intellectual Property Law (612)
- Land Use Law (608)
- Judges (586)
- Civil Law (577)
- Legal Profession (569)
- Energy and Utilities Law (564)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (540)
- Criminal Law (538)
- Agriculture Law (536)
- Legal Remedies (533)
- Health Law and Policy (531)
- Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law (531)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (816)
- Suffolk University (552)
- University of Colorado Law School (435)
- Seattle University School of Law (269)
- UIC School of Law (269)
-
- American University Washington College of Law (258)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (206)
- Cornell University Law School (202)
- Pepperdine University (200)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (192)
- Mercer University School of Law (169)
- Brooklyn Law School (168)
- Fordham Law School (120)
- University of Georgia School of Law (120)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (107)
- Roger Williams University (98)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (96)
- University of Washington School of Law (91)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (88)
- Georgetown University Law Center (87)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (83)
- Brigham Young University Law School (82)
- Notre Dame Law School (78)
- University of New Mexico (78)
- University of Richmond (77)
- BLR (72)
- Boston University School of Law (70)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (69)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (68)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (67)
- Keyword
-
- Litigation (643)
- Evidence (160)
- Class actions (121)
- Supreme Court (120)
- Trials (119)
-
- Courts (106)
- Discovery (105)
- Civil procedure (103)
- United States (102)
- Liability (99)
- Practice and Procedure (92)
- United States Supreme Court (87)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (86)
- Federal courts (85)
- Juries (83)
- California (82)
- Cleveland v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company (CEI) (82)
- Settlement (80)
- Arbitration (78)
- Damages (78)
- Jurisdiction (77)
- Colorado (76)
- Lawyers (73)
- Dispute resolution (68)
- Congress (67)
- Judges (65)
- Due process (63)
- Law reform (63)
- Law (62)
- Legislation (62)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy (552)
- Michigan Law Review (446)
- Faculty Scholarship (315)
- Seattle University Law Review (258)
- UIC Law Review (252)
-
- Articles (211)
- Faculty Publications (195)
- Sustainable Development Law & Policy (189)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (187)
- Publications (167)
- Mercer Law Review (165)
- Scholarly Works (147)
- City of Cleveland v. The Cleveland Illuminating Company, 1980 (105)
- Pepperdine Law Review (104)
- Indiana Law Journal (90)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (82)
- Touro Law Review (81)
- ExpressO (71)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (70)
- Fordham Law Review (69)
- Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal (68)
- Washington Law Review (67)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (66)
- Journal Articles (62)
- BYU Law Review (57)
- Scholarly Articles (57)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (53)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (50)
- NYLS Law Review (46)
- Akron Law Review (44)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 3181 - 3210 of 6932
Full-Text Articles in Litigation
Electronic Discovery And The Constitution: Inaccessible Justice, Jennifer M. Smith
Electronic Discovery And The Constitution: Inaccessible Justice, Jennifer M. Smith
Journal Publications
Computers are the cynosure of American society. As a result, most information is stored electronically and only a small amount of information ever becomes a paper document. This explosion of electronically stored information has affected every aspect of society, including the court system. Litigation is drastically different than a few years ago due to this onset of electronically stored information. The discovery of electronically stored information in litigation has become known as electronic discovery. For many, electronic discovery is expensive and complicated, and thus, litigants are settling frivolous cases to avoid the costs and complexities of engaging in discovery to …
Forum Non Conveniens On Appeal: The Case For Interlocutory Review, Cassandra Burke Robertson
Forum Non Conveniens On Appeal: The Case For Interlocutory Review, Cassandra Burke Robertson
Faculty Publications
Court-access doctrine in transnational litigation is plagued by uncertainty. Without a national court-access policy, federal courts often reach inconsistent forum non conveniens decisions even on very similar facts. This inconsistency is compounded by the district court’s largely unreviewable discretion in making those forum-access decisions, which precludes effective resolution of these conflicts through the appellate process. As a result, the law underlying the forum non conveniens doctrine remains unsettled, creating systemic inefficiency both in litigation procedure and in regulatory policy.
This article, prepared for the symposium “Our Courts and the World: Transnational Litigation and Civil Procedure,” argues that expanding appellate review …
A Question Of Taste: Touchstones For Determining The Certifiability Of Classwide Claims For Declaratory And Injunctive Relief Under Rule 23 Of The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure, Randy D. Gordon
Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy
No abstract provided.
Claim Accrual Under The Federal Tort Claims Act: When Should Claimants File Suit Against The Federal Bureau Of Investigation For Tort Liability, Caitlin A. Romasco
Claim Accrual Under The Federal Tort Claims Act: When Should Claimants File Suit Against The Federal Bureau Of Investigation For Tort Liability, Caitlin A. Romasco
Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy
No abstract provided.
Firearms Identification: The Need For A Critical Approach To, And Possible Guidelines For, The Admissibility Of Ballistics Evidence, Bonnie Lanigan
Firearms Identification: The Need For A Critical Approach To, And Possible Guidelines For, The Admissibility Of Ballistics Evidence, Bonnie Lanigan
Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy
No abstract provided.
Swept Under The Rug: The Brady Disclosure Obligation In A Pre-Plea Context, Daniel Conte
Swept Under The Rug: The Brady Disclosure Obligation In A Pre-Plea Context, Daniel Conte
Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy
No abstract provided.
Closing The Loophole In Massachusetts Protection Order Legislation To Provide Greater Security For Victims Of Sexual Assault: Has Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 258e Closed It Enough, Hayley Jodoin
Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy
No abstract provided.
Cafa's Impact On Forum Shopping And The Manipulation Of The Civil Justice System, Kalee Difazio
Cafa's Impact On Forum Shopping And The Manipulation Of The Civil Justice System, Kalee Difazio
Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law - In Protecting One's Right To Speak, The First Amendment Also Protects One's Right To Lie - 281 Care Committee V. Arneson, 638 F.3d 621 (8th Cir. 2011), Jaclyn Mcneely
Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy
No abstract provided.
Criminal Law - Use Of Equitable Tolling To Enforce Violations Of Supervised Release After Original Term Has Expired - United States V. Buchanan, 638 F.3d 448 (4th Cir. 2011), Eric Speed
Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy
No abstract provided.
Outpatient Commitment: The Role Of Counsel In Preserving Client Autonomy, R. A. Bernfeld
Outpatient Commitment: The Role Of Counsel In Preserving Client Autonomy, R. A. Bernfeld
Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy
No abstract provided.
The Disadvantaged Plaintiff: Is It Time To Revisit The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, Matthew Engellenner
The Disadvantaged Plaintiff: Is It Time To Revisit The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, Matthew Engellenner
Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law - Revising The Application Of Tinker And Fraser In The Age Of The Internet - J.S. Ex Rel. Snyder V. Blue Mountain School District, 650 F.3d 915 (3d Cir. 2011), Christopher Lynett
Constitutional Law - Revising The Application Of Tinker And Fraser In The Age Of The Internet - J.S. Ex Rel. Snyder V. Blue Mountain School District, 650 F.3d 915 (3d Cir. 2011), Christopher Lynett
Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy
No abstract provided.
Criminal Law - Failed The Breathalyzer: Just Contest The Location Of The Stop - Commonwealth V. Virgilio, 947 N.E.2d 1112 (Mass. App. Ct. 2011), Jillise Ketcham
Criminal Law - Failed The Breathalyzer: Just Contest The Location Of The Stop - Commonwealth V. Virgilio, 947 N.E.2d 1112 (Mass. App. Ct. 2011), Jillise Ketcham
Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy
No abstract provided.
Criminal Law - New Evidence In Gateway Claim Of Actual Innocence Requires Evidence Not Previously Available At Trail - Kidd V. Norman, 651 F.3d 947 (8th Cir. 2011), David Cashman
Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law - Seventh Circuit Denies Sovereign Immunity Defense To Counterclaims For Appealing State Agency - Board Of Regents Of The University Of Wisconsin System V. Phoenix International Software, Inc., 653 F.3d 448 (7th Cir. 2011), Daniel S. Tyler
Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy
No abstract provided.
Changes In The European Union's Regime Of Recognizing And Enforcing Judgments And Transnational Litigation In The United States, Samuel P. Baumgartner
Changes In The European Union's Regime Of Recognizing And Enforcing Judgments And Transnational Litigation In The United States, Samuel P. Baumgartner
Akron Law Faculty Publications
The European Commission has proposed to amend (recast) the Brussels I Regulation, which governs jurisdiction to adjudicate, parallel proceedings, and judgments recognition within the European Union. Although much of the Brussels I Regulation is simply the 1968 Brussels Convention cast into European Union legislation, the proposed amendments are part of a deeper set of structural and conceptual changes in the law of transnational litigation within the Union over the past couple of decades. Understanding these changes is essential to understanding what drives the proposed amendments and what is likely to follow.
In this paper – presented at the symposium Our …
Rejecting Sovereign Immunity In Public Law Litigation, Howard M. Wasserman
Rejecting Sovereign Immunity In Public Law Litigation, Howard M. Wasserman
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Plausibility Pleading And Employment Discrimination, Suzette M. Malveaux
Plausibility Pleading And Employment Discrimination, Suzette M. Malveaux
Publications
No abstract provided.
Five Mistakes For New Child-Welfare Lawyers To Avoid, Jennifer Baum
Five Mistakes For New Child-Welfare Lawyers To Avoid, Jennifer Baum
Faculty Publications
(Excerpt)
You’ve graduated, passed the bar, and started your first legal job working with children and families. Perhaps you work for an institutional provider of legal services for children or as a prosecutor of dependency cases, or perhaps you are defending such cases. Perhaps, still, you are in private practice, and this is your first pro bono experience working on a family or juvenile court matter. Whatever your role, your job is the same: to represent your client and seek as favorable an outcome as possible.
But you are new—you don’t know the ropes or who the players are, you …
The Evolution Of The Summary Trial: A Flexible Tool To Meet A Variety Of Needs, Paula Hannaford-Agor, Nicole L. Waters
The Evolution Of The Summary Trial: A Flexible Tool To Meet A Variety Of Needs, Paula Hannaford-Agor, Nicole L. Waters
Faculty Publications
Are summary jury trials a viable forum for dispute resolution? The National Center for State Courts studied summary trials in six state courts to understand how these programs work and to determine the benefits and detriments of this approach to dispute resolution.
The Underappreciated Importance Of The Sequence In Which The Issues Are Addressed In Contract Litigation, Gregory S. Crespi
The Underappreciated Importance Of The Sequence In Which The Issues Are Addressed In Contract Litigation, Gregory S. Crespi
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
Judicial opinions rarely identify the precise sequence in which the issues presented were addressed by the court. Since this sequence is not generally regarded as being significant for the decisions reached, persons later parsing the opinions for their significance rarely go to the considerable trouble involved in acquiring the litigation briefs and interviewing the attorneys and judges involved so as to ascertain this sequence. However, my surmise is that at least in contract litigation the sequence in which the issues are addressed can sometimes be significant or even outcome-determinative for the results. A good example of this is presented by …
Play Through The Whistle: The Scope Of Anti-Retaliation Protection For Employee Complaints Pursuant To Erisa Section 510, James Coughlin
Play Through The Whistle: The Scope Of Anti-Retaliation Protection For Employee Complaints Pursuant To Erisa Section 510, James Coughlin
Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy
No abstract provided.
Raise Or Lose: Appellate Discretion And Principled Decision-Making, Tory A. Weigand
Raise Or Lose: Appellate Discretion And Principled Decision-Making, Tory A. Weigand
Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy
No abstract provided.
Is Canada The New Shangri-La Of Global Securities Class Actions?, Tanya J. Monestier
Is Canada The New Shangri-La Of Global Securities Class Actions?, Tanya J. Monestier
Journal Articles
There has been significant academic buzz about Silver v. Imax, an Ontario case certifying a global class of shareholders alleging statutory and common law misrepresentation in connection with a secondary market distribution of shares. Although global class actions on a more limited scale have been certified in Canada prior to Imax, it can now be said that global classes have “officially” arrived in Canada. Many predict that the Imax decision means that Ontario will become the new center for the resolution of global securities disputes. This is particularly so after the United States largely relinquished this role in Morrison v. …
Arbitrability And Vulnerability, Carolyn L. Dessin
Arbitrability And Vulnerability, Carolyn L. Dessin
Akron Law Faculty Publications
Arbitration is cool. Everybody‟s doing it. In the eighty-five years since the passage of the Federal Arbitration Act, that seems to be the prevailing sentiment. Recent decades have seen the meteoric rise of arbitration as a form of alternative dispute resolution. Arbitration is widely regarded as a less expensive, more expeditious alternative to litigation.
Courts frequently note that federal policy clearly favors arbitration. No judicial enthusiasm for arbitration seems more complete than that evidenced in the jurisprudence of the United States Supreme Court.
Along with the rise of arbitration, however, there has also been a rise in the amount of …
The Character Of The Governmental Action, Thomas W. Merrill
The Character Of The Governmental Action, Thomas W. Merrill
Faculty Scholarship
Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City holds a secure position in the architecture of the regulatory takings doctrine. That doctrine is at bottom a tool for distinguishing between different governmental powers; in particular, between the power of eminent domain and the police power. Because eminent domain requires that compensation be paid, whereas the police power does not, it is necessary to draw a line between these powers. Conceivably we could simply take the legislature at its word as to which power it is exercising. But at least since Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon, the Supreme Court has insisted …
Aggregate Litigation Goes Public: Representative Suits By State Attorneys General, Margaret H. Lemos
Aggregate Litigation Goes Public: Representative Suits By State Attorneys General, Margaret H. Lemos
Faculty Scholarship
State attorneys general represent their citizens in aggregate litigation that bears a striking resemblance to the much-maligned damages class action. Yet, while class actions are subject to a raft of procedural rules designed to protect absent class members, equivalent suits in the public sphere are largely free from constraint. The procedural disconnect between the two categories of aggregate litigation reflects a widespread assumption that attorneys general will adequately represent the interests of the state’s citizens, obviating any need for case-specific mechanisms for assuring the loyalty of lawyer to client.
This Article challenges the presumption of adequate public representation. By conflating …
Japan's Love For Derivative Actions: Irrational Behavior And Non-Economic Motives As Rational Explanations For Shareholder Litigation, Dan W. Puchniak, Masafumi Nakahigashi
Japan's Love For Derivative Actions: Irrational Behavior And Non-Economic Motives As Rational Explanations For Shareholder Litigation, Dan W. Puchniak, Masafumi Nakahigashi
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
Not long ago, there was a consensus in the legal academy that the Japanese were irrational litigants. As the theory went, Japanese people would forgo litigating for financial gain because of a cultural obsession with maintaining social harmony. Based on this theory, it made perfect (but economically irrational) sense that Japanese shareholders let their U.S.-transplanted derivative action lay moribund for almost four post-war decades, while at the same time the derivative action was a staple of shareholder litigation in the United States.
The 1980s brought a wave of law and economics to the scholarship of Japanese law, which largely discredited …
Managing Summary Judgment, Steven S. Gensler, Lee Rosenthal
Managing Summary Judgment, Steven S. Gensler, Lee Rosenthal
Faculty Articles
No abstract provided.