Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Legal Writing and Research Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Internet Law

Institution
Keyword
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 241 - 270 of 304

Full-Text Articles in Legal Writing and Research

A Guide To Searching Cyberspace Law Online, Jennifer L. Selby Jan 2008

A Guide To Searching Cyberspace Law Online, Jennifer L. Selby

Law Librarian Scholarship

Cyberspace law is an umbrella term that touches on and encompasses many different areas of the law, including Internet, intellectual property, cybercrime, e-commerce, and privacy, among others. Cyberspace law includes aspects of United States law, in addition to foreign, comparative, and international law.1 Today, legal researchers in cyberspace law can enhance their search capabilities with web-based resources, including primary and secondary materials. Many of the resources discussed here are available freely on the Internet. For those resources that are licensed and networked, researchers may access them only at subscribing law libraries, and not remotely.2


The Google Dilemma, James Grimmelmann Jan 2008

The Google Dilemma, James Grimmelmann

NYLS Law Review

No abstract provided.


Law And Heidegger’S Question Concerning Technology: A Prolegomenon To Future Law Librarianship, Paul D. Callister Jan 2007

Law And Heidegger’S Question Concerning Technology: A Prolegomenon To Future Law Librarianship, Paul D. Callister

ExpressO

Following World War II, the German philosopher Martin Heidegger offered one of the most potent criticisms of technology and modern life. His nightmare is a world whose essence has been reduced to the functional equivalent of “a giant gasoline station, an energy source for modern technology and industry. This relation of man to the world [is] in principle a technical one . . . . [It is] altogether alien to former ages and histories.” For Heidegger, the problem is not technology itself, but the technical mode of thinking that has accompanied it. Such a viewpoint of the world is a …


A Complete Property Right Amendment, John H. Ryskamp Oct 2006

A Complete Property Right Amendment, John H. Ryskamp

ExpressO

The trend of the eminent domain reform and "Kelo plus" initiatives is toward a comprehensive Constitutional property right incorporating the elements of level of review, nature of government action, and extent of compensation. This article contains a draft amendment which reflects these concerns.


Bond Repudiation, Tax Codes, The Appropriations Process And Restitution Post-Eminent Domain Reform, John H. Ryskamp Jun 2006

Bond Repudiation, Tax Codes, The Appropriations Process And Restitution Post-Eminent Domain Reform, John H. Ryskamp

ExpressO

This brief comment suggests where the anti-eminent domain movement might be heading next.


The Twenty-Fifth Annual John Marshall International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Respondent, 24 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 733 (2006), Timothy T. Hsieh, Jennifer Simmen Lewin, Jerome C. Pandell Jan 2006

The Twenty-Fifth Annual John Marshall International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Respondent, 24 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 733 (2006), Timothy T. Hsieh, Jennifer Simmen Lewin, Jerome C. Pandell

UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law

No abstract provided.


The Twenty-Fifth Annual John Marshall International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Petitioner, 24 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 699 (2006), Chris Norris, Justin Sisemore, Anndi Queenan Jan 2006

The Twenty-Fifth Annual John Marshall International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Petitioner, 24 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 699 (2006), Chris Norris, Justin Sisemore, Anndi Queenan

UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law

No abstract provided.


The Twenty-Fifth Annual John Marshall International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 24 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 673 (2006), David E. Sorkin, Larisa V. Benitez-Morgan, J. Preston Carter, William P. Greubel Iii, Matthew Hector, Kellen Keaty, Lisa Rodriguez Jan 2006

The Twenty-Fifth Annual John Marshall International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 24 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 673 (2006), David E. Sorkin, Larisa V. Benitez-Morgan, J. Preston Carter, William P. Greubel Iii, Matthew Hector, Kellen Keaty, Lisa Rodriguez

UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law

No abstract provided.


The Ethics Of Electronic Record Sharing, Barbara A. Bintliff, Georgia Briscoe Jan 2006

The Ethics Of Electronic Record Sharing, Barbara A. Bintliff, Georgia Briscoe

Publications

No abstract provided.


Forty-Two: The Hitchhiker's Guide To Teaching Legal Research To The Google Generation, Ian Gallacher Sep 2005

Forty-Two: The Hitchhiker's Guide To Teaching Legal Research To The Google Generation, Ian Gallacher

ExpressO

Students are coming to law school increasingly dependent on computers to serve their research needs. And they expect that computerized legal research will be both more efficient and more effective than book-based research. These expectations place students in conflict with traditionalists who point to the inherent limitations of computer-assisted legal research and the dangers in relying on legal research conducted entirely in electronic databases. These traditionalists favor a “books first,” if not a “books only,” approach. This paper explores the cultural conflict between the traditionalists and the “Google generation,” evaluates the dangers associated with computer-assisted legal research, and proposes a …


Breaking The Bank: Revisiting Central Bank Of Denver After Enron And Sarbanes-Oxley, Celia Taylor Sep 2005

Breaking The Bank: Revisiting Central Bank Of Denver After Enron And Sarbanes-Oxley, Celia Taylor

ExpressO

No abstract provided.


2005 John Marshall International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 24 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 69 (2005), Richard C. Balough, Pirya Krishnamoorthy Venkat, Douglas Maclean, Larisa V. Morgan, Michael Rogalski Jan 2005

2005 John Marshall International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 24 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 69 (2005), Richard C. Balough, Pirya Krishnamoorthy Venkat, Douglas Maclean, Larisa V. Morgan, Michael Rogalski

UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law

No abstract provided.


2004 John Marshall International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 23 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 563 (2005), Patricia Gerdes, Tim Scahill, Otto Shragal, Richard C. Balough, Leslie Ann Reis Jan 2005

2004 John Marshall International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 23 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 563 (2005), Patricia Gerdes, Tim Scahill, Otto Shragal, Richard C. Balough, Leslie Ann Reis

UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law

No abstract provided.


2004 John Marshall International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Petitioner, 23 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 587 (2005), Ryan Dry, Angela Hamilton, Jason Newman Jan 2005

2004 John Marshall International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Petitioner, 23 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 587 (2005), Ryan Dry, Angela Hamilton, Jason Newman

UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law

No abstract provided.


2004 John Marshall International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Respondent, 23 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 633 (2005), Ashley S. Kamphaus, Michelle M. Prince, Jon Paul Carroll Jan 2005

2004 John Marshall International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Respondent, 23 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 633 (2005), Ashley S. Kamphaus, Michelle M. Prince, Jon Paul Carroll

UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law

No abstract provided.


2005 John Marshall International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For Petitioner, 24 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 97 (2005), Allyson Bennett, Christina Dallen, David Kestenbaum Jan 2005

2005 John Marshall International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For Petitioner, 24 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 97 (2005), Allyson Bennett, Christina Dallen, David Kestenbaum

UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law

No abstract provided.


2005 John Marshall International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Respondent, 24 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 133 (2005), Cherish M. Keller, Elaine Wyder-Harshman Jan 2005

2005 John Marshall International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Respondent, 24 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 133 (2005), Cherish M. Keller, Elaine Wyder-Harshman

UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law

No abstract provided.


Institutions Of Learning Or Havens For Illegal Activities: How The Supreme Court Views Libraries, 25 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 1 (2004), Raizel Liebler Jan 2004

Institutions Of Learning Or Havens For Illegal Activities: How The Supreme Court Views Libraries, 25 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 1 (2004), Raizel Liebler

UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship

The role of libraries in American society is varied: libraries act as curators and repositories of American culture's recorded knowledge, as places to communicate with others, and as sources where one can gain information from books, magazines and other printed materials, as well as audio-video materials and the Internet. Courts in the United States have called libraries "the quintessential locus of the receipt of information, "'places that are "dedicated to quiet, to knowledge, and to beauty," and "a mighty resource in the free marketplace of ideas." These positive views of libraries are often in sharp contrast with views by some …


2003 John Marshall International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Petitioner, 22 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 261 (2003), Abby K. Lill, Leopold E. Wetula, Nathan J. Wills Jan 2003

2003 John Marshall International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Petitioner, 22 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 261 (2003), Abby K. Lill, Leopold E. Wetula, Nathan J. Wills

UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law

No abstract provided.


2003 John Marshall International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Respondent, 22 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 335 (2003), Steven Anderson, Chad Edgington, Shannon Goss Jan 2003

2003 John Marshall International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Respondent, 22 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 335 (2003), Steven Anderson, Chad Edgington, Shannon Goss

UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law

No abstract provided.


2003 John Marshall International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 22 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 247 (2003), Terry Fernbach Jan 2003

2003 John Marshall International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 22 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 247 (2003), Terry Fernbach

UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law

No abstract provided.


2003 John Marshall International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Petitioner, 22 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 301 (2003), Daniel Crespo, Ryan Levine, Brian Walters Jan 2003

2003 John Marshall International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Petitioner, 22 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 301 (2003), Daniel Crespo, Ryan Levine, Brian Walters

UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law

No abstract provided.


The Right To Receive Information, Susan Nevelow Mart Jan 2003

The Right To Receive Information, Susan Nevelow Mart

Publications

Ms. Mart examines the legal evolution of the right to receive information, particularly focusing on its application to libraries, beginning with the Supreme Court holding in Board of Education v. Pico, and followed by cases that have considered the meaning of Pico in a variety of library-related contexts.


2002 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 21 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 37 (2002), Jeffrey M. Brown, Matthew Knorr, Pat Magierski, Charles Lee Mudd Jr., Elizabeth A. Walsh Jan 2002

2002 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 21 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 37 (2002), Jeffrey M. Brown, Matthew Knorr, Pat Magierski, Charles Lee Mudd Jr., Elizabeth A. Walsh

UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law

In this moot court competition bench memo, the Supreme Court the state of Marshall has three issues to decide: (1) whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that the Plaintiff failed to established the requisite elements to evidence a theory of intrusion upon seclusion as defined by the Restatement of Torts; (2) whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that the Defendant’s statements to third parties were not defamatory but rather opinions or fair comment; and (3) whether the Court of Appeals erred in applying a strict breach of contract analysis to Plaintiff’s claim for deceptive business practices, …


2002 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Petitioner, 21 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 59 (2002), Sheri L. Caldwell Jan 2002

2002 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Petitioner, 21 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 59 (2002), Sheri L. Caldwell

UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law

No abstract provided.


2002 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Respondent, 21 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 99 (2002), Joe Heenan Jan 2002

2002 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Respondent, 21 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 99 (2002), Joe Heenan

UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law

No abstract provided.


Book Review: A Guide To Electronic Legal Research By A. Zivanovic (Markham Ont.: Butterworths Canada, 2001), David H. Michels Jan 2002

Book Review: A Guide To Electronic Legal Research By A. Zivanovic (Markham Ont.: Butterworths Canada, 2001), David H. Michels

Canadian Journal of Law and Technology

No abstract provided.


2001 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 20 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 91 (2001), Ryan Alexander, Robert S. Gurwin, Dominick Lanzito, Nicole D. Milos, Bridget O'Neill Jan 2001

2001 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 20 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 91 (2001), Ryan Alexander, Robert S. Gurwin, Dominick Lanzito, Nicole D. Milos, Bridget O'Neill

UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law

In this bench memo, the Supreme Court of the state of Marshall is asked to decide whether the actions of defendant, Marshall Manatees, evidence a theory of false light invasion of privacy as defined by the Restatement (Second) of Torts and whether defendant's actions of comparing the digital photographic images collected at the Marshall Center to their database and ultimately posting plaintiff's photo on its billboard constituted an actionable claim for misappropriation. Plaintiff, Allen Sanders, attended a professional basketball game where the Marshall Manatees were hosting an opposing team at the Marshall Center. He purchased the ticket online and received …


2001 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Petitioner, 20 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 109 (2001), Gregory Brady, Steven Brooks, Christian Sullivan Jan 2001

2001 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Petitioner, 20 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 109 (2001), Gregory Brady, Steven Brooks, Christian Sullivan

UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law

No abstract provided.


2001 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Respondent, 20 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 151 (2001), Courtney Scantlin, Mekisha Walker, Warren Clint Wells Jan 2001

2001 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Respondent, 20 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 151 (2001), Courtney Scantlin, Mekisha Walker, Warren Clint Wells

UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law

No abstract provided.