Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Legislation (23)
- Courts (20)
- Jurisprudence (19)
- Constitutional Law (16)
- Business Organizations Law (15)
-
- Torts (14)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (12)
- Consumer Protection Law (12)
- Criminal Law (12)
- Commercial Law (11)
- State and Local Government Law (11)
- Civil Procedure (10)
- International Law (10)
- Law and Society (10)
- Legal Profession (10)
- Administrative Law (9)
- Criminal Procedure (9)
- Environmental Law (9)
- Food and Drug Law (9)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (9)
- Legal History (9)
- Evidence (8)
- Health Law and Policy (8)
- Judges (8)
- Legal Remedies (8)
- Tax Law (8)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (7)
- Intellectual Property Law (7)
- Institution
-
- UIC School of Law (19)
- Suffolk University (15)
- BLR (12)
- University of Michigan Law School (7)
- American University Washington College of Law (5)
-
- Mercer University School of Law (5)
- Cornell University Law School (4)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (4)
- University of Georgia School of Law (4)
- Georgetown University Law Center (3)
- New York Law School (3)
- Seattle University School of Law (3)
- University of Colorado Law School (3)
- University of Richmond (3)
- Boston University School of Law (2)
- Brigham Young University Law School (2)
- Brooklyn Law School (2)
- Florida State University College of Law (2)
- Georgia State University College of Law (2)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
- Pace University (2)
- University of Missouri School of Law (2)
- University of New Mexico (2)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (2)
- Bryant University (1)
- Chapman University (1)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- North Carolina Central University School of Law (1)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (1)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (1)
- Keyword
-
- Practice and Procedure (13)
- Litigation (9)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (7)
- Judges (6)
- Class actions (5)
-
- Jurisprudence (5)
- Courts (4)
- Evidence (4)
- Federal courts (4)
- Law and Economics (4)
- Law and Society (4)
- Supreme Court (4)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (3)
- Constitutional Law (3)
- Corporations (3)
- Discrimination (3)
- Dispute Resolution (3)
- Empirical studies (3)
- Environmental Law (3)
- General Law (3)
- Jurisdiction (3)
- Law reform (3)
- Legal History (3)
- Settlements (3)
- Antitrust (2)
- Appellate advocacy (2)
- Civil rights (2)
- Common law (2)
- Communications Law (2)
- Congress (2)
- Publication
-
- UIC Law Review (19)
- Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy (15)
- ExpressO (12)
- Faculty Scholarship (5)
- Mercer Law Review (5)
-
- Publications (5)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (4)
- Sustainable Development Law & Policy (4)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (4)
- Faculty Publications (3)
- Materials from All Student Organizations (3)
- Michigan Law Review (3)
- University of Richmond Law Review (3)
- Articles (2)
- Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law (2)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Faculty Publications By Year (2)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (2)
- NYLS Law Review (2)
- Oklahoma Law Review (2)
- Scholarly Publications (2)
- Seattle University Law Review (2)
- Articles & Book Chapters (1)
- Articles & Chapters (1)
- Business and Economics Faculty Publications (1)
- Economics Faculty Articles and Research (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (1)
- History and Social Sciences Faculty Journal Articles (1)
- Human Rights Brief (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 121 - 124 of 124
Full-Text Articles in Litigation
A Primer On The Doctrine Of Federal Sovereign Immunity, Gregory C. Sisk
A Primer On The Doctrine Of Federal Sovereign Immunity, Gregory C. Sisk
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Unconstitutional Courses, Frederic M. Bloom
Unconstitutional Courses, Frederic M. Bloom
Publications
By now, we almost expect Congress to fail. Nearly every time the federal courts announce a controversial decision, Congress issues a call to rein in "runaway" federal judges. And nearly every time Congress makes a "jurisdiction-stripping" threat, it comes to nothing.
But if Congress's threats possess little fire, we have still been distracted by their smoke. This Article argues that Congress's noisy calls have obscured another potent threat to the "judicial Power": the Supreme Court itself. On occasion, this Article asserts, the Court reshapes and abuses the "judicial Power"--not through bold pronouncements or obvious doctrinal revisions, but through something more …
Moody Investing And The Supreme Court: Rethinking The Materiality Of Information And The Reasonableness Of Investors, Peter H. Huang
Moody Investing And The Supreme Court: Rethinking The Materiality Of Information And The Reasonableness Of Investors, Peter H. Huang
Publications
This Article critically analyzes the judicial decisions and reasoning of the United States Supreme Court and lower courts accepting certain defenses in securities fraud litigation. This Article develops how and why the core notions of materiality of information and the reasonable investor should be revised in light of recent empirical data, experimental evidence, and theoretical models of moody investing. This Article proposes modifying three recent developments in materiality doctrine to take into account moody investing. In particular, this Article argues that current judicial treatment of puffery is flawed because it neglects the power of puffery to alter moods. This Article …
Foreign Judgments At Common Law: Rethinking The Enforcement Rules, Tanya J. Monestier
Foreign Judgments At Common Law: Rethinking The Enforcement Rules, Tanya J. Monestier
Journal Articles
England and Canada have adopted divergent approaches to the enforcement of foreign civil and commercial judgments. An English court will only enforce a foreign judgment where the defendant submitted to the junsdiction of the foreign court, or was present in the foreign jurisdiction when served with process. This position. while protecting domestic defendants, is outdated and does little to further the objectives underpinning judgment enforcement- Canadian courts, by contrast, have been far more liberal than their English counterparts, enforcing foreign judgments in cases where there is a "real and substantial connection" between the dispute and the judgment forum. While this …