Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Courts (20)
- Civil Procedure (17)
- State and Local Government Law (14)
- Insurance Law (8)
- Torts (8)
-
- Constitutional Law (6)
- Criminal Procedure (6)
- Law and Society (6)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (5)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (4)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (4)
- Jurisdiction (4)
- Jurisprudence (4)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (4)
- Legal Remedies (4)
- Legislation (4)
- Supreme Court of the United States (4)
- Criminal Law (3)
- Education Law (3)
- Evidence (3)
- Labor and Employment Law (3)
- Legal Profession (3)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (2)
- Business Organizations Law (2)
- Civil Law (2)
- Conflict of Laws (2)
- Consumer Protection Law (2)
- Contracts (2)
- Institution
-
- Suffolk University (17)
- Cornell University Law School (14)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (14)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (5)
- UIC School of Law (4)
-
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (4)
- Georgetown University Law Center (3)
- University of Michigan Law School (3)
- American University Washington College of Law (2)
- Brooklyn Law School (2)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (2)
- University of Georgia School of Law (2)
- University of Kentucky (2)
- University of Missouri School of Law (2)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (2)
- University of Washington School of Law (2)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Brigham Young University Law School (1)
- Campbell University School of Law (1)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (1)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Duke Law (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Georgia State University College of Law (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- Roger Williams University (1)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (1)
- Seattle University School of Law (1)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (1)
- University of Colorado Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- Litigation (8)
- Discovery (4)
- Expedited appeals (4)
- Appeals (3)
- Constitutional law (3)
-
- Expedited review (3)
- Federal courts (3)
- Appellate courts (2)
- Bad faith (2)
- Class actions (2)
- Education reform (2)
- Evidence (2)
- Insurance (2)
- Insurance law (2)
- Mediation (2)
- Plaintiffs (2)
- Punitive damages (2)
- 1996 Telecommunications Act (1)
- 3JX docket (1)
- Act of state doctrine (1)
- Active jury reforms (1)
- Administration of justice (1)
- Admissible evidence (1)
- Adoption of minor children (1)
- Adversary system (1)
- Anchoring (1)
- Antitrust law (1)
- Appellate caseload (1)
- Arbitrary and disparate treatment (1)
- Arbitration and settlement (1)
- Publication
-
- Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy (17)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (14)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (12)
- Faculty Scholarship (5)
- Scholarly Works (5)
-
- Faculty Publications (4)
- UIC Law Review (4)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (3)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (2)
- Nevada Law Journal (2)
- Oklahoma Law Review (2)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (2)
- American University Law Review (1)
- Articles (1)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (1)
- BYU Law Review (1)
- Buffalo Public Interest Law Journal (1)
- Campbell Law Review (1)
- Continuing Legal Education Materials (1)
- Faculty Publications By Year (1)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (1)
- Georgetown Law Historic Preservation Papers Series (1)
- Indiana Law Journal (1)
- Journal Articles (1)
- Kentucky Law Journal (1)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (1)
- Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Law Faculty Research Publications (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Law Publications (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 91 - 101 of 101
Full-Text Articles in Litigation
The Ethics Of Evidence, J. Alexander Tanford
The Ethics Of Evidence, J. Alexander Tanford
Articles by Maurer Faculty
Professor J. Alexander Tanford offers a unique perspective on the ethics of evidence, illustrated by examples of his own personal experiences as well as excerpts from film and literature. This Article is a must read for any litigator as it addresses the issue of where the line is to be drawn regarding evidence in the courtroom.
Keeping Cross-Examination Under Control, J. Alexander Tanford
Keeping Cross-Examination Under Control, J. Alexander Tanford
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Practicing "In The Interests Of Justice" In The Twenty-First Century: Pursuing Peace As Justice, Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Practicing "In The Interests Of Justice" In The Twenty-First Century: Pursuing Peace As Justice, Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
In these comments I suggest that in our current world, both international and domestic, practicing "in the interests of justice" includes-indeed, should give great priority to-the "peace-seeking" and "problem solving" aspects of lawyering. I continue to see this as counter-cultural to the more common practices of lawyers who are argumentative, persuasive and articulate debaters, who believe fervently and vigorously that seeking justice, on behalf of a client or cause, means advocating for and "winning" a legal claim. To the contrary, seeking peace for parties (and, indeed, nation-states) in conflict, searching for consensus solutions to seemingly intractable public policy and legal …
Don't Believe Everything You Think: Cognitive Bias In Legal Decision Making, Ian Weinstein
Don't Believe Everything You Think: Cognitive Bias In Legal Decision Making, Ian Weinstein
Faculty Scholarship
This article discusses the role of cognitive bias in legal decision making. Drawing on research in cognitive science and law, it explores the impact of cognitive bias on both lawyers and clients. These often subtle mental biases can lead to pervasive errors in decision making by causing us to ignore important information and make inaccurate predictions. They may lead a client to underestimate the risk of litigation. They may also lead a lawyer to miscategorize a client's value choice as a misjudgement of fact. The article offers illustrative stories of the impact of bias on both client and lawyer and …
When Litigation Is Not The Only Way: Consensus Building And Mediation As Public Interest Lawyering, Carrie Menkel-Meadow
When Litigation Is Not The Only Way: Consensus Building And Mediation As Public Interest Lawyering, Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
British social philosopher Stuart Hampshire recently articulated the fundamental and foundational principles of the modem conflict resolution movement (and I do call it a movement). He asserted that, "there will always be a plurality of different and incompatible conceptions of the good and there cannot be a single comprehensive and consistent theory of human virtue. Correspondingly, "our political enmities in the city or state will never come to an end while we have diverse life stories and diverse imaginations.'' Hampshire, a socially progressive, socialist philosopher hoped to articulate universal conceptions of the good. In his lifetime of reflection on this …
Pro Se Litigants At The Summary Judgment Stage: Is Ignorance Of The Law An Excuse?, Jessica Case
Pro Se Litigants At The Summary Judgment Stage: Is Ignorance Of The Law An Excuse?, Jessica Case
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Allocation Of Resources By Interest Groups: Lobbying, Litigation And Administrative Regulation, John M. De Figueiredo, Rui J.P. De Figueiredo Jr.
The Allocation Of Resources By Interest Groups: Lobbying, Litigation And Administrative Regulation, John M. De Figueiredo, Rui J.P. De Figueiredo Jr.
Faculty Scholarship
One of the central concerns about American policy making institutions is the degree to which political outcomes can be influenced by interested parties. While the literature on interest group strategies in particular institutions - legislative, administrative, and legal - is extensive, there is very little scholarship which examines how the interdependencies between institutions affects the strategies of groups. In this paper we examine in a formal theoretical model how the opportunity to litigate administrative rulemaking in the courts affects the lobbying strategies of competing interest groups at the rulemaking stage. Using a resource-based view of group activity, we develop a …
New Issues Arising Under Section 1983, Martin A. Schwartz
New Issues Arising Under Section 1983, Martin A. Schwartz
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Civil Litigation From Litigants' Perspectives: What We Know And What We Don't Know About The Litigation Experience Of Individual Litigants, Tamara Relis
Scholarly Works
This study of the entire phenomenon of civil litigation commenced with the sole aim of ascertaining the extant gaps in the available knowledge about litigation from the perspectives of those who are by far affected most by it: the litigants. What does litigation mean for those who are directly embroiled and whose lives may consequently be radically transformed? Serious lacunas exist. However, extensive readings worldwide throughout the research process result in a stark elucidation of an overlooked, yet crucially important and somewhat egregious state of affairs, making surprisingly clear just how pernicious litigation is for the average 'nonrepeat player'.
Constitutional Law: Mci Telecommunications Corp. V. Public Service Commission: The Tenth Circuit Rebuffs The Supreme Court Trend Supporting State Immunity, Stephanie Chapman
Constitutional Law: Mci Telecommunications Corp. V. Public Service Commission: The Tenth Circuit Rebuffs The Supreme Court Trend Supporting State Immunity, Stephanie Chapman
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Opportunities For Obtaining And Using Litigation Reserves And Disclosures, Matthew J. Barrett
Opportunities For Obtaining And Using Litigation Reserves And Disclosures, Matthew J. Barrett
Journal Articles
In late 1975, the accounting and legal professions reached an accord that led to three new professional standards: (1) a new financial accounting rule for contingencies, (2) an auditing standard addressing the requirement that an auditor obtain evidence about an audit client's contingent liabilities to determine whether the client has properly treated those items in its financial statements, and (3) the American Bar Association's Statement of Policy Regarding Lawyers' Responses to Auditors' Requests for Information under that auditing standard. The Commentary that accompanied the Statement of Policy explicitly stated that the organized bar's expectation that communications between lawyers and auditors …