Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (193)
- University of Michigan Law School (47)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (28)
- New York Law School (14)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (12)
-
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (11)
- Brooklyn Law School (10)
- University of Colorado Law School (9)
- BLR (6)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (6)
- UIC School of Law (6)
- Boston University School of Law (5)
- Cornell University Law School (5)
- Georgetown University Law Center (4)
- Roger Williams University (4)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (4)
- Duke Law (3)
- Duquesne University (3)
- Pace University (3)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (3)
- University of Georgia School of Law (3)
- University of Maine School of Law (3)
- University of Montana (3)
- University of Richmond (3)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (3)
- Marquette University Law School (2)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (2)
- University of Central Florida (2)
- University of Missouri School of Law (2)
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (2)
- Keyword
-
- Supreme Court (16)
- Judges (15)
- Unpublished opinions (15)
- Courts (14)
- Law (14)
-
- Constitution (12)
- Federal courts (11)
- Judge (10)
- Jurisprudence (9)
- Legal research (9)
- Legislation (9)
- Appellate courts (8)
- Briefs (8)
- Diversity (8)
- Evidence (8)
- Federalism (8)
- Research (8)
- United States Supreme Court (8)
- Affirmative Action (7)
- Antitrust (7)
- Citation (7)
- Legal Analysis and Writing (7)
- New York (7)
- Regulation (7)
- SFFA (7)
- Chief Judge (6)
- Constitutional Convention (6)
- Corporations (6)
- Dual Constitutionalism (6)
- ESG (6)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (191)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (28)
- Michigan Law Review (23)
- Faculty Scholarship (12)
- Articles (11)
-
- Washington and Lee Law Review (11)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (10)
- Publications (8)
- Brooklyn Law Review (6)
- ExpressO (6)
- NYLS Law Review (6)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (5)
- Law Faculty Publications (5)
- UIC Law Review (5)
- Faculty Publications (4)
- Faculty Works (4)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (4)
- Indiana Law Journal (4)
- Journal of Law and Policy (4)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (4)
- Book Chapters (3)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (3)
- Maine Law Review (3)
- Articles & Chapters (2)
- Books (2)
- Faculty Articles (2)
- Federal Courts and Federal Practice (2)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (2)
- Honors Undergraduate Theses (2)
- Law Librarian Journal Articles (2)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 391 - 420 of 435
Full-Text Articles in Legal Writing and Research
Twenty-Five 'Dos' For Appellate Brief Writers, Roger J. Miner '56
Twenty-Five 'Dos' For Appellate Brief Writers, Roger J. Miner '56
Federal Courts and Federal Practice
No abstract provided.
Restoring The Common In The Law: Proposal For The Elimination Of Rules Prohibiting The Citation Of Unpublished Decisions In Kansas And The Tenth Circuit, Mark D. Hinderks, Steve A. Leben
Restoring The Common In The Law: Proposal For The Elimination Of Rules Prohibiting The Citation Of Unpublished Decisions In Kansas And The Tenth Circuit, Mark D. Hinderks, Steve A. Leben
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
Social Science And The Courts: The Role Of Amicus Curiae Briefs, Ronald G. Roesch, Stephen L. Golding, Valerie P. Hans, N. Dickon Reppucci
Social Science And The Courts: The Role Of Amicus Curiae Briefs, Ronald G. Roesch, Stephen L. Golding, Valerie P. Hans, N. Dickon Reppucci
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
Social scientists have increasingly become involved in the submission of amicus curiae or "friend of the court" briefs in legal cases being decided by state and federal courts. This increase has triggered considerable debate about the use of briefs to communicate relevant social science research. This article evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of various methods of summarizing social science research for the courts. It also reviews the procedures for submitting briefs developed by the American Psychology-Law Society which, in collaboration with the American Psychological Association, has submitted its first brief in Maryland v. Craig, a case recently decided by …
Remarks: Appellate Advocacy Program, New York County Lawyers Association, Roger J. Miner '56
Remarks: Appellate Advocacy Program, New York County Lawyers Association, Roger J. Miner '56
Bar Associations
No abstract provided.
Appellate Advocacy From The Viewpoint Of An Appellate Judge, Roger J. Miner '56
Appellate Advocacy From The Viewpoint Of An Appellate Judge, Roger J. Miner '56
Law Practice
No abstract provided.
Judging The Judges: Three Opinions, James Boyd White
Judging The Judges: Three Opinions, James Boyd White
Articles
For some time I have been working on the problem of judicial criticism, focusing especially on the question: What is it in the work of a judge that leads us to admire a judicial opinion with the result of which we disagree, or to condemn an opinion that "comes out" the way we would do if we were charged with the responsibility of decision? The response I have been making is that this kind of judicial excellence (and its opposite too) lies in the sort of social and intellectual action in which the opinion engages: in the character the court …
The Myth Of The Disposable Opinion: Unpublished Opinions And Government Litigants In The United States Courts Of Appeals, Lauren K. Robel
The Myth Of The Disposable Opinion: Unpublished Opinions And Government Litigants In The United States Courts Of Appeals, Lauren K. Robel
Michigan Law Review
This article discusses the courts' adoption of the limited publication plans and analyzes the methods used by the courts to discourage the use of unpublished opinions. It also discusses the results of a survey conducted to determine if, and how, government litigants - some of the chief unanticipated beneficiaries of the publication plans make use of unpublished opinions. Finally, it challenges the assumption that limited publication is essential in an age of caseload crisis.
Changes In The Publication Of I.C.J. Reports: Effects Of These Suggestions On Teaching International Law, Ignaz Seidl-Hohenveldern
Changes In The Publication Of I.C.J. Reports: Effects Of These Suggestions On Teaching International Law, Ignaz Seidl-Hohenveldern
Michigan Journal of International Law
In August, 1986, the Joint Inspection Unit ("J.I.U.") transmitted to the Secretary General of the United Nations a report on the Publications of the International Court of Justice. The report stressed the desirability of extending the U.N. language regime to the publications of the International Court of Justice. Hitherto, the Judgments and Advisory Opinions of the I.C.J. have been published in English and French only. The texts in these two languages are published in juxtaposition (en regard). The J.I.U. report proposes to publish in the future only a limited number of copies in this way "for the use …
Appellate Justice Bureaucracy And Scholarship, William M. Richman, William L. Reynolds
Appellate Justice Bureaucracy And Scholarship, William M. Richman, William L. Reynolds
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Many of the other Articles in this Symposium demonstrate that a single great piece of legal scholarship can have an enormous impact on the development of legal doctrine. This Article differs in two respects. First, it focuses not on a single seminal work, but rather on a developing literature authored by a large group of scholars. Second, it attempts to assess the impact of that literature not on the growth of legal theory, but on the development of a single legal institution-the United States Courts of Appeals.
Brief For Petitioner, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 955 (1988), L. Lee Byrd, Yvonne T. Griffin, G. Rodney Young
Brief For Petitioner, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 955 (1988), L. Lee Byrd, Yvonne T. Griffin, G. Rodney Young
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Brief For Respondent, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 983 (1988), Matthew W. Nakon, Laura J. Steffe, Steven R. Yoo
Brief For Respondent, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 983 (1988), Matthew W. Nakon, Laura J. Steffe, Steven R. Yoo
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Law, Change, And Litigation: A Critical Examination Of An Empirical Research Tradition, Frank W. Munger
Law, Change, And Litigation: A Critical Examination Of An Empirical Research Tradition, Frank W. Munger
Articles & Chapters
This article examines the theory and empirical methods of recent studies of law and litigation. It argues that the recent interest in longitudinal studies of trial court dockets proceeds from a deeply rooted functionalist theoretical tradition in empirical work on courts. Functionalist theory, through its sophisticated application in the work of James Willard Hurst, is described as the direct or indirect source of theory for longitudinal litigation studies. Though there are many reasons for suspecting that fuctionalist theory is inadequate, it has seldom been rejected through proper empirical testing of its hypotheses. The theory, often poorly conceptualized, is discussed here …
Research In Judicial Administration: A Judge's Perspective, Conference On Judicial Administration Research, Roger J. Miner '56
Research In Judicial Administration: A Judge's Perspective, Conference On Judicial Administration Research, Roger J. Miner '56
Federal Court System and Administration
No abstract provided.
Judicial Criticism, James Boyd White
Judicial Criticism, James Boyd White
Articles
Today I shall talk about the criticism of judicial opinions, especially of constitutional opinions. This may at first seem to have rather little to do with our larger topic, "The Constitution and Human Values," but I hope that by the end I will be seen to be talking about that subject too. In fact I hope to show that in what I call our "criticism" our "values" are defined and made actual in most important ways.
Book Review, Richard B. Collins
Citation Sources And The New York Court Of Appeals, Mary Anne Bobinski
Citation Sources And The New York Court Of Appeals, Mary Anne Bobinski
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Review Of The Justice Of The Western Consular Courts In Nineteenth Century Japan, Whitmore Gray
Review Of The Justice Of The Western Consular Courts In Nineteenth Century Japan, Whitmore Gray
Reviews
Richard Chang attacks the generalization accepted by many historians that the Western consular tribunals in nineteenth-century Japan were so partial- toward West- erners and against Japanese-that they seldom rendered evenhanded justice. His study required two steps. First he tried to determine how many "mixed" cases came to trial-cases in which aJapanese brought a claim against a foreign resident in a consular court or was the complaining party in criminal proceedings against a foreigner. Between 1875 and 1895 there were five such cases that were widely reported and commented on at the time, and that have often been cited as examples. …
Legislative History In Washington, Arthur C. Wang
Legislative History In Washington, Arthur C. Wang
Seattle University Law Review
This Comment begins with an examination of court usage of Washington State legislative history and illustrates the lack of consistent judicial standards for acceptance of evidence of legislative intent. It then describes a systematic process that lawyers may use to identify and obtain relevant legislative history in Washington, and at the same time, points out defects in the record-keeping system. It concludes with recommendations to the Washington State Legislature to improve the accessibility and usefulness of state legislative history. Adoption of these recommendations would not only aid the legal researcher, but also provide the legislature with a better means to …
Iii. Recent French Extradition Cases, Michigan Journal Of International Law
Iii. Recent French Extradition Cases, Michigan Journal Of International Law
Michigan Journal of International Law
This section of the appendix contains the first published collection of recent French extradition cases dealing with the application of the political offense exception to terrorists. Because of the selective fashion in which French decisional law is reported, many French extradition cases are never reproduced in any French case reporter. The purpose of this appendix is to provide an English speaking audience with the substance of opinions which are otherwise nearly impossible to obtain. The editors hope that this collection will aid comparative research and contribute to an informed debate on the political offense exception.
A Personal View Of Justice Benjamin N. Cardozo: Recollections Of Four Cardozo Law Clerks, Joseph L. Rauh Jr., Melvin Siegel, Ambrose Doskow, Alan M. Stroock
A Personal View Of Justice Benjamin N. Cardozo: Recollections Of Four Cardozo Law Clerks, Joseph L. Rauh Jr., Melvin Siegel, Ambrose Doskow, Alan M. Stroock
Cardozo Law Review
A personal view of Justice Benjamin N. Cardozo and his approach to the law is perhaps best provided by those who worked under his direct tutelage. Four men who served as law clerks to the Justice during his six year term on the Supreme Court agreed to share their reflections on that experience in this commemorative volume. Joseph Rauh, the Justice's last law clerk, wrote first; his recollections were then circulated among the other three: Melvin Siegel, Ambrose Doskow and Alan M. Stroock. Their responses to Mr. Rauh's memories of the Justice and his judicial style present intriguing contrasts and …
Using A Prediction Model In Forecasting Appeals, Paul A. Rake
Using A Prediction Model In Forecasting Appeals, Paul A. Rake
IUSTITIA
Following the 1972 reorganization of the Indiana Court of Appeals into three panels serving defined geographical districts, the Court soon found itself floundering with too many unevenly distributed cases. Lacking a sufficient base of statistical data from which to formulate a plan to cope with the problem, various proposals, including redistricting the court, adding more judges, and developing a more sophisticated staff research, could not be measured for effectiveness or advisability.
In response to these problems, the Court developed a project to deal with the future caseload by constructing a regression model to predict appeals. This model generated estimates of …
The Supreme Court In Current Literature, Jenni Parrish, Roy Mersky
The Supreme Court In Current Literature, Jenni Parrish, Roy Mersky
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Section 12 Of The Canada Evidence Act And The Deliberations Of Simulated Juries, Valerie P. Hans, Anthony N. Doob
Section 12 Of The Canada Evidence Act And The Deliberations Of Simulated Juries, Valerie P. Hans, Anthony N. Doob
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
In the past, there have been three major approaches to the experimental investigation of the jury. First, juror selection research involves the study of the relation between verdicts or leniency toward certain classes of defendants and the characteristics of potential jurors. The second class of research is group study, in which the amount and style of individual participation is observed within the context of simulated jury deliberations (e.g., Strodtbeck, James and Hawkins, 1957). Finally, experimental psychology has made another contribution to the study of the jury; numerous researchers have conducted experimental studies employing legal stimulus materials. Typically, in such a …
Judicial Opinion Analysis, John J. Daley
Judicial Opinion Analysis, John J. Daley
LLM Theses and Essays
The aim of this paper is to suggest a method of judicial opinion analysis. This method has five essential aspects: 1) form; 2) procedure; 3) precedential value; 4) authority; and 5) substance. Observation of these aspects in judicial opinions should broaden legal and jurisprudential perspective and cause critical analysis of case dispositions.
Virtue: Survey Of Metropolitian Courts, Final Report, Paul L. Adams
Virtue: Survey Of Metropolitian Courts, Final Report, Paul L. Adams
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Survey of Metropolitian Courts, Final Report. By Maxine B. Virtue.
Llewellyn: The Common Law Tradition- Deciding Appeals, Luke K. Cooperrider
Llewellyn: The Common Law Tradition- Deciding Appeals, Luke K. Cooperrider
Michigan Law Review
A Review of The Common Law Tradition- Deciding Appeals. By Karl N. Llewellyn.
Dawson: A History Of Lay Judges, Spencer L. Kimball
Dawson: A History Of Lay Judges, Spencer L. Kimball
Michigan Law Review
A Review of A History of Lay Judges . By John P. Dawson
Lore: How To Win A Tax Case, John J. Raymond
Lore: How To Win A Tax Case, John J. Raymond
Michigan Law Review
A Review of How to Win A Tax Case. By Martin M. Lore
Brown: Digest Of Procedural Statutes And Court Rules: Pleading, Joinder, And Judgment Record, John W. Reed
Brown: Digest Of Procedural Statutes And Court Rules: Pleading, Joinder, And Judgment Record, John W. Reed
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Digest of Procedural Statutes and Court Rules: Pleading, Joinder, and Judgment Record . By Elizabeth Gaspar Brown
Jacobs: Law Writers And The Courts, Richard. A. Edwards
Jacobs: Law Writers And The Courts, Richard. A. Edwards
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Law Writers and the Courts. By Clyde E. Jacobs