Litigation Commons^™

Constitutional Law - Freedom From Accidental Shootings By Police Is Not A Clearly Established Right For The Purposes Of Qualified Immunity - Corbitt V. Vickers, 929 F.3d 1304 (11th Cir. 2019), Hannah A. Jacobs

Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy

No abstract provided.

One Should Not Pay For All - Drug Quantity Triggering Mandatory Minimums Should Be Individualized In Conspiracy Sentencing, Hunter R. Wildrick

Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy

No abstract provided.

Circuit Split On Constitutionality Of Public Carry Statutes: Why The Supreme Court Should Hold That States And Municipalities Know Best, Nick Mclaughlin

Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy

No abstract provided.

Promise Amid Peril: Prea's Efforts To Regulate An End To Prison Rape, Brenda V. Smith

Project on Addressing Prison Rape - Articles

This Article discusses the modest aspirations of the Prison Rape Elimination Act (“PREA”) that passed unanimously in the United States Congress in 2003. The Article posits that PREA created opportunities for holding correctional authorities accountable by creating a baseline for safety and setting more transparent expectations for agencies’ practices for protecting prisoners from sexual abuse. Additionally, the Article posits that PREA enhanced the evolving standards of decency for the Eighth Amendment and articulated clear expectations of correctional authorities to provide sexual safety for people in custody.

How To Deter Pedestrian Deaths: A Utilitarian Perspective On Careless Driving, John Clennan

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

New Prime Inc. V. Oliveira: Putting The Wheels Back On The Faa’S Section 1 Exemption For Transportation Workers, Reed C. Trechter

Oklahoma Law Review

No abstract provided.

Internet Jurisdiction: Using Content Delivery Networks To Ascertain Intention, Patrick Lin

LL.M. Essays & Theses

Specific jurisdiction in civil litigation centers on the rather general,yet immutable, concept of intention. Although the word “intention” does not surface prominently in the personal jurisdiction case law, it is clearly intrinsic to the concept of “purposeful availment”. On the Internet, however, intention is hard to ascertain: how does a court, for example, determine whether the defendant intended that its website, application, or advertisement within a mobile application should end up in the forum state? In answering such a question, courts have historically used one of two approaches to establish intent: (i) a targeting test or (ii) a degree of …

Towards An Analyses Of The Mega-Politics Jurisprudence Of The Ecowas Community Court Of Justice, Olabisi D. Akinkugbe

Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press

The judicialization of mega-political disputes before the ECOWAS Community Court is understudied. The ECOWAS Community Court lacks express mandate to adjudicate over political disputes. Despite this limitation, the court has been innovative in assuming jurisdiction over mega-political disputes where they are intertwined with potential or actual human rights violation. The Ugokwe Doctrine, enunciated in the case of, Dr. Jerry Ugokwe v. The Federal Republic of Nigeria and Dr. Christian Okeke, provides the precedential ‘cause of action’ for the judicialization of mega-political disputes before the ECOWAS Community Court. This chapter addresses this new body of jurisprudence by critically analyzing judicialized political …

Rethinking The Impact Of Third-Party Funding On Access To Civil Justice, Victoria Sahani

Faculty Scholarship

Third-party funding indisputably puts a gold-weighted thumb on the scales of justice in favor of funded parties for two main reasons: (1) funded cases already tend to be calculable winners on the merits, and (2) third-party funders seeking a profit generally do not fund cases that are demonstrably likely to lose on the merits. Thus, we are left with both the promising potential for winners to be more likely to win with third-party funding and the alarming realization that not all winners are offered this same chance. This provokes a larger, fundamental question: If funders are picking winners among the …

From Trulia To Akorn: A Ride On The Roller Coaster Of M&A Litigation, Pierluigi Matera, Ferruccio M. Sbarbaro

Faculty Scholarship

In recent years, M&A litigation has experienced a dramatic increase, culminating with a peak in 2015, when over 96. of publicly announced mergers were challenged in a shareholder lawsuit. A large number of these lawsuits were frivolous and vexatious, since most claims were filed by plaintiffs' attorneys just to extract some fees with little effort. Some abusive practices emerged, signalling an alarming exploitation of the system. One scheme that plaintiffs' attorneys put in place was the disclosure-only settlement. There, the stockholders obtained some modest supplemental disclosures, the plaintiff's attorneys got significant fee awards from the defendant directors and the defendant …

Preface, Jennie Lee Anderson

Lewis & Clark Law Review

On November 1–2, 2019, the Pound Civil Justice Institute and Lewis & Clark Law School together presented a unique academic symposium, addressing “Class Actions, Mass Torts, and MDLS: The Next 50 Years.” This symposium brought together distinguished legal academics, judges, and practitioners to consider the present status of class actions, mass torts, and multidistrict litigation in the United States, as well as possible future developments.

Foreword, Robert Klonoff

Lewis & Clark Law Review

This Symposium is entitled, “Class Actions, Mass Torts, and MDLs: The Next 50 Years.” It consists of a collection of articles by leading scholars and practitioners. All of the articles were presented at a live conference—co-sponsored by the Pound Civil Justice Institute—held at Lewis & Clark Law School on November 1 and 2, 2019.

Layers Of Lawyers: Parsing The Complexities Of Claimant Representation In Mass Tort Mdls, Lynn A. Baker, Stephen J. Herman

Lewis & Clark Law Review

The individual plaintiff in an MDL is subject to the efforts and decisions of numerous different attorneys, including many whom the plaintiff did not choose but who stand to share in any fees resulting from the plaintiff’s case. Which lawyers effectively represent the MDL plaintiff, at what point(s) in time, for what purpose(s), and with what obligations and potential liability to that plaintiff? What obligations and potential liability do the MDL leadership attorneys have to their own individually retained clients and other litigants in the MDL, and how should these attorneys handle any perceived conflicts in their obligations to the …

Procedural Self-Inflicted Wounds?, Joshua P. Davis, Brian J. Devine

Lewis & Clark Law Review

A proposal has recently come before the Federal Civil Rules Advisory Commit- tee to expand the ability of parties in multidistrict litigation to seek immediate interlocutory appellate review. This Essay suggests that the proposal is unwise as a matter of policy. It would make MDL litigation more expensive and less efficient. Counterintuitively, it may even harm the very large corporations who are championing the change. This Essay explains why that might occur—why large corporate defendants may pursue legal innovations that harm them—a possibility with implications well beyond interlocutory appellate review.

What Is A Fair Price For Objector Blackmail? Class Action Objectors And The 2018 Amendments To Rule 23, Elizabeth J. Cabraser, Adam N. Steinman

Lewis & Clark Law Review

As part of a symposium addressing what the next 50 years might hold for class actions, mass torts, and MDLs, this Article examines a recent amendment to Rule 23 that offers a new solution to the persistent problem of strategic objections. Most significantly, Rule 23 now requires the district judge to approve any payments made to class members in exchange for withdrawing or forgoing challenges to a class action settlement. Although the new provision is still in its infancy, it has already been deployed to thwart improper objector behavior and to bring for-pay objection practice out of the shadows. The …

In Defense Of The Cy-Pres-Only Class Action, Robert G. Bone

Lewis & Clark Law Review

Cy pres is frequently used to dispose of class action settlement funds, yet it is one of the most controversial aspects of class action practice. Perhaps the most contested use of cy pres is what I call the “cy-pres-only class action”: a settlement class action in which the judge certifies a class and approves a settlement that expressly provides for a third-party charity to receive all the settlement funds. In these cases, the judge exercises her judicial power to enable a lawsuit that compensates a third party who does not have legal rights at stake and does so without providing …

The Importance Of Cy Pres In Modern Class Action Jurisprudence And Myths Concerning Its Use, Gerson H. Smoger

Lewis & Clark Law Review

When class actions resolve, it is common for some or even all funds paid to the class to remain undistributed. All U.S. circuits, 40 states, and the Class Action Fairness Act have permitted undistributed funds to be distributed as cy pres. Recently, a few commentators have voiced constitutional objections to cy pres, based upon standing pursuant to Article III, the Rules Enabling Act, and the First Amendment. However, these analyses generally ignore the congressional mandate found within Rule 23 and the power of the courts to supervise cy pres distribution. Finally, the following recommendations are made: such awards should not …

Symposium Interview On Aggregate Litigation, Arthur R. Miller, Robert Klonoff

Lewis & Clark Law Review

Professor Arthur R. Miller joined Professor Robert Klonoff for a Q&A session at Lewis & Clark Law School.

Rico Extraterritoriality, Rjr Nabisco And Shareholder Residence – A Key Consideration In Determining Rico Domestic Injury, Laurence A. Steckman, Esq., Adam J. Rader, Esq.

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

Judicial Adjuncts In Multidistrict Litigation, Elizabeth Chamblee Burch, Margaret S. Williams

Scholarly Works

Peeking under the tent of our nation's largest and often most impactful cases reveals that judges often act like ringmasters: They delegate their authority to a wide array of magistrate judges, special masters, and settlement administrators. Some, like the American Bar Association, see this as a plus that promotes efficiency and cost savings. Critics, however, contend that delegating judicial power especially to private citizens, removes adjudication from public scrutiny, injects thorny ethical questions about ex parte communications, and risks cronyism and high costs. By constructing an original dataset of ninety-two multidistrict products liability proceedings centralized over fourteen years, we introduce …

The Shadow Judiciary, Charlotte S. Alexander, Nathan Dahlberg, Anne M. Tucker

Scholarly Works

Magistrate judges function as a shadow judiciary, assisting U.S. district court judges-and sometimes standing in their shoes-in managing caseloads, resolving disputes, making law, and choosing winners and losers. Yet we lack basic knowledge about magistrates themselves, the rules that govern their activity, and the ways in which they execute their duties. To fill those gaps, this Article offers a detailed typology of the district-level local rules and standing orders that govern magistrate operations in civil cases. It also describes a case study of ten years of magistrate practice in a single federal district court, the U.S. District Court for the …

Better By The Dozen: Bringing Back The Twelve-Person Civil Jury, Steven Gensler, Lee Rosenthal, Patrick Higginbotham

Other Faculty Publications

A jury of 12 resonates through the centuries. Twelve-person juries were a fixture from at least the 14th century until the 1970s. Over 600 years of history is a powerful endorsement. So too are the many social-science studies consistently showing that a 12-person jury makes for a better deliberative process, with more predictable (and fewer outlier) results, by a more diverse group that is a more representative cross-section of the community. And yet, most federal judges today routinely seat civil juries without the full complement of 12 members. Why? Because in 1973 the United States Supreme Court said it was …

Can The International Criminal Court Succeed? An Analysis Of The Empirical Evidence Of Violence Prevention, Stuart Ford

Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review

Despite significant optimism about the future of the International Criminal Court (“ICC”) during its early years, recently there has been growing criticism of it by both scholars and governments. As a result, there appears to be more doubt about the ICC’s ability to succeed now than at any other point in its history. So, are the critics correct? Is the ICC failing? No. This Article argues that, not only can the ICC succeed, there is strong evidence that it is already succeeding. It analyzes several recent empirical articles that have convincingly demonstrated that the ICC prevents serious violations of international …

Chasing The Fruits Of Misery: Confronting The Historical Relationships Between Opioid Revenues, Offshore Financial Centers, And International Regulatory Networks, Stephen C. Wilks

Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business

As the opioid crisis continues to claim lives throughout the U.S., tort litigants have faced challenges pursuing Purdue Pharma – one of the drug makers responsible for aggressively promoting OxyContin while downplaying the drug’s addictive effects. Much of this litigation posture sought to recover billions in public health costs incurred responding to the crisis at federal, state and local levels. As the plaintiff class grew, Purdue Pharma petitioned for bankruptcy protection, at which point auditors discovered the entity’s beneficial owners had caused it to wire billions in opioid profits into offshore accounts – placing them beyond the reach of litigants. …

The Halo Effect: Willful Infringement And Enhanced Damages In Light Of Halo, Rachel Weiner Cohen, Holly Victorson, Kellye Quirk

American University Law Review

The Supreme Court’s decision in Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc. overruled the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s longstanding Seagate test and empowered district courts to exercise their discretion in deciding whether to enhance damages for willful patent infringement. In the three years since the Halo decision, district courts have developed their own approaches to addressing willfulness allegations at the various stages of litigation, including pleading, summary judgment, trial, and post-trial. This Article observes trends in how district courts have addressed willfulness claims at each stage of litigation, highlights factors courts have considered when declining …

Choice Of Law As Extraterritoriality, Carlos Manuel Vázquez

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works

This contribution to Resolving Conflicts on the Law: Essays in Honour of Lea Brilmayer (published under the title Choice of Law as Geographic Scope Limitation) argues that the choice-of-law question commonly addressed by state and foreign courts is conceptually identical to the question addressed by federal courts in determining whether a federal statute applies to a dispute having foreign elements. The latter question is clearly understood today to relate to the statute’s territorial scope. State courts have long conceptualized the choice-of-law question in the same way. Faced with a state statute addressing the issue before it and phrased in …

Do Patent Law Suits Target Invalid Patents?, Michael Frakes, Melissa F. Wasserman

Faculty Scholarship

One objective of the patent litigation system is to screen meritorious from non-meritorious patents and invalidate the latter. While much of this screening may occur at trial, some amount of targeting may take place at the time of the filing of the suit itself. In this chapter, we assess the targeting efficiency of the patent litigation system at this earlier filing stage. Should the system indeed screen at this stage, one would predict a higher likelihood of patent lawsuits among a set of patents with weaker underlying validity relative to a set of patents with stronger underlying validity. In prior …

Foreword: State Enforcement In An Interstate World, Margaret H. Lemos

Faculty Scholarship

“State Enforcement in an Interstate World” is an important topic—fully deserving of all the attention it has received. Past commentators on this topic have generally treated the federal government as a unitary entity. Building on prior work on the subject, this Article explores the polycentric nature of federal regulatory authority and shows how cooperation and rivalry have long been dominant realities of the modern administrative state. The Article discusses how these dynamics complicate analysis of state enforcement in an interstate world and identifies strategies for reducing the frequency and magnitude of the seemingly inevitable conflicts.

Arbitration Law Update: 2019–2020 (July 2020), Scott Eichorn, Elissa Germaine

Faculty Publications

(Excerpt)

This article summarizes leading arbitration cases during the last year that are of particular relevance to the securities arbitration practitioner, as well as cases on the horizon for the coming year. The decided cases focus on class arbitration, arbitrability, customer identification, discovery abuse, grounds to modify arbitration awards, enforceability of arbitration agreements, and challenges to Regulation Best Interest. The upcoming cases focus on class arbitration and arbitrability.

'Rifled Precision': Using E-Discovery Technology To Streamline Books And Records Litigation, Joshua A. Manning

Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law

In 1993, the Delaware Supreme Court urged stockholders to use the "tools at hand" to flesh out complaints in derivative lawsuits. The plaintiffs' bar got the message. In the years since that proclamation, the Delaware Court of Chancery has seen dramatic increases in so-called Section 220 litigation-stockholders exercising their statutory right to inspect a company 's books and records. As Delaware courts have made it harder for stockholders to challenge merger transactions, this trend has only intensified. Due to increased filings, as well as other structural hurdles, these "summary proceedings" have begun to drag, with many requiring full trials. Because …