Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Courts (1473)
- Civil Procedure (1206)
- Constitutional Law (1058)
- State and Local Government Law (959)
- Legislation (926)
-
- Environmental Law (920)
- Law and Society (836)
- Natural Resources Law (811)
- Administrative Law (807)
- Torts (803)
- Water Law (735)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (700)
- International Law (695)
- Jurisdiction (683)
- Evidence (647)
- Jurisprudence (636)
- Intellectual Property Law (612)
- Land Use Law (608)
- Judges (586)
- Civil Law (577)
- Legal Profession (569)
- Energy and Utilities Law (564)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (540)
- Criminal Law (538)
- Agriculture Law (536)
- Legal Remedies (533)
- Health Law and Policy (531)
- Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law (531)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (816)
- Suffolk University (552)
- University of Colorado Law School (435)
- Seattle University School of Law (269)
- UIC School of Law (269)
-
- American University Washington College of Law (258)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (206)
- Cornell University Law School (202)
- Pepperdine University (200)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (192)
- Mercer University School of Law (169)
- Brooklyn Law School (168)
- Fordham Law School (120)
- University of Georgia School of Law (120)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (107)
- Roger Williams University (98)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (96)
- University of Washington School of Law (91)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (88)
- Georgetown University Law Center (87)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (83)
- Brigham Young University Law School (82)
- Notre Dame Law School (78)
- University of New Mexico (78)
- University of Richmond (77)
- BLR (72)
- Boston University School of Law (70)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (69)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (68)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (67)
- Keyword
-
- Litigation (643)
- Evidence (160)
- Class actions (121)
- Supreme Court (120)
- Trials (119)
-
- Courts (106)
- Discovery (105)
- Civil procedure (103)
- United States (102)
- Liability (99)
- Practice and Procedure (92)
- United States Supreme Court (87)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (86)
- Federal courts (85)
- Juries (83)
- California (82)
- Cleveland v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company (CEI) (82)
- Settlement (80)
- Arbitration (78)
- Damages (78)
- Jurisdiction (77)
- Colorado (76)
- Lawyers (73)
- Dispute resolution (68)
- Congress (67)
- Judges (65)
- Due process (63)
- Law reform (63)
- Law (62)
- Legislation (62)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy (552)
- Michigan Law Review (446)
- Faculty Scholarship (315)
- Seattle University Law Review (258)
- UIC Law Review (252)
-
- Articles (211)
- Faculty Publications (195)
- Sustainable Development Law & Policy (189)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (187)
- Publications (167)
- Mercer Law Review (165)
- Scholarly Works (147)
- City of Cleveland v. The Cleveland Illuminating Company, 1980 (105)
- Pepperdine Law Review (104)
- Indiana Law Journal (90)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (82)
- Touro Law Review (81)
- ExpressO (71)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (70)
- Fordham Law Review (69)
- Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal (68)
- Washington Law Review (67)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (66)
- Journal Articles (62)
- BYU Law Review (57)
- Scholarly Articles (57)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (53)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (50)
- NYLS Law Review (46)
- Akron Law Review (44)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 3031 - 3060 of 6932
Full-Text Articles in Litigation
Is The Prosecution Of War Crimes Just And Effective? Rethinking The Lessons From Sociology And Psychology, Ziv Bohrer
Is The Prosecution Of War Crimes Just And Effective? Rethinking The Lessons From Sociology And Psychology, Ziv Bohrer
Michigan Journal of International Law
Should perpetrators of genocide, violent acts against civilians during war, or other massive violations of core human rights be punished? International criminal law (ICL) answers this question affirmatively, asserting that the punishment of such atrocities is just and that their effective prosecution can (and should) contribute to the prevention of such future acts. Moreover, an increasing attempt has been made in the international and domestic arenas to act in accordance with these assertions of ICL through the prosecution of war crimes. During the last two decades the role of ICL has become gradually more significant, and the fall of the …
American Indian Water Right Settlements, Darcy Bushnell
American Indian Water Right Settlements, Darcy Bushnell
Publications
No abstract provided.
California Democratic Party V. Jones: Invalidation Of The Blanket Primary, Teresa Macdonald
California Democratic Party V. Jones: Invalidation Of The Blanket Primary, Teresa Macdonald
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Trial Objections From Beginning To End: The Handbook For Civil And Criminal Trials, Craig Lee Montz
Trial Objections From Beginning To End: The Handbook For Civil And Criminal Trials, Craig Lee Montz
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Mohamed V. Jeppesen Dataplan, Inc.: The Ninth Circuit Sends The Totten Bar Flying Away On The Jeppesen Airplane, Michael Q. Cannon
Mohamed V. Jeppesen Dataplan, Inc.: The Ninth Circuit Sends The Totten Bar Flying Away On The Jeppesen Airplane, Michael Q. Cannon
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Takings In Vandevere V. Lloyd, Cory S. Clements
Judicial Takings In Vandevere V. Lloyd, Cory S. Clements
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Keep Your Program Out Of My Game: The Ninth Circuit’S Convoluted Copyright Analysis In Mdy Industries, Inc. V. Blizzard Entertainment, Inc, Brandon T. Crowther
Keep Your Program Out Of My Game: The Ninth Circuit’S Convoluted Copyright Analysis In Mdy Industries, Inc. V. Blizzard Entertainment, Inc, Brandon T. Crowther
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Did Bad Debtors Influence The Tenth Circuit To Make An Unfortunate Decision? Making Reorganization More Difficult For Farmers In United States V. Dawes, Laura Jones
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
De-Frauding The System: Sham Plaintiffs And The Fraudulent Joinder Doctrine, Matthew C. Monahan
De-Frauding The System: Sham Plaintiffs And The Fraudulent Joinder Doctrine, Matthew C. Monahan
Michigan Law Review
Playing off the strict requirements of federal diversity jurisdiction, plaintiffs can structure their suits to prevent removal to federal court. A common way to preclude removability is to join a nondiverse party. Although plaintiffs have a great deal of flexibility, they may include only those parties that have a stake in the lawsuit. Put another way, a court will not permit a plaintiff to join a party to a lawsuit when that party is being joined solely to prevent removal. The most useful tool federal courts employ to prevent this form of jurisdictional manipulation is Federal Rule of Civil Procedure …
Agenda: A Life Of Contributions For All Time: Symposium In Honor Of David H. Getches, University Of Colorado Boulder. School Of Law, University Of Colorado Law Review
Agenda: A Life Of Contributions For All Time: Symposium In Honor Of David H. Getches, University Of Colorado Boulder. School Of Law, University Of Colorado Law Review
A Life of Contributions for All Time: Symposium in Honor of David H. Getches (April 26-27)
On April 26-27, 2012, Colorado Law honored David H. Getches with a symposium to celebrate his life and legacy of trailblazing scholarship. “A Life of Contributions for All Time” featured a keynote address by Distinguished Professor Charles Wilkinson entitled, “Hero for the People, Hero for the Land and Water: Reflections on the Enduring Contributions of David Getches.” Top scholars in the fields of natural resources, water, and American Indian law reflected on Dean Getches’ contributions and their own insights into these fields, including Professor John Leshy, John Echohawk, Professor Carole Goldberg, Professor Joe Sax, Professor Rebecca Tsosie, Justice Greg Hobbs, …
New Mexico Ex Rel. State Engineer V. Aamodt, No. 66cv6639 (D.N.M.), New Mexico State Engineer
New Mexico Ex Rel. State Engineer V. Aamodt, No. 66cv6639 (D.N.M.), New Mexico State Engineer
Publications
No abstract provided.
Absolute Immunity From Civil Liability: Lessons For Litigation Lawyers, T. Leigh Anenson
Absolute Immunity From Civil Liability: Lessons For Litigation Lawyers, T. Leigh Anenson
Pepperdine Law Review
The common law doctrine of absolute immunity provided to litigation lawyers is said to be "as old as law." This centuries-old doctrine protects litigators from lawsuits instigated by the adversaries of their clients. It is typically invoked, irrespective of any nefarious or malicious motives, so long as the course of action taken bears some reasonable relation to the lawsuit. This Article examines the historical antecedents of the litigation privilege as well as the policies motivating its creation. It also provides a comprehensive description of the doctrine of absolute immunity, explores the circumstances in which it has been applied, and discusses …
Addressing The "Elephantine Mass" Of Asbestos Cases: Consolidation Versus Inactive Dockets (Pleural Registries) And Case Management Plans That Defer Claims Filed By The Non-Sick, Victor E. Schwartz, Mark A, Behrens, Rochelle M. Tedesco
Addressing The "Elephantine Mass" Of Asbestos Cases: Consolidation Versus Inactive Dockets (Pleural Registries) And Case Management Plans That Defer Claims Filed By The Non-Sick, Victor E. Schwartz, Mark A, Behrens, Rochelle M. Tedesco
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Merging Roles: Mass Tort Lawyers As Agents And Trustees, Charles Silver
Merging Roles: Mass Tort Lawyers As Agents And Trustees, Charles Silver
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Cumulative Sources Of The Asbestos Litigation Phenomenon, George L. Priest
The Cumulative Sources Of The Asbestos Litigation Phenomenon, George L. Priest
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Asbestos Litigation And Bankruptcy: A Case Study For Ad Hoc Public Policy Limitations On Joint And Several Liability, Richard L. Cupp Jr
Asbestos Litigation And Bankruptcy: A Case Study For Ad Hoc Public Policy Limitations On Joint And Several Liability, Richard L. Cupp Jr
Pepperdine Law Review
Over a decade ago, the Federal Judicial Conference warned of an asbestos litigation “disaster of major proportions.” The Supreme Court of the United States has described the litigation as a “crisis.” According the RAND Institute for Civil Justice, by the end of 2000, more than 600,000 asbestos claims were filed. RAND estimates that as many as three million more plaintiffs may eventually file claims. Most new claimants are not sick. The flood of claims has forced almost sixty companies into bankruptcy; many of these bankruptcies are very recent. As a result, defendants with only remote connections to asbestos – known …
Lawyer Ethics On The Lunar Landscape Of Asbestos Litigation, Roger C. Cramton
Lawyer Ethics On The Lunar Landscape Of Asbestos Litigation, Roger C. Cramton
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Efficiency In Asbestos Litigation, Alfred Chiantelli
Judicial Efficiency In Asbestos Litigation, Alfred Chiantelli
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
On The Theory Class's Theories Of Asbestos Litigation: The Disconnect Between Scholarship And Reality?, Lester Brickman
On The Theory Class's Theories Of Asbestos Litigation: The Disconnect Between Scholarship And Reality?, Lester Brickman
Pepperdine Law Review
More than 100,000 new asbestos claims were filed in 2003, the most ever in one year. Asbestos litigation thus continues to thrive even though 80-90% of claimants have no illness recognized by medical science, let alone suffer any lung impairment. To explain how this disconnect between medical science and tort litigation has come about, I cover the following subjects: 1) medical consequences of exposure to asbestos-containing materials; 2) the phenomenon of the unimpaired claimant; 3) medical evidence with regard to the incidence of asbestosis; 4) the effect on asbestos litigation of the failure of the Manville Trust audit to be …
Alternatives To Asbestos Impairment Standards, Alan Brayton
Alternatives To Asbestos Impairment Standards, Alan Brayton
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Keeping Junk Science Out Of Asbestos Litigation, David E. Bernstein
Keeping Junk Science Out Of Asbestos Litigation, David E. Bernstein
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Asbestos & The Sleeping Constitution, Griffin B. Bell
Asbestos & The Sleeping Constitution, Griffin B. Bell
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Policing Of Consumer Arbitration , Edward A. Dauer
Judicial Policing Of Consumer Arbitration , Edward A. Dauer
Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal
Adhesive consumer arbitration agreements pose questions that go beyond the problems of adhesion contracting generally. This essay describes why standard-form consumer arbitration requirements may be particularly troublesome. Despite its superficial neutrality, arbitration between individual consumers and business entities may be systematically more favorable to the business entities. The rules of arbitration law, however, inhibit effective judicial policing of the consequences of those inequalities. The federal sources of arbitration law further diminish the ability of state-based contract law to police the more subtle abuses. The result is a particularly difficult jurisprudential problem with a specially weakened legal solution. This essay offers, …
The Dispute Settlement Understanding Of The Wto Agreement: An Inadequate Mechanism For The Resolution Of International Trade Disputes, Sean P. Feeney
The Dispute Settlement Understanding Of The Wto Agreement: An Inadequate Mechanism For The Resolution Of International Trade Disputes, Sean P. Feeney
Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal
The 1994 signing of the World Trade Organization (WTO) Agreement marked the initiation of the most far-reaching and comprehensive international agreement on trade in the history of the modern world. The creation of an actual trade organization was a marked improvement over the WTO's predecessor, the 1944 GATT, which never formed an organization per se. Among the many improvements to the GATT, the WTO Agreement substantially changed the mechanism for dispute settlement whenever conflict arose between member states. This change, codified as the Dispute Settlement Understanding ("DSU"), was initially hailed as a great improvement over the GATT dispute settlement provisions. …
First Options Of Chicago, Inc. V. Kaplan And The Kompetenz-Kompetenz Principle , Adrianna Dulic
First Options Of Chicago, Inc. V. Kaplan And The Kompetenz-Kompetenz Principle , Adrianna Dulic
Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal
In 1995, the United States Supreme Court in First Options of Chicago, Incorporated v. Kaplan considered whether arbitral tribunals or courts should have the primary power to decide if parties agreed to arbitrate the merits of the dispute and whether the court of appeals should accept the district court's findings of fact and law or apply a de novo standard of review. The Court unanimously held that, unless the parties clearly and unmistakably provide otherwise, the question of whether the parties agreed to arbitrate is to be decided by the court, not the arbitral tribunal. Furthermore, in such a case, …
Institutionalizing Mediation: The Role Of Lawyers And Bar Associations , Ronald R. Volkmer
Institutionalizing Mediation: The Role Of Lawyers And Bar Associations , Ronald R. Volkmer
Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal
The world of trusts and estates is changing before our eyes - the "multidiscipline practice" trend may radically change the traditional practice of the probate bar. There is one constant, however, besides change and that is conflict. That conflict is oftentimes lurking beneath the surface when a lawyer becomes involved in the estate planning process. All of the technical knowledge you may possess about the legal system and its rules is valuable and necessary. But, the estate planning lawyer is preeminently a counselor at law. In the strongest possible way I urge students to become aware of conflict management skills …
Mediation And Jury Trials As Means Of Resolving Will Contests , Ronald Chester
Mediation And Jury Trials As Means Of Resolving Will Contests , Ronald Chester
Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal
In the vast range of human problems that law seeks to govern, there are certain areas in which legalisms and legal thinking are not particularly useful. It is my belief that one of these areas is that of will contests, in which nonlawyer dispute resolution seems particularly effective.
Mediation Of Probate Matters: Leaving A Valuable Legacy , Lela Porter Love
Mediation Of Probate Matters: Leaving A Valuable Legacy , Lela Porter Love
Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal
Mediation has the power to bring parties to a different level of understanding about their underlying situation and about each other, to re-establish family harmony and to resolve both monetary and relationship issues that probate matters generally involve. To realize these advantages, this paper makes two suggestions. First, attorneys should urge testators to consider dispute resolution provisions in their will. Such provisions allow the testator to weigh in with a directive that the family pull together and attempt to resolve its conflicts creatively. A dispute resolution clause can also provide a vehicle to express and encourage family values connected with …
Advantages And Disadvantages Of Mediation In Probate, Trust, And Guardianship Matters , Mary F. Radford
Advantages And Disadvantages Of Mediation In Probate, Trust, And Guardianship Matters , Mary F. Radford
Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal
Mediation is the ADR process by which a neutral third party works with disputants to reach a mutually agreeable resolution. Mediation is arguably the oldest and most popular ADR technique in use today. Part I of this essay discusses the commonly accepted advantages of mediation as an alternative to litigation, and, in some instances, questions whether those advantages become disadvantages in the context of probate, trust, and guardianship cases. Part II examines the use of mediation as a component of the actual estate planning process rather than as an alternative to litigation.
The Greatest Heritage Is The Love Of A Family: The Larson Case And The Mediation Of Probate Disputes, Susan N. Gary
The Greatest Heritage Is The Love Of A Family: The Larson Case And The Mediation Of Probate Disputes, Susan N. Gary
Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal
In 1981, two brothers, Ben and William Larson, began litigation that would last for four years. By the time the lawsuit ended, the "winning" brother was dead, and the other brother was bitter and estranged from the family of his only sibling. Although one can only speculate, had the brothers chosen mediation, rather than litigation, to resolve their dispute, both brothers might have achieved a better outcome.