Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Evidence (73)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (26)
- Courts (23)
- Civil Procedure (19)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (12)
-
- Securities Law (12)
- Constitutional Law (9)
- Supreme Court of the United States (7)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (5)
- Family Law (5)
- International Law (5)
- Legislation (5)
- Torts (5)
- Transnational Law (5)
- Business Organizations Law (4)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (4)
- Juvenile Law (4)
- Legal Profession (4)
- Contracts (3)
- Environmental Law (3)
- First Amendment (3)
- Jurisdiction (3)
- Legal Education (3)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (3)
- Legal Remedies (3)
- Medical Jurisprudence (3)
- State and Local Government Law (3)
- Administrative Law (2)
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Litigation (91)
- Evidence (61)
- Dispute resolution (16)
- Antitrust (11)
- Class actions (7)
-
- Scientific (7)
- Spencer works (7)
- Courts (6)
- Discovery (6)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (6)
- United States. Supreme Court (6)
- Hearsay (5)
- Ohio (5)
- Polygraph (5)
- Alternative dispute resolution (4)
- Arbitration (4)
- Character (4)
- Depositions (4)
- Etc.) (4)
- Federal courts (4)
- Forensic Science (4)
- Legal self-representation (4)
- Litigation (Trial practice (4)
- Science (4)
- Settlement (4)
- Testimony (4)
- Transnational litigation (4)
- ADR (3)
- Arbitrability (3)
- Civil procedure (3)
Articles 181 - 195 of 195
Full-Text Articles in Litigation
Hypnotic Evidence, Paul C. Giannelli
Illinois Brick Revisited: An Analysis Of A Developing Antitrust Jurisprudence, Edward D. Cavanagh
Illinois Brick Revisited: An Analysis Of A Developing Antitrust Jurisprudence, Edward D. Cavanagh
Faculty Publications
(Excerpt)
In June 1977, the United States Supreme Court handed down the landmark decision in Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois. Reaffirming its decision in Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe Machinery Corp., the Court held that in a treble damages action where defendants are charged with price-fixing in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, first purchasers, and not others down the distribution line ("indirect purchasers"), are injured by the full amount of any overcharge; and indirect purchasers are prohibited from offering proof that illegal overcharges had been "passed on" to them by their sellers.
The holding …
Constitutional Limitations On Obtaining Evidence For Scientific Analysis, Paul C. Giannelli
Constitutional Limitations On Obtaining Evidence For Scientific Analysis, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Ohio Rules Of Evidence: Part Iii, Paul C. Giannelli
The Ohio Rules Of Evidence: Part Iii, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Ohio Rules Of Evidence: Part V, Paul C. Giannelli
The Ohio Rules Of Evidence: Part V, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Ohio Rules Of Evidence: Part Iv, Paul C. Giannelli
The Ohio Rules Of Evidence: Part Iv, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Ohio Rules Of Evidence: Part Ii, Paul C. Giannelli
The Ohio Rules Of Evidence: Part Ii, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Scientific Evidence - Part Ii, Paul C. Giannelli
Scientific Evidence - Part Ii, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Scientific Evidence - Part I, Paul C. Giannelli
Scientific Evidence - Part I, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Ohio Rules Of Evidence: Part I, Paul C. Giannelli
The Ohio Rules Of Evidence: Part I, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Character Evidence, Paul C. Giannelli
Credibility Of Witnesses, Paul C. Giannelli
Credibility Of Witnesses, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Eyewitness Identifications, Paul C. Giannelli
Eyewitness Identifications, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Polygraph Evidence, Paul C. Giannelli
Theories Of Water Pollution Litigation, Peter N. Davis
Theories Of Water Pollution Litigation, Peter N. Davis
Faculty Publications
The common law has traditionally provided the rules that govern relationships among landowners in their use of watercourses. These rules are embodied in the eastern United States in the doctrine of riparian rights, which addresses itself both to water quantity, and to water quality. Persons complaining of pollution of waters abutting their lands have, in addition to redress by complaint to the state pollution control agency, redress by lawsuit against the alleged polluter. This common law supplements the body of statutory law regulating the waters of the state for the benefit of the people.